US defense contractor describes seven-minute UFO encounter

[UM-Bot]

The contractor and two other witnesses encountered a strange barbell-shaped object over the Canadian wilderness.

https://www.unexplained-mysteries.com/news/377811/us-defense-contractor-describes-seven-minute-ufo-encounter

[pallidin]

I've often considered how the many, many completely different extraterrestrial civilizations out there (of which I firmly believe) have differing cultures, as well as different utilization of obviously advanced physics and technologies... providing for, among other things, the rather large variety of craft construction.

This one, for example, is described as having a barbell-shape. Not unheard of in reports, but not typical either.

The "static" and "magnetism" reference is likely more common, and perhaps a type of purposeful emissions or an emissions artifact from its specific engineering, IMHO.

Love these accounts. 

 

 

[astrobeing]

Don't you hate it when a UFO appears for seven minutes but everyone's camera equipment "malfunctions"? Don't you hate it when your eyes feel crappy after you saw a UFO?

Both of these are straight out of John Keel's fiction-presented-as-fact book "The Mothman Prophecies".

[pallidin]

6 hours ago, astrobeing said:

Don't you hate it when a UFO appears for seven minutes but everyone's camera equipment "malfunctions"? Don't you hate it when your eyes feel crappy after you saw a UFO?

Both of these are straight out of John Keel's fiction-presented-as-fact book "The Mothman Prophecies".

Nah. Does a UAP encounter being electronically interfered with surprise you?

Militaries around the world do it all the time against, say, military adversaries. So what's the issue with this? There is none to me.

And the witness said that the incoming visual was highly distorted, like looking at a laser beam through a diffraction grating. So what??? 

And the "comparison" to the Mothman Prophesies (in the vein of "presented as facts") seem more like emotional attack language. That is plainly obvious.

Not to mention it WAS presented as a factual UAP encounter. It's an account of that encounter, simple as that, not an exposė of irrefutable evidence.

 

 

 

 

 

[the13bats]

7 hours ago, astrobeing said:

Don't you hate it when a UFO appears for seven minutes but everyone's camera equipment "malfunctions"? Don't you hate it when your eyes feel crappy after you saw a UFO?

Both of these are straight out of John Keel's fiction-presented-as-fact book "The Mothman Prophecies".

Yep, yet another anonymous story with zero supporting evidence but it gives true believers something to both grasp at and get angry at skeptics over.

Now, if a defense contractor wanted to be anonymous he keeps his trap shut, he doesn't detail where he was and what he was doing because I would bet you his boss knew where he was etc so not very anonymous,

And yes, all the excuses about our cams broke and eyes hurt does sound like the babblings of the late John keel a beatnik writer of fiction who put point pleasant on the map by blowing up the tall tales of some kids out partying,  an old worn out bridge failing was just icing on his fantasy cake.

While I fully admit I have no clue what exterterestial craft ought to look like things like shooting sparks and glarring bright lights while dramatic seems a tad bit superfluous, I guess since it was out in the woods I can't ask why no one else saw a huge bright object in the sky. And 2013 weren't our skies fairly well watched.

Ooh yeah, our tech couldn't see it.

[Malaria_Kidd]

Thanks for that story UM-Bot and pallidin nailed it from top to bottom!✍️This report was proof enough for me. It took me 58 years to see my first day time UAP on January 28, 2006. I saw a 50 - 60? foot long, grayish white, round ended craft at 10k feet elevation. 👽💊 While flying slowly North over the confluence of the Ohio and Mississippi Rivers between Cairo, Illinois and Wickliffe, Kentucky. They've been up there watching our crazy Ps & Qs and strange warring ways since time immemorial.

 

MK 

Edited June 14, 2024 by Malaria_Kidd
I deleted "at" after Rivers. ;-)

[Malaria_Kidd]

This field is required??

[Hazzard]

7 hours ago, Malaria_Kidd said:

Thanks for that story UM-Bot and pallidin nailed it from top to bottom!✍️This report was proof enough for me. It took me 58 years to see my first day time UAP on January 28, 2006. I saw a 50 - 60? foot long, grayish white, round ended craft at 10k feet elevation. 👽💊 While flying slowly North over the confluence of the Ohio and Mississippi Rivers between Cairo, Illinois and Wickliffe, Kentucky. They've been up there watching our crazy Ps & Qs and strange warring ways since time immemorial.

 

MK 

So you saw this from an airplane? 

Did anyone else see it?

How did you conclude its size?

Was it stationary or did it fly along with you?

Did it make the news?

[astrobeing]

18 hours ago, pallidin said:

Nah. Does a UAP encounter being electronically interfered with surprise you?

Militaries around the world do it all the time against, say, military adversaries. So what's the issue with this? There is none to me.

So you believe "militaries" have the ability to disable all forms of photographic equipment.

Please tell me more about what you know about this.