Trump sues CBS over Kamala Harris '60 Minutes' interview

[ExpandMyMind]

7 hours ago, Link of Hyrule said:

Ah, blame the Republicans

It was the Republicans who abolished it. I'm confused as to why you think my comment is not accurate or something? They were the ones who did the thing.

As soon as it was abolished, right wing talk radio launched with impunity and poisoned the minds of millions of conservatives with complete nonsense. Half the Republicans on this forum still listen to that garbage.

Then FOX News launched and sweeped up the rest of them.

It's a well-documented part of US history. It more or less marked the end of critical thinking from the US right.

[Gromdor]

Didn't the Fox Interview with Kamela use edited Trump video too?  Kamala Harris Shares Full Trump Clip After Accusing Fox News of Editing - Newsweek

Isn' this standard industry practice now?

[+Razman]

3 minutes ago, Gromdor said:

Didn't the Fox Interview with Kamela use edited Trump video too?  Kamala Harris Shares Full Trump Clip After Accusing Fox News of Editing - Newsweek

Isn' this standard industry practice now?

Fox has done this multiple times as far as i understand. It's Trumps loud "victim me" screaming mouth that is the difference. Just like it always was.

[ExpandMyMind]

11 minutes ago, Gromdor said:

Didn't the Fox Interview with Kamela use edited Trump video too?  Kamala Harris Shares Full Trump Clip After Accusing Fox News of Editing - Newsweek

Isn' this standard industry practice now?

This was much worse than just editing to make someone look more coherent.

They made the claim, 'Trump didn't say that thing' then played a clip from an interview to attempt to prove that he didn't say that thing, but cut the clip off just before he actually did say the thing they're denying he said.

One of the worst moments of "journalism" I've ever witnessed, even from FOX.

[+Razman]

So , is this right that Trump can go to any judge he wants and file this lawsuit? He can go to the  most MAGA friendly judge and file this? 

Donald Trump Files Lawsuit Before Election in 'MAGA Judge' District

Texas federal judge Matthew Kascmaryk, nominated by Trump in 2017, will hear the complaint by the former president's legal team, which alleges "partisan and unlawful acts of election and voter interference" by the broadcaster.

The case was filed in the federal court in Amarillo, which covers the northern district of Texas, where Republicans have long been accused of "venue-shopping" before Kascmaryk to obtain the best result. Senate Majority Leader Chuck Schumer has denounced Republicans for taking the cases to Kascmaryk, saying he is "MAGA's favorite judge."

[preacherman76]

22 hours ago, Sir Wearer of Hats said:

El Trumpo is suing … because they edited for brevity her interview. 
Matey, you take the sermonisation of nonsequtors to epochal levels. 

Edited for brevity?? lol that’s one way to put it. It was edited for deception, to try and make her look like she answered questions without looking as dumb as she actually sounded. 

[preacherman76]

18 hours ago, ExpandMyMind said:

Unfortunately, The Fairness Doctrine was abolished by Republicans like 40 years ago or something, so there is nothing illegal happening.

Basically, Republicans made the media in the US what it is today. Before the Fairness Doctrine was abolished, there was true debate and each side was required by law to have an equal opportunity to put forth their argument. You had actual news and debate instead of pure propaganda.

Fox has even argued in court that they're not a news organisation in situations with talking heads (like 60 minutes type interviews and shows) and are instead entertainment, and that no one would or should take what they say as fact.

Keep voting for Republicans though. I'm sure they'll make something in the US better eventually.

Also, I think Raz posted a link to the edits made for Trump. They basically edited out most of his incoherent rambling and conspiracy theories, from what I read about it.

What was it 60 minutes was supposed to.habe done?

Mm 90% shill for democrats 

60 minutes should have let us see the answers she actually gave to the questions. Everyone threw a fit when Trump refused to go on 60 minutes this election. Who could blame him. Zero integrity. 

[ExpandMyMind]

1 minute ago, preacherman76 said:

Mm 90% shill for democrats 

60 minutes should have let us see the answers she actually gave to the questions. Everyone threw a fit when Trump refused to go on 60 minutes this election. Who could blame him. Zero integrity. 

Am I not still waiting for you to show me examples of voter fraud you said existed? Or are you still looking? 

I'll now ask you for evidence that 60 minutes spliced answers for one question to match a different question asked. I've not read about this or seen the evidence, so this is a legitimate request.

[preacherman76]

10 minutes ago, ExpandMyMind said:

Am I not still waiting for you to show me examples of voter fraud you said existed? Or are you still looking? 

I'll now ask you for evidence that 60 minutes spliced answers for one question to match a different question asked. I've not read about this or seen the evidence, so this is a legitimate request.

https://youtu.be/hJyHPDgqGUI?si=y11RYqM69K3QingP

[+Razman]

I still don't see the issue , on oct 6th face the nation says they got an excerpt from 60 minutes and shows the long Harris answer, the next day on oct 7th , 60 minutes shows a shorter edited version of the same answer. What's the problem ?The whole answer was known the day before anyway.

Edited November 1 by Razman

[moonman]

Of course there is nothing the orange idiot can do, no matter how petty, meaningless or trite, that his moron supporters won't back up and defend their daddy 100%, every time. Why did I think this one would be different for some reason?

Just goes to prove how brainwashed the whole cult is.

Edited November 1 by moonman

[preacherman76]

17 minutes ago, Razman said:

I still don't see the issue , on oct 6th face the nation says they got an excerpt from 60 minutes and shows the long Harris answer, the next day on oct 7th , 60 minutes shows a shorter edited version of the same answer. What's the problem ?The whole answer was known the day before anyway.

The problem is that’s BS. Watch the video I posted. Her answers are not shortened. 

[preacherman76]

Hey Expanded here is some voter fraud. First the back story. A county in PA shut down early voting after a mass wave of people were voting for Trump. This was unlawful. A court said they had to reopen voting until 5 o’clock today. So they manned the building with 2 poll workers and people have been standing in line for hours on end. They are making it so most of those people won’t be able to vote. Cause if the lines are this long now, wait till Election Day. 
 

 

[preacherman76]

Hey Expanded here is some voter fraud. First the back story. A county in PA shut down early voting after a mass wave of people were voting for Trump. This was unlawful. A court said they had to reopen voting until 5 o’clock today. So they manned the building with 2 poll workers and people have been standing in line for hours on end. They are making it so most of those people won’t be able to vote. Cause if the lines are this long now, wait till Election Day. 
 

Again in NY. Even when your signature doesn’t match they refuse to see ID, and just have you sign something saying it’s really you. WTH??

 

 

[+Razman]

1 hour ago, preacherman76 said:

The problem is that’s BS. Watch the video I posted. Her answers are not shortened. 

One was longer , one was shorter and concise.

Edited November 1 by Razman

[preacherman76]

Then we got voting machines that won’t allow you to vote Trump. 
 

 

[preacherman76]

9 minutes ago, Razman said:

One was longer , one was shorter and concise.

One was completely different than the other, and was clipped from a different question 

[Doc Socks Junior]

1 minute ago, preacherman76 said:

Then we got voting machines that won’t allow you to vote Trump. 
 

 

Liars going to lie.

https://www.courier-journal.com/story/news/politics/elections/2024/10/31/ky-officials-respond-after-voting-machine-error-video-goes-viral/75972099007/

Quote

"There is no 'vote-switching.' The voter confirmed that her ballot was correctly printed as marked for the candidate of her choice. Get your voting information from legitimate sources," Adams wrote.

For your own mental health, chief, you should stay off social media until after the election. You're just being lied to and you don't have the mental tools to discern it.

[pellinore]

20 hours ago, Will Due said:

I've always thought you were a Christian of some denomination. I thought Christians were about loving one another, helping the poor, etc, (Matthew 25:42-46) 

I'm astonished you seem to be a Republican supporter.

[+Razman]

30 minutes ago, preacherman76 said:

Then we got voting machines that won’t allow you to vote Trump. 
 

 

Was a temporary glitch on one machine , pretty sure you might have the wrong video up there though. Seems to work ok there in that one. Otherwise looking further it seems like they are saying it was voter error.

Edited November 1 by Razman

[ExpandMyMind]

7 minutes ago, Razman said:

Was a temporary glitch on one machine , pretty sure you might have the wrong video up there though. Seems to work ok there in that one.

As explained in the text as well, the machine doesn't cast your vote. It marks your ballot that you can then view to confirm it has marked correctly.

[+Razman]

6 minutes ago, ExpandMyMind said:

As explained in the text as well, the machine doesn't cast your vote. It marks your ballot that you can then view to confirm it has marked correctly.

Yea i was reading that they are now saying it was voter error anyway. In light of what your saying above also , it sounds like right winger( or to be fair , someone) is blowing things out of proportion. It's like they are paranoid they are gonna get ripped off , like Trump led them to believe, so they are looking for any little thing in that way.

[ExpandMyMind]

3 minutes ago, Razman said:

Yea i was reading that they are now saying it was voter error anyway. In light of what your saying above also , it sounds like right winger( or to be fair , someone) is blowing things out of proportion. It's like they are paranoid they are gonna get ripped off , like Trump led them to believe, so they are looking for any little thing in that way.

Every time they try to prove voter fraud, they just end up showing how robust and secure the elections are. But then never admit that.

[Will Due]

11 minutes ago, pellinore said:

helping the poor

 

Democrat politicians are not interested in helping the poor. But they do lie a lot to them.

It's beyond obvious that the primary thing Democrat politicians are interested in, is USING the poor (and the economic situation they're in) to ENRICH THEMSELVES.

And what's so astounding about that to me is that so many (otherwise good people) seem so incapable of recognizing the truth of this fact.

 

[+Razman]

1 minute ago, Will Due said:

 

Democrat politicians are not interested in helping the poor. But they do lie a lot to them.

It's beyond obvious that the primary thing Democrat politicians are interested in, is USING the poor (and the economic situation they're in) to ENRICH THEMSELVES.

And what's so astounding about that to me is that so many (otherwise good people) seem so incapable of recognizing the truth of this fact.

 

 

In my opinion , the Dems are the ones that will help the poor , Repubs help the rich and wait for it to trickle down.