Waspie_Dwarf Posted May 25, 2006 #1 Share Posted May 25, 2006 Scientists Predict How to Detect a Fourth Dimension of Space The Duke University press release is reproduced below:New theory of gravity challenges Einstein's general relativityThursday, May 25, 2006 Durham, N.C. -- Scientists at Duke and Rutgers universities have developed a mathematical framework they say will enable astronomers to test a new five-dimensional theory of gravity that competes with Einstein's General Theory of Relativity Charles R. Keeton of Rutgers and Arlie O. Petters of Duke base their work on a recent theory called the type II Randall-Sundrum braneworld gravity model. The theory holds that the visible universe is a membrane (hence "braneworld") embedded within a larger universe, much like a strand of filmy seaweed floating in the ocean. The "braneworld universe" has five dimensions -- four spatial dimensions plus time -- compared with the four dimensions -- three spatial, plus time -- laid out in the General Theory of Relativity. The framework Keeton and Petters developed predicts certain cosmological effects that, if observed, should help scientists validate the braneworld theory. The observations, they said, should be possible with satellites scheduled to launch in the next few years. If the braneworld theory proves to be true, "this would upset the applecart," Petters said. "It would confirm that there is a fourth dimension to space, which would create a philosophical shift in our understanding of the natural world." The scientists' findings appeared May 24, 2006, in the online edition of the journal Physical Review D. Keeton is an astronomy and physics professor at Rutgers, and Petters is a mathematics and physics professor at Duke. Their research is funded by the National Science Foundation. The Randall-Sundrum braneworld model -- named for its originators, physicists Lisa Randall of Harvard University and Raman Sundrum of Johns Hopkins University -- provides a mathematical description of how gravity shapes the universe that differs from the description offered by the General Theory of Relativity. Keeton and Petters focused on one particular gravitational consequence of the braneworld theory that distinguishes it from Einstein's theory. The braneworld theory predicts that relatively small "black holes" created in the early universe have survived to the present. The black holes, with mass similar to a tiny asteroid, would be part of the "dark matter" in the universe. As the name suggests, dark matter does not emit or reflect light, but does exert a gravitational force. The General Theory of Relativity, on the other hand, predicts that such primordial black holes no longer exist, as they would have evaporated by now. "When we estimated how far braneworld black holes might be from Earth, we were surprised to find that the nearest ones would lie well inside Pluto's orbit," Keeton said. Petters added, "If braneworld black holes form even 1 percent of the dark matter in our part of the galaxy -- a cautious assumption -- there should be several thousand braneworld black holes in our solar system." But do braneworld black holes really exist -- and therefore stand as evidence for the 5-D braneworld theory? The scientists showed that it should be possible to answer this question by observing the effects that braneworld black holes would exert on electromagnetic radiation traveling to Earth from other galaxies. Any such radiation passing near a black hole will be acted upon by the object's tremendous gravitational forces -- an effect called "gravitational lensing." "A good place to look for gravitational lensing by braneworld black holes is in bursts of gamma rays coming to Earth," Keeton said. These gamma-ray bursts are thought to be produced by enormous explosions throughout the universe. Such bursts from outer space were discovered inadvertently by the U.S. Air Force in the 1960s. Keeton and Petters calculated that braneworld black holes would impede the gamma rays in the same way a rock in a pond obstructs passing ripples. The rock produces an "interference pattern" in its wake in which some ripple peaks are higher, some troughs are deeper, and some peaks and troughs cancel each other out. The interference pattern bears the signature of the characteristics of both the rock and the water. Similarly, a braneworld black hole would produce an interference pattern in a passing burst of gamma rays as they travel to Earth, said Keeton and Petters. The scientists predicted the resulting bright and dark "fringes" in the interference pattern, which they said provides a means of inferring characteristics of braneworld black holes and, in turn, of space and time. "We discovered that the signature of a fourth dimension of space appears in the interference patterns," Petters said. "This extra spatial dimension creates a contraction between the fringes compared to what you'd get in General Relativity." Petters and Keeton said it should be possible to measure the predicted gamma-ray fringe patterns using the Gamma-ray Large Area Space Telescope, which is scheduled to be launched on a spacecraft in August 2007. The telescope is a joint effort between NASA, the U.S. Department of Energy, and institutions in France, Germany, Japan, Italy and Sweden. The scientists said their prediction would apply to all braneworld black holes, whether in our solar system or beyond. "If the braneworld theory is correct," they said, "there should be many, many more braneworld black holes throughout the universe, each carrying the signature of a fourth dimension of space."Source: Duke University press release Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Celumnaz Posted May 25, 2006 #2 Share Posted May 25, 2006 What's the 4th spatial dimension called and what does it measure? Length, Width, Height, _______, and Time. Some kind of aperture? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Waspie_Dwarf Posted May 25, 2006 Author #3 Share Posted May 25, 2006 What's the 4th spatial dimension called and what does it measure? Length, Width, Height, _______, and Time. Some kind of aperture? It would be like length, width and height but it is at 90 degrees to them. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Celumnaz Posted May 26, 2006 #4 Share Posted May 26, 2006 I guess we don't know what it's called or what it would measure. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
TeraLink Posted May 26, 2006 #5 Share Posted May 26, 2006 I guess we don't know what it's called or what it would measure. Any name would do, just like those guys that discovered the fifth state of matter, the soquid. Link here. TeraLink Was Here! Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
D.vandyke Posted June 9, 2006 #6 Share Posted June 9, 2006 What's the 4th spatial dimension called and what does it measure? Length, Width, Height, _______, and Time. Some kind of aperture? Since everything within the interior of the black hole will hit the singularity within a fixed finite time, the part which is traced over partially might "disappear", never to appear again. Of course, we don't really know what goes on at singularities once quantum effects are taken into account, which is why this is conjectural and controversial. An example is the duality between Type IIB string theory defined on AdS5 × S5 space (a product of five dimensional AdS space with a five dimensional sphere) and a supersymmetric N=4 Yang-Mills gauge theory defined on the 4-dimensional boundary of AdS5. It is the most successfully tested realization of the holographic principle, a speculative idea about quantum gravity originally proposed by Gerard 't Hooft and improved and promoted by Leonard Susskind. The AdS/CFT correspondence was originally proposed by Juan Maldacena in late 1997. Some of its technical properties were soon clarified in an article by Edward Witten and another article by Gubser, Klebanov, and Polyakov. The correspondence has also been generalized and applied to many other (non-AdS) backgrounds or (non-conformal) theories. In about five years, Maldacena's article had 3000 citations and became one of the most obvious conceptual breakthroughs in theoretical physics of the 1990s, providing stark new insight into both quantum gravity and QCD. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Celumnaz Posted June 9, 2006 #7 Share Posted June 9, 2006 A measure of "Reality", or "Existance/Being", or maybe more towards "Observance of Exsistance"? Or more "Distance from Singularity" that provides a warp in the plane of time causing/allowing the formation of the other 3 dimensions? Or is that off? Pretend I'm 13, this is a diverse board and a cool subject. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Avinash_Tyagi Posted June 10, 2006 #8 Share Posted June 10, 2006 It would be like length, width and height but it is at 90 degrees to them. Doesn't Ekytropic theory already postualte 11 dimesions with 5th dimension Branes? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
D.vandyke Posted June 10, 2006 #9 Share Posted June 10, 2006 (edited) A measure of "Reality", or "Existance/Being", or maybe more towards "Observance of Exsistance"? Or more "Distance from Singularity" that provides a warp in the plane of time causing/allowing the formation of the other 3 dimensions? Or is that off? Pretend I'm 13, this is a diverse board and a cool subject. This should help you (imagining you're 13yr old) These theorems,strictly speaking,prove that there is at least one non-spacelike geodesic that is only finitely extendible into the past but there are cases in which the conditions of these theorems obtain in such a way that all past-directed spacetime paths terminate at a singularity. into the past. I hope this clears it up for you. Edited June 10, 2006 by D.vandyke Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Celumnaz Posted June 10, 2006 #10 Share Posted June 10, 2006 hrmm... so distance from/to singularity, proportional to time... makes me think there's another measure these operate on. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
crouton Posted June 11, 2006 #11 Share Posted June 11, 2006 I suddenly feel very, very stupid. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Avinash_Tyagi Posted June 11, 2006 #12 Share Posted June 11, 2006 I suddenly feel very, very stupid. If you're having trouble understanding the physics Jargon, go to Wikipedia and do a search, they have quite a few good articles on these topics. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
crouton Posted June 11, 2006 #13 Share Posted June 11, 2006 If you're having trouble understanding the physics Jargon, go to Wikipedia and do a search, they have quite a few good articles on these topics. Thanks! I'll try that. (I was beginning to wonder if it really is English!) Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
boorite Posted June 12, 2006 #14 Share Posted June 12, 2006 What's the 4th spatial dimension called and what does it measure? Length, Width, Height, _______, and Time. How about something x-treme and edgy, like "balls?" Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Avinash_Tyagi Posted June 12, 2006 #15 Share Posted June 12, 2006 How about something x-treme and edgy, like "balls?" They already have "Bucky Balls" Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
rapid7 Posted June 28, 2006 #16 Share Posted June 28, 2006 How about something x-treme and edgy, like "balls?" Classic Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Create an account or sign in to comment
You need to be a member in order to leave a comment
Create an account
Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!
Register a new accountSign in
Already have an account? Sign in here.
Sign In Now