Jump to content
Join the Unexplained Mysteries community today! It's free and setting up an account only takes a moment.
- Sign In or Create Account -

Mystery creature filmed moving across the surface of Loch Ness


UM-Bot

Recommended Posts

 

The slipstream pattern doesn't look right to me, considering there seems to be a pretty strong tide that the creature is swimming against.

  • Like 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Eels. Sturgeons, Otters, Seals. Take your pick.

  • Like 2
Link to comment
Share on other sites

I imagine that is an elephant on a surfboard.

I wonder where it acquired that surfboard? Borrowed it from Bigfoot?

  • Like 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 hour ago, Ell said:

I imagine that is an elephant on a surfboard.

You are on to something @Ell. A lot of people think that Loch Ness monster was actually a circus elephant. It is without a doubt a traveling circus featuring elephants passed by a misty lake in the 1930s. At the height of monster sightings.

It is quite possible that people not used to seeing a swimming elephant. The vast bulk of animal is submerged, with only a thick trunk and a couple of humps visible.

They probably thought they saw a monster.

  • Like 3
  • Thanks 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

5 hours ago, UM-Bot said:

A veteran Nessie hunter has recorded webcam footage showing something unusual moving across the water.

https://www.unexplained-mysteries.com/news/381245/mystery-creature-filmed-moving-across-the-surface-of-loch-ness

The guy who filmed it has reasons to make it look real.

  • Like 3
Link to comment
Share on other sites

6 hours ago, sanchez710 said:

Some big eels in there. Most likely one of those I reckon.

Probably a good food source for some macro predator.  I’m glad you’re coming around to the truth.

  • Thanks 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

 
18 hours ago, Cho Jinn said:

Probably a good food source for some macro predator.  I’m glad you’re coming around to the truth.

The giant eels would be the apex predators in that environment 

  • Like 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

3 hours ago, Saru said:

The object is clearly a swimmer..

Brr, I wouldn't have a courage to swim in the Loch Ness even though I don't believe in a monsters.

  • Like 2
Link to comment
Share on other sites

I would never swin in that lake. Only the thinking of large fish, sea searpents, dinosaurs etc underneath in those dark waters make me anxious.

  • Like 2
Link to comment
Share on other sites

On 10/1/2024 at 12:47 AM, Mr.UFO said:

I'm not a Nessie believer, but I love listening to Adrian Shine talk about it.

Hes a very savvy cool fellow, iirc he went into the nessie phenomenon a believer or at least rather hopeful but after decades hands on research last i read he doesnt think there is any undiscovered loch monster. He also said if there is he will be delighted, seems he has a nessie museum, hes one paranormal profiteer i can respect, not out duping the credulous.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

On 9/30/2024 at 5:32 AM, Saru said:

An update on this one:

Well we won one again,

It reminds me of a jeff meldumb blunder, also an expect in this area of cryptozoology,

Im comparing this nessie mistake to jeffs snowwalker fail however i commend the nessie hunter for being up front with his error, still it serves to prove just how bad eye witnesses really are overestimating size etc,

This cat jumped to set things straight where jeff after overestimating size and other details and saying he saw no way it was a man in suit and shown it was a promo for a show still tried to blame others for what he said.

 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

On 9/30/2024 at 8:44 AM, jethrofloyd said:

Brr, I wouldn't have a courage to swim in the Loch Ness even though I don't believe in a monsters.

Any guess the depth there?

Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 hour ago, the13bats said:

Any guess the depth there?

I'm not sure, but this damn lake is a quite deep everywhere. The average deep is 132 m.(433ft). Tmax deep is 227 m.(744 ft)

But, the main thing with Loch Ness is the the water visibility. Already two meaters from a shore the water visibility is 0 (zero). It is dark and deep lake.

So, you can''t see if something is swimming or coming below you.

  • Like 2
Link to comment
Share on other sites

4 minutes ago, jethrofloyd said:

I'm not sure, but this damn lake is a quite deep everywhere. The average deep is 132 m.(433ft). Tmax deep is 227 m.(744 ft)

But, the main thing with Loch Ness is the the water visibility. Already two meaters from a shore the water visibility is 0 (zero). It is dark and deep lake.

So, you can''t see if something is swimming or coming below you.

Ty, yeah, too deep for my tastes,

I used to play on the butler chain of lakes in orlando early 90s spring fed some water would be gin clear where some was very brown tea stained from the cypress trees,

While i did enjoy hydro sliding it was unnerving to be way out in that deep dark water waiting even a few moments for the boat to come back,

Weird side effect after a day in the water my sterling silver jewelry would look like gold, but by the time i drove home less than an hour it was back silver.

 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

12 hours ago, jethrofloyd said:

I'm not sure, but this damn lake is a quite deep everywhere. The average deep is 132 m.(433ft). Tmax deep is 227 m.(744 ft)

But, the main thing with Loch Ness is the the water visibility. Already two meaters from a shore the water visibility is 0 (zero). It is dark and deep lake.

"On the bottom of a dark, Scottish lake. 20 miles away." The Police's best song, Synchronicity II.

  • Like 2
Link to comment
Share on other sites

 

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    • No registered users viewing this page.