Jump to content
Join the Unexplained Mysteries community today! It's free and setting up an account only takes a moment.
- Sign In or Create Account -
Lottie

Collapse of the WTC Towers - Official Story..

32 posts in this topic

Recommended Posts

AztecInca

Thank-you to both our debaters, you both did a fantastic job!

I shall now hand this debate over to the debate judges. :tu:

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
 
TooFarGone

Debater 1: aquatus1

Relevancy: 9

Countering: 8

Style: 10

Persuasiveness: 10

Total: 37

Debater 2: Sunofone

Relevancy: 8

Countering: 5

Style: 5

Persuasiveness: 6

Total: 24

EDIT: Forgot to comment :P

Great job to both. Sunofone, for future debates please try to capitalize, and use spell check. These are just simple things, and make a world of difference in the score you receive

Edited by TooFarGone

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Sunofone

congrats to A1-- i guess that flowery mental imagery thing worked out for you-- i guess "the truth" is irrelavent

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
TooFarGone

The judging isnt over......

Edited by TooFarGone

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
__Kratos__

Debater 1: aquatus1

Relevancy: 9

Countering: 10

Style: 9

Persuasiveness: 10

Total: 38

Debater 2: Sunofone

Relevancy: 9

Countering: 10

Style: 7

Persuasiveness: 8

Total: 34

Great debate the both of you. Lots of information from both sides and a wealth of personal knowledge thrown in to your posts. I hope to see both of you sometime in the future for other debates. :tu:

If you have any questions or concerns, feel free to PM AztecInca or tiddlyjen.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
thebarman

Great debate, both stayed pretty relevant throughout however I felt the gold/feathers argument a little unnecessary, no doubt it was an accurate analogy of conspiracy theory tactics but it didn't really add much to the conclusion.

Apart from that small detail I thought aquatus1 was the stronger debater, I cannot find fault with neither countering ability nor persuasiveness.

Style was very strong for both sides, good use of illustrations and technical knowledge although I must reiterate the point about the spell checker, it certainly takes away some credibility when claiming to be knowledgable about a subject when key words are spelled incorrectly.

Debater 1: aquatus1

Relevancy: 8

Countering: 10

Style: 9

Persuasiveness: 10

Total: 37

Debater 2: Sunofone

Relevancy: 9

Countering: 5

Style: 7

Persuasiveness: 6

Total: 27

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
AztecInca

aquatus1 wins this debate with a final score of 37.3.

Sunofone finishes this debate with a final score of 28.3.

Well done to both our debaters, you both did an excellent job. :tu:

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Guest
This topic is now closed to further replies.

  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    No registered users viewing this page.