Jump to content
Join the Unexplained Mysteries community today! It's free and setting up an account only takes a moment.
- Sign In or Create Account -

The US Military might be testing a new means of propulsion.


Qubit

Recommended Posts

The US Military might be testing a new means of propulsion that will render rockets, planes, and every other form of flight useless.


 

Now I know what you’re thinking, this is an extraordinary claim, how could the military keep such a program under wraps? And how would it be possible to know? It is important to emphasize that I think this is a possibility but please take what I am about to tell you with a grain of salt, I will present the evidence and you will decide if it's sufficient.

 

Off the coast of Southern California near the USS Nimitz, according to anonymous testimony from a US Navy Pilot, a cube with a translucent sphere around it flew between 2 Boeing F/A-18E/F Super Hornets after the USS Princeton detected UAPs on its radar.

 

“10 miles

off the coast of Virginia Beach, two F-18 Super Hornets were 

split by a UAP. The object, described as a dark gray or a black 

cube inside of a clear sphere came within 50 feet of the lead 

aircraft and was estimated to be five to 15 feet in diameter.

    The mission commander terminated the flight immediately and 

returned to base. Our squadron submitted a safety report but 

there was no official acknowledgment of the incident and no 

further mechanism to report the sightings.” - Ryan Graves, House Hearing “Unidentified Anomalous Phenomena: Implications on National Security, Public Safety, and Government Transparency”

 

There was no official acknowledgment of the incident, meaning no one acknowledged it though a cube flew in between 2 fighter jets, which is a very big deal, or there was no clear follow-up by the US Navy. Normally if something like this happened you would expect the government to be very concerned, like the balloon incident with China, which seems much less dangerous than a cube flying in between 2 US jet fighters. Furthermore, the former director of the Advanced Aerospace Threat Identification Program resigned in protest of the Department of Defense’s ignorance or inattention to UAP incidents. 

 

“Despite overwhelming evidence at both the unclassified and classified levels. Certain individuals in the Department remain staunchly opposed to further research on what could be a tactical threat to our pilots, sailors, and soldiers, and perhaps even an existential threat to our national security” - Resignation letter of Luis Elizando

 

So there seem to be two responses within the Department of Defense to UAP research and reports, ignorance or opposition to further research. Additionally, there are unverified rumors of higher-resolution videos and longer videos of the UAP incidents that never saw the light of day. Remember the cube in a translucent sphere? There is a patent written by Dr. Salvatore Pais whose Assignee is the Department of Navy, called, “Craft using an inertial mass reduction device”. To summarise this patent basically patents an untested technology that uses a new method of propulsion that changes the orientation of how quantum virtual particles annihilate or interact in order to create lift. The craft has an inner and outer resonant cavity wall and a microwave emitter. The microwave emitter is supposed to emit microwaves that bounce between the inner and outer resonant cavity walls which will cause the outer wall to vibrate and create a polarized vacuum outside the resonant cavity wall (Which I assume is the outside surface of such a craft). I won’t go into specifics of how this operates but it is supposed to enable a craft to fly without drag and has reduced (or no) inertia, this craft would be able to hover, and fly at insanely fast speeds, and because of the lack of inertia and drag it would theoretically be able to jitter back and forth just like the tic tac UAP. Either this patent could be something to throw off US adversaries, but Dr. Pais who wrote it, seems like a genuine person in interviews. This patent coupled with the ignorance of the DoD and Navy of UAPs or at least the ignorance of higher-up officials in those departments indicates that maybe the military is prototyping some sort of secret means of propulsion for drones. It would make sense that it is secret, if this is true then this technology will be the biggest technological leap in human history. However, this hypothesis would also raise other questions like why would the Navy test such classified technology near training exercises? Also, I would like to point out that in the patent, Dr. Pais also mentions a sort of Plasma bubble around such a craft, eerily similar to the translucent bubble around the cube UAP in the Nimitz Incident. 

 

“This hybrid craft would move with great ease through the air/space/water mediums, by being enclosed in a vacuum plasma bubble/sheath, due to the coupled effects of EM field-induced air/water particles repulsion and vacuum energy polarization.” - Dr Pais

 

From my perspective, I would think that there would be a 99% chance that this hypothesis would be true, mainly because of the lack of explanations other than “Oh, Aliens!” or optical illusions, which from my perspective have little evidence, and seem unreasonable as pilots are highly trained observers and from the audio from one of the videos, there were “fleets” of the tic-tac UAPs apparently and radars also detected fleets. It could be possible that it would be Aliens but then why were these incidents only occurring near military infrastructure or at the sea, if it was I would see no reason why aliens would not interact with humans or at least not be scared to be seen or detected by humans because the UAPs usually linger around for some time very far away and only visible through radar and just faint pixels on cameras before escaping detection at very fast speeds. This coupled with the ignorance of higher-up military officials probably indicates the Military probably has something to do with this. I encourage you to do further research, thank you for reading.

 

Illustrations of the Inertial Mass Reduction Device

US10144532-20181204-D00000.png

US10144532-20181204-D00000.png

 

Resignation Letter Elizando

 

https://documents2.theblackvault.com/documents/osd/18-F-0324.pdf 

 

Patent

https://patents.google.com/patent/US10144532B2/en 

 

Hearing 

 

https://www.congress.gov/event/118th-congress/house-event/116282/text 




 

  • Like 5
  • Thanks 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Good catch, but you'll never get the skeptics to admit that Navy, or Air Force pilots are credible witnesses. They're just going to latch onto " anonymous testimony from an unnamed pilot" and call it debunked. 

   Your added info about Dr. Salvatore Pais lends credence to the possibility though, imo.

  • Like 6
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Welcome to U.M!

Good catch, but you'll never get the skeptics to admit that Navy, or Air Force pilots are credible witnesses. They're just going to latch onto " anonymous testimony from an unnamed pilot" and call it debunked. 

   Your added info about Dr. Salvatore Pais lends credence to the possibility though, imo.

 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

It’s what I have been offering as the best explanation for UAP’s all along.

  • Like 4
Link to comment
Share on other sites

@Guyver 

2 minutes ago, Guyver said:

It’s what I have been offering as the best explanation for UAP’s all along.

Yes, I am trying to make this hypothesis more mainstream, maybe I should make a YouTube video on it if another UAP incident arises but for now, I can't find the time to do that now though.

  • Like 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Welcome to UM, Qubit!  

Sounds a little like an Alcubierre drive.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

8 minutes ago, Hankenhunter said:

Welcome to U.M!

Good catch, but you'll never get the skeptics to admit that Navy, or Air Force pilots are credible witnesses. They're just going to latch onto " anonymous testimony from an unnamed pilot" and call it debunked. 

   Your added info about Dr. Salvatore Pais lends credence to the possibility though, imo.

 

Thank you, It's not only about convincing people it's true it's about convincing people it can be a reasonable possibility. There are only two sides to the UAP world, which is either Aliens or some optical illusion. If for some reason people don't trust pilot witnesses then they should be asked why the Navy patented such a far-fetched and currently outlandish technology. (Outlandish as seen by the rest of the scientific community) I added in the bit about Dr. Pais seeming more "genuine" because I didn't know how to word it differently haha, if you watch his interviews he seems like a scientist who believes what he does, I can't explain it differently.

  • Like 2
Link to comment
Share on other sites

3 minutes ago, Qubit said:

@Guyver 

Yes, I am trying to make this hypothesis more mainstream, maybe I should make a YouTube video on it if another UAP incident arises but for now, I can't find the time to do that now though.

I'm still curious as to why they would be flying these things all over the world in high population areas, and sparsely populated areas as well. It makes no sense strategically, or from a security standpoint. 

  • Like 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

4 minutes ago, and-then said:

Welcome to UM, Qubit!  

Sounds a little like an Alcubierre drive.

Thanks! Although I don't understand this Inertial Mass Reduction craft much myself, the patent is very high Lexile and hard to comprehend but I did manage to figure out that apparently the craft utilizes virtual particles - which are particles that are created out of random quantum fluctuations, one particle is matter and the other is antimatter and they annihilate. These particles exist for a short time, apparently, this process produces no macro effect because it is random, it's like static on a TV, but the Inertial Mass Reduction device changes it so that the way these virtual pairs annihilate produces a force in one direction which creates lift. I didn't write this in the essay I wrote but if you look at the materials required for this, or at least the materials Dr. Pais outlined, the cost of developing a prototype would probably be $1-10 billion, and we know that the military throws money at stupid projects all the time, like there was this one time where the military spent taxpayer dollars for telekinesis technology,  I think the military threw their money at something that sounded stupid and it worked out.

  • Like 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

2 hours ago, Qubit said:

“This hybrid craft would move with great ease through the air/space/water mediums, by being enclosed in a vacuum plasma bubble/sheath, due to the coupled effects of EM field-induced air/water particles repulsion and vacuum energy polarization.” - Dr Pais

This appears to be scientific gobbledygook.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

4 hours ago, Ell said:

This appears to be scientific gobbledygook.

It does at first, apparently, a plasma bubble is supposed to shield it from other mediums and electromagnetic interference. You can read the patent yourself if you like, it was approved meaning the government finds it realistic (which is extremely odd considering how theoretical and far-fetched it is). 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

6 hours ago, Hankenhunter said:

I'm still curious as to why they would be flying these things all over the world in high population areas, and sparsely populated areas as well. It makes no sense strategically, or from a security standpoint. 

I have the same question as well, perhaps they don't care because they can cover it as a "UAP" incident. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

26 minutes ago, Qubit said:

It does at first, apparently, a plasma bubble is supposed to shield it from other mediums and electromagnetic interference. You can read the patent yourself if you like, it was approved meaning the government finds it realistic (which is extremely odd considering how theoretical and far-fetched it is). 

My bold above.

I know you were replying to @Ell, but what you’re suggesting is quite misleading.

A granted patent doesn't mean that it works or is possible.

  • Like 2
Link to comment
Share on other sites

9 hours ago, Qubit said:

The craft has an inner and outer resonant cavity wall and a microwave emitter.

Isn't this just the EmDrive, which produced no thrust outside of the margin of error?

  • Like 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

10 hours ago, Hankenhunter said:

I'm still curious as to why they would be flying these things all over the world in high population areas, and sparsely populated areas as well. It makes no sense strategically, or from a security standpoint. 

Dress rehearsals.

  • Like 2
Link to comment
Share on other sites

3 hours ago, Trelane said:

"The US Military might be testing a new means of propulsion."

So is NASA, big deal.

Agreed. I would be shocked if they didnt.

  • Like 2
Link to comment
Share on other sites

16 hours ago, Qubit said:

 There are only two sides to the UAP world, which is either Aliens or some optical illusion. 

What are you talking about?!!

There could be hundreds of different mundane explanations for a UAP/UFO ... where ET (how ever small the chance might be) could be at the bottom of that very long list.

  • Like 2
Link to comment
Share on other sites

On 12/1/2024 at 4:17 AM, Timothy said:

My bold above.

I know you were replying to @Ell, but what you’re suggesting is quite misleading.

A granted patent doesn't mean that it works or is possible.

The Military is certainly looking into it: https://www.navair.navy.mil/foia/sites/g/files/jejdrs566/files/document/[filename]/2021-003244 FINAL VERSION PAX 205 - INERTIAL MASS REDUCTION DEVICE.pdf

Link to comment
Share on other sites

On 12/1/2024 at 7:00 AM, Trelane said:

"The US Military might be testing a new means of propulsion."

So is NASA, big deal.

You don't understand how big propulsion without propellant is, it would be way bigger than the internet revolution, it would be like reinventing the wheel but better.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

3 minutes ago, Qubit said:

You don't understand how big propulsion without propellant is, it would be way bigger than the internet revolution, it would be like reinventing the wheel but better.

Ok, And?

  • Like 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

4 hours ago, Trelane said:

Ok, And?

Another Trekkie.

  • Like 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

17 hours ago, Qubit said:

You don't understand how big propulsion without propellant is, it would be way bigger than the internet revolution, it would be like reinventing the wheel but better.

there will always be 'propellant' in 1 form or another.  Things cannot move without a form of energy.  Simple science.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

On 12/1/2024 at 4:09 AM, Qubit said:

but please take what I am about to tell you with a grain of salt

I will--- & it's a pinch of salt, not a grain..... bloody Americans😁

  • Haha 2
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    • No registered users viewing this page.