Jump to content
Join the Unexplained Mysteries community today! It's free and setting up an account only takes a moment.
- Sign In or Create Account -

British officer jailed for refusing to go to


Recommended Posts

ALDERSHOT (Reuters) - A British Air Force doctor was sentenced to eight months jail on Thursday for refusing orders to go to Iraq.

Australian-born Flight-Lieutenant Malcolm Kendall-Smith, 37, was convicted by a five-member panel of officers of what the judge called "calculated and deliberate disobedience" of five orders to train, prepare and deploy to Iraq last year.

Kendall-Smith said he viewed the war as a crime and could not participate in any form.

But judge Jack Bayliss ruled British troops were in Iraq in 2005 with the permission of the United Nations, and that Kendall-Smith's view of the war's legality was no defense.

"Obedience to orders is at the heart of any disciplined force. Refusal to obey orders means that force is not a disciplined force but a rabble," he said.

"Those who wear the queen's uniform cannot pick and choose the orders they follow."

His lawyer, Philip Sapsford, described him as a "man of great moral courage" who had taken his step out of principle.

But Bayliss said Kendall-Smith had had the opportunity to resign from the military earlier if he opposed the war.

"If they disagree with the moral position of the government, the recourse of an officer in a volunteer service is to do the honorable thing and to request to resign and to give his reasons," he said.

"You didn't ask to resign. You continued to draw your not-inconsiderable salary."

During the tense two-day court martial, on a base in southern England, Kendall-Smith, who has dual British-New Zealand citizenship, testified on his own behalf. He was the only witness to be called.

In frequently abrasive exchanges from the witness stand, he described the United States as the moral equivalent of Nazi Germany, and the prosecutors themselves as complicit in crimes.

As an officer, he must serve his prison term in a civilian jail. He was also expelled from the Air Force and ordered to pay 20,000 pounds toward the cost of his defense.

In passing down his sentence, the judge said Kendall-Smith's own testimony had hurt his case.

"You have in the view of this court sought to make a martyr of yourself," he said. "You have shown a degree of arrogance which is amazing."

The case was the first of its kind in Britain, with war opponents viewing it as a landmark test of whether the decision to invade Iraq in 2003 was lawful.

But Bayliss ruled before the trial began that the question of the legality of the invasion itself was irrelevant, and that British troops had a right to be in Iraq in 2005 under U.N. resolutions passed after the fall of Saddam Hussein.

Defense lawyer Justin Hugheston-Roberts issued a statement after the verdict, saying Kendall-Smith would appeal.

"He feels that his actions were totally justified and he would not, if placed in the same circumstances, seek to do anything differently," he added.



If he had just resigned it wouldn't have been that big of a deal.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Replies 6
  • Created
  • Last Reply

Top Posters In This Topic

  • PadawanOsswe


  • aquatus1


  • twpdyp


  • __Kratos__


Top Posters In This Topic

He can feel however he likes, but if he can't convince the court that his feelings were in keeping with the law, then his feelings mean bupkus. The man is a military officer, he draws military pay, he gets military benifits, and he took an oath to carry out the orders given to him. It doesn't matter if he was ordered to go to war, to beat a restrained prisoner, or to kick a puppy; if he refuses to follow an order, he damn well better be able to show that it wasn't a lawful order.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Bravo to the British Military. I will never understand why someone would sign up for military service and then get squeemish about going into combat. What is it they do not understand about the military? If I could offer an analogy it is like becoming a Formula 1 race car driver and then complaining that the cars go to fast.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Exactly. what part about the word Military do people not get? :huh:

Edited by PadawanOsswe
Link to comment
Share on other sites

In frequently abrasive exchanges from the witness stand, he described the United States as the moral equivalent of Nazi Germany, and the prosecutors themselves as complicit in crimes.

This seems to sum him up in my opinion. I can understand that he feels the war is unjust or illegal we all have differing opinion on issues but if you serve in the military you follow orders unless there is a damn good reason not to.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I believe everyone has a choice..

Unless there are obvious reasons to disobey an order I would stick by him and his decision. Him classing the war as a crime is not justified, many military personal in Iraq and Afghanistan will probably feel the same but they get on with their job.

This guy has been happy to take the tax payers money and when he has to justify his role he decides to bail out..

Hell he is an Air force Doctor, it is not like he was going to the front lines of a real War..

Link to comment
Share on other sites

imagine him in a civilian medical carreer.

surgeon1: "There's the kidney Doctor,now to remove it!"

Doctor: "No way am I touching that,I didnt go to med school to operate on people!"


Link to comment
Share on other sites

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    • No registered users viewing this page.