UM-Bot Posted November 1 #1 Share Posted November 1 A virtual simulation has been used in an effort to determine if the famous biblical relic really shows the image of Jesus. https://www.unexplained-mysteries.com/news/382128/was-the-shroud-of-turin-really-used-to-wrap-the-body-of-jesus 3 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Ell Posted November 1 #2 Share Posted November 1 No. 4 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
AZDZ Posted November 1 #3 Share Posted November 1 A fascinating subject. There are two accounts, the Shroud and the Bible. The Shroud is what it is, but the Bible says... Quote John 20:6,7. 6Then cometh Simon Peter following him, and went into the sepulchre, and seeth the linen clothes lie, 7And the napkin, that was about his head, not lying with the linen clothes, but wrapped together in a place by itself. These texts Bend over backwards to indicate the body linens and the head napkin were two distinct objects. Could be that the body linen covered the head AND a separate napkin for the head was over top of the head too but that text shouts to the contrary. 🤷♂️ 1 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Sir Wearer of Hats Posted November 1 #4 Share Posted November 1 I’d LOVE to say “yes”. 1 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
XenoFish Posted November 1 #5 Share Posted November 1 This again. 4 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Dejarma Posted November 1 #6 Share Posted November 1 It's pretty much agreed Leonardo Da Vinci created the Turin Shroud. Why rehash this: 'it's Jesus Christ' BS!? zzzzzz🥱 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Alex_Rogan Posted November 2 #7 Share Posted November 2 Does it really matter? Can it be compared to political yard signs? It won't affect or change anything either way. 1 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Djehuty Posted November 2 #8 Share Posted November 2 If Jesus really existed, then he looked like a guy from the Middle East and not like this European with long hair. He was always portrayed like that in the Middle Ages, which is why they designed the shroud that way. Of course, it's a fake. 5 2 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Piney Posted November 2 #9 Share Posted November 2 3 hours ago, Djehuty said: If Jesus really existed, then he looked like a guy from the Middle East and not like this European with long hair. He was always portrayed like that in the Middle Ages, which is why they designed the shroud that way. Of course, it's a fake. It looks exactly like a half starved Frankish knight with forearm development from someone who wielded a sword and thigh development from steering horses with them. 5 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Abramelin Posted November 2 #10 Share Posted November 2 2 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Antigonos Posted November 2 #11 Share Posted November 2 No. It was carbon dated to the Crusader period and if genuine it’s the burial shroud of a knight. Most likely a Templar because they wore their hair long. 5 1 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Piney Posted November 2 #12 Share Posted November 2 18 minutes ago, Antigonos said: No. It was carbon dated to the Crusader period and if genuine it’s the burial shroud of a knight. Most likely a Templar because they wore their hair long. I lean towards Templar too. 3 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Abramelin Posted November 2 #13 Share Posted November 2 (edited) 24 minutes ago, Antigonos said: No. It was carbon dated to the Crusader period and if genuine it’s the burial shroud of a knight. Most likely a Templar because they wore their hair long. I didn't even google it, but I read long ago that they had taken samples from the repair patches instead of from the original cloth. Those patches were added to repair the corners of the folded cloth after a fire in the middle ages had almost destroyed the thing. Well, I think that was most probably the story propagated by those who believed the shroud was really 2,000 years old. Edited November 2 by Abramelin 1 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Piney Posted November 2 #14 Share Posted November 2 15 minutes ago, Abramelin said: I didn't even google it, but I read long ago that they had taken samples from the repair patches instead of from the original cloth. Those patches were added to repair the corners of the folded cloth after a fire in the middle ages had almost destroyed the thing. I remember that. It was on BBC. 15 minutes ago, Abramelin said: Well, I think that was most probably the story propagated by those who believed the shroud was really 2,000 years old. Yup, and it was a lie too. 1 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
eight bits Posted November 2 #15 Share Posted November 2 You gotta respect the Shroud as the long-time title holder as the Whitest Jesus in Western Art, until finally beaten by the Mormons in the 19th Century (photo credit, our very own @acute) 2 1 1 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Will Due Posted November 2 #16 Share Posted November 2 Jesus was a Jew who looked like this... Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Piney Posted November 2 #17 Share Posted November 2 2 minutes ago, eight bits said: You gotta respect the Shroud as the long-time title holder as the Whitest Jesus in Western Art, until finally beaten by the Mormons in the 19th Century (photo credit, our very own @acute) And that little cider swizzling Brummie pizza locust stole it from me. 🤬 1 1 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Piney Posted November 2 #18 Share Posted November 2 Just now, Will Due said: Jesus was a Jew who looked like this... More like this........ 2 3 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
XenoFish Posted November 2 #19 Share Posted November 2 All of it is lies, this is the real Jesus. 4 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Piney Posted November 2 #20 Share Posted November 2 2 minutes ago, XenoFish said: All of it is lies, this is the real Jesus. Jesus had Williams Syndrome? 😲 1 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
XenoFish Posted November 2 #21 Share Posted November 2 2 minutes ago, Piney said: Jesus had Williams Syndrome? 😲 He took the probe for your sins. So that no one shall be probed again. 4 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Portre Posted November 2 #22 Share Posted November 2 34 minutes ago, XenoFish said: He took the probe for your sins. So that no one shall be probed again. You nailed it, 1 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Portre Posted November 2 #23 Share Posted November 2 No. The image on the shroud does not match descriptions of Roman-era crucifixions. 1 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Piney Posted November 2 #24 Share Posted November 2 19 minutes ago, Portre said: You nailed it, 🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Jenny Martin Posted November 2 #25 Share Posted November 2 What he discovered was correct - the stains don't match what would happen to an average human but he was vibrating at a different frequency. Dr. Piczek, a physicist and sculpture artist discovered that the body would have had to be hovering above ground in the cloth in order to create the pattern on the fabric. With her background in physics, she described the impression in terms of a quantum hologram. Dr. Piczek is interviewed in this documentary: The Fabric of Time: Are the Secrets of the Universe Hidden in an Ancient Cloth? 2 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Create an account or sign in to comment
You need to be a member in order to leave a comment
Create an account
Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!
Register a new accountSign in
Already have an account? Sign in here.
Sign In Now