JFK files are reportedly going to be released shortly

[+Shooter McGavin]

Trump promised 9/11 declassification in his first term and didn't deliver. That one matters because it is recent. I wonder what is the hold up now?

[Alchopwn]

Bush Senior planned and executed the entire assassination.  He was head of the Dallas office of the CIA.  He was intimately involved in the Bay of Pigs fiasco.  American Arms corporations didn't want detente, and neither did the actual military.  Kennedy and Kruschev were both ambushed by hawks.

[Trelane]

8 hours ago, Alchopwn said:

Bush Senior planned and executed the entire assassination.  He was head of the Dallas office of the CIA.  He was intimately involved in the Bay of Pigs fiasco.  American Arms corporations didn't want detente, and neither did the actual military.  Kennedy and Kruschev were both ambushed by hawks.

How can you validate these statements? based on what documentation? If he was as you assert, a CIA officer involved, it would have been revealed during the the House Select Committee on Assassinations (HSCA) and the Church Committee. He was active in the Texas republican party during JFKs assassination and by 1966 had won a house seat. he only served as CIA director for one year. It stands to reason if he was as spooky as you claim, his tenure would have been a bit longer.

I know where you're pulling this from and that video has a lot of holes an inaccuracies.

Edited January 24 by Trelane

[Unusual Tournament]

22 hours ago, Shooter McGavin said:

Trump promised 9/11 declassification in his first term and didn't deliver. That one matters because it is recent. I wonder what is the hold up now?

TBH I think the public would much rather Trump release Epstein’s client list

[Earl.Of.Trumps]

Does anyone really think that the CIA is going to admit doing it??  🤣

[Tatetopa]

I don't think we do fact checking anymore because it is biased. At least that is what I have been hearing lately from the administration. 

[acidhead]

2 hours ago, Tatetopa said:

I don't think we do fact checking anymore because it is biased. At least that is what I have been hearing lately from the administration. 

There's no wrong or right - just popular opinion 

It's been that way since like forever 

[Golden Duck]

2 hours ago, Tatetopa said:

I don't think we do fact checking anymore because it is biased. At least that is what I have been hearing lately from the administration. 

Luckily we can always do our own.  Look for transcripts and read annual reports.  Except for leaks, you have just as much information as any journalist.

[Trelane]

I only want to know a few things. Who were the "Admirals and Generals " in the Bethesda autopsy ordering Dr. Humes what to do and not do (specifically why no dissection of the brain to illustrate wound entry/exit). The other item would be a full release of names for all CIA and FBI personnel assigned to or dispatched to Dallas that day.

Based on what we might see from those releases, I may have follow on items.

[Golden Duck]

1 hour ago, Trelane said:

I only want to know a few things. Who were the "Admirals and Generals " in the Bethesda autopsy ordering Dr. Humes what to do and not do (specifically why no dissection of the brain to illustrate wound entry/exit). The other item would be a full release of names for all CIA and FBI personnel assigned to or dispatched to Dallas that day.

Based on what we might see from those releases, I may have follow on items.

The scenario in Mortal Error is interesting.

Edited January 27 by Golden Duck

[Robotic Jew]

On 1/23/2025 at 11:49 PM, Shooter McGavin said:

Trump promised 9/11 declassification in his first term and didn't deliver. That one matters because it is recent. I wonder what is the hold up now?

Saudi money. Same thing that's always held it up. 

[Robotic Jew]

On 1/24/2025 at 10:04 PM, Unusual Tournament said:

TBH I think the public would much rather Trump release Epstein’s client list

And he won't do that. For obvious reasons. 

[LucidElement]

On 1/27/2025 at 4:01 PM, Robotic Jew said:

And he won't do that. For obvious reasons. 

Lol sounds like I know who you may have voted for 😆.

But back to the topic at hand.  I’m just hoping the JFK release will not be completely redacted .  

Someone had said something to me the other night along the lines of, “Perhaps Trump is releasing this info to show the corruption within the CIA and FBI during the that time of JFKs assassination. (Who Knows)  ,

However, before anymore wormholes need to open , let’s just see what we get within the next 45 days , if any .

MiLK and RFK we know the shooter and the reasoning .   JFK we don’t know jack diddly!
 

 

Edited January 30 by LucidElement

[Golden Duck]

2 hours ago, LucidElement said:

Lol sounds like I know who you may have voted for 😆.

But back to the topic at hand.  I’m just hoping the JFK release will not be completely redacted .  

Someone had said something to me the other night along the lines of, “Perhaps Trump is releasing this info to show the corruption within the CIA and FBI during the that time of JFKs assassination. (Who Knows)  ,

However, before anymore wormholes need to open , let’s just see what we get within the next 45 days , if any .

MiLK and RFK we know the shooter and the reasoning .   JFK we don’t know jack diddly!

Or a cover-up in the SS.

[Robotic Jew]

8 hours ago, LucidElement said:

Lol sounds like I know who you may have voted for 😆.

But back to the topic at hand.  I’m just hoping the JFK release will not be completely redacted .  

Someone had said something to me the other night along the lines of, “Perhaps Trump is releasing this info to show the corruption within the CIA and FBI during the that time of JFKs assassination. (Who Knows)  ,

However, before anymore wormholes need to open , let’s just see what we get within the next 45 days , if any .

MiLK and RFK we know the shooter and the reasoning .   JFK we don’t know jack diddly!
 

 

Are you denying that trump's name has been tied to epstein multiple times in the small amount of information that has been released?

People who have seen the JFK files say they don't show anything outrageous or "ground breaking" and that people will be disappointed if they're looking for confirmation of any conspiracy theories. 

My guess is it's classified to save face for the CIA and the FBI for having eyes on Oswald before the assassination and not following up properly or something to that account. 

[Sir Wearer of Hats]

7 hours ago, Robotic Jew said:

Are you denying that trump's name has been tied to epstein multiple times in the small amount of information that has been released?

People who have seen the JFK files say they don't show anything outrageous or "ground breaking" and that people will be disappointed if they're looking for confirmation of any conspiracy theories. 

My guess is it's classified to save face for the CIA and the FBI for having eyes on Oswald before the assassination and not following up properly or something to that account. 

That’s the famous JFK conspiracy theorist joke… a JKF CT dies and goes to Heaven, God meets him and tells him God’s willing to set his mind at ease so he can let go of all Earthly concerns and He’ll answer any and all of the CT’s questions. The CT asks “who killed JFK?” And God says “Oswald”. The CT mutters to himself “the conspiracy goes higher than I thought”.

[Zebra3]

BREAKING NEWS Head of JFK task force says there were TWO shooters in assassination

The Florida Republican added that her investigation into JFK's assassination will be more comprehensive than past efforts.

'In previous investigations, they didn't have access to the information that we are going to have access to, and so that's a big deal, especially if you're looking at what truly happened with JFK,' the 35-year-old continued.

She also dropped a bombshell about her personal beliefs about JFK's 1963 murder: 'I believe that there were two shooters, and we should be finding more information as we are able to.'

 

Guess we'll see what's leading to her personal beliefs.

Edited February 11 by Zebra3

[Golden Duck]

Nothing about this on her site.

https://luna.house.gov/

It raises the apprehension this is an agenda driven exercise. 

[+OverSword]

Okay I found them

[Sir Wearer of Hats]

1 hour ago, Zebra3 said:

BREAKING NEWS Head of JFK task force says there were TWO shooters in assassination

The Florida Republican added that her investigation into JFK's assassination will be more comprehensive than past efforts.

'In previous investigations, they didn't have access to the information that we are going to have access to, and so that's a big deal, especially if you're looking at what truly happened with JFK,' the 35-year-old continued.

She also dropped a bombshell about her personal beliefs about JFK's 1963 murder: 'I believe that there were two shooters, and we should be finding more information as we are able to.'

 

Guess we'll see what's leading to her personal beliefs.

Two shooters is a prevailing theory ATM, it came up in the recent Ross Coultart interview he did. 

 

[Wickian]

On 1/22/2025 at 8:43 PM, Occupational Hubris said:

you shouldn't use a nazi website as a source 

You do realize that even the ADL said Elon didn't make a nazi salute right?

[+DieChecker]

https://apnews.com/article/jfk-fbi-trump-newly-discovered-files-0bd8ad5569f5fa3ed92b8ee9b795c9e7

Quote

DALLAS (AP) — The FBI on Tuesday said it discovered 2,400 new records related to the assassination of President John F. Kennedy as federal agencies work to comply with President Donald Trump's executive order last month to release thousands of files.

And this made me LOL.

Quote

“It shows that the FBI is serious about being transparent,” said Morley, who is also editor of the JFK Facts blog.

Transparent? Trump wrote an order. They don't really get a choice.

[Portre]

When will they release the stolen 2020 election evidence?