Jump to content
Join the Unexplained Mysteries community today! It's free and setting up an account only takes a moment.
- Sign In or Create Account -

New Study Challenges Long-Held Theories of Continent Formation


Grim Reaper 6

Recommended Posts

A recent study challenges traditional views on how Earth’s continents were formed, suggesting that subduction may not have been necessary. His findings propose that the melting of Earth’s crust could explain the formation of continents, casting doubt on when plate tectonics began and highlighting its impact on life’s origin..

https://scitechdaily.com/reimagining-earths-history-new-study-challenges-long-held-theories-of-continent-formation/.

https://www.nature.com/articles/s41561-024-01489-z

  • Like 2
Link to comment
Share on other sites

 

I'm not going for it. I'm still under the opinion plate tectonics started with the impact that created the moon.

@Doc Socks Junior Whadda ya say brother? 

  • Like 3
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Posted (edited)
37 minutes ago, Piney said:

I'm not going for it. I'm still under the opinion plate tectonics started with the impact that created the moon.

@Doc Socks Junior Whadda ya say brother? 

Currently in the scientific community there is no proven method only hypothesis’s on the subject. Now I am not saying this is a game changer, however in my opinion it will take time for the academic community to come to a conclusion. Until then I am going to keep an open mind on the subject. 

Edited by Grim Reaper 6
  • Thanks 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Posted (edited)

More research needed ......

And the answers, when we know for certain what happened, will affect at least ....... oh, maybe a dozen people?    


Edit:  actually, it does have some significance with regards the search for life on other planets.    Knowing how, when, and why, tectonics began on Earth will affect our expectations on what we may find on other planets.   

Edited by Essan
  • Like 4
Link to comment
Share on other sites

10 hours ago, Piney said:

I'm not going for it. I'm still under the opinion plate tectonics started with the impact that created the moon.

@Doc Socks Junior Whadda ya say brother? 

I think the moon impact is a little too early on and too catastrophic to have plate tectonics operating soon thereafter. In my opinion. Basically, one has reset the clock on surficial evolution. Still have to cool the surface back down, establish a proto-crust, before recognizable tectonics might operate.

That impact was what, still around 4.5 Ga?

I imagine that one had the same sort of tectonics one has on the surface of a lava lake, but the rocks haven't survived.

  • Thanks 2
Link to comment
Share on other sites

46 minutes ago, Doc Socks Junior said:

I think the moon impact is a little too early on and too catastrophic to have plate tectonics operating soon thereafter. In my opinion. Basically, one has reset the clock on surficial evolution. Still have to cool the surface back down, establish a proto-crust, before recognizable tectonics might operate.

That impact was what, still around 4.5 Ga?

I imagine that one had the same sort of tectonics one has on the surface of a lava lake, but the rocks haven't survived.

Thank you, you make some great points I appreciate your input!:tu:

  • Like 2
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    • No registered users viewing this page.