Jump to content
Join the Unexplained Mysteries community today! It's free and setting up an account only takes a moment.
- Sign In or Create Account -

Avi Loeb - TED Talks -Search for Proof of Alien Life


MrAnderson

Recommended Posts

A very interesting and entertaining talk by Dr Avi Loeb who is trying to bring the UFO Phenomenon closer to academia and trying to argue that we need to look harder if we want to find signs of life elsewhere in the universe. My favourite part is when he says that

Extraordinary claims need extraordinary evidence and extraordinary evidence needs extraordinary funding!

  • Thanks 3
Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 minute ago, MrAnderson said:

Extraordinary claims need extraordinary evidence and extraordinary evidence needs extraordinary funding!

😁 one needs extraordinary evidence first--- when real extraordinary evidence is available i'm sure it will get tons of funding.

I don't need a Dr to tell me the bleeding obvious :sleepy: 

  • Like 3
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Just now, Dejarma said:

😁 one needs extraordinary evidence first--- when real extraordinary evidence is available i'm sure it will get tons of funding.

I don't need a Dr to tell me the bleeding obvious :sleepy: 

You don't think of this very well. Try to watch his video. Without extraordinary funding or good fudging let's say you may not be able to collect/find the evidence you want. He makes it clear in his talks. You need money for research and money to produce/find the evidence needed. He gave an example of how much money invested at CERN to find new particles such as the Higgs Boson. 

  • Like 1
  • Thanks 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 minute ago, MrAnderson said:

You don't think of this very well. Try to watch his video. Without extraordinary funding or good fudging let's say you may not be able to collect/find the evidence you want. He makes it clear in his talks. You need money for research and money to produce/find the evidence needed. He gave an example of how much money invested at CERN to find new particles such as the Higgs Boson. 

the only evidence there is with regards to ufos is 'stories'.

Science can not & will not waste time effort & money studying a story

why do you think they haven't done it yet?

  • Like 1
  • Thanks 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

9 hours ago, Dejarma said:

the only evidence there is with regards to ufos is 'stories'.

Science can not & will not waste time effort & money studying a story

why do you think they haven't done it yet?

You didn't watch the video as it seems and you can't understand or don't want to understand what Avi Loeb says.

Let me put it to you again.

Extraordinary evidence requires extraordinary funding and plenty of search to find what you are trying to find. He gave some examples and one was the amount of money spend to find the Higgs Boson at CERN.

It's very clear what he says.

  • Like 3
  • Haha 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

2 minutes ago, Hazzard said:

@MrAnderson I dont think they find your thread interesting. 

Doesn't matter. There is no compulsion in participsting anyway.

  • Like 2
  • Haha 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

7 minutes ago, Trelane said:

Such utter rubbish. 

I havent watched it yet... Can you give me the short version?

Link to comment
Share on other sites

5 minutes ago, Hazzard said:

I havent watched it yet... Can you give me the short version?

Just more of Loeb's comically speculative conjecture. Still trying to leverage his credentials as point of authority. Even though it's a subject outside of his scope and discipline in academia.

  • Like 2
Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 hour ago, Trelane said:

Such utter rubbish. 

 

1 hour ago, Hazzard said:

I havent watched it yet... Can you give me the short version?

Better to watch it first and then you can come to any conclusions. But it's difficult to understand the mind of a scientist when you are not scientists and you have very little knowledge and understanding of astronomy and astrophysics.

I am particularly interested on what he said about extraordinary evidence which requires extraordinary funding and he gave an example. He has given similar examples before on a number of occasions.

  • Like 2
Link to comment
Share on other sites

3 hours ago, Trelane said:

Such utter rubbish. 

yep... yet another book, more beer money :sleepy: I think i'm in the wrong trade

  • Like 3
Link to comment
Share on other sites

26 minutes ago, Dejarma said:

yep... yet another book, more beer money :sleepy: I think i'm in the wrong trade

I'm seriously considering concocting a UFO tale of my own so I can start my podcast interviews and convention circuit for when I retire. It's easy money.

Maybe I'll have to crank out a book but I'll use AI for that.

  • Like 2
  • Haha 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

3 hours ago, MrAnderson said:

 But it's difficult to understand the mind of a scientist when you are not scientists and you have very little knowledge and understanding of astronomy and astrophysics.

Then may I suggest that you dont click on it.

  • Like 3
Link to comment
Share on other sites

3 hours ago, MrAnderson said:

 

Better to watch it first and then you can come to any conclusions. But it's difficult to understand the mind of a scientist when you are not scientists and you have very little knowledge and understanding of astronomy and astrophysics.

I am particularly interested on what he said about extraordinary evidence which requires extraordinary funding and he gave an example. He has given similar examples before on a number of occasions.

Every analogy limps.  That's why it's a fallacy.  And Loeb's example is no different. 

But anyone au fait with the science and physics would know this.

  • Like 3
Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 hour ago, Trelane said:

I'm seriously considering concocting a UFO tale of my own so I can start my podcast interviews and convention circuit for when I retire. It's easy money.

Maybe I'll have to crank out a book but I'll use AI for that.

I used to clean the toilets at the highly classified NSA base in north Yorkshire England.

I could concoct a great tale... I can prove i worked there because i smuggled out toilet paper with the NSA logo on each sheet 😉

  • Haha 2
Link to comment
Share on other sites

2 minutes ago, Golden Duck said:

But anyone au fait with the science and physics would know this.

It would be like if I joined an astronaut forum pretending to be one.

How long do you think it would take them to start laughing at my dumb äss!

ZetAndersson 🤣

  • Like 2
  • Thanks 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 hour ago, Dejarma said:

I used to clean the toilets at the highly classified NSA base in north Yorkshire England.

I could concoct a great tale... I can prove i worked there because i smuggled out toilet paper with the NSA logo on each sheet 😉

Brilliant idea!!!

Link to comment
Share on other sites

3 hours ago, Golden Duck said:

Every analogy limps.  That's why it's a fallacy.  And Loeb's example is no different. 

But anyone au fait with the science and physics would know this.

Where is the fallacy? Did you see his reasoning? There is nobody who has called his reasoning as flawed and this analogy as a fallacy. It can only come from you and a few others here.

  • Like 2
Link to comment
Share on other sites

4 hours ago, Trelane said:

I'm seriously considering concocting a UFO tale of my own so I can start my podcast interviews and convention circuit for when I retire. It's easy money.

Maybe I'll have to crank out a book but I'll use AI for that.

The difference is that your tale won't be true and it would of be a fabrication. But not all tales and incidents are fabrications and lies. Many of them are not and that's where you got this wrong.

  • Like 1
  • Thanks 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

3 hours ago, Hazzard said:

It would be like if I joined an astronaut forum pretending to be one.

How long do you think it would take them to start laughing at my dumb äss!

ZetAndersson 🤣

Having watched how you guys try to argue about matter you don't know either in physics or in mathematics it makes me smile a lot. Trying to take away degrees from length for example or challenge the Drake equation. You can have a look at the Navier-Stokes equation as another task for later on.

  • Like 3
Link to comment
Share on other sites

12 hours ago, MrAnderson said:

Where is the fallacy? Did you see his reasoning? There is nobody who has called his reasoning as flawed and this analogy as a fallacy. It can only come from you and a few others here.

I already told you.  Formally, it is known as The False Analogy. 

"All analogies limp" is an idiom that has stood the test of time, an is apt on this occasion too.

To support your cult leader perhaps you could produce papers that predict ET that rise to the standard of the 1964 PRL symmetry breaking papers.

 

 

  • Like 2
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    • No registered users viewing this page.