Multiple video clips show brightly lit UFO flying over streets of Tehran

[preacherman76]

4 hours ago, the13bats said:

Preachingman beat a dead horse and hard, I took that original claim of ten minutes more figure of speech and when called out the posted retracted, so horse is beaten dead.

No I didn’t. I mentioned it along with several other BS claims you folks made. You all are the one who put a microscope on it. It was cherry picked out of my post. 

[astrobeing]

OK, you don't remember challenging everyone here to duplicate the CGI and if they couldn't then the claim it was CGI should be disregarded:

On 6/21/2024 at 11:06 AM, preacherman76 said:

He didn’t say that. Just hearing the opinions of low quality, and how this is so easy to do, I wouldn’t mind seeing if that were true. If any of you guys could recreate something similar. I’d be impressed myself. 
 

And if not, maybe playing arm chair critic, especially after no one here has given a solid reason as to why this is CGI, shouldn’t necessarily be taken seriously. 

 

[Dejarma]

7 hours ago, preacherman76 said:

Ok. My apologies. Truth is though you are unable. Anyone who claims they can recreate that in 10 minutes is full of crap. I suspect you are unable no matter how much time you had. 
 

What’s really funny is the hypocrisy. For someone who spends so much time here demanding proof, demanding evidence, when you are asked to do the same you don’t have time for it. Not even 10 minutes lol. 
 

If you don’t want to be called out on your BS, then stop slinging it. 

It's not BS though Preach me 'ol mate... I've already said 10 minutes was a little exaggerated but 10 minutes, 10 days whatever:

Do you think it's possible for someone to have created said ufo on a computer- yes or no? despite how long it took

Do you think it's a little strange that the only report is via the uploaded footage- yes or no?

 

[preacherman76]

19 hours ago, astrobeing said:

OK, you don't remember challenging everyone here to duplicate the CGI and if they couldn't then the claim it was CGI should be disregarded:

 

Sure I remember. But I never said the idea of CGI should be disregarded. I said the opinions of certain individuals who made claims that were not true, who spoke about it like they are experts and knew for a fact it was CGI should be disregarded. Many said it would be easy to do. So the challenge of recreating it seemed like it could really be possible. It certainly wasn’t intended to be a got cha moment  

 And even then, not just for being unable to recreate it. I also asked for them to just tell me, scientifically why they believed it is CGI. I did that with honest intentions. I believed with so many so confident, someone could explain it. To no avail. 

[preacherman76]

17 hours ago, Dejarma said:

It's not BS though Preach me 'ol mate... I've already said 10 minutes was a little exaggerated but 10 minutes, 10 days whatever:

Do you think it's possible for someone to have created said ufo on a computer- yes or no? despite how long it took

Do you think it's a little strange that the only report is via the uploaded footage- yes or no?

 

I definitely believe it’s possible to create that on a computer. However I suspect it couldn’t be done by just anyone. I think it took a great deal of knowledge on how to run such programs. Maybe even a bit of talent. 
 

I disagree with the folks who claim this is easy to do. Or is a mediocre attempt. Or that it’s poor quality. 

Edited June 29 by preacherman76

[Dejarma]

1 hour ago, preacherman76 said:

However I suspect it couldn’t be done by just anyone. I think it took a great deal of knowledge on how to run such programs. Maybe even a bit of talent. 

Well there's the misconception. Millions of people are using CGI software these days.

The software is ten times easier to use compared to 8/12 years ago. Plus some of the top software is 'free' to use, hence so many people using it, & so many ufo vids out there!

As an example= to create realistic water effects ten years ago would need skill & hours of experience.

Now you can get the same results at the click of a button- literally. Therefore to create said video would be very easy with just a modicum of experience & skill.

I use CGI software on a regular basis myself for work at times- so I know how easy it is to use... You either believe that or you don't.

You still have not put forward a reason why you feel it might not be CGI.. oh well, there ya go, hope springs eternal 😉
 

[Dejarma]

2 hours ago, preacherman76 said:

I definitely believe it’s possible to create that on a computer.

I see you've made no attempt to answer this question:

Do you think it's a little strange that the only report is via the uploaded footage- yes or no?

As far as logical/ rational thinking is concerned there's no real reason to actually look at the video in the first place.. But one does just out of interest

[ChrLzs]

A small follow up.  Apart from the kiss of death from Jaime Maussan, who recommends hoaxes left and right as soon as they appear... I've been monitoring the web... there were 4 videos (2 of which didn't seem to be the same object) released simultaneously when the story broke.  Since then, from a city of >8.5 million people, I have not been able to locate even just one more image or video.

All those people, most with phones.

Security cameras on buildings.

Dashcams.

etc.

I would be delighted to be proven wrong.  But currently, it all stinks like a hoax.

[preacherman76]

21 hours ago, Dejarma said:

Well there's the misconception. Millions of people are using CGI software these days.

The software is ten times easier to use compared to 8/12 years ago. Plus some of the top software is 'free' to use, hence so many people using it, & so many ufo vids out there!

As an example= to create realistic water effects ten years ago would need skill & hours of experience.

Now you can get the same results at the click of a button- literally. Therefore to create said video would be very easy with just a modicum of experience & skill.

I use CGI software on a regular basis myself for work at times- so I know how easy it is to use... You either believe that or you don't.

You still have not put forward a reason why you feel it might not be CGI.. oh well, there ya go, hope springs eternal 😉
 

Yeah it’s definitely becoming better and more easy to use. But not all CGI  projects are created equal. 

[preacherman76]

21 hours ago, Dejarma said:

I see you've made no attempt to answer this question:

Do you think it's a little strange that the only report is via the uploaded footage- yes or no?

As far as logical/ rational thinking is concerned there's no real reason to actually look at the video in the first place.. But one does just out of interest

Not really. I think back to the summer of 91. Just up the road from where I lived there’s an entire street full of apartment complexes. I know many of the people there. 
 

Well a couple hundred people from those apartments one summer afternoon claimed to see a large saucer type object over the Hudson River. The police were called and showed up to the scene. So a couple officers witnessed it as well. 
 

If I didn’t personally know several of those people, including three cousins, I would have never heard anything about it. No newspaper articles. No spot on the local news. I lived less than 5 miles away. 
 

None of this is to say I think the Iran ufo was real. I heavily lean towards it being CGI or some other type of hoax. 

[csspwns]

8 hours ago, preacherman76 said:

Not really. I think back to the summer of 91. Just up the road from where I lived there’s an entire street full of apartment complexes. I know many of the people there. 
 

Well a couple hundred people from those apartments one summer afternoon claimed to see a large saucer type object over the Hudson River. The police were called and showed up to the scene. So a couple officers witnessed it as well. 
 

If I didn’t personally know several of those people, including three cousins, I would have never heard anything about it. No newspaper articles. No spot on the local news. I lived less than 5 miles away. 
 

None of this is to say I think the Iran ufo was real. I heavily lean towards it being CGI or some other type of hoax. 

I think back to June 30, 2024. I think it's extremely strange that this footage is practically all we have. 

[the13bats]

On 6/28/2024 at 11:10 AM, astrobeing said:

OK, you don't remember challenging everyone here to duplicate the CGI and if they couldn't then the claim it was CGI should be disregarded:

 

You ever notice some empty handed believers say stuff then claim they didn't and when proven they did they freak out playing victim and throwing insults?

[preacherman76]

15 hours ago, csspwns said:

I think back to June 30, 2024. I think it's extremely strange that this footage is practically all we have. 

I’m not. YouTube seems to have dumped thousands of ufo videos down the rabbit hole. Now we only get new segments there. 

[preacherman76]

13 hours ago, the13bats said:

You ever notice some empty handed believers say stuff then claim they didn't and when proven they did they freak out playing victim and throwing insults?

Here bats goes off to make believe land again. Not one part of this post is accurate. 

[Golden Duck]

20 minutes ago, preacherman76 said:

Here bats goes off to make believe land again. Not one part of this post is accurate. 

Hankenhunter said if was CGI then skeptics here should be able to reproduce it.

[astrobeing]

On 6/30/2024 at 3:28 AM, preacherman76 said:

Not really. I think back to the summer of 91. Just up the road from where I lived there’s an entire street full of apartment complexes. I know many of the people there.

Hey the same thing happened here one of the summers in the 2000's about two towns over at a big trailer park. I know people who know people who know people there.

[csspwns]

8 hours ago, preacherman76 said:

I’m not. YouTube seems to have dumped thousands of ufo videos down the rabbit hole. Now we only get new segments there. 

X, Instagram, TikTok, etc also exist and videos are instantly shared and viewed as they're happening, especially on X. Your point on YouTube is irrelevant in 2024. It's still extremely strange that this footage is all that exists on ALL platforms. The hoaxers should follow up with a recent upload but it seems like they've had their fun. 

Here's my predictions regarding this case:

1. If any new footage were to be uploaded, it won't be any longer than the previous clips <1min. That's because the longer the clip goes on, the harder it is to keep up the CGI quality.
2. There will be no daytime footage. Attempting to do quality CGI of an object in the sky reflecting sun rays is difficult unless you have a lot of time and experience. The tradeoff would be compromising the video quality to be a fuzzy mess as seen in the "Mysterious Lights" post which I also suspect to be CGI - the hoaxers who created that video weren't skilled enough to create realistic light reflections in the water, so they decreased the video quality to cover that. 

I'm extremely excited and eagerly await for my predictions to be proven wrong soon. 

Edited July 1 by csspwns

[preacherman76]

3 hours ago, astrobeing said:

Hey the same thing happened here one of the summers in the 2000's about two towns over at a big trailer park. I know people who know people who know people there.

Yeah whatev. 
 

What are you trying to say about people in trailer parks? 

[astrobeing]

19 hours ago, preacherman76 said:

What are you trying to say about people in trailer parks? 

That people know them.

[ChrLzs]

On 7/1/2024 at 8:24 PM, preacherman76 said:

Here bats goes off to make believe land again. Not one part of this post is accurate. 

No, it's the whole thing.

[ChrLzs]

On 7/1/2024 at 8:19 PM, preacherman76 said:

I’m not. YouTube seems to have dumped thousands of ufo videos down the rabbit hole. Now we only get new segments there. 

Of course, how could I be so dumb.  I even thought that there are plenty of ways by which videos are shared, so .. er.. umm.. yeah, really good point.  Youtube can control what gets seen, and they obviously don't want UFO videos, er..  because .. umm ..   err....  it's a tax write off...?

And I'm definitely not being sarcastic or patronising.. oh not me, never.

[preacherman76]

2 hours ago, ChrLzs said:

Of course, how could I be so dumb.  I even thought that there are plenty of ways by which videos are shared, so .. er.. umm.. yeah, really good point.  Youtube can control what gets seen, and they obviously don't want UFO videos, er..  because .. umm ..   err....  it's a tax write off...?

And I'm definitely not being sarcastic or patronising.. oh not me, never.

Yeah cause you obviously spent all kinds of time over the years searching YouTube for ufo videos like I have. You’re obviously an expert on the subject. 
 

I am being sarcastic and patronizing 

[ChrLzs]

1 hour ago, preacherman76 said:

Yeah cause you obviously spent all kinds of time over the years searching YouTube for ufo videos like I have. You’re obviously an expert on the subject.

I'll let others judge who has the best record on the topic.  You can easily prove your expertise by posting, right now, what you think is the best evidenced case.  My claim is that there simply isn't even one case with physical evidence, let alone even half decent footage.  We have not been, and are not being, visited by non-terrestrials.

1 hour ago, preacherman76 said:

I am being sarcastic and patronizing

Yes, spotted it.  That's why I asked you to get serious - think about the topic before posting..  Feel free to address the elephant - over the years, our surveillance of the skies has increased by many orders of magnitude, both in terms of coverage and quality/resolution.  So why is there no new video or still evidence that is non-terrestrial?

[ChrLzs]

On 7/5/2024 at 8:45 PM, ChrLzs said:

I'll let others judge who has the best record on the topic.  You can easily prove your expertise by posting, right now, what you think is the best evidenced case.  My claim is that there simply isn't even one case with physical evidence, let alone even half decent footage.  We have not been, and are not being, visited by non-terrestrials.

.. Feel free to address the elephant - over the years, our surveillance of the skies has increased by many orders of magnitude, both in terms of coverage and quality/resolution.  So why is there no new video or still evidence that is non-terrestrial?

And upon seeing these two simple requests, @preacherman76 vanished.  How odd.....

[the13bats]

1 hour ago, ChrLzs said:

And upon seeing these two simple requests, @preacherman76 vanished.  How odd.....

Because he isn't here to back up his claims with any evidence he's here to troll to try to trigger of course he knows he has nothing I recall a cat not unlike him vanished for two weeks when evidence that proved he was full of bull was presented and when he did return he just tossed insults and cried victim.

They of course could prove me wrong by not crying victim not tossing insults but rather just posting evidence to support their claims.