soulfire78 Posted October 24, 2003 #26 Share Posted October 24, 2003 Seeing that even the functions of the cells in our own bodies are unexplained, I'd say I'm an open minded skeptic. Theories must be posed on any given mystery so that the mind is prompted to question further, to ask, "what is next?" Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
fletch Posted October 24, 2003 #27 Share Posted October 24, 2003 I like to think that I am a believer to a point. I also like to stick to the facts and have definitive proof before making a judgement Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
thepsychoticseaotter Posted October 24, 2003 #28 Share Posted October 24, 2003 I would call myself a skeptical believer, I buy hauntings and such since I have seen things first hand. I cannot buy Gov conspiricies, or alien abductions since they are so easily faked and so widespread to be obviously sick cries for attention. any way thats my 2 cent ramble. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Great Big Sea Posted December 15, 2003 #29 Share Posted December 15, 2003 I'm a believer, of the supernatural and the paranormal, my friend M (from Alberta Canada) said she believed in ghosts but not the parnoramal she contradicted herself. But I'm not going to convince anyone of ghosts exsistence. But I do have my own proof that I prooved to myself. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Lung Posted December 15, 2003 #30 Share Posted December 15, 2003 I'm a believer, of the supernatural and the paranormal, my friend M (from Alberta Canada) said she believed in ghosts but not the parnoramal she contradicted herself. But I'm not going to convince anyone of ghosts exsistence. But I do have my own proof that I prooved to myself. How can anyone dispute that? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
crosswarrior Posted December 15, 2003 #31 Share Posted December 15, 2003 I am going to put my self down as the skeptic who wnts to believe. I don't reject stuff right off the bat, but neither do i accept it completely at first either. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Xenojjin Posted December 15, 2003 #32 Share Posted December 15, 2003 Believer in some cases that seem possible but a skeptic to things that seemingly come out of nowhere ( AKA sounds like some kid thought it up ) . Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
bathory Posted December 15, 2003 #33 Share Posted December 15, 2003 a little from column A a little from column B Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
moe eubleck Posted December 15, 2003 #34 Share Posted December 15, 2003 I am a believer in the fact that I am a skeptic. But I dont always believe other skeptics. At times, I tend to be skeptical about believers. I firmly believe that believers actually believe some of the more ridiculous beliefs out there while skeptics remain skeptical. But are skeptics skeptical about thier own skeptic beliefs? Of this, Moe believes he is a skeptic. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
kreestar Posted December 16, 2003 #35 Share Posted December 16, 2003 I'm a believer...doo doo doo doo doo. Very Sorry. Unless their claims seems outrageous or they can't spell what they are trying to talk about. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Scorpius Posted December 29, 2003 #36 Share Posted December 29, 2003 From what i understand, the unexplained-mysteries TV show, discusses and presents these mysteries that have existed for many years and have not been explained, hence the title "Unexplained-mysteries". In addition, it demonstrates many stories and claims of certain paranormal and psychic phenomenon that seems to be quite authentic and true. To the mere skeptic, one could immediately dismiss these as part of an elaborate scheme for the producers to profit from. However, there are facts to these and one cannot deny what is known, otherwise you would be in a state of denial, and to deny what is real is to deny your own existance. To the mere believer, one could immediately approve of all topics and claims that have been demonstrated and shown, without analyzing the facts from the fiction. And from the perspective of a skeptic, one could simply judge a believer as a gullable "nut-case". To the fair and open-minded, one could completely analyze the facts from the fiction, and gather his or her own educated judgements, with such logic and clarification, that neither the believer nor the skeptic can dismiss. And this is where i stand, neither ying nor yang, but generally inbetween. "To believe something unbelievable is simply "unbelievable", and to believe something believable is simply "believable"--or is it?" Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Create an account or sign in to comment
You need to be a member in order to leave a comment
Create an account
Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!
Register a new accountSign in
Already have an account? Sign in here.
Sign In Now