Claira Posted November 29 #1 Share Posted November 29 About 1.5m years ago a big-toothed cousin of prehistoric humans walked quickly along a lakeside in Kenya, footprints marking the muddy ground. But they were not our only distant relative on the scene: treading the same ground was the early human Homo erectus. Researchers say an analysis of fossilised footprints discovered in deposits of the Turkana Basin, northern Kenya, suggest the marks were made by two different species on the human family tree who were in the same place within hours or days of each other. https://www.theguardian.com/science/2024/nov/28/footprints-in-kenya-show-distant-relatives-of-modern-humans-coexisted 7 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Piney Posted November 29 #2 Share Posted November 29 This is actually "old news". We ran around and had introgression events with several other species of Homo. 7 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Claira Posted November 29 Author #3 Share Posted November 29 6 minutes ago, Piney said: This is actually "old news". We ran around and had introgression events with several other species of Homo. Old news in that we're aware that lineages existed contemporaneously, but the report regarding the fossilized footprint findings in Kenya is new news, having been released just yesterday. I know what you meant in your post, but am clarifying in case other members think you're referring to the current findings presented above. 4 1 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Piney Posted November 29 #4 Share Posted November 29 12 minutes ago, Claira said: Old news in that we're aware that lineages existed contemporaneously, but the report regarding the fossilized footprint findings in Kenya is new news, having been released just yesterday. I know what you meant in your post, but am clarifying in case other members think you're referring to the current findings presented above. Thanks! Autism takes clarification. 😆 6 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guyver Posted November 29 #5 Share Posted November 29 Interesting find and article. 3 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Kenemet Posted November 29 #6 Share Posted November 29 I looked it up... while erectus is indeed in our direct linage, Paranthropus boisei is a "cousin (several times removed)" when the lineage diverged into Australopithecus and Paranthropus. See diagram in this article: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Paranthropus 4 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
jethrofloyd Posted November 30 #7 Share Posted November 30 On 11/29/2024 at 12:43 PM, Piney said: This is actually "old news". I remember 2-3 years ago there was a similar news here at UM when a some old prehistoric traces were found at the slopas of an volcano. 3 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Piney Posted November 30 #8 Share Posted November 30 22 minutes ago, jethrofloyd said: I remember 2-3 years ago there was a similar news here at UM when a some old prehistoric traces were found at the slopas of an volcano. They were Australopithecus stomping through volcanic ash. National Geographic has a online archived article about it that might be free. 3 2 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Piney Posted November 30 #9 Share Posted November 30 16 hours ago, Kenemet said: I looked it up... while erectus is indeed in our direct linage, Paranthropus boisei is a "cousin (several times removed)" when the lineage diverged into Australopithecus and Paranthropus. See diagram in this article: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Paranthropus Paranthropus.......extinct because of veganism. 😆 2 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Create an account or sign in to comment
You need to be a member in order to leave a comment
Create an account
Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!
Register a new accountSign in
Already have an account? Sign in here.
Sign In Now