Jump to content
Join the Unexplained Mysteries community today! It's free and setting up an account only takes a moment.
- Sign In or Create Account -

Super clear metallic disc-shaped UFO photographed over China


Recommended Posts

Once again, a city of over 5 million people and 2 photos (on this post, not sure if there are more on twitter but I do not go to twitter). That seems likely.

Edited by esoteric_toad
  • Like 3
  • Thanks 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Nice looking picture. Exactly what I would want for proof. Crystal clear. Now let's have these photos analyzed. Investigate if there are more photos taken by other Chinese citizens. Interview the person who took the photos to gain more information regarding the sighting. The subject does not start and end with just a picture.

Also, photos taken in China by a Chinese national posted on Mexican TV personality's Twitter account??? What's up with that? Was this a re -Tweet? Also, also I think he took the post down I can't seem to find it.

Edited by Trelane
  • Like 3
  • Thanks 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

7 minutes ago, esoteric_toad said:

Once again, a city of over 5 million people and 2 photos (on this post, not sure if there are more on twitter but I do not go to twitter). That seems likely.

And presumably, not only did 4,999,999 people not see it (on a clear day) but it wasn't detected by radar either - or do the Chinese normally turn a blind eye to unknown aircraft flying over their cities?  *

It's either fake or a small, mundane, object


* same argument for most other photos of UFOs  (bearing in mind last year the USAF even shot down a small pico balloon because it was in US airspace and unidentified)

  • Like 4
Link to comment
Share on other sites

 

Silver-UFO-30_004.jpg

Edited by Hazzard
  • Like 2
Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 hour ago, Trelane said:

Also, photos taken in China by a Chinese national posted on Mexican TV personality's Twitter account??? What's up with that? Was this a re -Tweet? Also, also I think he took the post down I can't seem to find it.

It's been reposted on various social media accounts, I couldn't find the original.

It's possible it was originally posted up on a China-specific social media site.

  • Like 2
  • Thanks 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Perfect example of why pics don't matter anymore.

  • Like 1
  • Thanks 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

not convinced at all.  when I play around with the images I get something with a light on top, I think.  Doesn't fit with a normal reflection.

And there's a hole in the silver band, right in the middle.  Camera?

As a 2nd thought.  I think I can pretty much pull this of with a simple camera setup and throwing an ear cup from my headphones in the air.

 

  • Like 2
Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 hour ago, Zebra3 said:

Perfect example of why pics don't matter anymore.

Thats pretty much the foundation of this phenomenon.

Eyewitnesses testimony, pictures and wacky radar returns. 

 

  • Like 2
Link to comment
Share on other sites

8 hours ago, Trelane said:

Nice looking picture. Exactly what I would want for proof. Crystal clear. Now let's have these photos analyzed. Investigate if there are more photos taken by other Chinese citizens. Interview the person who took the photos to gain more information regarding the sighting. The subject does not start and end with just a picture.

Also, photos taken in China by a Chinese national posted on Mexican TV personality's Twitter account??? What's up with that? Was this a re -Tweet? Also, also I think he took the post down I can't seem to find it.

You don't always get that quality images especially if the object it travelling very fast or at incredible speeds. I don't know if this is a legitimate picture and a legitimate story. Having discovered the radar we can pick up pretty much everything even when they move at incredible speeds.

  • Like 2
Link to comment
Share on other sites

3 hours ago, Hazzard said:

Thats pretty much the foundation of this phenomenon.

Eyewitnesses testimony, pictures and wacky radar returns. 

 

Wacky they are but only to you and to a few others who deny and dismiss the whole thing. Eyewitness testimonies are very important regardless of how much you try to convince us they are not. The human factor is the most important even in science because it's humans who make the interpretations of evidence.

  • Like 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

8 hours ago, esoteric_toad said:

Once again, a city of over 5 million people and 2 photos (on this post, not sure if there are more on twitter but I do not go to twitter). That seems likely.

You can use the same argument for helicopters. In city of 5 million how many have seen a helicopter today?

  • Like 2
Link to comment
Share on other sites

49 minutes ago, MrAnderson said:

Wacky they are but only to you and to a few others who deny and dismiss the whole thing. Eyewitness testimonies are very important regardless of how much you try to convince us they are not. The human factor is the most important even in science because it's humans who make the interpretations of evidence.

Based on this post alone... I can safely say that you are lying about your education. 

  • Thanks 2
  • Confused 1
  • Sad 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

4 hours ago, Hazzard said:

Thats pretty much the foundation of this phenomenon.

Eyewitnesses testimony, pictures and wacky radar returns. 

 

you mean, that's pretty much the foundation of the true sceptics. thank you

  • Like 1
  • Thanks 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Phew. 

This is a good photo. OR... it's a deep fake. 

Notice you couldn't get the man's full name. Is that because he feared what the CCP would do?? And is that because the photo is fake or because the CCP censors UFO pics?

I'm on the fence with this one. 

  • Like 2
  • Haha 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

37 minutes ago, Earl.Of.Trumps said:

you mean, that's pretty much the foundation of the true sceptics.

thank you

 
No that is not what I mean.
 
adjective: skeptical
 
1.1 Not easily convinced; having doubts or reservations. Doubting that something is true or useful: having or expressing doubt about something (such as a claim or statement)
 
You are welcome.
 
 
  • Like 1
  • Thanks 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 hour ago, MrAnderson said:

 The human factor is the most important even in science because it's humans who make the interpretations of evidence.

The most important and characteristic feature of science is that it relies on data gathered based on verifiable evidence such as concrete factual observation. Other important features include being empirical, replicable, provisional, systematic, and objective.

Now, does any of that work with your belief that ET is here flying around in UFOs?  (Eyewitnesses testimony, pictures and wacky radar returns.)

If your answer is No... then I rest my case.

If Yes... then explain it to me.

Edited by Hazzard
  • Like 2
Link to comment
Share on other sites

2 hours ago, Hazzard said:

Based on this post alone... I can safely say that you are lying about your education. 

If you want to smear others go somewhere else and do it. We know how truthful and correct your conclusions are. You don't seem to have an issue trying to smear scientists such Avi Loeb or Kaku because their worldview doesn't agree with yours. It doesn't make any difference though what your opinion is.

  • Like 1
  • Haha 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

14 hours ago, MrAnderson said:

You can use the same argument for helicopters. In city of 5 million how many have seen a helicopter today?

I work in an area that has a pop of around 20000-25000. I see helicopters everyday and I am not staring at the sky all day. In fact I work inside most of the time. Seems to me a shiny metallic spheroid would definitely garner more attention than a helicopter and since almost everyone has a high definition camera it is unlikely it would come down to a single person with pics. My opinion of course.

  • Like 2
  • Thanks 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

15 hours ago, MrAnderson said:

If you want to smear others go somewhere else and do it. We know how truthful and correct your conclusions are. You don't seem to have an issue trying to smear scientists such Avi Loeb or Kaku because their worldview doesn't agree with yours. It doesn't make any difference though what your opinion is.

Avi Loeb is a hypocrite who in an interview scolded his fellow scientists claiming that they weren't "following the Scientific Method" and less than five minutes later claimed that his theories don't have to follow the rules of scientific discovery.

Since you know little about science, you'll have no idea why this statement disqualified him as a legitimate scientist.

  • Like 4
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    • No registered users viewing this page.