Bigfoot Photographed in Indiana

[Portre]

A remarkable series of photos captured by a game camera in Indiana shows what appears to be a mysterious bipedal creature walking through a wooded area and some believe the strange animal was a Sasquatch. The compelling images were reportedly sent to the Rocky Mountain Sasquatch Organization by an individual named Josh Banker. Writing "I literally don't have the words" to describe what appeared in the photos, he explained that the pictures were snapped this past weekend by a game camera on his property in the community of Connersville. In the images, showcased above, a seemingly bipedal creature crosses in front of the device as it makes its way through the woods, leading Banker to marvel that "I think I caught a freakin' Sasquatch!"

Video: Bigfoot Photographed by Game Camera in Indiana?

[+OverSword]

I would like to see that daylight picture of the area with a normal sized man in frame to get some scale for starters.

[Piney]

25 minutes ago, OverSword said:

I would like to see that daylight picture of the area with a normal sized man in frame to get some scale for starters.

From the series of movements. It's a clumsy human in a clumsy suit. 

[CrimsonKing]

16 minutes ago, Piney said:

From the series of movements. It's a clumsy human in a clumsy suit. 

Agreed, probably someone lost in the words after sleeping off a Halloween party lol

Seriously though,the "gait" is all to human.

[Piney]

4 minutes ago, CrimsonKing said:

Agreed, probably someone lost in the words after sleeping off a Halloween party lol

Seriously though,the "gait" is all to human.

The only primate that would make that kind of effort to step over something is Homo Sapien Sapien.

Great apes go around low branches. 

[papageorge1]

Papameter Reading

65% Bigfoot    35% Hoax

[Resume]

1 hour ago, Piney said:

From the series of movements. It's a clumsy human in a clumsy suit. 

Moreover, the clumsy human is likely the game cam owner.  I hope he only rented the suit.

[+joc]

4 hours ago, Piney said:

From the series of movements. It's a clumsy human in a clumsy suit. 

 Where's the video?  Oh there's not one...why?  Because it's a trail...c a m e r a  bro!

Ohhhhhhhhh...got it...

Oh, you mean like this one for $30 that puts out crisp images at night, records video for 60 seconds and is the state of the art?  

Muddy Outdoors MTC100X 16 MP Trail Camera

$29.99

DETAILS & SPECS

Hook up the Muddy Outdoors MTC100X 16 MP Trail Camera in your backyard and wait to see wildlife. The 1.5-second trigger speed with a 2-second burst interval quickly snaps images before animals move out of frame, and the 5-foot invisible flash range enables the camera to capture pictures of animals at a passing distance. This camera takes full-color 16-megapixel images and 2-megapixel monochrome images at night for around-the-clock surveillance, and the images are stamped with the date, time, and moon phase to help you narrow down exactly when animals are out and about.

Features and Benefits

• Captures full-color 16-megapixel images and 2-megapixel monochrome images at night for crisp images
• 18 high-efficacy LEDs create an invisible flash that reaches out to 50 feet to capture images of animals with no visible flash
• Backlit LCD screen is easy to navigate in all lighting conditions
• Records videos ranging from 10 to 60 seconds
• 1.5-second trigger speed with a 2-second burst interval
• Burst mode snaps 2 to 6 shots each time the trigger is activated
• Images are stamped with date, time, and moon phase
• Compatible with cable locks and padlocks for theft deference
• Requires 8 AA batteries (not included)
• Accepts SD cards up to 32 gigabytes
• Includes an adjustable mounting strap

[+joc]

And with the foot to track comparison...the 'bigfoot' would have to be at least 12 feet tall.  And it's interesting that the 'bigfoot' always walks with a human gait and that it's arms are proportional to humans not primates.  

Face it people. It's really simple math:

No scat  +  No bones  +  No fur  = No Bigfoot

[Buzz_Light_Year]

6 hours ago, OverSword said:

I would like to see that daylight picture of the area with a normal sized man in frame to get some scale for starters.

Judging from the size of the ground clutter and the size of the tree (sapling) I'd say 6ft or less.

The foreground tree on the right looks to be 3" or less in diameter and the tree that it walks in front of is about the same size.

 

[Harte]

Quote

 "I think I caught a freakin' Sasquatch!"

Harte

[+DieChecker]

I'd tend to agree. The pics aren't really good evidence, as nothing backs them up. 

Could just be a guy wandering around.