Jump to content
Join the Unexplained Mysteries community today! It's free and setting up an account only takes a moment.
- Sign In or Create Account -

Skull n 'Bones/CIA/Air America/Hells Angels


Recommended Posts

The CIA special forces unit is bombing American troops and Iraqi civilians in order to extend the war. They

are using stolen American and Canadian vehicles for these car-bomb attacks on allied targets.

There are at least two incidents where Americans and Britons have been actually caught dressed as Arabs while carrying out these bombing

operations(linked below , or see Terrorstorm by Alex Jones for background http://video.google.com/videoplay?docid=78...torm&hl=en)

The Hells Angels are obtaining (stealing) the vehicles used in these attacks and shipping them overseas via west coast shipping ports.

The Hells Angels are nothing more than an extension of George H. Bush's CIA/Skull n' Bones narcotics-smuggling cartel.

The Hells Angels were originally formed by former WWII/Korean War and Vietnam War vets ( a high % CIA AIr America pilots/paratroopers/international drug and weapons smugglers).

They named themselves Hells Angels because it is a term that reaches all the way back to elite WWI mercenary paratroopers, the 'for hire'

covert operations assassins and terrorists known as Hells Angels who carried out illegal civilian kidnappings, interrogations, tortures,

assassinations, and numerous terrorist atrocities on behalf of the U.S. government. Howard Hughes made the film Hells Angels about WWI-era fighter squadrons and named it after them. The Hells Angels have always been a conduit for the street drugs that the Skull n' Bones/CIA international narcotics trafficking network fly or ship into the United States and Canada.


Now we find that this same network is supplying the vehicles used by covert forces in car-bomb attacks against U.S. troops. Mercenary

special forces units are attacking key American and allied strongholds in Iraq with car bombs while dressed as Arabs. Hells Angels. The Iraq

and Afghanistan wars are all about Bush and his narcotics cartel moving opium, cocaine, weapons, and even human organs and sex slaves around the world and killing as many people

as possible in the process.


You have to understand one thing about Skull n' Bones//CIA . They are occult Globalists. They hold no allegiance to any one nation. They are satanic elitists, and they feel that they are smarter than the rest of us, and that their evil is beneficial to the world, because the wealth that they accrue 'strengthens their superior genes as a gift to humanity' etc., and the large number of people that they kill are eliminated as a service to the ecology of the planet/gene pool blah blah blah.

They are nothing but a bunch of murderous, greedy scumbags who have latched onto all sorts of occult new-age bull to make them feel

good about what they are. Air America and Special Forces etc. are just their henchmen.

The Hells Angels Bikers/gangs are just the domestic little retirement club that the elite set up to reward their burnt-out henchman with plumb little 'regional' drug-dealing

contracts, complete with bought off/planted police in select areas. Membership sometimes has its rewards, even for the burnt-out smack-addict pilots and jungle psychos that staff Air America.

(they come back to America from overseas assignments still addicted to heroin & coke more often than not )


WASHINGTON -- The FBI's counterterrorism unit has launched a broad investigation of US-based theft rings after discovering that some of

the vehicles used in deadly car bombings in Iraq, including attacks that killed US troops and Iraqi civilians, were probably stolen in the

United States, according to senior government officials. John E. Lewis, deputy assistant director of the FBI for counterterrorism, told the Globe that the investigation hasn't yielded

any evidence that the vehicles were stolen specifically for car bombings. But there is evidence, he said, that the cars were smuggled

from the United States as part of a widespread criminal network that includes terrorists and insurgents.

Cracking the car theft rings and tracing the cars could help identify the leaders of insurgent forces in Iraq and shut down at least one of

the means they use to attack the US-led coalition and the Iraqi government, the officials said.

The inquiry began after coalition troops raided a bomb-making factory in Fallujah last November and found a sport utility vehicle registered

in Texas that was being prepared for a bombing mission.

Investigators said they are comparing several other cases where vehicles evidently stolen in the United States wound up in Syria or

other Middle East countries and ultimately into the hands of Iraqi insurgent groups -- including Al Qaeda in Iraq, led by Jordanian-born

Abu Musab Al Zarqawi. Citing the sensitive nature of the ongoing inquiry, investigators wouldn't say how many specific cases they have found, and FBI spokesman

Edwin Cogswell in Washington did not respond to repeated requests for comment.

But Lewis said the origins of the vehicles in question were unearthed by tracing the vehicle identification numbers, or VINs -- a standard

production marker stamped on during manufacture -- as well as through other forensic tools such as auto parts. Some of the automobiles can be

easily identified, specialists said, while others have had their VINs ground down or have been fitted with fake ones.


Reports of secret U.S. govt. operations featuring special forces operatives disguised as arabs carrying out bomb attacks in Iraq:


Iraqis apprehend two Americans disguised as Arabs trying to detonate a car bomb in a residential neighborhood of western Baghdad.

A number of Iraqis apprehended two Americans disguised in Arab dress as they tried to blow up a booby-trapped car in the middle of a

residential area in western Baghdad on Tuesday. Residents of western Baghdad's al-Ghazaliyah district told Quds Press

that the people had apprehended the Americans as they left their Caprice car near a residential neighborhood in al-Ghazaliyah on Tuesday

afternoon (11 October 2005). Local people found they looked suspicious so they detained the men before they could get away. That was when they

discovered that they were Americans and called the Iraqi police.

Five minutes after the arrival of the Iraqi police on the scene, a large force of US troops showed up and surrounded the area. They put

the two Americans in one of their Humvees and drove away at high speed to the astonishment of the residents of the area.

Quds Press spoke by telephone with a member of the al-Ghazaliyah puppet police who confirmed the incident, saying that the two men were

non-Arab foreigners but declined to be more precise about their nationality.

Quds Press pointed out that about a month ago, the Iraqi police in the southern Iraqi city of al-Basrah arrested two Britons whom they accused

of attempting to cause an explosion in the city. The Britons were taken into custody by the Iraqi police only to be broken out of prison by an

assault of British occupation troops. That incident has created a tense relationship between the British and the local authorities in

al-Basrah, Quds Press noted.



Hells Angels linked to international SUV theft/export ring:


These same bikers, once hunted down by the Hells Angels during the Quebec war, have since joined the rival gang, Hells Angels, doing

business in Ottawa.

Though the elite chapter's lucrative business is based in Ottawa's francophone community, with more than two dozen associates taking care

of street-level dealings, its members are spread across the region. Police have accused them of drug trafficking, money laundering,

prostitution, car-theft operations, and extortion. Some members of the Ottawa chapter, one of the most powerful units in

the country, include:

- Paul (Sasquatch) Porter. Born in 1963, the president of Ontario Nomads was an original member of Rock Machine, since absorbed by

Bandidos. Intelligent and known for keeping a low profile, Mr. Porter has survived two attempts on his life. He is awaiting trial on charges

of masterminding an international car-theft ring targeting luxury SUVs, which were later sold around the world, according to Quebec police.


So, looks like we have a situation where the CIA does not want an end to violence. They want things to escalate in Iraq, and they want more

dead U.S. soldiers coming home. They know that if there are no American casualties in Iraq, the Americans will look like bullies, and

furthermore, there will seem to be no reason to stay there. They are creating the illusion of fierce resistance by bombing their own troops.

Pathetic that the Americans even have to supply the vehicles used in these attacks, but it is part of their strategy. CIA Special Forces units in Iraq take delivery.

They wire up these expensive foreign vehicles with explosives, like luxury SUVS , which are in great demand overseas, and these are rigged to detonate via remote control.

The economic chaos created in Iraq means their are plenty of Iraqis willing to 'deliver' these stolen vehicles to a 'rendezvous' (usually a crowded market spot) or some

other strategically selected location where there will be witnesses as to who is driving. . The explosives-laden vehicle is followed, and then detonated via remote control.

Another ploy is to just park the vehicle overnight in a crowded area. The next morning , when the crowds are out, they detonate it, again via remote control.


> Zero evidence. None of the Hells Angels are Yale or even Harvard or Stanford men > not even UBC or Queens University.


I said they were an extension, ie: closely associated. I have never said the Hells Angels bikers/gnagsters are direct Skull n' Bones members. I have said that many of them

are closely associated via their history of involvement in covert CIA war and drug operations. If you have any doubts about CIA involvement in drugs watch the Clinton

Chronicles or watch this:


and this:


> > They named themselves Hells Angels because it is a term that reaches

> > all the way back to elite WWI mercenary paratroopers,


> Paratroopers in WW1?? Wrong. They took the name from the WW2 bomber

> group of the same name and the Howard Hughes movie of the same name.

wrong: http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Hell%27s_Angels_%28film%29

the film Hells Angels was made before WWII, in 1929-30


So, the term Hells Angels has been around a lot longer than you think, and prior to WWII. It is from WWI.

Hughes named his 1929 film 'Hells Angels' after the term for covert mercenary soldiers and paratroopers known as Hells Angels, operatives

who would do anything for money, including torture, murder, assassinations, and terrorism. These WWI-era Hells Angels preceded the

creation of the CIA , which was created after WWII. The predecessor organization which created the CIA was the Skull n' Bones society,

founded by the wealthy Russel international opium syndicate family. *


Were British Special Forces Soldiers Planting Bombs in Basra?

Suspicions Strengthened by Earlier Reports

by Michael Keefer

Global Research, September 25, 2005

Does anyone remember the shock with which the British public greeted the revelation four years ago that one of the members of the Real IRA

unit whose bombing attack in Omagh on August 15, 1998 killed twenty-nine civilians had been a double agent, a British army soldier?

That soldier was not Britain's only terrorist double agent. A second British soldier planted within the IRA claimed he had given forty-eight

hours advance notice of the Omagh car-bomb attack to his handlers within the Royal Ulster Constabulary, including "details of one of the

bombing team and the man's car registration." Although the agent had made an audio tape of his tip-off call, Sir Ronnie Flanagan, chief

constable of the RUC, declared that "no such information was received"


This second double agent went public in June 2002 with the claim that from 1981 to 1994, while on full British army pay, he had worked for

"the Force Research Unit, an ultra-secret wing of British military intelligence," as an IRA mole. With the full knowledge and consent of

his FRU and MI5 handlers, he became a bombing specialist who "mixed explosive and ... helped to develop new types of bombs," including

"light-sensitive bombs, activated by photographic flashes, to overcome the problem of IRA remote-control devices having their signal jammed by

army radio units." He went on to become "a member of the Provisional IRA's 'internal security squad'-also known as the 'torture

unit'-which interrogated and executed suspected informers"


The much-feared commander of that same "torture unit" was likewise a mole, who had previously served in the Royal Marines' Special Boat

Squadron (an elite special forces unit, the Marines' equivalent to the better-known SAS). A fourth mole, a soldier code-named "Stakeknife"

whose military handlers "allowed him to carry out large numbers of terrorist murders in order to protect his cover within the IRA," was

still active in December 2002 as "one of Belfast's leading Provisionals" (http://www.sundayherald.com/29997).

Reliable evidence also emerged in late 2002 that the British army had been using its double agents in terrorist organizations "to carry out

proxy assassinations for the British state"-most notoriously in the case of Belfast solicitor and human rights activist Pat Finucane, who

was murdered in 1989 by the Protestant Ulster Defence Association. It appears that the FRU passed on details about Finucane to a British

soldier who had infiltrated the UDA; he in turn "supplied UDA murder teams with the information" (http://www.sundayherald.com/29997).

Recent events in Basra have raised suspicions that the British army may have reactivated these same tactics in Iraq.

Articles published by Michel Chossudovsky, Larry Chin and Mike Whitney at the Centre for Research on Globalization's website on September

20, 2005 have offered preliminary assessments of the claims of Iraqi authorities that two British soldiers in civilian clothes who were

arrested by Iraqi police in Basra on September 19-and in short order released by a British tank and helicopter assault on the prison where

they were being held-had been engaged in planting bombs in the city See: http://www.globalresearch.ca/index.php?con...mp;code=20050...



A further article by Kurt Nimmo points to false-flag operations carried

out by British special forces troops in Northern Ireland and elsewhere, and to Donald Rumsfeld's formation of the P2OG, or Proactive

Preemptive Operations Group, as directly relevant to Iraqi charges of possible false-flag terror operations by the occupying powers in Iraq


These accusations by Iraqi officials echo insistent but unsubstantiated claims, going back at least to the spring of 2004, to the effect that

many of the terror bombings carried out against civilian targets in Iraq have actually been perpetrated by U.S. and British forces rather

than by Iraqi insurgents.

Some such claims can be briskly dismissed. In mid-May 2005, for example, a group calling itself "Al Qaeda in Iraq" accused U.S. troops

"of detonating car bombs and falsely accusing militants" (http://siteinstitute.org/bin/articles.cgi?ID=publications45605&Catego...).

For even the most credulous, this could at best be a case of the pot calling the kettle soot-stained. But it's not clear why anyone would

want to believe this claim, coming as it does from a group or groupuscule purportedly led by the wholly mythical al-Zarqawi-and one

whose very name affiliates it with terror bombers. These people, if they exist, might themselves have good reason to blame their own crimes

on others.

Other claims, however, are cumulatively more troubling.

The American journalist Dahr Jamail wrote in April 20, 2004 that the

recent spate of car bombings in Baghdad was widely rumoured to have

been the work of the CIA:

"The word on the street in Baghdad is that the cessation of suicide car bombings is proof that the CIA was behind them. Why? Because as one man states, '[CIA agents are] too busy fighting now, and the unrest they wanted to cause by the bombings is now upon them.' True or not, it doesn't bode well for the occupiers' image in Iraq."


Two days later, on April 22, 2004, Agence France-Presse reported that five car-bombings in Basra-three near-simultaneous attacks outside

police stations in Basra that killed sixty-eight people, including twenty children, and two follow-up bombings-were being blamed by

supporters of Shiite cleric Moqtada al-Sadr on the British. While eight hundred supporters demonstrated outside Sadr's offices, a Sadr

spokesman claimed to have "evidence that the British were involved in these attacks" (http://www.inq7.net/wnw/2004/apr/23/wnw_3_1.htm).

An anonymous senior military officer said on April 22, 2004 of these Basra attacks that "It looks like Al-Qaeda. It's got all the

hallmarks: it was suicidal, it was spectacular and it was symbolic."

Brigadier General Nick Carter, commander of the British garrison in Basra, stated more ambiguously that Al Qaeda was not necessarily to

blame for the five bombings, but that those responsible came from outside Basra and "quite possibly" from outside Iraq: "'All that we

can be certain of is that this is something that came from outside,' Carter said" (http://www.inq7.net/wnw/2004/apr/23/wnw_4_1.htm). Moqtada

al-Sadr's supporters of course believed exactly the same thing-differing only in their identification of the criminal outsiders as British agents rather than as Islamist mujaheddin from

other Arab countries.

In May 2005 'Riverbend', the Baghdad author of the widely-read blog Baghdad Burning, reported that what the international press was

reporting as suicide bombings were often in fact "car bombs that are either being remotely detonated or maybe time bombs." After one of the

larger recent blasts, which occurred in the middle-class Ma'moun area of west Baghdad, a man living in a house in front of the blast site was

reportedly arrested for having sniped an Iraqi National Guardsman. But according to 'Riverbend', his neighbours had a different story:

"People from the area claim that the man was taken away not because he shot anyone, but because he knew too much about the bomb. Rumor has it

that he saw an American patrol passing through the area and pausing at the bomb site minutes before the explosion. Soon after they drove away,

the bomb went off and chaos ensued. He ran out of his house screaming to the neighbors and bystanders that the Americans had either planted

the bomb or seen the bomb and done nothing about it. He was promptly taken away."


Also in May 2005, Imad Khadduri, the Iraqi-exile physicist whose writings helped to discredit American and British fabrications about

weapons of mass destruction, reported a story that in Baghdad a driver whose license had been confiscated at an American check-point was told

"to report to an American military camp near Baghdad airport for interrogation and in order to retrieve his license." After being

questioned for half an hour, he was informed that there was nothing against him, but that his license had been forwarded to the Iraqi

police at the al-Khadimiya station "for processing"-and that he should get there quickly before the lieutenant whose name he was given

went off his shift.

"The driver did leave in a hurry, but was soon alarmed with a feeling that his car was driving as if carrying a heavy load, and he also

became suspicious of a low flying helicopter that kept hovering overhead, as if trailing him. He stopped the car and inspected it

carefully. He found nearly 100 kilograms of explosives hidden in the back seat and along the two back doors. The only feasible explanation

for this incident is that the car was indeed booby trapped by the Americans and intended for the al-Khadimiya Shiite district of Baghdad.

The helicopter was monitoring his movement and witnessing the anticipated 'hideous attack by foreign elements'."


According to Khadduri, "The same scenario was repeated in Mosul, in the north of Iraq." On this occasion, the driver's life was saved when

his car broke down on the way to the police station where he was supposed to reclaim his license, and when the mechanic to whom he had

recourse "discovered that the spare tire was fully laden with explosives."

Khadduri mentions, as deserving of investigation, a "perhaps unrelated incident" in Baghdad on April 28, 2005 in which a Canadian truck-driver

with dual Canadian-Iraqi citizenship was killed. He quotes a CBC report according to which "Some media cited unidentified sources who said he

may have died after U.S. forces 'tracked' a target, using a helicopter gunship, but Foreign Affairs said it's still investigating

conflicting reports of the death. U. S. officials have denied any involvement."

Another incident, also from April 2005, calls more urgently for investigation, since one of its victims remains alive. Abdul Amir

Younes, a CBS cameraman, was lightly wounded by U.S. forces on April 5 "while filming the aftermath of a car bombing in Mosul." American

military authorities were initially apologetic about his injuries, but three days later arrested him on the grounds that he had been "engaged

in anti-coalition activity" (http://www.huffingtonpost.com/arianna-huffington/Kafka-does-iraq-the-...).

Arianna Huffington, in her detailed account of this case, quite rightly emphasizes its Kafkaesque qualities: Younes has now been detained, in

Abu Graib and elsewhere, for more than five months-without charges, without any hint of what evidence the Pentagon may hold against him,

and without any indication that he will ever be permitted to stand trial, challenge that evidence, and disprove the charges that might at

some future moment be laid. But in addition to confirming, yet again, the Pentagon's willingness to violate the most fundamental principles

of humane and democratic jurisprudence, this case also raises a further question. Was Younes perhaps arrested, like the Iraqi whose rumoured

fate was mentioned by 'Riverbend', because he had seen-and in Younes' case photographed-more than was good for him?

Agents provocateurs?

Spokesmen for the American and British occupation of Iraq, together with newspapers like the Daily Telegraph, have of course rejected with

indignation any suggestion that their forces could have been involved in false-flag terrorist operations in Iraq.

It may be remembered that during the 1980s spokesmen for the government of Ronald Reagan likewise heaped ridicule on Nicaraguan accusations

that the U.S. was illegally supplying weapons to the 'Contras'-until, that is, a CIA-operated C-123 cargo aircraft full of weaponry was shot down over Nicaragua, and Eugene Hasenfus, a

cargo handler who survived the crash, testified that his supervisors (one of whom was Luis Posada Carriles, the CIA agent responsible for

the 1976 bombing of a Cuban civilian airliner) were working for then-Vice-President George H. W. Bush.

The arrest-and the urgent liberation-of the two undercover British soldiers in Iraq might in a similar manner be interpreted as casting a retrospective light on previously unsubstantiated claims about the involvement of members of the occupying armies in terrorist bombing attacks on civilians.

The parallel is far from exact: in this case there has been no dramatic confession like that of Hasenfus, and there are no directly incriminating documents like the pilot's log of the downed C-123.

There is, moreover, a marked lack of consensus as to what actually happened in Basra. Should we therefore, with Juan Cole, dismiss the possibility British soldiers were acting as agents provocateurs as a "theory [that] has almost no facts behind it"


Members of Britain's Elite SAS Forces

It appears that when on September 19 suspicious Iraqi police stopped the Toyota Cressida the undercover British soldiers were driving, the two men opened fire, killing one policeman and wounding another. But the soldiers, identified by the BBC as "members of the SAS elite special forces" (http://news.bbc.co.uk/2/hi/middle_east/4264614.stm),

were subdued by the police and arrested. A report published by The Guardian on September 24 adds the further detail that the SAS men "are

thought to have been on a surveillance mission outside a police station in Basra when they were challenged by an Iraqi police patrol"


As Justin Raimondo has observed in an article published on September 23 at Antiwar.com, nearly every other aspect of this episode is disputed.

The Washington Post dismissively remarked, in the eighteenth paragraph of its report on these events, that "Iraqi security officials variously

accused the two Britons they detained of shooting at Iraqi forces or trying to plant explosives"


Iraqi officials in fact accused them not of one or the other act, but of both.

Fattah al-Shaykh, a member of the Iraqi National Assembly, told Al-Jazeera TV on September 19 that the soldiers opened fire when the

police sought to arrest them, and that their car was booby-trapped "and was meant to explode in the centre of the city of Basra in the popular

market" (quoted by Chossudovsky). A deliberately inflammatory press release sent out on the same day by the office of Moqtada al-Sadr (and

posted in English translation at Juan Cole's Informed Comment blog on September 20) states that the soldiers' arrest was prompted by their

having "opened fire on passers-by" near a Basra mosque, and that they were found to have "in their possession explosives and remote-control

devices, as well as light and medium weapons and other accessories" (http://www.juancole.com).

What credence can be given to the claim about explosives? Justin Raimondo writes that while initial BBC Radio reports acknowledged that

the two men indeed had explosives in their car, subsequent reports from the same source indicated that the Iraqi police found nothing beyond

"assault rifles, a light machine gun, an anti-tank weapon, radio gear, and medical kit. This is thought to be standard kit for the SAS

operating in such a theater of operations" (http://www.antiwar.com/justin/?articleid=7366).

One might well wonder, with Raimondo, whether an anti-tank weapon is "standard operating equipment"-or what use SAS men on "a surveillance

mission outside a police station" intended to make of it. But more importantly, a photograph published by the Iraqi police and distributed

by Reuters shows that-unless the equipment is a plant-the SAS men were carrying a good deal more than just the items acknowledged by the



I would want the opinion of an arms expert before risking a definitive judgment about the objects shown, which could easily have filled the

trunk and much of the back seat of a Cressida. But this photograph makes plausible the statement of Sheik Hassan al-Zarqani, a spokesman

for Al-Sadr's Mahdi Army militia:

"What our police found in their car was very disturbing-weapons, explosives, and a remote control detonator. These are the weapons of

terrorists. We believe these soldiers were planning an attack on a market or other civilian targets..." (quoted by Raimondo)

The fierce determination of the British army to remove these men from any danger of interrogation by their own supposed allies in the

government the British are propping up-even when their rescue entailed the destruction of an Iraqi prison and the release of a large

number of prisoners, gun-battles with Iraqi police and with Al-Sadr's Mahdi Army militia, a large popular mobilization against the British

occupying force, and a subsequent withdrawal of any cooperation on the part of the regional government-tends, if anything, to support the

view that this episode involved something much darker and more serious than a mere flare-up of bad tempers at a check-point.

US-UK Sponsored Civil War

There is reason to believe, moreover, that the open civil war which car-bomb attacks on civilians seem intended to produce would not be an

unwelcome development in the eyes of the occupation forces.

Writers in the English-language corporate media have repeatedly noted that recent terror-bomb attacks which have caused massive casualties

among civilians appear to be pushing Iraq towards a civil war of Sunnis against Shiites, and of Kurds against both. For example, on September

18, 2005 Peter Beaumont proposed in The Observer that the slaughter of civilians, which he ascribes to Al Qaeda alone, "has one aim: civil



But H. D. S. Greenway had already suggested on June 17, 2005 in the Boston Globe that "Given the large number of Sunni-led attacks against

Shia targets, the emerging Shia-led attacks against Sunnis, and the extralegal abductions of Arabs by Kurdish authorities in Kirkut, one

has to wonder whether the long-feared Iraqi civil war hasn't already begun"


And on September 21, 2005 Nancy Youssef and Mohammed al Dulaimy of the Knight Ridder Washington Bureau wrote that the ethnic cleansing of

Shiites in predominantly Sunni Baghdad neighbourhoods "is proceeding at an alarming and potentially destabilizing pace," and quoted the

despairing view of an Iraqi expert:

"'Civil war today is closer than any time before,' said Hazim Abdel Hamid al Nuaimi, a professor of politics at al-Mustansiriya University

in Baghdad. 'All of these explosions, the efforts by police and purging of neighbourhoods is a battle to control Baghdad.'"


Whether or not it has already begun or will occur, the eruption of a full-blown civil war, leading to the fragmentation of the country,

would clearly be welcomed in some circles. Israeli strategists and journalists proposed as long ago as 1982 that one of their country's

strategic goals should be the partitioning of Iraq into a Shiite state, a Sunni state, and a separate Kurdish part. (See foreign ministry

official Oded Yinon's "A Strategy for Israel in the 1980s," Kivunim 14 [February 1982]; a similar proposal put forward by Ze'ev Schiff in

Ha'aretz in the same month is noted by Noam Chomsky in Fateful Triangle [2nd ed., Cambridge, MA: South End Press, 1999], p. 457).

A partitioning of Iraq into sections defined by ethnicity and by Sunni-Shia differences would entail, obviously enough, both civil war

and ethnic cleansing on a massive scale. But these considerations did not deter Leslie H. Gelb from advocating in the New York Times, on

November 25, 2003, what he called "The Three-State Solution".


Gelb, a former senior State Department and Pentagon official, a former editor and columnist for the New York Times, and president emeritus of

the Council on Foreign Relations, is an insider's insider. And if the essays of Yinon and Schiff are nasty stuff, especially in the context

of Israel's 1981 bombing attack on Iraq's Osirak nuclear reactor, there is still some difference between speculatively proposing the

dismemberment of a powerful neighbouring country, and actively advocating the dismemberment of a country that one's own nation has

conquered in a war of unprovoked aggression. The former might be described as a diseased imagining of war and criminality; the latter

belongs very clearly to the category of war crimes.

Gelb's essay proposes punishing the Sunni-led insurgency by separating the largely Sunni centre of present-day Iraq from the

oil-rich Kurdish north and the oil-rich Shia south. It holds out the dismembering of the Yugoslav federation in the 1990s (with the

appalling slaughters that ensued) as a "hopeful precedent."

Gelb's essay has been widely interpreted as signaling the intentions of a dominant faction in the U.S. government. It has also, very

appropriately, been denounced by Bill Vann as openly promoting "a war crime of world-historic proportions"


Given the increasing desperation of the American and British governments in the face of an insurgency that their tactics of mass

arbitrary arrest and torture, Phoenix-Program or "Salvadoran-option" death squads, unrestrained use of overwhelming military force, and

murderous collective punishment have failed to suppress, it comes as no surprise that in recent military actions such as the assault on Tal

Afar the U.S. army has been deploying Kurdish peshmerga troops and Shiite militias in a manner that seems designed to inflame ethnic


No one, I should hope, is surprised any longer by the fact that Abu Musab al-Zarqawi-that fictional construct of the Pentagon's serried

ranks of little Tom Clancies, that one-legged Dalek, that Scarlet Pimpernel of terrorism, who manages to be here, there, and everywhere

at once-should be so ferociously devoted to the terrorizing and extermination of his Shiite co-religionists.

Should we be any more surprised, then, to see evidence emerging in Iraq of false-flag terrorist bombings conducted by the major occupying

powers? The secret services and special forces of both the U.S. and Britain have, after all, had some experience in these matters.


And if you have any doubt at all that Skull n' Bones, aka Haliburton, CIA etc. have a vested interest in extending these wars as long as possible, watch

the video 'Iraq For Sale'


A Robert Greenwald film about corporations in Iraq.

This is Vietnam all over again, Its all about the Skull n' Bones clan getting rich selling weaponry n' drugs, nothing more.


Edited by thunkerdrone
  • Like 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Thank You So much for this post......Some of the Above Info. really filled in a few Blanks I had about certain subjects....

Link to comment
Share on other sites

:rolleyes::wacko:.....now I know why you can't spell thinker and spelled it thunker. Edited by SwampGator
Link to comment
Share on other sites


LOL....The Halliburton Contracts in Iraq I mean. IE Skull N' Bones..

I'm guessing you have insight on the subjects............

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Can't speak on the rest of the groups but we now know you know little to nothing about the Hells Angles. I'm sure Sonny Barger would be shocked to find out what they were up to, especially after the RICO deal and his years in prision.


Hells Angels (being) originally formed by former WWII/Korean War and Vietnam War vets
Most 1% clubs of the era were also.
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Can't speak on the rest of the groups but we now know you know little to nothing about the Hells Angles. I'm sure Sonny Barger would be shocked to find out what they were up to, especially after the RICO deal and his years in prision.

Working for the Hells Angels does not make you completely immune to prison. If you have any doubt about the CIA involvement in drugs , see this video:

BBC documentary called the Secrets of the CIA, that gets into some detail on Air America's narcotic activities in SE Asia


  • Like 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites


Also the film Air America takes you right into some of the action

download the movie:

Thunker; this forum has no tolerance for piracy, and I have removed the link for that reason, please do not do that again.

Edited by Fluffybunny
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Check out these examples of how bikers seem to habitually show up in opposition to war protesters.

(Guess they don't want their smack/crack supply lines cut off, whether it's Afghanistan or Vietnam)


October 15, 1965: Anti-Vietnam war rallies are held in four U.S. cities, the largest in New York and Berkeley. "That evening, some 15,000 demonstrators left the campus marching toward Oakland.

The following day (October 16), the marchers return. (About 100 had remained in the park overnight). When the two to five thousand protesters reach the Oakland City line, they are stopped by police. The police ask the protestors to sit down in the street to avoid violent confrontations. Poet Allen Ginsberg chants "Hare Krishna" at the front of the march. The Hell's Angels motorcycle gang appears, rips down banners, and attacks protestors, yelling, "Go back to Russia communists!".


Bikers on guard at Iraq war funerals

The sound of outraged patriotism is echoing across the American heartland like rolling thunder.

Mounted on earth-trembling Harley-Davidsons, a volunteer army is shielding grieving families from Iraq war protesters.

Marshalling more than 200 bikes for a military funeral in hardbitten Kokomo, the Indiana "state captain" of the Patriot Guard Riders, Richard Wilbur, was loathe to discuss the protests.

Edited by thunkerdrone
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Can't speak on the rest of the groups but we now know you know little to nothing about the Hells Angles. I'm sure Sonny Barger would be shocked to find out what they were up to, especially after the RICO deal and his years in prision.

BTW: Most 1% clubs of the era were also.

I suspect that it is not just people within the Hells Angels mixed up with the CIA. At a guess, there are likely operatives

in the Bandidos, the mafia, maybe even the Crips etc. The drugs have to be moved, and we know the CIA is not above

working with such people as Lawrence King , who ran the BoysTown prostitution ring in Conspiracy of Silence.

The error that you and others make in assessing the CIA is in the assumption that the CIA are subject to all of the same

checks and balances that every other agency of the government is subject to, which is just not the case. They operate

outside and 'above' the laws of the normal law and order world that you and I and America know. (ostensibly of necessity,

purportedly of benefit to all). In reality the axiom holds true here that power corrupts, and absolute power corrupts absolutely.

The CIA have been given nearly absolute power and license to do as they see fit, which has led to the situation that we are in today, with levels of corruption and collusion that defy belief.

Edited by thunkerdrone
Link to comment
Share on other sites


So what do you think is this just to show the media that they are not working toghter-

People have to get their heads around the fact the CIA is largely a criminal organization. The police and the rest of the

government are not 'working together'with the Hells Angels. The CIA plants people in various positions in govt. and

in police, to enable the smooth traffic of narcotics, but it is not always smooth sailing . What they are doing is still illegal.

, things still go wrong, and Hells Angels still end up in jail.

Edited by thunkerdrone
  • Like 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

why drag the hells angels into it...CIA spooks...i believe they foment war were there is none...good guy bad guy. you play both...for the most profit.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

why drag the hells angels into it...

Simple. The CIA is flying in the drugs. Flights leave South America and Afghanistan every week. They need someone at the other end (this end) to

take delivery.

CIA spooks...i believe they foment war were there is none...good guy bad guy. you play both...for the most profit.


Link to comment
Share on other sites

Wednesday, January 31, 2007

Rogue U.S. Troops Knowingly Bombed British In Iraq


Rogue U.S. Troops Knowingly Bombed British In Iraq

British soldiers desperately released friendly fire smoke canisters, before A10 bombers swooped in for a second attack

Paul Joseph Watson


Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • 2 weeks later...

Support your local 81 :tu:

Support the red & white :ph34r:

It is amazing to me how the conspiracies always seem to mix disparate groups together; I'm not intending to glorify the Angels, but I hesitate to connect them with Skull&Bones (unless some S&B members were also motorcycle enthusiasts) and the CIA (the same government that raided the Angels clubhouses and sent a number of members to Federal Prison?).

That's my story and I'm sticking to it :rofl:

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Support your local 81 :tu:

Support the red & white :ph34r:

It is amazing to me how the conspiracies always seem to mix disparate groups together; I'm not intending to glorify the Angels, but I hesitate to connect them with Skull&Bones (unless some S&B members were also motorcycle enthusiasts) and the CIA (the same government that raided the Angels clubhouses and sent a number of members to Federal Prison?).

That's my story and I'm sticking to it :rofl:

Skull n' Bones are part of the same network as the Hells Angels, namely international drug smuggling, & as previously pointed out the term Hells Angels applies to more than its North American motorcycle gang manifestation.

The FBI raided the Angels, btw, so get your head out of the sand.

Edited by thunkerdrone
Link to comment
Share on other sites

I think I put by head back in the sand. It makes more sense than this.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I think I put by head back in the sand. It makes more sense than this.

this is the battle cry of Generation Y

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Actually Guy Im with you on most of your stuff.................

i think your doing great work here at UM

But i am AFRAID that you are WAY off the mark with 81

Im sorry but what your implying just does NOT exist

within the organization....and dont let Sonny catch ya

talkin trash....on this part your right they have long

arms and GOOD ears be careful


BTW it is advisable to *Remove* the colors shown in the post on the last page you are breaking a strict trademark law and if the angels see it and so decide they will act upon it

just a friendly reminder

*The words Hells Angels and the Deaths Head Logo are property of Hells Angels Motorcycle Corporation, Inc. ( HAMC). and protected by one or more Trademarks, Service marks, and Collective Membership Marks owned by HAMC. All unauthorized use is strictly forbidden, including reproduction in any manner.

All Rights Reserved*

jimmy phelps

Edited by jimmyphelps
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Thank You So much for this post......Some of the Above Info. really filled in a few Blanks I had about certain subjects....

Just wanted to say I like the owl pic from the Bohemian Grove....

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • 1 month later...

Ten minute trailer preview (excellent, includes footage from Mel Gibson's 'Air America')

on the CIA/Skull&Bones drug running in Laos, Vietnam, and Afghanistan


[the CIA's secret airline is called Air America]

brief 4 min. interview of author of 'Fleshing out Skull & Bones':


(notice how she cuts off the interview as soon as he mentions the CIA drug running )

brief video:

Bush and Kerry both admitting they are members of Skull & Bones

related ten minute clip:

Edited by thunkerdrone
Link to comment
Share on other sites

mask and hood photo from spy video taken of Skull & Bones ritual at Yale (done with night-vision video camera from nearby rooftop over-looking the Skulls

'tomb' building's inner court yard.)


This photo is of Dennis Rader (aka BTK killer) in a grave that he

had dug for his murder victim Dolores Davis. He is wearing a plastic



Rader would dress up as his victims and pose for photographs taken by himself with

a tripod and timer camera arrangement. Delores Davis' body was found discarded beneath a bridge with the plastic mask beside it. (Rader had apparently not had time to carry out his fantasy of burying her (alive?) in the mask and had killed her and dumped her body instead)

What is interesting about this is that this is eerily similar to the Skull & Bones

initiation rituals which feature both the use of the same types of masks and live

burials. Moreover, Rader killed Delores Davies in 1991, long before all of the information on the Skull & Bones society rituals hit the internet or was otherwise made generally known to the public.

I think it unlikely that Rader would, out of sheer fantasy. replicate so closely many of the elements of a Skull & Bones ritual. Rader may have had prior experience with said rituals, as he himself was an Air Force operative during the Vietnam War, based in Japan, as was George H.W. Bush Sr. (Air Force) based in Japan during the Korean War. George Bush Sr. is known to have been both a member of Skull & Bones and at one time head of the CIA.

Rader's first murder was of Joseph Otera (and his family) , a former U.S. Air Force pilot based in Panama during the years of the Manuel Noriega/CIA cocaine cartel.(Panamanian Manuel Noriega has long been rumored to have been on the CIA payroll during the years that George Bush Sr. was head of the CIA.) Otera was killed almost immediately after retiring from the U.S. Air Force and settling down in Kansas. It has long been speculated that the Otera murders were likely committed by more than one person , as Otera was an ex-military martial-arts expert.

The 'BTK' murder of Otera may have actually been as much of a CIA hit as a sex crime.


from the book

The CIAs Greatest Hits

by Mark Zepezauer

For most of his life, Manuel Noriega got along very well with the CIA. As far back as 1959, he was reporting on Panamanian leftists to the Americans; by 1966, he was on the CIA payroll. Despite-or maybe because of-Noriega's "perverse" treatment of prisoners, he was deemed worthy to be trained at the notorious School of the Americas (also known as the "School of Dictators" or the "School of Assassins" ), run by the US Army in Panama City (it's since moved to Ft. Benning, Georgia).

As early as 1972, reports of Noriega's drug trafficking irked the DEA, and the State Department complained of his dealings with other intelligence services, notably those of Israel and Cuba. Don't worry, said the CIA-he's our boy.

In 1976, Noriega paid a visit to CIA Director George Bush in Washington. Bush's successor was less comfortable with Noriega and took him off the CIA payroll, but when Bush became vice-president in 1980, Noriega went back on, with a six-figure annual salary.

In 1981, Panama's popular head of state, Omar Torrijos, was killed in a plane crash; by 1983, Noriega had consolidated his control. In 1987, a close Noriega aide corroborated what many suspected-Noriega had sabotaged Torrijos' plane. (The CIA has also been linked to the assassination, in 1955, of Panama's president, allegedly with the approval of then-Vice-President Nixon).

Nothing Noriega did seemed to upset the CIA. If he smuggled cocaine on contra supply planes ...well, he wasn't the only one. If he beheaded a political opponent who accused him of drug running...well, he was just being firm.

If he used violence and fraud to steal the 1984 Panamanian elections...well, we couldn't have been more pleased with the outcome.

By 1989, however, the love affair was over. Noriega had angered his handlers by waffling on his opposition to the Sandinistas in Nicaragua and he was showing other disquieting signs of disobedience. In December 1989, US troops invaded Panama to "arrest" Noriega, slaughtering 2,000 - 4,000 innocent civilians in the process.

What changed after the invasion? Violence, fraud and drug trafficking continued unabated. But, unlike Noriega, Panama's new rulers knew how to follow orders, and agreed to reconsider the Torrijos treaties, under which all US military bases in Panama would be shut down by the year 2000. (In 1994, Torrijos' and Noriega's old party was voted back in-so look for more CIA sabotage.

Another strange coincidence here is that Berdella used animal tranquilizer to knock out and immobilize his victims, and Dennis Rader worked as Wichita dog catcher who was once accused of harassing residents and even euthanized one resident'd dog:


In 1991 Rader ran and was elected as a Republican[2] supervisor of the Compliance Department at Park City, a two-employee, multi-functional department in charge of "animal control, housing problems, zoning, general permit enforcement and a variety of nuisance cases." In this position, neighbors recalled him as sometimes overzealous and extremely strict; one neighbor complained that he euthanized her dog for no reason.

so there are a lot of strange coincidences between Berdella and BTK.

Both of them serial killers, both operated in the Kansas area during the 1980s. Both of them had access to animal tranquilizer, and both of them were found to have owned occult ritual masks, both of them affiliated with municipal services (Berdella a 'drug counsellor', Rader a dog catcher/bylaw enforcement officer)

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Like bush and kerry said...it's a secret..........perpetual war for perpetual profit; is the game....that's the big secret...

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    • No registered users viewing this page.