UFO’s have visited every major nuclear missle base “repeatedly, year after year” since the 1960s

[Unusual Tournament]

 

[Hazzard]

UFOs are seen everywhere and all the time.

Im pretty sure we could change the word "missile base" with whatever we want and it would be as true as this claim. 

[Unusual Tournament]

20 minutes ago, Hazzard said:

UFOs are seen everywhere and all the time.

Im pretty sure we could change the word "missile base" with whatever we want and it would be as true as this claim. 

Are you saying UFO’s have visited every MacDonald year after year since 1960?

[Unusual Tournament]

A tad off topic: it’s evident the anti UAP crowd is losing ground in these discussions as of late as their participation and argumentative rates have fallen dramatically.

we’re kicking goals

[Hazzard]

6 minutes ago, Unusual Tournament said:

A tad off topic: it’s evident the anti UAP crowd is losing ground in these discussions as of late as their participation and argumentative rates have fallen dramatically.

we’re kicking goals

 The question of alien visitation will be decided by the evidence, not by the intensity of opinion. 

So far there is zero corroborating evidence that UFOs have anything at all to do with ET. All the believers have at this point are opinions and wishful thinking. 

Thats a fact.

[Hazzard]

14 minutes ago, Unusual Tournament said:

Are you saying UFO’s have visited every MacDonald year after year since 1960?

No Im saying that your OP is dog💩

[Mr.UFO]

1 hour ago, Hazzard said:

UFOs are seen everywhere and all the time.

Im pretty sure we could change the word "missile base" with whatever we want and it would be as true as this claim. 

What about in 1967 when a UFO turned off nuclear missiles in Montana?

[Golden Duck]

43 minutes ago, Unusual Tournament said:

A tad off topic: it’s evident the anti UAP crowd is losing ground in these discussions as of late as their participation and argumentative rates have fallen dramatically.

we’re kicking goals

Own goals are nothing to brag about.

[Hazzard]

17 minutes ago, Mr.UFO said:

What about in 1967 when a UFO turned off nuclear missiles in Montana?

That old fairytale was debunked a long time ago.

Edited October 24 by Hazzard

[Claira]

No surprise that UFOs have visited every major nuclear missile base.

If one country is going to spy on another, nuclear missile bases and other military installations would be key targets.

The other possibility is that these UFOs belong to the bases themselves and are operating in a protective capacity.

Just a guess obviously, but the likelihood of them being alien craft is zilch to none.

[Unusual Tournament]

3 hours ago, Hazzard said:

 The question of alien visitation will be decided by the evidence, not by the intensity of opinion. 

So far there is zero corroborating evidence that UFOs have anything at all to do with ET. All the believers have at this point are opinions and wishful thinking. 

Thats a fact.

Well you’ve been inundated with fact and testimony from military and government sources. You don’t know as much as them and your only defence to date is ridicule and persistence in being negative 

Happy to wait for your arguments on UFO’s visiting military bases since the 1960’s??

[Unusual Tournament]

3 hours ago, Hazzard said:

No Im saying that your OP is dog💩

You know more than the military. Okay got it!

[Unusual Tournament]

3 hours ago, Golden Duck said:

Own goals are nothing to brag about.

Coming from the dude that calls himself ‘Golden Duck’

[Hazzard]

52 minutes ago, Unusual Tournament said:

Well you’ve been inundated with fact and testimony from military and government sources. You don’t know as much as them and your only defence to date is ridicule and persistence in being negative 

They clearly stated in the last report (from 2024) that there is no evidence that any of the UFOs (going back decades) have anything to do with ET.  Dont you believe them?

Quote

Happy to wait for your arguments on UFO’s visiting military bases since the 1960’s??

Its been debunked many times here at UM, use the search function. Regurgitating old stories and opinions is Skyeagles thing not mine.

[Golden Duck]

1 hour ago, Unusual Tournament said:

Coming from the dude that calls himself ‘Golden Duck’

That's right.  It's called self deprecating humour.

You know, free from an unjustified ego that claims to have kicked goals when in fact you've been nutmegged.

Edited October 25 by Golden Duck

[+and-then]

7 hours ago, Unusual Tournament said:

in these discussions

These are "discussions"?  You post some oddball on X saying something with zero proof and how do you expect skeptics to react?

[Unusual Tournament]

49 minutes ago, and-then said:

These are "discussions"?  You post some oddball on X saying something with zero proof and how do you expect skeptics to react?

So you’re saying the “odd ball” is wrong? Haven’t we been hearing for decades about these incidents over military and nuclear facilities?

[HeyBim]

11 hours ago, Unusual Tournament said:

A tad off topic: it’s evident the anti UAP crowd is losing ground in these discussions as of late as their participation and argumentative rates have fallen dramatically.

we’re kicking goals

Isn't it more like "anti UAP=alien spacecraft crowd"? I haven't been here long but it seems that the majority accept people see things in the sky they can't identify, but some people prefer not to jump straight to what they see as an extraordinary conclusion without sufficient evidence.

I would also suggest any lack of participation from them might be more to do with not wanting to repeat the same arguments over and over, rather than any point-scoring from the other side.

[iAlrakis]

13 hours ago, Unusual Tournament said:

A tad off topic: it’s evident the anti UAP crowd is losing ground in these discussions as of late as their participation and argumentative rates have fallen dramatically.

we’re kicking goals

A bit of nuance is needed here.

 

I've been reading about UFOs for about 40 years.  They're called UAPs now but that doesn't change anything.

The fact is that I never doubted their existence but so far I haven't seen any concrete evidence that aliens are involved.

1 of the things that's mostly used as 'proof' are the 'un-earthly' capabilities.  "We cannot do those speeds".  "The human body cannot handle..."

That's all based on knowledge that's publicly available.

What's going on in black/classified projects is mostly 30-40 years ahead of what we see in the unclassified world.  1. because it's extremely expensive, 2. because of military or other advantages.

 

 

[Essan]

15 hours ago, Unusual Tournament said:

 

But only in the USA cos that's the only country aliens are interested in on account that they only study more primitive lifeforms 


Seriously, what a load of nonsense.   But hey, people will believe it cos ol' Barnum was absolutely right   

[Timothy]

14 hours ago, Unusual Tournament said:

A tad off topic: it’s evident the anti UAP crowd is losing ground in these discussions as of late as their participation and argumentative rates have fallen dramatically.

we’re kicking goals

Much more likely (as is the case with me) that people get bored arguing, when it’s the same rehashed stuff over and over with nothing new or compelling enough to warrant a response.

Also I wouldn’t call it the ‘anti UAP’ crowd, pretty much everyone agrees that there’s stuff people can’t identify. 
But it’s usually due to lack of data rather than evidence of anything fantastical.

[Trelane]

15 hours ago, Unusual Tournament said:

A tad off topic: it’s evident the anti UAP crowd is losing ground in these discussions as of late as their participation and argumentative rates have fallen dramatically.

we’re kicking goals

I don't think there's an "anti UAP crowd" as you put it. However, there many people skeptical of the the connections of UAPs to extraterrestrials. There has been zero scientific evidence of the existence of an alien species, let alone routine visitation. That's where the real divide lies currently. Events and stories are not the smoking guns some have been praying for. They are interesting from time to time and it would be awesome if it turned out to be aliens visiting. However, the data and science show that the phenomenon is not connected to alien visitation.

Kicking goals eh? I wouldn't quite say that my fiend. This is what I've seen in the cases presented thus far.

 

[Abramelin]

15 hours ago, Unusual Tournament said:

Are you saying UFO’s have visited every MacDonald year after year since 1960?

Yes, but since a couple of days they stopped doing that.

I wonder why...

😛

[Hazzard]

13 hours ago, Unusual Tournament said:

You know more than the military. Okay got it!

A couple of guys in the armed forces stating their belief and opinions (that some UFOs are ET) does in no way make it true or valid.

[Unusual Tournament]

12 hours ago, HeyBim said:

Isn't it more like "anti UAP=alien spacecraft crowd"? I haven't been here long but it seems that the majority accept people see things in the sky they can't identify, but some people prefer not to jump straight to what they see as an extraordinary conclusion without sufficient evidence.

I would also suggest any lack of participation from them might be more to do with not wanting to repeat the same arguments over and over, rather than any point-scoring from the other side.

Hi HeyBim,

yes and no. You need some reasoning to discount something otherwise you need to have an open mind. You can’t say they’re aliens without providing some data that they could be and alternatively, you can’t discount something without providing some reasoning.

As lots of proof in the form of performance of these UAP is no guarantee they are aliens, they do provide a sort of evidence on why they cannot be man made. 
 

Deductive reasoning