10-page UFO dossier released by Australia's Department of Defence

[Dejarma]

1 minute ago, Unusual Tournament said:

The U.S. Navy releases video footage of UAP’s and your knee deep into a nothing burger lol

no-they-did-not!!!!!!! if you think this is fact then prove it! 💤

[Unusual Tournament]

1 minute ago, Dejarma said:

no-they-did-not!!!!!!! if you think this is fact then prove it! 💤

"Unresolved": US Government Releases Fresh Batch Of UFO Footage To The Public

 

https://www.iflscience.com/unresolved-us-government-releases-fresh-batch-of-ufo-footage-to-the-public-73337

 

[Dejarma]

4 minutes ago, Unusual Tournament said:

"Unresolved": US Government Releases Fresh Batch Of UFO Footage To The Public

 

https://www.iflscience.com/unresolved-us-government-releases-fresh-batch-of-ufo-footage-to-the-public-73337

 

no good you linking a vid made by someone else telling us this!!!

the tic tac etc footage== who initially released it??? it was not the US Navy- ya know, the footage that started all this BS off

Edited April 12 by Dejarma

[Golden Duck]

2 hours ago, Unusual Tournament said:

"Unresolved": US Government Releases Fresh Batch Of UFO Footage To The Public

 

https://www.iflscience.com/unresolved-us-government-releases-fresh-batch-of-ufo-footage-to-the-public-73337

 

What's your point?

The "dossier" states the RAAF have not been interested in UAP for nearly 30 years.

[Unusual Tournament]

Just now, Golden Duck said:

What's your point?

The "dossier" states the RAAF have not been interested in UAP for nearly 30 years.

Do you believe that?

[Golden Duck]

35 minutes ago, Unusual Tournament said:

Do you believe that?

Why not?  They were questioned by budget estimates.  So what's suspicious? 

[Earl.Of.Trumps]

11 hours ago, Trelane said:

Whatever they saw, we can reasonably and logically eliminate an extraterrestrial craft.

Ya, right. why don't you address the issue at hand

 

11 hours ago, Trelane said:

Is it unexplained, yes. However there are many other items that need to be investigated and eliminated before we take the jump into the unproven fantasy of alien visitation. At any rate please take that discussion to the appropriate thread.

Back on topic...

Hey, y;all are the ones deviating from the topic, not me. 

So, what was the object that descended from the sky, and where did it go? 

[Unusual Tournament]

2 hours ago, Golden Duck said:

Why not?  They were questioned by budget estimates.  So what's suspicious? 

No I’m referring specifically to the RAAF not interested in UFO’s and there’s plenty suspicious about something that has gripped militaries around the world, including our biggest ally but somehow eluded the bean counters at “budget estimates” 

Please

[Golden Duck]

5 minutes ago, Unusual Tournament said:

No I’m referring specifically to the RAAF not interested in UFO’s and there’s plenty suspicious about something that has gripped militaries around the world, including our biggest ally but somehow eluded the bean counters at “budget estimates” 

Please

Ok,  so a small number of questions from RAAF budget estimates make it clear that RAAF does not want money to chase UAP like the yanks.

Please detail what is suspicious - specifically how the RAAF is doing something without spending money.

[Unusual Tournament]

4 minutes ago, Golden Duck said:

Ok,  so a small number of questions from RAAF budget estimates make it clear that RAAF does not want money to chase UAP like the yanks.

Please detail what is suspicious - specifically how the RAAF is doing something without spending money.

So let’s just throw around this scenario: UAP is detected and F-18/F-35 dispatched for visuals. What happens next? 

[Dejarma]

2 hours ago, Earl.Of.Trumps said:

So, what was the object that descended from the sky, and where did it go?

who told you this happened?

[Golden Duck]

37 minutes ago, Unusual Tournament said:

So let’s just throw around this scenario: UAP is detected and F-18/F-35 dispatched for visuals. What happens next? 

We're talking about the RAAF.  When did such an event happen?

[Unusual Tournament]

Just now, Golden Duck said:

We're talking about the RAAF.  When did such an event happen?

No I’m talking about what control “budget estimates “ has on matters of national security. And to answer my own question (since you won’t) zero! 

[Golden Duck]

48 minutes ago, Unusual Tournament said:

No I’m talking about what control “budget estimates “ has on matters of national security. And to answer my own question (since you won’t) zero! 

RAAF is spending nothing on UAP research.

The topic is about programs, not incidents.

 

[Unusual Tournament]

1 hour ago, Golden Duck said:

RAAF is spending nothing on UAP research.

The topic is about programs, not incidents.

 

Define programs?

[Golden Duck]

2 hours ago, Unusual Tournament said:

Define programs?

You're trolling, aren't you?

A program is defined as a logical group of related projects, subsidiary programs, and program activities managed in a coordinated manner to obtain benefits not available from managing them individually.

[Golden Duck]

@B.Dunning, you're now on the ignore list, with your other account Zetorian 

[Unusual Tournament]

12 hours ago, Golden Duck said:

You're trolling, aren't you?

A program is defined as a logical group of related projects, subsidiary programs, and program activities managed in a coordinated manner to obtain benefits not available from managing them individually.

You’re trolling. Go away!

[Trelane]

12 hours ago, Golden Duck said:

You're trolling, aren't you?

A program is defined as a logical group of related projects, subsidiary programs, and program activities managed in a coordinated manner to obtain benefits not available from managing them individually.

You'll have to excuse UT. He is a notorious troller sand "seagull poster". Placed him and his nonsense on ignore a long time ago when is staggering ignorance was on full display in the threads about the Ukraine war. That's why he got booted out of that sub forum.

[Sir Wearer of Hats]

21 hours ago, Unusual Tournament said:

Do you believe that?

I do, because I suspect that there’s a different department that deals with UFO/UAP in Australia that isn’t connected to the RAAF or the Defence Department so that everyone can state with full legal authority “the RAAF does not investigate UAPs”, “the department of defence has no records of UFO encounters” and so forth.

[Unusual Tournament]

7 minutes ago, Sir Wearer of Hats said:

I do, because I suspect that there’s a different department that deals with UFO/UAP in Australia that isn’t connected to the RAAF or the Defence Department so that everyone can state with full legal authority “the RAAF does not investigate UAPs”, “the department of defence has no records of UFO encounters” and so forth.

Absolutely. The mere thought that a budget overview would stop national security is ludicrous 

[Unusual Tournament]

1 hour ago, Trelane said:

You'll have to excuse UT. He is a notorious troller sand "seagull poster". Placed him and his nonsense on ignore a long time ago when is staggering ignorance was on full display in the threads about the Ukraine war. That's why he got booted out of that sub forum.

Seagull poster? As for my Ukraine posting I seemed to be the only correct poster. Time is a wonderful commodity to deal in …

[Golden Duck]

10 minutes ago, Unusual Tournament said:

Absolutely. The mere thought that a budget overview would stop national security is ludicrous 

How does UAP affect National Security?

Stop talking about why information would be classified if you've never even seen guidelines for classification.

[Golden Duck]

1 hour ago, Sir Wearer of Hats said:

I do, because I suspect that there’s a different department that deals with UFO/UAP in Australia that isn’t connected to the RAAF or the Defence Department so that everyone can state with full legal authority “the RAAF does not investigate UAPs”, “the department of defence has no records of UFO encounters” and so forth.

And that would be revealed by a black hole of money in the annual reports.

[Sir Wearer of Hats]

7 minutes ago, Golden Duck said:

And that would be revealed by a black hole of money in the annual reports.

No, it’s a perfectly valid department … somewhere. There’ll be a perfectly valid sounding paper trail…. Just using “departmental shorthand”. “We recovered a wounded osprey” or “repaired damaged photocopier” rather than “recovered a downed craft from Zeta Ridiculi”, that sort of thing.