Moon Hoax?

[crystal sage]

Saw this interesting site.... . http://www.revisionism.nl/Moon/The-Mad-Revisionist.htm .. any coments?????

e establishment most often cites the work of Isaac Newton in support of its story. Newton is well known for coming up with entirely theoretical notions such as the Law of Universal Gravitation, and his more famous Laws of Motion which serve to gloss over the more obvious inconsistencies in the moon story. What he is less known for is his "extra-curricular" pursuits, which he kept quite secret during his lifetime but which have since been uncovered. Newton was a dominating figure in the Royal Society, a fellowship riddled with members of the various secret societies whose goal to dominate the world has already been outlined. Newton himself possessed copies of Rosicrucian manifestos, and, as is evident in his notes, had studied them thoroughly. Many of his biographers suspect that he shared the religious beliefs of many of his colleagues. It does not take a genius to conclude that these beliefs may have influenced his scientific reasoning.

This is, of course, the reason why revisionists are excluded from academic institutions. The majority of scientists and professors of most universities are members of organizations such as these, as are most of the scientists who work for NASA. Those that are not realize that their livelihood depends on towing the establishment line, and therefore only a few have had the courage to speak out.

However, eminent scientists, working in defiance of the establishment, have proven conclusively, using the most scrupulous methods, that if an object such as the moon really existed, it could not remain fixed in the sky for very long. Proactive arguments in support of this finding return to a closer examination of the original mathematical formula generally referenced when rallying to solidify the moon’s improbable existence:

F = GMm/r2

Where F = gravitational attraction

G = the gravitational constant

M = mass of one body

m = mass of the second body

r = distance between the two bodies

Established by Newton himself, this numerical gem is based completely on the assumption that the moon travels in concentric circles around our planet. F (the gravitational attraction holding the moon to its "true" path) requires that r (the distance between the two celestial bodies) remains constant. Should the distance, r, decrease at any given moment, the gravitational force will increase in strength. When this event occurs the moon will be pulled towards this planet. According to Newton’s theory that a body set in motion remains in motion, such an incident would initiate a logical series of events with a singular chaotic result: propagated drawing of satellite to planet until the two massive bodies collide.

However, even the most fanatical Lunarists no longer cling to the absurd notion that objects in the solar system travel in concentric circles. These so-called "scientists" have changed their story so many times, who knows what to believe anymore? The currently fashionable dogma is that the route followed by celestial bodies is not circular but a concave oval with the origin point at the centre (in the case of the earth, the sun; in the case of the moon, the earth) followed by a spiraling series of pathways. Thus, the moon is not maintaining a constant distance from our planet. Our orbiting satellite is forever oscillating towards us, drawing near then distant, in a continuous cycle. Each successive approach brings this massive wonder closer to our midst.

In other words, the moon does indeed alter its distance from the earth. So why is it not widespread knowledge that the end – mathematically predicated BY NEWTON’S OWN FORMULA - has been anticipated and is drawing near? Due to some irrational explanation the moon has managed to defy those very laws of physics that were originally developed to justify its existence.

The authorities expect us to believe a story that is prima facie absurd, and has been proven absurd by simple mathematical calculations. Yet they do not give us a single piece of reliable forensic evidence, nor an argument put forward by any expert free from institutional pressure.

A cash reward of $100,000 has been offered to anyone who can send us, by e-mail, conclusive physical evidence of the existence of the moon. This reward remains unclaimed.

Can you prove that the moon exists? Write to us at: madrev@reptiles.org

(NOTE: e-mail received through this address may be posted on this page)

SEE EVIDENCE OF PHOTOGRAPHIC TAMPERING

http://www.revisionism.nl/Moon/Moonphoto.htm

THE MAD REVISIONIST: We do not recruit; we convince. Truth has no need of coercion. We invite your support and submissions.

For relentless Moon promotion, on the other hand, contact NASA at http://www.nasa.gov/

For another Lunar point of view, contact the National Space Science Data Center (NSSDC) at http://nssdc.gsfc.nasa.gov/

[IamsSon]

I'm assuming that all moon rocks retrieved by our astronauts during their exploration of the moon are, for some reason not regarded as proof.

I'm also assuming any pictures, movies, or drawings of the moon, or even views of the moon as seen through terrestrial telescopes.

So, other than waiting for this object to either crash against the Earth, at which point they could say, "Aha! See we told you it would come crashing down!" just before all the wind was sucked out of their bodies by the shock wave arriving prior to the incredible fireball, or pieces fall to Earth from a clearly visible meteor strike on the Moon, or actually taking a member of this organization to the moon, there's no proof they will accept.

[crystal sage]

http://www.megaessays.com/viewpaper/30946.html

You could try for the $100,000

My guess the cheque is glued to the ground... just like Randi's challenge

http://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=...p;printable=yes

[crystal sage]

http://www.newdawnmagazine.com/Article/Who...the######Moon.html

CHRISTOPHER KNIGHT: The Moon sits very close to the Earth yet it is widely regarded as the strangest object in the known universe. It is a bit like knowing that every person in the world is completely normal except the person you live next door to, who has three heads and lives on a diet of broken razor blades.

The book lists the strangeness of the Moon, which includes the fact that it does not have a solid core like every other planetary object. It is either hollow or has a very low-density interior. Bizarrely, its concentration of mass are located at a series of points just under its surface – which caused havoc with early lunar spacecraft. The material the Moon is made from came from the outer surface of the Earth and left a shallow hole that filled with water and we now call the Pacific. This rock left the Earth to produce the Moon very quickly after our planet had formed around 4,6 billion years ago.

The Moon is not only extremely odd in its construction; it also behaves in a way that is nothing less than miraculous. It is exactly four hundred times smaller than the Sun but four hundred times closer to the Earth so that both the Sun and the Moon appear to be precisely the same size in the sky – which gives us the phenomenon we call a total eclipse. Whilst we take this for granted it has been called the biggest coincidence in the universe.

Furthermore, the Moon mirrors the movement of the Sun in the sky by rising and setting at the same point on the horizon as the Sun does at opposite solstices. For example, this means the Moon rises at midwinter at the same place the Sun does at midsummer. There is no logical reason why the Moon mimics the Sun in this way and it is only meaningful to a human standing on the Earth.

[Pax Unum]

I'm assuming that all moon rocks retrieved by our astronauts during their exploration of the moon are, for some reason not regarded as proof.

yeah, and theres the "lunar laser ranging retroreflector array." a 2-foot wide panel studded with 100 mirrors pointing at Earth, left on the Moon by Buzz Aldrin and Neil Armstrong... still in use today to "ping" with laser pulses and measure the Earth-moon distance very precisely...

[FrothyDog]

did any of you read the joking disclaimer at the bottom of the page? the site is a joke set up to make a knowingly false arguement.

DISCLAIMER: All editorial content on this website is strictly not the writer’s/author’s opinion. THE MAD REVISIONIST, located on the moon, is owned and operated by accident. The content of this page is the copyrighted property of THE MAD REVISIONIST. Any illegal copying or circulating of this page, in whole or in part, without the expressed permission of THE MAD REVISIONIST will be taken as a compliment. And no, we're not really offering $100,000. What are you, crazy?

[Pax Unum]

did any of you read the joking disclaimer at the bottom of the page? the site is a joke set up to make a knowingly false arguement.

D'oh, if crystal sage posted it, I should have known it was suspect...

[frogfish]

I still don't know why crystal sage posts all this...

[Waspie_Dwarf]

I still don't know why crystal sage posts all this...

I don't know why crystal sage doesn't bother reading anything on this site or any of the stuff he posts. If he did he would know that this was posted several months ago by Lilly who was actually realised it was a spoof.