MrAnderson Posted September 14 #1 Share Posted September 14 A very interesting and entertaining talk by Dr Avi Loeb who is trying to bring the UFO Phenomenon closer to academia and trying to argue that we need to look harder if we want to find signs of life elsewhere in the universe. My favourite part is when he says that Extraordinary claims need extraordinary evidence and extraordinary evidence needs extraordinary funding! 3 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Dejarma Posted September 14 #2 Share Posted September 14 1 minute ago, MrAnderson said: Extraordinary claims need extraordinary evidence and extraordinary evidence needs extraordinary funding! 😁 one needs extraordinary evidence first--- when real extraordinary evidence is available i'm sure it will get tons of funding. I don't need a Dr to tell me the bleeding obvious 3 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
MrAnderson Posted September 14 Author #3 Share Posted September 14 Just now, Dejarma said: 😁 one needs extraordinary evidence first--- when real extraordinary evidence is available i'm sure it will get tons of funding. I don't need a Dr to tell me the bleeding obvious You don't think of this very well. Try to watch his video. Without extraordinary funding or good fudging let's say you may not be able to collect/find the evidence you want. He makes it clear in his talks. You need money for research and money to produce/find the evidence needed. He gave an example of how much money invested at CERN to find new particles such as the Higgs Boson. 1 1 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Dejarma Posted September 14 #4 Share Posted September 14 1 minute ago, MrAnderson said: You don't think of this very well. Try to watch his video. Without extraordinary funding or good fudging let's say you may not be able to collect/find the evidence you want. He makes it clear in his talks. You need money for research and money to produce/find the evidence needed. He gave an example of how much money invested at CERN to find new particles such as the Higgs Boson. the only evidence there is with regards to ufos is 'stories'. Science can not & will not waste time effort & money studying a story why do you think they haven't done it yet? 1 1 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
MrAnderson Posted September 14 Author #5 Share Posted September 14 9 hours ago, Dejarma said: the only evidence there is with regards to ufos is 'stories'. Science can not & will not waste time effort & money studying a story why do you think they haven't done it yet? You didn't watch the video as it seems and you can't understand or don't want to understand what Avi Loeb says. Let me put it to you again. Extraordinary evidence requires extraordinary funding and plenty of search to find what you are trying to find. He gave some examples and one was the amount of money spend to find the Higgs Boson at CERN. It's very clear what he says. 3 1 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
MrAnderson Posted September 14 Author #6 Share Posted September 14 @Earl.Of.Trumps and @Unusual Tournament you may find this very interesting. 1 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
MrAnderson Posted September 16 Author #7 Share Posted September 16 @josellama2000 you may find this thread interesting. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Hazzard Posted September 16 #8 Share Posted September 16 @MrAnderson I dont think they find your thread interesting. 1 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
MrAnderson Posted September 16 Author #9 Share Posted September 16 2 minutes ago, Hazzard said: @MrAnderson I dont think they find your thread interesting. Doesn't matter. There is no compulsion in participsting anyway. 2 1 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Green Devil Posted September 16 #10 Share Posted September 16 2 1 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Trelane Posted September 16 #11 Share Posted September 16 Such utter rubbish. 2 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Hazzard Posted September 16 #12 Share Posted September 16 7 minutes ago, Trelane said: Such utter rubbish. I havent watched it yet... Can you give me the short version? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Trelane Posted September 16 #13 Share Posted September 16 5 minutes ago, Hazzard said: I havent watched it yet... Can you give me the short version? Just more of Loeb's comically speculative conjecture. Still trying to leverage his credentials as point of authority. Even though it's a subject outside of his scope and discipline in academia. 2 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
MrAnderson Posted September 16 Author #14 Share Posted September 16 1 hour ago, Trelane said: Such utter rubbish. 1 hour ago, Hazzard said: I havent watched it yet... Can you give me the short version? Better to watch it first and then you can come to any conclusions. But it's difficult to understand the mind of a scientist when you are not scientists and you have very little knowledge and understanding of astronomy and astrophysics. I am particularly interested on what he said about extraordinary evidence which requires extraordinary funding and he gave an example. He has given similar examples before on a number of occasions. 2 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Dejarma Posted September 16 #15 Share Posted September 16 3 hours ago, Trelane said: Such utter rubbish. yep... yet another book, more beer money I think i'm in the wrong trade 3 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Trelane Posted September 16 #16 Share Posted September 16 26 minutes ago, Dejarma said: yep... yet another book, more beer money I think i'm in the wrong trade I'm seriously considering concocting a UFO tale of my own so I can start my podcast interviews and convention circuit for when I retire. It's easy money. Maybe I'll have to crank out a book but I'll use AI for that. 2 1 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Hazzard Posted September 16 #17 Share Posted September 16 3 hours ago, MrAnderson said: But it's difficult to understand the mind of a scientist when you are not scientists and you have very little knowledge and understanding of astronomy and astrophysics. Then may I suggest that you dont click on it. 3 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Golden Duck Posted September 16 #18 Share Posted September 16 3 hours ago, MrAnderson said: Better to watch it first and then you can come to any conclusions. But it's difficult to understand the mind of a scientist when you are not scientists and you have very little knowledge and understanding of astronomy and astrophysics. I am particularly interested on what he said about extraordinary evidence which requires extraordinary funding and he gave an example. He has given similar examples before on a number of occasions. Every analogy limps. That's why it's a fallacy. And Loeb's example is no different. But anyone au fait with the science and physics would know this. 3 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Dejarma Posted September 16 #19 Share Posted September 16 1 hour ago, Trelane said: I'm seriously considering concocting a UFO tale of my own so I can start my podcast interviews and convention circuit for when I retire. It's easy money. Maybe I'll have to crank out a book but I'll use AI for that. I used to clean the toilets at the highly classified NSA base in north Yorkshire England. I could concoct a great tale... I can prove i worked there because i smuggled out toilet paper with the NSA logo on each sheet 😉 2 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Hazzard Posted September 16 #20 Share Posted September 16 2 minutes ago, Golden Duck said: But anyone au fait with the science and physics would know this. It would be like if I joined an astronaut forum pretending to be one. How long do you think it would take them to start laughing at my dumb äss! ZetAndersson 🤣 2 1 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Trelane Posted September 16 #21 Share Posted September 16 1 hour ago, Dejarma said: I used to clean the toilets at the highly classified NSA base in north Yorkshire England. I could concoct a great tale... I can prove i worked there because i smuggled out toilet paper with the NSA logo on each sheet 😉 Brilliant idea!!! Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
MrAnderson Posted September 17 Author #22 Share Posted September 17 3 hours ago, Golden Duck said: Every analogy limps. That's why it's a fallacy. And Loeb's example is no different. But anyone au fait with the science and physics would know this. Where is the fallacy? Did you see his reasoning? There is nobody who has called his reasoning as flawed and this analogy as a fallacy. It can only come from you and a few others here. 2 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
MrAnderson Posted September 17 Author #23 Share Posted September 17 4 hours ago, Trelane said: I'm seriously considering concocting a UFO tale of my own so I can start my podcast interviews and convention circuit for when I retire. It's easy money. Maybe I'll have to crank out a book but I'll use AI for that. The difference is that your tale won't be true and it would of be a fabrication. But not all tales and incidents are fabrications and lies. Many of them are not and that's where you got this wrong. 1 1 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
MrAnderson Posted September 17 Author #24 Share Posted September 17 3 hours ago, Hazzard said: It would be like if I joined an astronaut forum pretending to be one. How long do you think it would take them to start laughing at my dumb äss! ZetAndersson 🤣 Having watched how you guys try to argue about matter you don't know either in physics or in mathematics it makes me smile a lot. Trying to take away degrees from length for example or challenge the Drake equation. You can have a look at the Navier-Stokes equation as another task for later on. 3 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Golden Duck Posted September 17 #25 Share Posted September 17 12 hours ago, MrAnderson said: Where is the fallacy? Did you see his reasoning? There is nobody who has called his reasoning as flawed and this analogy as a fallacy. It can only come from you and a few others here. I already told you. Formally, it is known as The False Analogy. "All analogies limp" is an idiom that has stood the test of time, an is apt on this occasion too. To support your cult leader perhaps you could produce papers that predict ET that rise to the standard of the 1964 PRL symmetry breaking papers. 2 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Create an account or sign in to comment
You need to be a member in order to leave a comment
Create an account
Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!
Register a new accountSign in
Already have an account? Sign in here.
Sign In Now