Grim Reaper 6 Posted August 7 #1 Share Posted August 7 A recent study challenges traditional views on how Earth’s continents were formed, suggesting that subduction may not have been necessary. His findings propose that the melting of Earth’s crust could explain the formation of continents, casting doubt on when plate tectonics began and highlighting its impact on life’s origin.. https://scitechdaily.com/reimagining-earths-history-new-study-challenges-long-held-theories-of-continent-formation/. https://www.nature.com/articles/s41561-024-01489-z 2 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Piney Posted August 7 #2 Share Posted August 7 I'm not going for it. I'm still under the opinion plate tectonics started with the impact that created the moon. @Doc Socks Junior Whadda ya say brother? 3 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Grim Reaper 6 Posted August 7 Author #3 Share Posted August 7 (edited) 37 minutes ago, Piney said: I'm not going for it. I'm still under the opinion plate tectonics started with the impact that created the moon. @Doc Socks Junior Whadda ya say brother? Currently in the scientific community there is no proven method only hypothesis’s on the subject. Now I am not saying this is a game changer, however in my opinion it will take time for the academic community to come to a conclusion. Until then I am going to keep an open mind on the subject. Edited August 7 by Grim Reaper 6 1 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Essan Posted August 7 #4 Share Posted August 7 (edited) More research needed ...... And the answers, when we know for certain what happened, will affect at least ....... oh, maybe a dozen people? Edit: actually, it does have some significance with regards the search for life on other planets. Knowing how, when, and why, tectonics began on Earth will affect our expectations on what we may find on other planets. Edited August 7 by Essan 4 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Doc Socks Junior Posted August 7 #5 Share Posted August 7 10 hours ago, Piney said: I'm not going for it. I'm still under the opinion plate tectonics started with the impact that created the moon. @Doc Socks Junior Whadda ya say brother? I think the moon impact is a little too early on and too catastrophic to have plate tectonics operating soon thereafter. In my opinion. Basically, one has reset the clock on surficial evolution. Still have to cool the surface back down, establish a proto-crust, before recognizable tectonics might operate. That impact was what, still around 4.5 Ga? I imagine that one had the same sort of tectonics one has on the surface of a lava lake, but the rocks haven't survived. 2 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Grim Reaper 6 Posted August 7 Author #6 Share Posted August 7 46 minutes ago, Doc Socks Junior said: I think the moon impact is a little too early on and too catastrophic to have plate tectonics operating soon thereafter. In my opinion. Basically, one has reset the clock on surficial evolution. Still have to cool the surface back down, establish a proto-crust, before recognizable tectonics might operate. That impact was what, still around 4.5 Ga? I imagine that one had the same sort of tectonics one has on the surface of a lava lake, but the rocks haven't survived. Thank you, you make some great points I appreciate your input! 2 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Create an account or sign in to comment
You need to be a member in order to leave a comment
Create an account
Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!
Register a new accountSign in
Already have an account? Sign in here.
Sign In Now