et's daddy Posted March 5, 2006 #1 Share Posted March 5, 2006 WASHINGTON -- The Army said Saturday it will launch a criminal investigation into the April 2004 death of Pat Tillman, the former professional football player who was shot to death by fellow soldiers in Afghanistan in what previous Army reviews had concluded was an accidental shooting. Col. Joseph Curtin, an Army spokesman, said the Defense Department office of inspector general had reviewed the matter at the Army's request and concluded that a criminal probe was warranted. Members of the Tillman family were notified on Friday, Curtin said. Curtin said the scope of the new investigation by the Army Criminal Investigation Command, had not yet been determined in detail. Members of the Tillman family were notified on Friday, Curtin said. In the past, Tillman's father, Patrick Tillman, and other family members have criticized the Army and its investigations. "We are obligated to answer the family's questions, as we are with all grieving families,'' Curtin said. Curtin said the scope of the new investigation by the Army Criminal Investigation Command had not yet been determined in detail. A Pentagon official, who spoke on condition of anonymity because the new investigation has not been formally begun, said it would focus on possible charges of negligent homicide. Tillman, 27, died on April 22, 2004, when he was struck by gunfire during a firefight along a canyon road near the Pakistan-Afghanistan border. The Army said at the time that the barrage of bullets came from enemy fire. A report by the Army later found that troops with Tillman knew at the time that friendly fire had killed the football star. Officers destroyed critical evidence and concealed the truth from Tillman's brother, also an Army Ranger, who was nearby, the report found. More than three weeks after a memorial service in San Jose, Calif., the Army announced on May 29, 2004, that friendly fire rather than an enemy encounter caused Tillman's death. However, even at the time of the memorial, top Army officials were aware that the investigation showed the death had been caused by an act of "gross negligence,'' the report said. In spite of the Army's findings, the officer who prepared the report, Brig. Gen. Gary M. Jones, concluded there was no official reluctance to report the truth. Army officials have acknowledged that they should have better handled the information they released on Tillman's death. Tillman joined the Army after the Sept. 11, 2001, terror attacks even though he had a multimillion-dollar contract to play football for the Arizona Cardinals. He and his brother completed a tour in Iraq before going to Afghanistan. http://sports.espn.go.com/nfl/news/story?id=2354510 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Stellar Posted March 5, 2006 #2 Share Posted March 5, 2006 Just heard it 30 seconds ago on TV... Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
KingTomis Posted March 5, 2006 #3 Share Posted March 5, 2006 A very sad story for someone I view as a true American hero and a man to be held in the highest respect. The army f'd up big time when it came to informing his family and something should be done about it. As for homicide? Murder? It sucks, but sh** happens in combat. sh** happened. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Birmingham Posted March 5, 2006 #4 Share Posted March 5, 2006 Concerning the distruction of his uniform and body armor, what is the standard operating proceadure for disposing of the personal equiptment of a soldier killed in action. I know that was common in WWII, but what do they do now? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Stellar Posted March 5, 2006 #5 Share Posted March 5, 2006 Im not quite sure what you mean? The uniform and the body armor was no longer servicable. I figure they did to it exactly what they do with other NS items (or maybe they didnt just leave it lying around and DIDNT give it to the next poor troop that needed it issued to them... but that would be a special case ) Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Birmingham Posted March 5, 2006 #6 Share Posted March 5, 2006 I'm sorry Stellar I was not clearer. In some theatres of WWII they burned the uniforms of dead soldiers, while in other areas the uniforms were patched, cleaned and reissued. If burning the uniforms are now the S.O.P. it would eliminate any conspiracy therorys that the Army was trying to destroy evidence. As you know, anything out of the normal would be jumped on as a plot by some people here. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
et's daddy Posted March 5, 2006 Author #7 Share Posted March 5, 2006 I'm sorry Stellar I was not clearer. In some theatres of WWII they burned the uniforms of dead soldiers, while in other areas the uniforms were patched, cleaned and reissued. If burning the uniforms are now the S.O.P. it would eliminate any conspiracy therorys that the Army was trying to destroy evidence. As you know, anything out of the normal would be jumped on as a plot by some people here. they would not just sew a uniform and reissue it the body armor is the property of the unit not the soldier so it would have been returned to the unit, if completely unservicable it would have been destroyed Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Unlimited Posted March 8, 2006 #8 Share Posted March 8, 2006 This wouldnt even be an issue except he was a football player..mistakes happen in wars it's a shame but let the dead rest. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
et's daddy Posted March 8, 2006 Author #9 Share Posted March 8, 2006 This wouldnt even be an issue except he was a football player..mistakes happen in wars it's a shame but let the dead rest. im not so sure the gov is going to be very careful to not look stupid must be big if they reopened it and yeahhhhhhhhh i have the 1st thread in the new section Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
timewarrior Posted August 9, 2016 #10 Share Posted August 9, 2016 The official DoD OIG report on this matter is online. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Create an account or sign in to comment
You need to be a member in order to leave a comment
Create an account
Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!
Register a new accountSign in
Already have an account? Sign in here.
Sign In Now