Raistlin Majere 0 #26 Posted December 2, 2004 They're not Alien skulls. The first was a baby with a birth defect, the second is the skull of an ancient tribe who practiced elongating their skulls by restricting the growth of the skull in their children, thus making the skulls grow outward. Both real, however both not Aliens. History Channel tells all! Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
Dando Kast 0 #27 Posted December 31, 2004 are there any thoughts on the third skull (alien star child)? Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
cor_raven 0 #28 Posted January 3, 2005 YOU killed beldar cone head you b****** Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
Bone_Collector 3 #29 Posted January 3, 2005 Deformed real skulls: yes, Alien skulls: definitely no. I know a guy who lives right next door in my apartment, he's 3 1/2 feet tall and has an extremely odd shaped head. His skull would be much similar to the third skull. So, would that make him alien? Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
riotboy555 2 #30 Posted January 3, 2005 i saw the discovery channel debunk the first one, and the second, looks like the skull of twins conjoined at the head. Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
