TheSearcher Posted March 10, 2010 #1226 Share Posted March 10, 2010 (edited) It would be more correct to say they are creating the pyramid, rather then digging it up. All the stones they have found that look like layers of a pyramid, were in fact layers... of sedimentary stone, some with fossils in them. I'm still thinking they are hills that were smoothed out to allow for better fields of fire from the Roman fortress that was at the top. The only cut stones that have been found stacked are for foundations of ancient buildings built at the base of the hills. Some of which were called "Entrances", but had no doors, archways, tunnels or other indications they were entrances, other then old Semir said so. The tunnels were said to be from military exercises, when they were first mentioned, but now are suggested to be as ancient as the "pyramids". Yet the tunnels are of crumbling stone and not well supported, and so in 10000, or 2000 or 200 years, they should have caved in by now. XY. Please read the entire thread. You will either be fully Fanaticized or a complete skeptic of these pyramids by the end. I like the idea of a better field of fire, it makes sense when you know the normal roman procedures for their military camps. I have merged the 2 threads. Please remember, resurrecting an old thread can even have it's benefits if something new and relevant is brought to the table. Yes, oh wise one. We hear and obey. Edited March 10, 2010 by TheSearcher Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Create an account or sign in to comment
You need to be a member in order to leave a comment
Create an account
Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!Register a new account
Already have an account? Sign in here.Sign In Now