Still Waters Posted February 17 #1 Share Posted February 17 A recent study by Dr. Albert Jambon and his colleagues, published in the Journal of Archaeological Science: Reports, revealed the presence of meteoric iron in Early Iron Age ornaments in Poland. According to Dr. Jambon, the study was prompted by the desire to know the origin of iron smelting. "The point of my research is to find out who, when, and where the iron smelting was discovered. To that end, we need to analyze archaeological irons and check whether they are meteoritic or smelted." To do this, two Early Iron Age cemeteries and their iron artifacts, Częstochowa-Raków and Częstochowa-Mirów, both located in southern Poland, were analyzed. https://phys.org/news/2025-02-meteoric-iron-early-age-artifacts.html 4 1 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Piney Posted February 17 #2 Share Posted February 17 They switched to iron because trade networks collapsed and meteoric iron is easy to work and laying around the Baltic. High quality bronze was actually stronger than iron. 3 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Abramelin Posted February 17 #3 Share Posted February 17 (edited) 23 minutes ago, Piney said: They switched to iron because trade networks collapsed and meteoric iron is easy to work and laying around the Baltic. High quality bronze was actually stronger than iron. You can wonder whether the bolid creating the Kaali Crater (Estonia) was part of a swarm. Some of that swarm may have impacted in Poland, and found centuries later. Edited February 17 by Abramelin 1 1 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Piney Posted February 17 #4 Share Posted February 17 8 minutes ago, Abramelin said: You can wonder whether the bolid creating the Kaali Crater (Estonia) was part of a swarm. Some of that swarm may have impacted in Poland, and found centuries later. That's what it was. But more of a breakup than swarm. Good lookin! 🤙 1 1 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Abramelin Posted February 17 #5 Share Posted February 17 11 minutes ago, Piney said: That's what it was. But more of a breakup than swarm. Good lookin! 🤙 Yep. A larger body breaking up, creating a swarm of impactors. 1 1 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Piney Posted February 17 #6 Share Posted February 17 3 minutes ago, Abramelin said: Yep. A larger body breaking up, creating a swarm of impactors. Or a bollide shattering to pieces on impact creating a strewnfield. Which is what I was about. The Chesapeake Bay strewnfield crosses Texas. 2 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Create an account or sign in to comment
You need to be a member in order to leave a comment
Create an account
Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!
Register a new accountSign in
Already have an account? Sign in here.
Sign In Now