Abramelin Posted September 13 #1 Share Posted September 13 CNN — It started with a melting glacier that set off a huge landslide, which triggered a 650-foot high mega-tsunami in Greenland last September 2023. Then came something inexplicable: a mysterious vibration that shook the planet for nine days. Over the past year, dozens of scientists across the world have been trying to figure out what this signal was. Now they have an answer, according to a new study in the journal Science, and it provides yet another warning that the Arctic is entering “uncharted waters” as humans push global temperatures ever upwards. https://edition.cnn.com/2024/09/13/climate/mega-tsunami-landslide-greenland-seismic-signal/index.html 5 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
the13bats Posted September 13 #2 Share Posted September 13 Hum, and i watched day after tomorrow tonight. 1 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
docyabut2 Posted September 13 #3 Share Posted September 13 Wow scary 😟 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
docyabut2 Posted September 13 #4 Share Posted September 13 (edited) It could be one of these sounds? https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/List_of_unexplained_sounds https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Submarine_volcano https://www.google.com/search?q=greenland+volcanic+activity&rlz=1C1GGGE_enUS631US633&oq=Greenland+vo&aqs=chrome.5.69i57j0i512l5j46i175i199i512j0i512l3.18786j0j15&sourceid=chrome&ie=UTF-8 https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0277379122005674 https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/The_Hum#:~:text=The Hum is a name,United Kingdom%2C Australia and Canada. Edited September 13 by docyabut2 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Abramelin Posted September 15 Author #5 Share Posted September 15 On 9/13/2024 at 3:43 PM, docyabut2 said: It could be one of these sounds? https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/List_of_unexplained_sounds https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Submarine_volcano https://www.google.com/search?q=greenland+volcanic+activity&rlz=1C1GGGE_enUS631US633&oq=Greenland+vo&aqs=chrome.5.69i57j0i512l5j46i175i199i512j0i512l3.18786j0j15&sourceid=chrome&ie=UTF-8 https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0277379122005674 https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/The_Hum#:~:text=The Hum is a name,United Kingdom%2C Australia and Canada. No. It is explained in the article. The subsequent mega-tsunami — one of the highest in recent history — set off a wave which became trapped in the bendy, narrow fjord for more than a week, sloshing back and forth every 90 seconds. The phenomenon, called a “seiche,” refers to the rhythmic movement of a wave in an enclosed space, similar to water splashing backwards and forwards in a bathtub or cup. One of the scientists even tried (and failed) to recreate the impact in their own bathtub. While seiches are well-known, scientists previously had no idea they could last so long. 2 2 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
docyabut2 Posted September 15 #6 Share Posted September 15 https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Submarine_https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Submarine_volcano could it be from a submrine volcano? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Abramelin Posted September 15 Author #7 Share Posted September 15 3 hours ago, docyabut2 said: could it be from a submrine volcano? No. I explained to you already by quoting from the site I linked to. What is your problem? You don't believe it, or what? 2 1 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
docyabut2 Posted September 15 #8 Share Posted September 15 Yes, underwater volcanic eruptions can cause tsunamis https://www.google.com/search?q=a+under+volcano+can+cause+tsunami&rlz=1C1GGGE_enUS631US633&oq=a+under+volcano+can+cause&aqs=chrome.4.69i57j33i160l3j33i671l6.141187j0j15&sourceid=chrome&ie=UTF-8 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Antigonos Posted September 15 #9 Share Posted September 15 30 minutes ago, docyabut2 said: Yes, underwater volcanic eruptions can cause tsunamis https://www.google.com/search?q=a+under+volcano+can+cause+tsunami&rlz=1C1GGGE_enUS631US633&oq=a+under+volcano+can+cause&aqs=chrome.4.69i57j33i160l3j33i671l6.141187j0j15&sourceid=chrome&ie=UTF-8 Yes but that’s NOT what this is about. Jesus. 1 2 1 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Abramelin Posted September 15 Author #10 Share Posted September 15 20 minutes ago, Antigonos said: Yes but that’s NOT what this is about. Jesus. It's like talking to a concrete wall... @docyabut2 Please read the first post in this thread. Maybe you have a problem with your memory, but you're not blind yet, are you? 1 1 1 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Skulduggery Posted September 16 #11 Share Posted September 16 That would be quite surreal to witness. I am saddened no video exists. 2 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Amorlind Posted September 16 #12 Share Posted September 16 This kind of phenomenon (landslide like this one) is not new. Happened already, and there were 2 witnesses : https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/1958_Lituya_Bay_earthquake_and_megatsunami Cheers 👽 1 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Abramelin Posted September 16 Author #13 Share Posted September 16 22 minutes ago, Amorlind said: This kind of phenomenon (landslide like this one) is not new. Happened already, and there were 2 witnesses : https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/1958_Lituya_Bay_earthquake_and_megatsunami Cheers 👽 No, that's not the same thing. Both were tsunamis alright, but the one in post 1 reverberated in an enclosed by for 9 days. 1 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Amorlind Posted September 17 #14 Share Posted September 17 (edited) Well as a matter of fact it is as the wave was 524m high (meaning more than the double of what was mesured here) on the one i mention...and at the time no mesures were done on the reverberation...but we can be pretty sure the consequences were a lot more persistent than in our case here. But i agree on the fact there are no traces nevertheless the absence of proof is not the proof of absence. The Lithuya bay is 15.5 km by 3.2 km and 24 m deep...the numbers speak enough i think Edited September 17 by Amorlind 1 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Abramelin Posted September 17 Author #15 Share Posted September 17 9 hours ago, Amorlind said: Well as a matter of fact it is as the wave was 524m high (meaning more than the double of what was mesured here) on the one i mention...and at the time no mesures were done on the reverberation...but we can be pretty sure the consequences were a lot more persistent than in our case here. But i agree on the fact there are no traces nevertheless the absence of proof is not the proof of absence. The Lithuya bay is 15.5 km by 3.2 km and 24 m deep...the numbers speak enough i think This is not a dick contest, Amor. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Amorlind Posted September 18 #16 Share Posted September 18 (edited) ... Edited September 18 by Amorlind Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Create an account or sign in to comment
You need to be a member in order to leave a comment
Create an account
Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!
Register a new accountSign in
Already have an account? Sign in here.
Sign In Now