UM-Bot Posted December 3, 2005 #1 Share Posted December 3, 2005 Image credit: stockxpert (With pics) A backpacker from Vancouver, Washington, took these photos on Silver Star Mountain in Gifford Pinchot National Forest on November 17. He says he doesn't know what the figure was, but he does not believe it was another hiker or backpacker. The photos are inconclusive, but they are potentially relevant. The figure you see could be a sasquatch. The silhouette is comparable to the lanky silhouette in the Marble Mountains footage. It also looks similar to some eyewitness sketches. View: Full Article | Source: BFRO.net Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Welsh Shaun Posted December 3, 2005 #2 Share Posted December 3, 2005 Shame they couldnt get to the footprints? or follow it. But that would mean finding the truth That would spoil the whole mystery wouldnt it? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
darkknight Posted December 3, 2005 #3 Share Posted December 3, 2005 The size might be very big, and possibly off the chart for a human. The camera positions will be easy to re-establish, along with the horizontal and vertical position on the ridge. The exact distance will be hard to determine and re-create with accuracy. interesting' photo is quite good.... Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Boo_ Boi Posted December 3, 2005 #4 Share Posted December 3, 2005 Wow they are really clear but why didnt they follow Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Celt Posted December 3, 2005 #5 Share Posted December 3, 2005 That looks like a cuff on the left wrist. Why did no one follow 'it'? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
frogfish Posted December 3, 2005 #6 Share Posted December 3, 2005 Knothere made a good point in the other thread about this that he checked the Information of the picture, and the camera was on 24 mm...the basic "zoom". So why didn't the witness zoom in when taking the pictures? I think the person couldn't follow it because in the article, they say that area is ahr to traverse, and in the foreground, you can see a rocky outcropping close to the witness (in pic). Maybe that prevented him from getting closer...also he could of been in fear....just my 2 cents worth... Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
ImAnAlienWa8iD Posted December 4, 2005 #7 Share Posted December 4, 2005 (edited) I would have taken a sniper rifle to it's head. Then we'd have proof, solid, dead weight evidence. If it was a hoaxer then he shouldnt have been messing around. Just kidding. Who else thinks this is a craptastic hoax? I will be the first to sign - HOAX Edited December 4, 2005 by ImAnAlienWa8iD Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
mike^_^ Posted December 4, 2005 #8 Share Posted December 4, 2005 if im up on some mountain, freezing cold, and I see some (perceived) sasquatch, i sure as hell won't be chasing after it Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
~Alex Posted December 4, 2005 #9 Share Posted December 4, 2005 I don't buy it. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Mr. Blonde Posted December 4, 2005 #10 Share Posted December 4, 2005 I love that picture, it makes me think hes a wonderful lone wanderer of the land. What a loveable character, haha. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
frogfish Posted December 4, 2005 #11 Share Posted December 4, 2005 I' neutral on the pic....good pic, but not enough.... Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
QueryAnalyzer Posted December 4, 2005 #12 Share Posted December 4, 2005 (edited) The mystery would remain. That photo is useless , the mystery would only become bigger. Edited December 4, 2005 by QueryAnalyzer Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
__Kratos__ Posted December 4, 2005 #13 Share Posted December 4, 2005 Hmm... messing with one of the pictures... A hiker or anybody up that high, in the cold... why doesn't the figure have a backpack or sack on their back? Posture is ackward. The general outline can be screwd up with layers of clothing (as it is freakin cold there) so... that's out. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
ImAnAlienWa8iD Posted December 4, 2005 #14 Share Posted December 4, 2005 thats exactly what they did this hoax for. to keep believers on their toes. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Atlantean Posted December 4, 2005 #15 Share Posted December 4, 2005 Hmmmmm....I dunno... I know one thing, if I were the cameraman, I would have been in full pursuit, even if it ended up being the death of me! After all, short of dying in the process, the dead-or-alive carcass would have been worth way, way more than a couple of grainy images. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
ImAnAlienWa8iD Posted December 4, 2005 #16 Share Posted December 4, 2005 me too , that thing could smash my head. if it's smart enough to take the camera and smash it up then we definitely need to capture one of these things. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Mad Manfred Posted December 4, 2005 #17 Share Posted December 4, 2005 Hmm... messing with one of the pictures... A hiker or anybody up that high, in the cold... why doesn't the figure have a backpack or sack on their back? Posture is ackward. The general outline can be screwd up with layers of clothing (as it is freakin cold there) so... that's out. I don't see anything wrong with the posture. He looks slightly hunched...like a man walking in the snow. What I see is someone with perhaps a beanie on and a large, tight, but baggy jacket on with a hood bunched up at the back. *drum roll* Deeeeebunked! *takes a bow* Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Atlantean Posted December 4, 2005 #18 Share Posted December 4, 2005 Ok, I've been taking a closer look at the images and I need some feedback. Focus your attention on the snow encircled on the above image. The snow seems to have been disturbed in this area. Can anyone determine if there is any symmetry in those distrubances? Might be some footprints there. If that is foot traffic, whose feet caused it? Bigfoot or hoaxers getting into position? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Boff Posted December 4, 2005 #19 Share Posted December 4, 2005 Looks pretty real to me.. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Welsh Shaun Posted December 4, 2005 #20 Share Posted December 4, 2005 Ok, I've been taking a closer look at the images and I need some feedback. Focus your attention on the snow encircled on the above image. The snow seems to have been disturbed in this area. Can anyone determine if there is any symmetry in those distrubances? Might be some footprints there. If that is foot traffic, whose feet caused it? Bigfoot or hoaxers getting into position? Well spotted. But you cannot tell whether they are footprints. They do look like some sort of track, left by what I dont know. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Pandora7321 Posted December 12, 2005 #21 Share Posted December 12, 2005 How come NO ONE ever gets a good shot of ANYTHING ever?? EVER!! Bigfoot never runs across camera crew trying to film a documentary. UFO's never fly by when the news crew is out doing traffic. Noooooooo....... Then again we probably have seen countless clear shots of bigfoot, ufo's and ghosts and we all call PHOTOSHOP. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Create an account or sign in to comment
You need to be a member in order to leave a comment
Create an account
Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!
Register a new accountSign in
Already have an account? Sign in here.
Sign In Now