Abramelin Posted August 5 #1 Share Posted August 5 (edited) The Venus of Mierlo is the nickname of a prehistoric engraving on stone of a young woman which was found at Geldrop-Mierlo in the North Brabant province of Netherlands. The name is, of course, purely modern, as the engraving predated by many millennia the Italian religion and the goddess Venus. There is no way of knowing what was the woman's name or those who made the engraving, and its exact cultural and religious significance is a matter of conjecture. https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Venus_of_Mierlo %%%%%% The Mystery of the Venus of Mierlo The Venus van Mierlo, also known as the Little Dancer of Geldrop, is the oldest human representation in Brabant history. This cycle route takes you past various places that have something to tell about Venus. In fact, it is even said to be the oldest expression of art ever found in the Netherlands. The Venus is a woman, drawn with sharp lines or rather, scratched in a stone. The stone was excavated in 1961 and after investigation, it turned out to have been left at that spot some thirteen thousand years ago. And that is officially just in Geldrop, hence the double name. https://www.degrooteheide.eu/en/routes/12404327/the-mystery-of-the-venus-of-mierlo %%%%% https://ancientstandard.com/2008/01/page/3/ And scroll down. My question: To be honest I am getting tired of archaeologists calling ancient depictions of naked women 'goddesses', or 'Mother Earth'. Men will be men, and Ì think these ancient men loved women as much as we men do now. And when they had nothing else on their hands and getting bored, they started carving 'pretty pictures'. It's clear these men loved big breasted, voluminous women back then. But some, like the ancient Dutch, loved the more gracile ones. And that more than 10,000 years ago. I am interested in your opinions. Edited August 5 by Abramelin 2 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Grim Reaper 6 Posted August 5 #2 Share Posted August 5 12 minutes ago, Abramelin said: The Venus of Mierlo is the nickname of a prehistoric engraving on stone of a young woman which was found at Geldrop-Mierlo in the North Brabant province of Netherlands. The name is, of course, purely modern, as the engraving predated by many millennia the Italian religion and the goddess Venus. There is no way of knowing what was the woman's name or those who made the engraving, and its exact cultural and religious significance is a matter of conjecture. https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Venus_of_Mierlo %%%%%% The Mystery of the Venus of Mierlo The Venus van Mierlo, also known as the Little Dancer of Geldrop, is the oldest human representation in Brabant history. This cycle route takes you past various places that have something to tell about Venus. In fact, it is even said to be the oldest expression of art ever found in the Netherlands. The Venus is a woman, drawn with sharp lines or rather, scratched in a stone. The stone was excavated in 1961 and after investigation, it turned out to have been left at that spot some thirteen thousand years ago. And that is officially just in Geldrop, hence the double name. https://www.degrooteheide.eu/en/routes/12404327/the-mystery-of-the-venus-of-mierlo %%%%% https://ancientstandard.com/2008/01/page/3/ And scroll down. My question: To be honest I am getting tired of archaeologists calling ancient depictions of naked women 'goddesses', or 'Mother Earth'. Men will be men, and Ì think these ancient men loved women as much as we men do now. And when they had nothing else on their hands and getting bored, they started carving 'pretty pictures'. It's clear these men loved big breasted, voluminous women back then. But some, like the ancient Dutch, loved the more gracile ones. And that more than 10,000 years ago. I am interested in your opinions. Men loved big breasted voluminous women because they were considered to be stronger and more capable of have children and taking care of their needs. It’s funny how much things have changed in the last few hundred years. 1 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Abramelin Posted August 5 Author #3 Share Posted August 5 1 minute ago, Grim Reaper 6 said: Men loved big breasted voluminous women because they were considered to be stronger and more capable of have children and taking care of their needs. It’s funny how much things have changed in the last few hundred years. That's nothing but an assumption cooked up by nerds. 3 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Grim Reaper 6 Posted August 5 #4 Share Posted August 5 3 minutes ago, Abramelin said: That's nothing but an assumption cooked up by nerds. I am not certain it is at all. But I would like to hear your take on it then? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Abramelin Posted August 5 Author #5 Share Posted August 5 Just now, Grim Reaper 6 said: I am not certain it is at all. But I would like to hear your take on it then? You know, I already posted what I think of the idea that these depictions of naked women representing goddesses were cooked up by nerds, or better, guys who had no experience with, or interest in women. 2 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Grim Reaper 6 Posted August 5 #6 Share Posted August 5 (edited) 23 minutes ago, Abramelin said: You know, I already posted what I think of the idea that these depictions of naked women representing goddesses were cooked up by nerds, or better, guys who had no experience with, or interest in women. That really has nothing to do with my comment, my comment had nothing to do with fertility goddess at all. It was based upon the belief that a buck some women was better suited in producing strong child than a frail woman would be. Edited August 5 by Grim Reaper 6 1 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Abramelin Posted August 5 Author #7 Share Posted August 5 You have no idea what I'm on about, right? 1 1 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
jmccr8 Posted August 5 #8 Share Posted August 5 I thought she was somewhat slimmer than some I have seen. 7 minutes ago, Abramelin said: You have no idea what I'm on about, right? HI Rob Ancient Penthouse/Play Boy porn, likely rented it out around the campfire. 4 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Grim Reaper 6 Posted August 5 #9 Share Posted August 5 11 minutes ago, Abramelin said: You have no idea what I'm on about, right? I am sorry, but I obviously don’t. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Abramelin Posted August 5 Author #10 Share Posted August 5 14 minutes ago, Grim Reaper 6 said: I am sorry, but I obviously don’t. And I have no idea how to explain it to you. 2 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Grim Reaper 6 Posted August 5 #11 Share Posted August 5 Just now, Abramelin said: And I have no idea how to explain it to you. That’s fine, no harm no foul! 1 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Piney Posted August 6 #12 Share Posted August 6 18 hours ago, Abramelin said: The Venus of Mierlo is the nickname of a prehistoric engraving on stone of a young woman which was found at Geldrop-Mierlo in the North Brabant province of Netherlands. The name is, of course, purely modern, as the engraving predated by many millennia the Italian religion and the goddess Venus. There is no way of knowing what was the woman's name or those who made the engraving, and its exact cultural and religious significance is a matter of conjecture. https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Venus_of_Mierlo %%%%%% The Mystery of the Venus of Mierlo The Venus van Mierlo, also known as the Little Dancer of Geldrop, is the oldest human representation in Brabant history. This cycle route takes you past various places that have something to tell about Venus. In fact, it is even said to be the oldest expression of art ever found in the Netherlands. The Venus is a woman, drawn with sharp lines or rather, scratched in a stone. The stone was excavated in 1961 and after investigation, it turned out to have been left at that spot some thirteen thousand years ago. And that is officially just in Geldrop, hence the double name. https://www.degrooteheide.eu/en/routes/12404327/the-mystery-of-the-venus-of-mierlo %%%%% https://ancientstandard.com/2008/01/page/3/ And scroll down. My question: To be honest I am getting tired of archaeologists calling ancient depictions of naked women 'goddesses', or 'Mother Earth'. Men will be men, and Ì think these ancient men loved women as much as we men do now. And when they had nothing else on their hands and getting bored, they started carving 'pretty pictures'. It's clear these men loved big breasted, voluminous women back then. But some, like the ancient Dutch, loved the more gracile ones. And that more than 10,000 years ago. I am interested in your opinions. This was obviously a representation of a living woman. I think a few of the "Venus" figurines were also. Hunter-gatherers didn't have "goddesses". 1 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Piney Posted August 6 #13 Share Posted August 6 17 hours ago, jmccr8 said: I thought she was somewhat slimmer than some I have seen. HI Rob Ancient Penthouse/Play Boy porn, likely rented it out around the campfire. NA Eastern Archaic pestles were sometimes carved into the shape of penises, so da wimmens were just as horny. 1 1 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Create an account or sign in to comment
You need to be a member in order to leave a comment
Create an account
Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!
Register a new accountSign in
Already have an account? Sign in here.
Sign In Now