Boozing British Girls (BBC Documentry)

[Ashigaru]

That was so gay.

[hyperactive]

what an entertaining thread.

[Ghost Ship]

Seriously speaking, who would you rather hang out with after a rough week of work? Option A or Option B?

Edit: image removed.

That women on the left is one of the greatest poets who has ever lived. I would choose her. Even after a long work week.

Edited May 17, 2007 by Lottie

[Ghost Ship]

EMILY DICKINSON

[Syd Boggle]

LOL Scummage you are hilarious!

Although your superior knowledge of recent pop songs coupled with your poor spelling leads me to believe that you are not in fact a dinosaur but perhaps a disgruntled former yob yourself that has become hostile to your former ways. This "friend" of yours taking these pictures is none other than.... you dun dun dunnnnn! Your "son's" girlfriend that broke his heart was probably.... your girlfriend dun dun dunnn! and dumped you because she caught you watching the Paris tape and taking pictures of girls who are intoxicated! She in turn sought revenge by yobbing it up herself, which has led you to become hostile to this behaviour in girls dun dun dunn!

Or you were a boozer who's friends did this to you after a night of heavy drinking, causing you to urinate yourself in morning, which in turn led to a fight and the loss of your friends causing you to hate all things associated with heavy alcohol consumption... dun dun dunn!

Or thats you on the bottom right of that pic you posted... the one staring straight into the camera like some kind of possessed demon child, who now finds corrupting todays youth by posting hot pics of chicks, while feigning disgust to hide your true motives, satisfyingly entertaining in your quest for world domination... dun dun dunn!!

Or perhaps, just perhaps I am totally wrong and not thinking clearly because I am upset that you havent posted anymore pics of hot chicks lately...

Yes Batch 22 (because it really is like you are a mass produce of popular society) but once again, your attemp at amateur psychology falls totally off the mark! much like el midgure (or what ever his pretentious name is)

Ofcourse in my later years in life, i have made a point to stay familiar with "current" lingo, music & fashions! its unavoidable having grand-children!

Now your attempt at being witty has morphed into humiliating failure! unfortunately your post started off ammusingly enough, but your over eagerness to capitalise on the "dun dun dun" theme, only amplifies that you are a one trick pony....its funny once, but through lack of intellectual wit & originality, you've produced the musical equivalent, of a musical 4 chord wonder....

You my friend are...the archetypal, tattooed "im an individual" slave to whatever the current trend dictates!

Welcome my son, welcome to the machine.

Where have you been? It's alright we know where you've been.

You've been in the pipeline, filling in time,

provided with toys and Scouting for Boys.

You got a tattoo to punish your mum.

What did you dream? It's alright they told you what to dream....................C'mon

Edited May 12, 2007 by lord scrummage

[Bill Hill]

lol Lord Scummage owned explorer and catch 22.

[aussiemermaid]

"daggy" ??

I gather the Australians have the term "ferals" for unruly juveniles ? Is this true, or a UK urban myth ?

Meow Purr.

LOL Quiet right there as well!! it is also for referring to unkept children, teenages and adults!

An excellent comment Airika...this is the kind of opinion I have tirelessly been trying to weed out of this pond of gunky green, liberal water!

Women are far more suited to expressing their creative side by Poetry, cooking or even flower arraging....these are all feminine qualities that men truely find attractive.....

hence my picture...A total delight...& not a bared breast, tattoo, or New age peircing in sight....

You are oh so sexists and stereotyping- flower arranging??? im sorry but unless your a "florist"no thanks. I couldnt think of anything more boring to do. Old granny there probably has her tats covered- along with all those nipple rings. I know plenty of guys who have tats and peircing- what do you think of them???

You always seem to have an excuse for men- be it lame- that they are allowed to. Whats makes them any different????? They have a penis. wow :angry2:

i agree with billy and catch- at least they are two males that have respect for females.

And about your "son"- how about you ask him how many girls his bedded or how many times his been slaughtered (though he wont tell youthe truth, just lie so that he looks perfect in his borning daddys eyes, and make women look bad) i reckon you should give politics a go, all they do is talk $hit.

I'll be very careful to use "yob" in the proper context to avoid this confusion as I spread use of the word in the United States.

For example:

ME: "Hey, Tommy, check out those yobs vommiting on the sidewalk over there!"

TOMMY: "Whoa! Sexy!"

Or, in the bar:

"Do any of you yobs want to dance -- that is, if you can stand up long enough?"

You dam americans! lol a yob is never "sexy" here! Yobs are tacky westies!!!!lol

[Clocker]

lol Lord Scummage owned explorer and catch 22.

I don't see how someone as ridiculous as Scrummy can own anyone. Not in my eyes anyway. I don't see why you guys even bother to reply in such a lengthy manner to him? He's that provocative for that very reason; to make people comment, and maybe lose their temper so they would comment something stupid. That post by Scrummy was once again that plain old labeling/accusing with no basis whatsoever. And you consider THAT owning?

[hemet nesw weret]

I don't see how someone as ridiculous as Scrummy can own anyone. Not in my eyes anyway. I don't see why you guys even bother to reply in such a lengthy manner to him? He's that provocative for that very reason; to make people comment, and maybe lose their temper so they would comment something stupid. That post by Scrummy was once again that plain old labeling/accusing with no basis whatsoever. And you consider THAT owning?

Very well said, Clocker!

[Syd Boggle]

I don't see how someone as ridiculous as Scrummy can own anyone. Not in my eyes anyway. I don't see why you guys even bother to reply in such a lengthy manner to him? He's that provocative for that very reason; to make people comment, and maybe lose their temper so they would comment something stupid. That post by Scrummy was once again that plain old labeling/accusing with no basis whatsoever. And you consider THAT owning?

Oh im sorry Clocker, Is it my imagination? or have you come in on this topic before to stick the boot in!......yes, must be my imagination!..since you indirectly claim to be above all this mud-slinging! And of course, your not here to provke or offend me , are you?..............

Now there is a debate going on here, and you have taken it way off topic, to the degree of insulting the intelligence of UM members involved in this topic, plus making a personal attack on me!

Now why? Well perhaps your trying to get noticed! who knows!

Im surprised at you! being someone who takes the high moral stance, Accusing me of being provocative! Not only were your last two posts equally provocative! But you cant seem to help following the overall debat!!!

The word Hypocrite springs to mind....

Sheriff Clocker always hated me,

For what, I don't know:

Every time I plant a seed,

He said kill it before it grow -

He said kill them before they grow.....

All of a sudden I saw sheriff Clocker

Aiming to shoot the Topic down,

So I shot - I shot - I shot him down and I say:

If I am guilty I will pay.

I Shot the sheriff, but i didnt shoot no moderator.........C'mon

Edited May 13, 2007 by lord scrummage

[Clocker]

Oh im sorry Clocker, Is it my imagination? or have you come in on this topic before to stick the boot in!......yes, must be my imagination!..since you indirectly claim to be above all this mud-slinging! And of course, your not here to provke or offend me , are you?..............

Now there is a debate going on here, and you have taken it way off topic, to the degree of insulting the intelligence of UM members involved in this topic, plus making a personal attack on me!

Now why? Well perhaps your trying to get noticed! who knows!

Im surprised at you! being someone who takes the high moral stance, Accusing me of being provocative! Not only were your last two posts equally provocative! But you cant seem to help following the overall debat!!!

The word Hypocrite springs to mind....

Sheriff Clocker always hated me,

For what, I don't know:

Every time I plant a seed,

He said kill it before it grow -

He said kill them before they grow.....

All of a sudden I saw sheriff Clocker

Aiming to shoot the Topic down,

So I shot - I shot - I shot him down and I say:

If I am guilty I will pay.

I Shot the sheriff, but i didnt shoot no moderator.........C'mon

I knew you'd take the bait. Thanks for proving my point

And if you want me to take part in this "conversation", I will say this: let the British Girls Booze all they want; it's only their own loss.

edit: Btw thanks meritaten

Edited May 13, 2007 by Clocker

[Dan_Orlovsky]

Its all about which country you live in. Take the USA for example, there are like hundreds of murders every year. BUT, Canada who shares a hundreds of mile boarder with us, only has like 10 murders per year. It all depends on culture and where you live.

[Syd Boggle]

I knew you'd take the bait. Thanks for proving my point

And if you want me to take part in this "conversation", I will say this: let the British Girls Booze all they want; it's only their own loss.

Erm, what sort of pseudo intellegent point is that? In a real life situation, if i wanted to get into an argument with someone, i would insult them, or punch them, 9 times out of ten they will respond! To call it "taking the bait" although technically correct, wouldnt demonstrate a devilish cleverness on my part!

Unfortunately you appear to be making the point that you are Devilishly clever!...........your point...is..pointless my friend.

However i am pleased by your second point, The fact that your in total agreement with me....is only Right ,and justified logic.....A respectful backdown...thankyou

Edited May 13, 2007 by lord scrummage

[Bill Hill]

Wow… in debating terms, clocker was ‘bagged ‘n’ tagged’ faster than you could say ‘Intellectual jihad.’

[Leonardo]

Wow… in debating terms, clocker was ‘bagged ‘n’ tagged’ faster than you could say ‘Intellectual jihad.’

True, billy, but I'd give him a few extra points for spelling and punctuation...

[Syd Boggle]

True, billy, but I'd give him a few extra points for spelling and punctuation...

In the overall scheme of things, while debating online, a man who critizises the spelling and punctuation of another, Is the mark of a man, whos ideas & wit, have indeed been overpowered by a Camp, spelling neurosis, But more importantly, is the mark of a man out of angles, and should therfore bow out graciously....

Wow… in debating terms, clocker was ‘bagged ‘n’ tagged’ faster than you could say ‘Intellectual jihad.’

Billy, once again, you have excecuted good old fashioned english wit......a rare talent

Also good to see someone else out there, appreciates a woman of class, rather than your common or garden, Man hungry, "Juiced up on STD´s & Alcohol" Baby machine...

Here we have a typical display of Drunken, cheap, women............Here we see a demonsration of a Drunken, Man Sandwich.

Its Wrong on every level..

Edited May 13, 2007 by lord scrummage

[Story]

Plus ça change, plus c’est la même chose.

Hogarth's "Gin Lane", @ 1730

[louie]

In the overall scheme of things, while debating online, a man who critizises the spelling and punctuation of another, Is the mark of a man, whos ideas & wit, have indeed been overpowered by a Camp, spelling neurosis, But more importantly, is the mark of a man out of angles, and should therfore bow out graciously....

Billy, once again, you have excecuted good old fashioned english wit......a rare talent

Also good to see someone else out there, appreciates a woman of class, rather than your common or garden, Man hungry, "Juiced up on STD´s & Alcohol" Baby machine...

Here we have a typical display of Drunken, cheap, women............Here we see a demonsration of a Drunken, Man Sandwich.

Its Wrong on every level..

I have to disagree, that photo is a bunch of kids just messing around in front of a camera, there are far worse images out there to prove your point, that one is just kids messing about.

[Leonardo]

In the overall scheme of things, while debating online, a man who critizises the spelling and punctuation of another, Is the mark of a man, whos ideas & wit, have indeed been overpowered by a Camp, spelling neurosis, But more importantly, is the mark of a man out of angles, and should therfore bow out graciously....

Billy, once again, you have excecuted good old fashioned english wit......a rare talent

Also good to see someone else out there, appreciates a woman of class, rather than your common or garden, Man hungry, "Juiced up on STD´s & Alcohol" Baby machine...

Here we have a typical display of Drunken, cheap, women............Here we see a demonsration of a Drunken, Man Sandwich.

Its Wong on every level..

I have to agree with you Lard Scrummage...

...it IS Wong on every level...John Wong!!!!!!!!!!!!!!

Edited May 13, 2007 by Leonardo

[Bill Hill]

Billy, once again, you have excecuted good old fashioned english wit......a rare talent

Also good to see someone else out there, appreciates a woman of class, rather than your common or garden, Man hungry, "Juiced up on STD´s & Alcohol" Baby machine...

Good to meet a man who recognises class. Charmed I’m sure.

Here we have a typical display of Drunken, cheap, women............Here we see a demonsration of a Drunken, Man Sandwich.

Ah yes, the infamous ‘Man sandwich’.. can any self-respecting woman resist?

[Syd Boggle]

I would like to take this opportunity to thank my contact in the local community, he has worked tirelessly & valiantly, He has compiled an array of "photo Evidence" to lobby the local council....... With any luck, we shall see these bars, and bad behaviour disappear from our Village community...

I would like to pay tribute to my friend, Syd Boggle..he is a community hero...and one of mine..

I think people should see Syd, so here is a pic of him, on webcam.....This is for all the Spineless liberals...this is the face of courage

ll have

Edited May 13, 2007 by lord scrummage

[Bill Hill]

For a man who.. travels around London taking pictures of drunken women in compromising positions and then reporting them to the local councilors, his image, is strangely, exactly how I’d imagine he would look like.

Edited May 13, 2007 by billyhill

[Clocker]

Erm, what sort of pseudo intellegent point is that? In a real life situation, if i wanted to get into an argument with someone, i would insult them, or punch them, 9 times out of ten they will respond! To call it "taking the bait" although technically correct, wouldnt demonstrate a devilish cleverness on my part!

Unfortunately you appear to be making the point that you are Devilishly clever!...........your point...is..pointless my friend.

However i am pleased by your second point, The fact that your in total agreement with me....is only Right ,and justified logic.....A respectful backdown...thankyou

Well, I really did think my point was obvious: that you almost only resort to baseless labeling and presumptions. To claim I "take the high moral stance" or assuming I'm "trying to get noticed" are just that. What I said in that post was a reference to my earlier post in which I made clear my belief that you, Scrummy are not a representation of your real life persona. That is what I meant by ridiculous; I was not directly attacking your opinions.

In short, you proved my point of you just resorting to labeling/accusations/provocation by writing an short story of my post, and adding some second-hand poetry on the side. I already quoted some of your labeling/accusations right there with quote marks, and the provocation part is there too, strongly supported by the cleverly altered Bob Marley(?) verses. In addition, you state right there that if you want to get into an argument, you would insult or punch someone to get a response. Are we talking about an argument or a debate here? If you're in a neutral debate, based on facts, logic and reason, you're not supposed to insult or punch anyone; you're not helping your cause then and you'll end up losing if there's a jury.

Now, to say I'm in total agreement with you seriously adds to the pointlessness of this whole thread. If you agree that it's only the girls' own loss and let them continue their way of partying and boozing, why all the fuzz really? Having said that, I don't think there's anything more for me to add to this conversation. Thank you.

PS. I find it amusing how Billyhill is watching Scrummy's back here

[Bill Hill]

Think I might need my lawyer to interpret that post.

[aussiemermaid]

I would like to take this opportunity to thank my contact in the local community, he has worked tirelessly & valiantly, He has compiled an array of "photo Evidence" to lobby the local council....... With any luck, we shall see these bars, and bad behaviour disappear from our Village community...

I would like to pay tribute to my friend, Syd Boggle..he is a community hero...and one of mine..

I think people should see Syd, so here is a pic of him, on webcam.....This is for all the Spineless liberals...this is the face of courage

ll have

And you really think that photo evidence of someone participating in their actions of CHOICE will make bars close. how you even spoken to the bar owners??? WOW its really YOU who has no respect for anyone else--not even your self.

You where the one who didnt want to get off topic, but you havent even answered my question. My guess is because im a female, and because your sexist, wont answer it. Instead you take part in blowing off anyone male who tends to disagree with you.

How sad. Crawl back under your rock and stay there- your name should read scumbag instead of scrummage- though scrummage suits you to- scrummaging around London looking for woman and taking advantage of them.

BTW are those condoms around his eyes??? ready for his next victim maybe.

Edited May 13, 2007 by aussiemermaid