Jump to content
Join the Unexplained Mysteries community today! It's free and setting up an account only takes a moment.
- Sign In or Create Account -
blieve

Telekinesis

274 posts in this topic

Recommended Posts

Ness of Psionix

Anything from the xmen movies will do :P

I'll throw the cars and you can blow them up into giant flying fireballs! :D

Teamwork! :tu:

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Virtual Particle

As far as moving objects with the power of the mind using scientific protocols that has already been done, a simple search of the internet will establish that. But of course, as the skeptics in this forum have often made clear, those are not acceptable either so why would a believer consider such a request to be a valid or for that matter, even a sincere offer??

You see Triad you have this ability to turn what people say around and use it against them!

I never said that i deny Radin Meta Analysis, I only said it is useless and worthless to me, because i for one do not care for all those random number studies on Pk!

Silentom, the study in question has been acknowledged by a mainstream scientific journal if as you say it is worthless and useless to you, your assessment (your opinion) can be interpreted in relation to that study in the same way.

As far as turning peoples words around and using it against them that is a false accusation what I have done is present a very simple issue, for which, there must be alternative response to engaging in ridicule. As I have made very clear (and by virtue of the lack

of realistic responses in relation to the resident skeptics....i.e..."Anything from the xmen movies will do") what has been established consistently is a pathological pattern of behavior, with respect to skeptical responses in this forum.

Stated simply you and some of the skeptics in this forum are not making any real substantive contribution to discussion here. Seriously it is not like the majority of the

forum is populated by PhD’s interested in conducting scientific research into paranormal ability, with the recourses to effectively present, in this forum, the ability of members here who claim to have paranormal ability. There is also another obvious point, if in fact it was your real intention to investigate paranormal ability, on the scale you have expressed an interest in. Why are you not doing so, in an environment where the possibility of actually being able to observe such activity (first hand) is much, much more plausible, than within the confines (given the inherent restrictions) of an internet discussion forum. My point is obvious Silentom your behavior and the behavior of some of our resident skeptics is clearly not the result of an interest in objectively evaluating paranormal ability (which is what real skeptics do by the way), it is for a lack of a better term, an effort to engage in a bias solely for the purpose of expressing bias for its own sake and that sir is pathological.

Any thoughts?

PS: Bio-mage it sounds like you and Hugo Chaves have something in common :D

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
ShaunZero

I will say this again! I do not feel there is a way that kazuma could possibly show anyone, on this forum his abilities and have them believe it.

You see Triad you have this ability to turn what people say around and use it against them!

I never said that i deny Radin Meta Analysis, I only said it is useless and worthless to me, because i for one do not care for all those random number studies on Pk!

Isn't that the same thing as saying "I don't care because I don't like this type of evidence"? If you don't like the evidence, that's fine and dandy, but do not call this evidence invalid if it is not. You're acting as if it's not. If this is your opinion, please explain why, and if it's not then say so and let's move on.

As far as moving objects with the power of the mind using scientific protocols that has already been done, a simple search of the internet will establish that. But of course, as the skeptics in this forum have often made clear, those are not acceptable either so why would a believer consider such a request to be a valid or for that matter, even a sincere offer??

They'll most likely complain if it's not peer reviewed, and even if the data given is 100% correct, they'll pretend it's wrong and use the excuse "It's not peer reviewed". Then move on and act like no one ever showed evidence to them. I've stated in many places why it doens't make a big difference if it's peer reviewed or not. Alot of people agree with me as well.

Edited by Zero of Deism

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Virtual Particle

When I first came here the issue with the resident pseudo skeptics was observing evidence of the paranormal in a mainstream scientific journal. Since I have posted clear evidence, that in fact, they were incorrect (with respect to the Radin Meta-analysis) this has changed to personal attacks against individual members with respect to personal observations.

In relation to the current behavioral expressions of resident pseudo skeptics angst seems apparent......

Main Entry: angst

Function: noun

Pronunciation: 'ä[ng](k)st, 'a[ng](k)st

Etymology: Danish & German; Danish, from German

: a feeling of anxiety, apprehension, or insecurity

They have been proved wrong and all that is left to them is the effort to ridicule members for there individual beliefs.....

Raven states...

If you're going to nitpick and refuse to accept the terms, then there is no need to respond to this post nor a need to continue this hapless battle of bickering, pitting logic and idiocy in a mediocre cage match -- hence your weakness and transient, salient dissipation. Refusal to accept such terms renders your proceeding posts as worthless, and states that you have no ability to walk away because of pride and savage naivety.

In response to this....

The fact the skeptics and believers disagree with each other is irrelevant (there is no need to shout) what in the opinion of skeptics would (given the medium) be acceptable as proof???

There is a term it is called "setting unrealistic goals" it is an aspect of pathological skepticism and to be honest it is apparent in relation to this issue. This is very simple, no one needs a PHD to understand it, and Kazuma is not suggesting he is Darth Vader or that he is from the planet Krypton (sp).

Excuse me sir but what you are offering is a bunch of C&^$, whose laws are you suggesting as valid? EU, American, Australian, UN, Hindu, Native American, or perhaps you want to bring up Islamic regulations (or even Chinsee and or Russian)??? You call me a savage and an idiot, but in relation to your bestial response specifics you are not apparent....you want us to prepare a legal effort to resolve this conflict, but beyond, what is cleary presented, you have offered zero in relation to any particular specifics. It is your effort which is hapless, it is your logic which is pitting, and personally I would actually offer money, so as to make it possible for a more intelligent response as what you have to offer. The reason I do not walk away is that, it is so obvious that you sir are so full of S$!^ that a person would have t be an idiot not to notice the reality of the situation.

This being that you sir have lost control and while you feel (personally it is obviously as a result of your bias) that you have made a "point". Cleary the only thing you have done is making a complete A$$ of yourself with respect to anything you it have presented to date.

The only weakness that is apparent is in relation to your lack of ability to respond, the only idiocy is in respect to your lack of ability to present specifics with respect to what it is you are suggesting. What is worthless is in actuality, your last response, as it lacks any content which specifically relates to the content of the query. And for the record, what is weak is your inability, to state in fact is a response to the question at hand.

Quite literally "The Raven" you are the epitome of an "accident waiting to happen" and lets be clear there is no need too wait......what is apparent is that it is happening here and now .

Any thoughts?

PS: “The Raven” my advise is that giving up your day job would be a waste of time.

Edited by Triad

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Silentom

You are completely right Triad it has been proven to exist and that is great.

But where do all those minute numbers stand against people who want something more,

than just micro pk for results? I suppose you have seen that it is obvious that micro pk is just, not enough to some on here! Have you ever concidered that some would like to see this, phenomena on a larger scale like objects being moved with pk under close studies and be, proved that way?

So on that note i will say good luck with your studies or whatever it is you do and i will be,

on my way! :tu:

Edited by Silentom

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
ShaunZero

You are completely right Triad it has been proven to exist and that is great.

But where do all those minute numbers stand against people who want something more,

than just micro pk for results? I suppose you have seen that it is obvious that micro pk is just, not enough to some on here! Have you ever concidered that some would like to see this, phenomena on a larger scale like objects being moved with pk under close studies and be, proved that way?

So on that note i will say good luck with your studies or whatever it is you do and i will be,

on my way! :tu:

I agree with you as well. But next time those pseudo-skeptics need to make it a bit more clear on what they mean. :yes:

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Bio-Mage
As far as moving objects with the power of the mind using scientific protocols that has already been done, a simple search of the internet will establish that.

HAHAHAHA :D:rofl::w00t: Let me guess...is it like psipog.com?

Silentom, the study in question has been acknowledged by a mainstream scientific journal if as you say it is worthless and useless to you, your assessment (your opinion) can be interpreted in relation to that study in the same way.

This study only indicates interference and not telekinesis. But you are free same as the "scientists" on that journal to interpret this in any context you see fit.

PS: Bio-mage it sounds like you and Hugo Chaves have something in common grin2.gif

Who in the blazes is Hugo Chaves?

I agree with you as well. But next time those pseudo-skeptics need to make it a bit more clear on what they mean. yes.gif

I have watched you refer to this Pseudo sceptic concept a few times over lately. I am sure its great fun learning new words but unless you have something constructive other than stating how of a true sceptic you think you are and everyone else isn't...then be quiet already.

You can all debate the issue about what proof is and all that but the plain truth is the metaphysical (ironically enough) is all in your head and unless its proven otherwise dont expect people to accomodate your colorfull view of the world. In my book you have NOT ONE individual that can consistently demonstrate any of the abilities you mention, so unless you find someone who can do more than being a pain in the behind for one arm bandits in Las Vegas, dont spam as we have enough of that as it is. :tu:

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
LunarMoon

HAHAHAHA :D:rofl::w00t: Let me guess...is it like psipog.com?

This first link is a collection of PK studies. Many of these are the random number generators many have referred to while some actually involves macro-PK such as spoon bending; take them or leave them. However, I don't think anyone here's trying to argue that PK can be used to move furniture and cars as in the movies.

http://www.williamjames.com/Science/PK.htm

This second link is harder to navigate through. In truth its really a humongous collection of studies that go throughout all branches of parasychology so if you're interested I'd use the "edit-search" button if I were you; I haven't even read it all.

http://www.parapsych.org/pa_convention_abstracts_2002.html

If anyone's interested I could post a page on Nina Kulagina though I'm not going out of my way for it unless asked.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
ShaunZero
I have watched you refer to this Pseudo sceptic concept a few times over lately. I am sure its great fun learning new words but unless you have something constructive other than stating how of a true sceptic you think you are and everyone else isn't...then be quiet already.

It would be easier to get me to shut up, if you weren't an ass about it. There's no way to argue that telling someone "be quiet" is polite, unless, however, you were trying to be this way. Which is what I expected from you anyway.

And yes, pseudo-skeptic is a term I just realized fit some of the people on these boards perfectly. So instead of calling them "cynic" or just plane "silly", I think the word pseudo-skeptic really stands out more.

I bet if the same type of evidence came about, to prove something YOU claimed, you'd stick by it. But now that it's supporting something else, you don't want to accept it.

You can all debate the issue about what proof is and all that but the plain truth is the metaphysical (ironically enough) is all in your head and unless its proven otherwise dont expect people to accomodate your colorfull view of the world.

Things that aren't real, and are all in your head, produce results like Triad has showed? Wow, thanks for revealing such a thing to me, you've really opened my eyes... not.

Also bio, can you perhaps make a good debate as why these studies are not valid, and aren't evidence of anything, instead of whining like a baby saying you won't accept them?

I do not know if PK is real, I have never looked into it, but what I can see is that bio-mage is going about the situation completely wrong. If he truly wanted to know the truth he'd put up a better debate, but instead he just wants to stick around and complain just so that he won't have to open to the possability of changing his mind on the subject.

Edited by Zero of Deism

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Bio-Mage
It would be easier to get me to shut up, if you weren't an ass about it. There's no way to argue that telling someone "be quiet" is polite, unless, however, you were trying to be this way. Which is what I expected from you anyway.

I dont want you to "shut up" at all. I only want you to answer directlly on the points I make without the psychoanalysis.

It would be easier to get me to shut up, if you weren't an ass about it. There's no way to argue that telling someone "be quiet" is polite, unless, however, you were trying to be this way. Which is what I expected from you anyway.

Its not your place to concentrate on pseudo sceptics when there are a number of believers that are going this the wrong way as well. It only shows how passionate you are at remaining one sided.

bet if the same type of evidence came about, to prove something YOU claimed, you'd stick by it. But now that it's supporting something else, you don't want to accept it.

On the contrary. If you DO search a bit or follow my posts then you will see that I will never shrug research and input from sources that are making a contribution without presumptions. I remain neutral on this subject because I am yet to hear something convincing. If you continue to act as psychic abilities are a undeniable fact, then its you that can not accept the fact that you may be wrong.

Things that aren't real, and are all in your head, produce results like Triad has showed? Wow, thanks for revealing such a thing to me, you've really opened my eyes... not.

Explain to me how this makes you better of what you are accusing me off. You blindly accept this "research" and you have not even once referred to the point about interference I make. Do you even understand this subject? Have you followed on the debate that once took place here on them? My guess is you haven't even bothered to do a little research before allowing Triad to make an impression on you.

Also bio, can you perhaps make a good debate as why these studies are not valid, and aren't evidence of anything, instead of whining like a baby saying you won't accept them?

I have argued random number generators in the past. Triad keeps posting this every so often in an effort to stuff it down our throats when we are not looking. If you want something to warp your brain around, then have a look on this link but I am not gonna do your homework for you. I will be on another post if you want to discuss, but I am not gonna stay here and watch another psycho bubble rebutal solely focused as to why you think I am not fit to argue.

http://skepdic.com/pear.html

I do not know if PK is real, I have never looked into it, but what I can see is that bio-mage is going about the situation completely wrong. If he truly wanted to know the truth he'd put up a better debate, but instead he just wants to stick around and complain just so that he won't have to open to the possability of changing his mind on the subject.

That looks like a whinny reply to me...your argument is again about me...not why I am wrong. ;)

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
TheWizzKid

my opinion:

1- Tk may or may not exist

2- if subject say he has the faculty of doing tk it must apply to anything of relevant size & weight.

3- if subject S can push an object A he also has to be able to apply same "force" to a similar object in any direction meaning if S is capable of displacing object A in a given direction with force f he also has to be able to aplying it(f) to an object B of smaller weight

fighting gravity or any other kind of force to say he/she is telekinetic,right ?

4-if TK exist (im not realy skeptic here) the it must require practice just like pedaling a bicycle or driving.

Note:I have many weird experiences i have yet to see or do TK but i do have personal experience in psi among those :telepathy (once confirmed with partner) deja vu(so many times) premonition (real ones!!) out of body experiences(many)

invading/seeing dreams of a friend (or implanting toughts?)

call me weirdo ... ;)

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Virtual Particle

Gee Bio, it's interesting to see that after all the times you have claimed you would not respond to my comments anymore here you are. Let me makes something clear here, the study in question presented in the link at bottom was preformed in 1989 not 1987 and while I am certain Radin did do a study in 1987, it is the 1989 study that is being presented at this forum, in the link included in my signature (that is the one offered as evidence in relation to having been included in a mainstream scientific journal which for the record is Edited by Nobel Laureates). I have never cited psipog.com and for the record until you mentioned it, I did not know it even existed, specifically as cited by me, in earlier comments (in this thread), I was referring to the research done on Uri Geller and the Russian Lady (whose name escapes me at the moment and conducting a search feels tedious given a recent response by The Raven :td: ).

For the record Bio-Mage if you do not like the term Pseudo-skeptics I could take the time to come up with another.....

http://www.unexplained-mysteries.com/forum...c=63275&hl=

But given the above link, it seems strange you would suggest anything, but the obvious fact, the term exists.....Take into consideration, that given "The Ravens" comments, I would come up with a term ,that fits better :tu:. The fact of the matter is nothing, offered by the membership of this forum, has come even close to a reasonable conclusion, to the question at hand. This of course being; what, would to you, would be (specifically), a means, to provide proof, of paranormal ability given, the inherent restrictions of the internet???

Who in the blazes is Hugo Chaves?

Hugo Chaves is the current President of the country of Venezuela, in his rather recent visit to the United Nations (in New York, New York USA), he cited, that conclusively, the current President of the United States (George Bush) is Satan incarnate. My point was that your responses (taking into consideration all your responses to date) are equally as absurd. Given your most recent response in relation to the thread in question.....you sir have nothing to offer this forum.

Just change my name to yours and your statistics make sense...only then in fact...

I would say, that returning to the thread in question and actually presenting something of value, would be prudent; given the confidence you are presenting (in relation to any suggestion) that you have made, any realistic point, against the paranormal would be foolish to take into consideration.

For the record let me present "The Raven's" response....

Brilliant topic, Triad! I am completely shocked that not a single person has replied to it yet. I don't understand how such a thing could be true; it seem as though the statistics should be turned the other way around. If such an exponential odd were there to calculate the probability of it being false, everyone would be doing it all the time. Anyone can post anything on the web, so I find books more reliable in the first place. I'd love to get a hold of that magazine. :rofl:

Bio-Mage your "Mutant Gene Nullifier" is broken; it is time for you to consider another term. Perhaps it should be "I do not know," quite honestly, it would make much more sense.

Any thoughts?

PS: Sorry, have not been at the site for so long (three days) but I needed to take a break such members, as "The Raven", were completely inappropriate.....

Edited by Triad

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
ShaunZero
Explain to me how this makes you better of what you are accusing me off. You blindly accept this "research"

I never accepted any research. I'm pretty sure I already stated that I've not even looked into it. But that has nothing to do with what we're talking about, since I've never claimed anything about telekinesis being real or not.

That looks like a whinny reply to me...your argument is again about me...not why I am wrong. wink2.gif

Actually, my entire post was directed at why I thought you were wrong.

Edited by Zero of Deism

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
ShaunZero

Ah I love it. :D

Love what, lol? The arguements?

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Bio-Mage
Gee Bio, it's interesting to see that after all the times you have claimed you would not respond to my comments anymore here you are. Let me makes something clear here, the study in question presented in the link at bottom was preformed in 1989 not 1987 and while I am certain Radin did do a study in 1987, it is the 1989 study that is being presented at this forum, in the link included in my signature (that is the one offered as evidence in relation to having been included in a mainstream scientific journal which for the record is Edited by Nobel Laureates). I have never cited psipog.com and for the record until you mentioned it, I did not know it even existed, specifically as cited by me, in earlier comments (in this thread), I was referring to the research done on Uri Geller and the Russian Lady (whose name escapes me at the moment and conducting a search feels tedious given a recent response by The Raven thumbdown.gif ).

So your argument is about the date but not the actual content. Typical of you. Always further from the point.... :w00t:

For the record Bio-Mage if you do not like the term Pseudo-skeptics I could take the time to come up with another...

Well feel free. Its not like it stops you with all the other things you say here. I am sure your doctors recommends venting your frustrations online anyway...

But given the above link, it seems strange you would suggest anything, but the obvious fact, the term exists.....Take into consideration, that given "The Ravens" comments, I would come up with a term ,that fits better thumbsup.gif. The fact of the matter is nothing, offered by the membership of this forum, has come even close to a reasonable conclusion, to the question at hand. This of course being; what, would to you, would be (specifically), a means, to provide proof, of paranormal ability given, the inherent restrictions of the internet???

Time and again I suggested to people not to try to provide proof of any kind online. You are not here to convince me as such or any other in this forum. If you believe you have undeniable proof about phychic phenomena then you can request access to a research institute nearest to you. Trust me if any of what you say is possible, then you will not have to do much to facilitate world wide status recognition. It hapens even for false claims all the time and although those do die out eventually as the truth is revealed, yours (if indeed the truth) will justify you better than any half witted argument here.

Hugo Chaves is the current President of the country of Venezuela, in his rather recent visit to the United Nations (in New York, New York USA), he cited, that conclusively, the current President of the United States (George Bush) is Satan incarnate. My point was that your responses (taking into consideration all your responses to date) are equally as absurd. Given your most recent response in relation to the thread in question.....you sir have nothing to offer this forum.

I think just saying that in your opinion I dont make sense would be shorter and just as irrelevant.

Bio-Mage your "Mutant Gene Nullifier" is broken; it is time for you to consider another term. Perhaps it should be "I do not know," quite honestly, it would make much more sense.

You are yet to prove anything so my status name stands. Wishful thinking will get you nowhere with me...

Actually, my entire post was directed at why I thought you were wrong.

Actually your entire argument is about me and not about the subject. :tu:

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Virtual Particle

Bio it is not just because of the date, you need to check what you are presenting because in actuality, all the numbers your site is claiming are wrong (with respect to the Radin study published at Foundations of Physics Journals in 1989). I was being somewhat sarcastic about Radin doing a Meta analysis in 1987, but hoped, that it would result in you checking your facts. Actually, it does not make sense that you would not notice how different the data (all the numbers) is with respect to the skeptic’s dictionary site and the actual research. Truthfully Bio-Mage, there is no way this study would have made it into Foundations of Physics Journal, if in fact the variance had been that small and the truth is that it is not. :yes:

I am comparing you to Hugo Chaves not because of the fact I feel your opinion does not make sense but because it is such a biased opinion. Keep in mind Bio-mage you have not as of yet, presented a legitimate means to present proof, given the restrictions on the internet (medium)? It would make sense that if a person wanted something they would be able to come up with a way to achieve the goal of getting it.

So your argument is about the date but not the actual content. Typical of you. Always further from the point....

In truth that kind of behavior is typical of you Bio-mage :tu: the point at present is my question :yes:

Any thoughts?

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Lady seeking answers

Use your hands or arms to move the objects. Here are some reasons why:

1) It's efficient

2) It's faster

3) Requires no concentration

4) Doesn't get you ridiculed

5) It's the reason we have arms

giggle,pretty funny...

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Lady seeking answers

thank you

I wonder if that person believe's in air, i mean you cant see it but know how it works etc...i think he was just trying to be humerous though...dont stress to much.. :D

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
ShaunZero
Actually your entire argument is about me and not about the subject.

First you say I don't point out why YOU are wrong, then you tell me my entire post was about YOU. O_o

Remember, I was pointing out why you were not evaluating the situation correctly. I commented on how you were being a pesudo-skeptic. I not once commented on wether the subject in question was true or not.

So the subject was YOU.

Doesn't really matter though, I'm done argueing with you. Say what you will.

Edited by Zero of Deism

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Bio-Mage
Bio it is not just because of the date, you need to check what you are presenting because in actuality, all the numbers your site is claiming are wrong (with respect to the Radin study published at Foundations of Physics Journals in 1989). I was being somewhat sarcastic about Radin doing a Meta analysis in 1987, but hoped, that it would result in you checking your facts. Actually, it does not make sense that you would not notice how different the data (all the numbers) is with respect to the skeptic’s dictionary site and the actual research. Truthfully Bio-Mage, there is no way this study would have made it into Foundations of Physics Journal, if in fact the variance had been that small and the truth is that it is not. yes.gif

I am comparing you to Hugo Chaves not because of the fact I feel your opinion does not make sense but because it is such a biased opinion. Keep in mind Bio-mage you have not as of yet, presented a legitimate means to present proof, given the restrictions on the internet (medium)? It would make sense that if a person wanted something they would be able to come up with a way to achieve the goal of getting it.

The article denoted the fallacy of using random number generators in that kind of research. You can either choose to acknowledge that fact, or pretend it doesnt exist or that is wrong (and you are not) so that your beliefs (and only argument) stay intact. :tu:

And for the record I need no proof for the world being as we have known it to be up to date. YOU need proof to tell us otherwise... ;)

First you say I don't point out why YOU are wrong, then you tell me my entire post was about YOU. O_o

Playing with words Triad style is weakening your answers with every post. You know very well what I meant since I said you are not sticking to THE SUBJECT. As this forum is not called Bio-Mage Mysteries, you are making a mockery of yourself not being able to provide me with a straight answer on the matter at hand.

You are wrong...I am done with YOU because you have NOTHING to say.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Virtual Particle

The article denoted the fallacy of using random number generators in that kind of research. You can either choose to acknowledge that fact, or pretend it doesn’t exist or that is wrong (and you are not) so that your beliefs (and only argument) stay intact.

The article presents false data Bio-Mage and then tries to substantiate its false claims as justification for engaging in denial over validity of the process. Seriously Bio-Mage is a person lies to you about another person then discredits the person based upon there lie what is that called???

The correct term is Slander :yes:

And for the record I need no proof for the world being as we have known it to be up to date. YOU need proof to tell us otherwise. Playing with words Triad style is weakening your answers with every post.

So all the claims made by the Buddhist, Moslems and Christians about Buddha, Mohamed and Jesus Christ has nothing to do with the world as we know it. :td: Lets see, walking through walls, moving mountains and raising the dead is not believed as having occurred by pretty much 95% of the worlds population?? :no: I am not the one playing words games here Bio-Mage you are and as far as proof; as I made clear, providing proof, is something, that is dependent upon, whom one is providing proof to. So, the question which has been repeated sufficiently is valid, reasonable and within the norm, with respect, to reasonable discourse. It is apparently your desire to be unreasonable as is it obvious that, you are either incapable (or unwilling to admit it), unable (some mental incapacity) or refusing (a pseudo skeptic or an internet troll) to provide a reasonable response.

I myself have taken the first step and this being, providing for a requirement, you yourself introduced to me as significant. This (of course) being, data, regarding paranormal experiences presented in what is acknowledged as a mainstream scientific journal. Foundations of Physics is a Mainstream Scientific Journal whose reputation is beyond reproach and in fact its editing staff contains several Nobel laureates.

So the bottom line here, is there is no way, that this meta-analysis could have not been significant in every respect, your claim that it is not is, for lack of a better term :wacko:

You may sincerely feel you have a point Bio-Mage but to be honest :td:

Any thoughts?

Edited by Triad

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
ShaunZero
Playing with words Triad style is weakening your answers with every post. You know very well what I meant since I said you are not sticking to THE SUBJECT. As this forum is not called Bio-Mage Mysteries, you are making a mockery of yourself not being able to provide me with a straight answer on the matter at hand.

Dude, what the HELL? I did give you a straight answer! You are asking me to stick to the subject. What subject? The only friggin subject I ever brought up was YOU. Then when I say something true and honest, you tell me I'm playing with words.

What the hell do you want me to give you a straight answer on? I pointed out everything I talked about and why. What more do you want? I've never discussed wether telekinesis was real or not, I simply discussed why I thought you were being pseudo-skeptic.

Edited by Zero of Deism

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Virtual Particle

The reality of the situation is this Bio-Mage, unless you are prepared to provide me with a document which debunks the Radin Meta-Analysis, offered in a Mainstream Scientific Journal, which is equivalent in stature to Foundations of Physics. In that, it also contains

Editors, which are Nobel Laureates (forget Nature, comparing that to Foundations of Physics is like comparing Einstein to a high school physics professor) and are prepared to present there data; in manner consistent with the Radin Meta Analysis (in other words and for example, formatted as a scientific experiment which applied the scientific method) your point is no longer a valid consideration. :tu:

Forget the Skeptics Website Bio-Mage as here is an example of there one and only effort to engage in such an attempt......

http://www.planetos.info/marchron.html

More on the Skeptics Dictionary.....

http://www.alternativescience.com/skeptic&..._dictionary.htm

Any thoughts?

Edited by Triad

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
blieve

It is an open forum not a tree house. They can be questioned about these supposed powers.

What is constant questioning going to do? Questioning someone on the internet that you don't know/can't moniter their actions will do nothing. That will only cause more arguments. No matter what happens you probably aren't going to believe it. Some say to post videos so some of us do. Afterwards many people just say something like it was rigged or computer generated.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now

  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    No registered users viewing this page.