WorldMysteries Posted October 7 #1 Share Posted October 7 The idea that UFOs (Unidentified Flying Objects) could be secret technology is a topic of much debate and speculation. Here are a few key points to consider: 1. Military and Government Projects: Some UFO sightings could be attributed to advanced military technology that is not yet public knowledge. Governments often develop and test new aircraft and drones in secrecy. 2. Scientific Perspective: Many scientists argue that while some UFO sightings remain unexplained, they do not necessarily indicate extraterrestrial technology. Instead, these sightings could be advanced human-made technology or natural phenomena that we do not yet fully understand. 3. Pentagon Reports: Recent reports from the Pentagon have acknowledged the existence of Unidentified Aerial Phenomena (UAPs), but they have not confirmed these as extraterrestrial. The reports suggest that some sightings demonstrate advanced technology, but they do not provide conclusive evidence about their origin. 4. Public and Expert Opinions: There is a wide range of opinions on this topic. Some experts believe that the technology behind certain UFO sightings could be beyond current human capabilities, while others think they are more likely to be advanced but terrestrial technology. https://www.scientificamerican.com/article/what-we-can-learn-from-studying-ufos/ https://phys.org/news/2021-06-ufos-scientific-breakthroughs.html https://www.cbsnews.com/boston/news/ufos-aliens-harvard-uap-cryptoterrestrial-hypothesis/ https://futurism.com/harvard-scientists-unknown-civilization-cryptoterrestrials https://theconversation.com/pentagon-report-says-ufos-cant-be-explained-and-this-admission-is-a-big-deal-161806 1 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Ell Posted October 7 #2 Share Posted October 7 yes Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Sir Wearer of Hats Posted October 7 #3 Share Posted October 7 Could they? Yes. They could also be Transformers from the planet Cybertron. 2 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Alchopwn Posted October 7 #4 Share Posted October 7 Let me put a case to you. Suppose your government had a very unusual, very fast aircraft that could do amazing things, but it was an extreme danger to the public, because it used nuclear energy, and if it crashed, it could spray enough plutonium to make a a two hundred mile radius uninhabitable? Suppose they tried very hard to make it safe, but it could never be foolproof? Suppose that it was ring shaped because it used a fusion reactor, and that technology had been monopolized by the military for 50+ years after they nabbed it from the Nazis via Operation Paperclip? Do you think they'd be in a hurry to admit any of it? Mind you, I don't think this is what is going on. I do think there have been some rigid jet powered dirigible drones that worked as high altitude spy craft that were saucer shaped tho. 2 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Trelane Posted October 7 #5 Share Posted October 7 Some could be and others may not. Trying to broad brush stroke this topic is a common mistake in many discussions on this topic. In totality there is no preponderance of credible evidence that demonstrates any alleged sightings to be extraterrestrial in nature. However, there are several cases still classified as "unknown" due to the lack of sufficient data. These could very well be extraterrestrial craft, but that cannot be determined yet. 4 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
MrAnderson Posted October 7 #6 Share Posted October 7 (edited) 7 hours ago, WorldMysteries said: The idea that UFOs (Unidentified Flying Objects) could be secret technology is a topic of much debate and speculation. Here are a few key points to consider: 1. Military and Government Projects: Some UFO sightings could be attributed to advanced military technology that is not yet public knowledge. Governments often develop and test new aircraft and drones in secrecy. 2. Scientific Perspective: Many scientists argue that while some UFO sightings remain unexplained, they do not necessarily indicate extraterrestrial technology. Instead, these sightings could be advanced human-made technology or natural phenomena that we do not yet fully understand. 3. Pentagon Reports: Recent reports from the Pentagon have acknowledged the existence of Unidentified Aerial Phenomena (UAPs), but they have not confirmed these as extraterrestrial. The reports suggest that some sightings demonstrate advanced technology, but they do not provide conclusive evidence about their origin. 4. Public and Expert Opinions: There is a wide range of opinions on this topic. Some experts believe that the technology behind certain UFO sightings could be beyond current human capabilities, while others think they are more likely to be advanced but terrestrial technology. https://www.scientificamerican.com/article/what-we-can-learn-from-studying-ufos/ https://phys.org/news/2021-06-ufos-scientific-breakthroughs.html https://www.cbsnews.com/boston/news/ufos-aliens-harvard-uap-cryptoterrestrial-hypothesis/ https://futurism.com/harvard-scientists-unknown-civilization-cryptoterrestrials https://theconversation.com/pentagon-report-says-ufos-cant-be-explained-and-this-admission-is-a-big-deal-161806 Yes, they could be man made but we are talking about some of them. There are devices and aircraft that seem to have very mysterious origins and demonstrate a what it seems a superior technology and capabilities to our own just as described by pilots, radar operators, military personnel and others. Edited October 7 by MrAnderson Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
MrAnderson Posted October 7 #7 Share Posted October 7 4 minutes ago, Trelane said: Some could be and others may not. Trying to broad brush stroke this topic is a common mistake in many discussions on this topic. In totality there is no preponderance of credible evidence that demonstrates any alleged sightings to be extraterrestrial in nature. However, there are several cases still classified as "unknown" due to the lack of sufficient data. These could very well be extraterrestrial craft, but that cannot be determined yet. Thee is a lot of evidence for the existence of UFOs and some of them are truly uknork in origin and demonstrate unique capabilities. Just as described on my thread by Admiral Tim Gallaudet who said some of these objects are alien in origin. It's not just Charles Halt who has come to this conclusion, the deputy commander of the US based in England. If you have base commanders and admirals agreeing that some of these objects are alornbtin origin when we are into something very unusual and unique. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Hazzard Posted October 7 #8 Share Posted October 7 8 hours ago, MrAnderson said: Thee is a lot of evidence for the existence of UFOs No one has ever doubted the existence of UFOs... people see them every single day all over the world. Quote and some of them are truly uknork in origin Thats the U in UFO. Quote and demonstrate unique capabilities. The jury is still out on that one. I sure havent seen any conclusive evidence that this is the case. When disected there always seem to be another more down to Earth explanation to these "unique capabilities"..! 3 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
MrAnderson Posted October 8 #9 Share Posted October 8 27 minutes ago, Hazzard said: No one has ever doubted the existence of UFOs... people see them every single day all over the world. Thats the U in UFO. The jury is still out on that one. I sure havent seen any conclusive evidence that this is the case. When disected there always seem to be another more down to Earth explanation to these "unique capabilities"..! It's your onw opinion and but you may want to not raise the bar so much when you say 'conclusive'. If there was conclusive evidence or proof then we wouldn't be having this conversation. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Hazzard Posted October 8 #10 Share Posted October 8 1 minute ago, MrAnderson said: It's your onw opinion No its not. Literally everyone that knows anything about this topic knows that UFOs exist. Quote you may want to not raise the bar so much when you say 'conclusive'. Why not? Quote If there was conclusive evidence or proof then we wouldn't be having this conversation. Stating the obvious. 1 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
MrAnderson Posted October 8 #11 Share Posted October 8 9 minutes ago, Hazzard said: No its not. Literally everyone that knows anything about this topic knows that UFOs exist. Why not? Stating the obvious. Because if we had conclusibe evidence and proof then there was no point for posters debating whether these UFOs and man made or extraterrestrial. 1 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Earl.Of.Trumps Posted October 8 #12 Share Posted October 8 some technology today, perhaps, but no way were the technological displays put on in years past, domestic. 1 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Dejarma Posted October 8 #13 Share Posted October 8 17 hours ago, WorldMysteries said: The idea that UFOs (Unidentified Flying Objects) could be secret technology is a topic of much debate and speculation. i wouldn't say much.. who's debating it? ya know- someone of worth? NA, probably much debate & speculation amongst the tin foils no doubt! give it time & someone will write a book about it & profit from the gullible no doubt- oh joy 😁 1 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
MrAnderson Posted October 8 #14 Share Posted October 8 35 minutes ago, Earl.Of.Trumps said: some technology today, perhaps, but no way were the technological displays put on in years past, domestic. That's what others think too and claim that our technology was influenced significantly by extraterrestrial technology. 1 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Dejarma Posted October 8 #15 Share Posted October 8 (edited) 52 minutes ago, Earl.Of.Trumps said: some technology today, perhaps, but no way were the technological displays put on in years past, domestic. You talk as if it's fact- why? none domestic technological displays are not a fact despite what you're told & believe! You do understand that, don't ya????? 🥱 Here's the correct, logical, rational way to say it when trying to converse with logical, rational adults: ''''ALLEGEDLY'''' = no way were the technological displays put on in years past, domestic. Just_My_Opinion There's a good boy 😁 Edited October 8 by Dejarma Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Create an account or sign in to comment
You need to be a member in order to leave a comment
Create an account
Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!
Register a new accountSign in
Already have an account? Sign in here.
Sign In Now