Jump to content
Join the Unexplained Mysteries community today! It's free and setting up an account only takes a moment.
- Sign In or Create Account -

9/11 Bombshell:WTC7 Security Official Details


An Urban Legend

Recommended Posts

You can't expect people to find out this information because the people that do this stuff dont exist. Its CIA Special Operations. Its Top Secret!.

Just like the JFK Assasination, you'll never find out the truth because the Government have the answers and would be a national security concern, Ex CIA operatives aren't going to bring it out because they would be labelled crazy, there would be no way of finding out if that person even worked for the CIA. CIA would simply deny, and that person would end up in a box. These people can do anything and nothing can stop them. They are spooks

Meaning, you also can't give one person involve and yet suppose to have all the evidence. And you saying they were CIA Special Operations actually translate to, YOUR EVIDENCE POINTS TO NO ONE.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Replies 1k
  • Created
  • Last Reply

Top Posters In This Topic

  • flyingswan

    321

  • Q24

    261

  • Sunofone

    83

  • AROCES

    64

Top Posters In This Topic

Posted Images

Meaning, you also can't give one person involve and yet suppose to have all the evidence. And you saying they were CIA Special Operations actually translate to, YOUR EVIDENCE POINTS TO NO ONE.

Names don't mean anything. These people don't operate with name badges on, even if they had names it wouldn't be there real name.

Evidence of the whole thing happening and the control and manipulation of the system shows that a group of elite people have done this. These people dont live by the laws of day to day citizens. If there was any evidence it would be suppressed and burned and swept into the bin. Nobody can take on these people because they are the people that control us. You dont need to have evidence because common sense tells you that these people are the only ones capable of doing such a thing and burying it. You may as well start searching for the Holy Grail in your search for evidence, I doubt you will ever find what your looking for. Ill give you a name Jeb Bush, Head of Security, World Trade Center.

Edited by tribalactivity
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Did you ever see the massive damage the 1993 bombing did? About 3 levels of parking space blown and now you believe such same kind of explosion was heard and not one Fireman or Security went to check it out first, and not one is coming out now beside Reid, Pelosi, Kennedy, Gore or whoever is saying Bush lied. Not one Fireman notice or saw bomb damage in the basement, not one soul reported about it when the firemen arrived?

Or you telling us the firemen are part of the conspiracy?

Aroces, you have to have strength to be that ignorant, im sorry. Did you not read ANYTHING I posted in response to you? By the looks of it no, you didnt. You dont even have anything to validate your arguments, you know what I have? Eye Witnesses; that holds up more credible in a court of law then saying "no your wrong and crazy". And actually, the basement explosions were widely reported by firefighters and many eye witnesses present within the buildings; you seem to just purposely overlook all of the testimony/videos posted. I already know what you are, it's apparent that your not here to learn or "discuss" anything, otherwise it would be shown in your post; you intentionally overlook anything disproving your claim, then when you counter-respond it's composed of total nonsense or insults to make us appear crazy, no facts. You claim firemen or others havent reported bombs in the buildings when I just quoted "some" of them doing so on video! Yet, you act as if I never posted it at all. HELLLOOOO!

You wanna talk about basement damage at the World Trade Centers, well then lets talk about the janitor who worked there 20 years, William Rodriguez. He reported that there was large heavy duty explosion within the basement of the tower he was in BEFORE the first plane struck, he even witnessed people walking around with they're flesh hanging off of them. Yeah, Aroces just ignore that "I dont want it to be true, I cant believe it, ......it never happened".

Oh, I love this testimony of this EMS worker from 9/11.

Karin Deshore -- Captain (E.M.S.)

Somewhere around the middle of the World Trade Center, there was this orange and red flash coming out. Initially it was just one flash. Then this flash just kept popping all the way around the building and that building had started to explode. The popping sound, and with each popping sound it was initially an orange and then a red flash came out of the building and then it would just go all around the building on both sides as far as I could see. These popping sounds and the explosions were getting bigger, going both up and down and then all around the building.

Interview, 11/07/01, New York Times

Source (oral histories)

And, lets not forget this testimony from FDNY Chief of Safety on 9/11.

"....The Chief of Safety of the Fire Department of New York told me that...er...shortly after 9 o'clock here had roughly 200 men in the building trying to effect rescues of some of those civilians who were in there...er... and that basically he received word of the possibility of a secondary device, another bomb going off. He tried to get his men out as quickly as he could but he said that there was another explosion which took place and then an hour after the first hit here, the first crash that took place, he said there was another explosion which took place in one of the towers here.

So obviously he, according to his theory, he thinks that there were actually devices that were planted in the building. One of the secondary devices he thinks that took place after the initial impact was, he thinks, may have been on the plane that crashed into one of the towers. The second device, he thinks, he speculates, was probably planted in the building...er... so that's what we have been told by...erm...Albert Turi who is the Chief of Safety for the New York City Fire Department, he told me that just moments ago.

The bottom line is, that according to the Chief of Safety of the New York Fire Department, he says that he lost a great many men in those secondary explosions and he said that there were literally hundreds if not thousands of people in those towers when the explosions took place. He said everything above the 60th floor was extremely difficult to get to as you can imagine."-NBC reporter Pat Dawson on the morning of 9/11.

Like I said, so many thing can cause an explsosion coming from the top, thru the elevator chute or on the street.
Things like what?! Hmmm? What can could cause a large heavy duty explosion within the basement of one of the towers BEFORE any plane hit it? Start naming some things which could have done it, a multitude, a multitude of things, like ...earth, wind and fire???

The only carefully crafted agenda I see in this all is to bring down Bush, and take control of the White House.
Wow, why would we need an agenda to take Bush out of the White House, he is practically putting himself out of the White House with his actions and his low approval rating;approval rating at an all time low might I add.......(26%)

Some say there is a bomb. They heard it and they saw it, and yet none of the MAJOR media, CNN or the whole AP is pursuing the reports? Why?
Yet all of the major media outlets have REPORTED it. Can you curve your thinking process around the concept of a "Cover Up" or a "Media Blackout"? You would easily get a job working for Fox News, they need people like you. The media in it's current state is nothing more but a propaganda tool of the government, they wont report anything critical to the government's versions without putting this whacky theme to it to make it appear crazy so people would laugh a ridicule it and in turn disreguard it.

Me unaware of reality? Who is trying for years now trying to convince everyone of a different story about 9/11?

Conclusively demonstrate? Who concluded it and why still no public acceptance on it?

You folks will get old on this fairy tales and one day realize Alex Jones fooled you, BIG TIME!.

AROCES, why do you even waste your time and post? Many researchers and government whistle blowers have openly disproved the governments version on 9/11, your the one still trying to follow the yellow brick road Scarecrow. :cat:

I cant beleive there are people still trying to prove that the American Government was behind 911........The one simple fact that most of the conspirates are forgetting is there has to be between 500 and 2000 people if not more covering up and lieing about what they ****REALLY**** know is the so called truth......
No The14u2cee, your the one who is uneducated and misinformed about the nature of secrecy.

"

The term "need to know", when used by government and other organizations (particularly those related to the military or espionage), describes the restriction of data which is considered very sensitive.

Under need-to-know restrictions, even if one has all the necessary official approvals (such as a security clearance) to access certain information, one would not be given access to such information unless one has a specific need to know; that is, access to the information must be necessary for the conduct of one's official duties.

As with most security mechanisms, the aim is to make it difficult for unauthorised access to occur, without inconveniencing legitimate access. The principle also aims to discourage "browsing" of sensitive material by limiting access to the smallest possible number of people.

The Battle of Normandy in 1944 is an example of a need-to-know restriction. Though thousands of military personnel were involved in planning the invasion, only a small number of them knew the entire scope of the operation; the rest were only informed of data needed to complete a small part of the plan.

"Soruce Wikipedia

I have heard so much of this nonsense that if i were not as sane and realistic as most American's, i could see how all these lie's would generate a few so called red flags...

But Please, get a grip, Im sure there is something else that you, what 00.8% percent of the population who think's BUSH was behind this could find another subject to believe in....

Dont get me wrong, i love reading and watching the stories about these lie's but is just to imaginary to believe....

Try and put some of your money and effort to good use and do something positive for the 9/11 victim's and there Families....

Uh oh, your a sane American for not believing in this conspiracy? If you're a Sane American and can walk society freely.... with your thought process, I rather be committed to an asylum.

What are the chances that 50 years from now you folks are still trying to prove Bush was beind 9/11? Like I said, you folks will just get old and then realized you been had!
What Scarecrow? What are the chances of you actually intelligently responding to any of my post?

Oh yeah, let us see then supects, names, living specimens who actually planted the bombs, coordinated it, gave the orders, allow them to be planted, detonated it, bough the explosive, and so on and so forth. GIVE ME ONE SUSPECT, you can't huh? End of Story then
PNAC Members, the C.I.A., the F.B.I., the Bush Administration, the Rochefellers, the CFR,Trilateral Commission, ect ect.........

Meaning, you also can't give one person involve and yet suppose to have all the evidence. And you saying they were CIA Special Operations actually translate to, YOUR EVIDENCE POINTS TO NO ONE.
Talking in caps dont make you sound smart Scarecrow. Check the available evidence about 9/11 being an inside job, it may not point directly at who did it, but it sure says it was an inside job, hands down, it all begs you to ask who could of been in the position to pull off such attacks, it surely wasnt a man on a dialysis machine in a cave, the best canidates are elements within the U.S. governments.

linked-image

Edited by An Urban Legend
Link to comment
Share on other sites

YUP, how are you suppose to know not EVEN ONE person involve in such a BIG conspiracy? Surely it was not done by just a couple of evil agents working for Bush. Must be a lot involve for such an operation, like experts on demolitions, source of bomb, transport, communications, planting, engineering expertise, coordiating the plane and the detonation.

And come to think of it, THERE WAS NOT EVEN ONE REHEARSAL AND THEY DID IT PERFECTLY, TIMING AND EVERYTHING WAS PRECISE!

WOW! Unbelievable!

You folks really are looking so rediculous about this, it's not too late you know. :D

As usual you trot out the 'it would take too big a conspiracy' b.s. The CIA does things in secret all the time all over the world.

We already know how the whole thing was pulled off. It was done by people thinking they were taking part in 'drills' on that day,

when what they were doing in fact was assisting unknowingly in the conspiracy. The CIA's JFK assassination was kept secret for

at least 30 or 40 years. Only now is it pretty generally known that the CIA did it. But I guess you'd deny that too.

Eventually all of the details on 9/11 will emerge, such as how and when the demolition charges were placed in Tower 7.

There are some who will tell you that many 'politically sensitive' buildings are rigged for demolition from the time of their construction,

but we wouldn't the stupid public to know about all that , now, would we? Nor do we want the public to know that the elite has

been spying on them via google-Earth style satellite technology for the past twenty or so years.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I've watched the Loose Change videos several times and the videos speak for themselves; it was clearly an inside job. I'm interested in any follow-up information and thank you for posting this, Urban Legend.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

If the firefighters had told him to get away from the building as there were bombs going off everywhere. how come the firefighters havent come forward and tell the public it was planes and bombs caused the act.

whats the offical response on wtc 7 falling seeing that a plane dident hit it.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

“9/11 Bombshell” would be an understatement but obviously we need to wait for the “individual” Avery & Burmas interviewed to be properly identified and found credible before this is good information.

Bring on Loose Change: Final Cut.

Oh yeah, let us see then supects, names, living specimens who actually planted the bombs, coordinated it, gave the orders, allow them to be planted, detonated it, bough the explosive, and so on and so forth. GIVE ME ONE SUSPECT, you can't huh? End of Story then :tu:

Anyone looking for suspects should place the CIA and Mossad high on their list (followed closely by the ISI and MI6) - false flags and covert ops are their business.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

You folks really are looking so rediculous about this, it's not too late you know. :D

Aroces, there is no need for the personal attacks; please discuss the matter in a civil manner without the flaimbaiting. The past several posts of your add nothing but this kind of content and it isn't right.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

[

Aroces, you have to have strength to be that ignorant, im sorry. Did you not read ANYTHING I posted in response to you? By the looks of it no, you didnt. You dont even have anything to validate your arguments, you know what I have? Eye Witnesses; that holds up more credible in a court of law then saying "no your wrong and crazy". And actually, the basement explosions were widely reported by firefighters and many eye witnesses present within the buildings; you seem to just purposely overlook all of the testimony/videos posted. I already know what you are, it's apparent that your not here to learn or "discuss" anything, otherwise it would be shown in your post; you intentionally overlook anything disproving your claim, then when you counter-respond it's composed of total nonsense or insults to make us appear crazy, no facts. You claim firemen or others havent reported bombs in the buildings when I just quoted "some" of them doing so on video! Yet, you act as if I never posted it at all. HELLLOOOO!

You wanna talk about basement damage at the World Trade Centers, well then lets talk about the janitor who worked there 20 years, William Rodriguez. He reported that there was large heavy duty explosion within the basement of the tower he was in BEFORE the first plane struck, he even witnessed people walking around with they're flesh hanging off of them. Yeah, Aroces just ignore that "I dont want it to be true, I cant believe it, ......it never happened".

Oh, I love this testimony of this EMS worker from 9/11.

Me ignorant? Of course I read everything, why do you think I find the logic of it simply don't make sense?

William Rodriguez said there was LARGE HEAVY EXPLOSIONS? Then who called the Fire Dept. and the Police about it? Why none of them respnded to a Large Heavy Explotion in the basement? Why didn't any of the authorities went down there and checked it out? Don't tell me only William Rodriguez heard or notice it?

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Aroces, there is no need for the personal attacks; please discuss the matter in a civil manner without the flaimbaiting. The past several posts of your add nothing but this kind of content and it isn't right.

I'm fine with that if calling one rediculous is out of bound. But how about me being called ignorant repeatedly?

I have added logic to the evidence, can't use logic then? Some evidence are mere words from witness, even at court logic is use to make your case.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

As usual you trot out the 'it would take too big a conspiracy' b.s. The CIA does things in secret all the time all over the world.

We already know how the whole thing was pulled off. It was done by people thinking they were taking part in 'drills' on that day,

when what they were doing in fact was assisting unknowingly in the conspiracy. The CIA's JFK assassination was kept secret for

at least 30 or 40 years. Only now is it pretty generally known that the CIA did it. But I guess you'd deny that too.

Eventually all of the details on 9/11 will emerge, such as how and when the demolition charges were placed in Tower 7.

There are some who will tell you that many 'politically sensitive' buildings are rigged for demolition from the time of their construction,

but we wouldn't the stupid public to know about all that , now, would we? Nor do we want the public to know that the elite has

been spying on them via google-Earth style satellite technology for the past twenty or so years.

In that case, why bother with everything when you believe that CIA ghost are the ones who did it all?

Unless you believe that they are human beings too and if we really want to bag them , we can. That is if we have something that will bag them, but we dont. all we have is he said this and that, video evidence that is not recognise by any Elected Official in this country, the entire US goverment and the majority of the American people. And that is beacuse it is merely a make believe base on manufactured evidence.

Edited by AROCES
Link to comment
Share on other sites

If the firefighters had told him to get away from the building as there were bombs going off everywhere. how come the firefighters havent come forward and tell the public it was planes and bombs caused the act.

whats the offical response on wtc 7 falling seeing that a plane dident hit it.

The firemen in the area stated that the falling debris from the towers was damaging the foundation of the other building and that they did warn people away from it. The official response is that they did their job and did it well.

Dennis Leary who operates a national foundation for firemen is enraged whenever he hears of this conspiracy. You could perhaps google him and find out more on what he has to say about it. I think he is a very good man and he is very close with all of the firefighters.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

How about that video showing the BBC reporting wtc7 collapsed 20 mins before it actually did? And William Rodriguez and others heard the explosion below them seconds before they feel the big one above them so he didn't have time to report the explosions seeing how he was rescuing people being burn alive.

Edited by silentshadow
Link to comment
Share on other sites

yes, hey AROCES, lets begin here, CAN YOU PLEASE EXPLAIN TO ME WHY BUILDING SEVEN COLLAPSED?

BTW it was touched by nothing. (Anxiously awaiting your response)

Link to comment
Share on other sites

yes, hey AROCES, lets begin here, CAN YOU PLEASE EXPLAIN TO ME WHY BUILDING SEVEN COLLAPSED?

BTW it was touched by nothing. (Anxiously awaiting your response)

Fire from the twin tower destroyed building 7, but of course you don't believe that. I tell you what, find out who the Insurance company the building is insured with and tell them you know excatly who destroyed Building 7 , they might give you a reward for it.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Let's say fire destroyed WTC 7

My question then is, why did the building collapse in on itself like it did rather than coming down in stages?

I'm not convinced there was or wasn't a conspiracy, but how was it possible for WTC 1, 2 & 7 to all collapse at free fall speed?

Edited by Left Field
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Me ignorant? Of course I read everything, why do you think I find the logic of it simply don't make sense?

William Rodriguez said there was LARGE HEAVY EXPLOSIONS? Then who called the Fire Dept. and the Police about it?

Um, YEA, William did say there were large heavy duty explosions in the basement before the first plane struck;no need to ask me that, I've already stated it, just read my response. Who called the FireDept? Well, hmmm lets see......The first plane is heading towards the first Twin Tower then before the plane impacts there is a basement explosion, then seconds later there is another large explosion from up above at the top of the building(the first plane strikes),the first plane was seen by firemen on the streets and virtually everyone in the streets, because they actually seen the first crash the first thing they did was rush towards the buildings, then the city went into total chaos. It's possible people could have called authorities because of the basement explosion but the thing is, the basement explosion and the first plane impact happened within close time proximity of each other. Literally just about every authority(FDNY,NYPD) who saw or heard the first impact started rushing towards the Towers. It all happen so quickly, the FDNY and NYPD both sped towards the towers after the first impact, whether they heard of the impact from someone else or seen it themselves, they all took immediate actions once they found out. If people would have called to report either event(the basement explosion or plane impact) the police would have already been in front or in the building's close proximity to know about it ...like they were, so either way they knew already reguardless if anyone would have called, once that first plane hit that event became public knowledge in seconds and short minutes.

Why none of them respnded to a Large Heavy Explotion in the basement?
Again, you dont read anything, ive already posted testimony you most likely didnt even read or watch. I'm starting to question the very purpose of why Im discussing this with you in particular because you have nothing more but non-arguments(insults and opinions). It was widely reported by virtually all the news sources present in New York that there were secondary and third devices going off everywhere in the building AND lower heavy duty underground(basement) explosions.

why didn't any of the authorities went down there and checked it out? Don't tell me only William Rodriguez heard or notice it?
Hmm, lets see, William was helping people out of the building with they're flesh hanging off they're bodies and police and firemen were rushing the building doing the same, and these lower explosions in the building were reported, William isnt the only person who maintains that facts. Aroces, posting to you is becoming a waste of time and redundant; I just keep explaining the same things over to you, then you come back and ask a question which was similar to your last question, and you get the same answer. What more do you want Scarecrow?! :huh:

I'm fine with that if calling one rediculous is out of bound. But how about me being called ignorant repeatedly?

I have added logic to the evidence, can't use logic then? Some evidence are mere words from witness, even at court logic is use to make your case.

:lol: Oh, yea, sorry about that then Aroces, I didnt mean to call you ignorant in an insulting sense, more like ignorant in the sense that your so "unknowing" to alot of the very facts we are trying to discuss. So if I call you ignorant, dont take it personally. ;) But I find it funny you claim you were using logic; from reading your post that appeared to be the most distant thing from your arguments......

Dennis Leary who operates a national foundation for firemen is enraged whenever he hears of this conspiracy. You could perhaps google him and find out more on what he has to say about it. I think he is a very good man and he is very close with all of the firefighters.
Oh really? If thats the case he will be even more enraged while he argues with 3/4 of the fire department and first responders who claim they heard,saw, and felt explosions around WTC 1,2, and 7. :rolleyes:

Fire from the twin tower destroyed building 7, but of course you don't believe that.
AROCES, surely you know how much of a poorly formed argument that is...... Lets see, the official story claims impact damage + a raging inferno from jet-fuel is what brought the towers down causing a "global collapse". Your argument simply isnt following logically Aroces.

1.WTC7 wasnt hit by any plane. (No widespread fireproof dislodging, or damage to core columns)

2. Wtc7 recieved minor damage from falling debris from the twin towers.

3. The "debris" only caused a fire on 2 floors!!!!!!!!!

4. 2 floors!

5. The fires were'nt anywhere near as hot as the fires in the World Trade Centers because there was no jet fuel present!!!

6. So, the only fires which could have been present on 2 floors in Wtc7 is a regular office fire caused by debris, not jet fuel.

So listen to yourself, you want us to believe World Trade Center 7 fell because of a regualr office building fire, which many steel structured buildings in history built before the World Trade Centers have survived! Buildings have had worst fires than the fire that was present on 2 floors in WTC7, they have burned for hours on multiple floors and STILL the buildings DID NOT COLLAPSE. Fire has never caused any high rise steel structure to collapse unto it's own footprint like WTC7 did without damaging any surrounding buildings, while collpasing in a mere 7 seconds.

linked-image

You have no argument against these facts. The collapse of World Trade Center 7 was a classic controlled demolition. And not to mention, there was flowing molten metal found under the base of all 3 buildings months are the collapses. To defend the government's lies on this issue has to be from blind ignorance.

linked-image

Jet fuel did not do this to the World Trade Center steel. This steel bended next to NO CRACKS. It bent like a pretzel, and Aroces fire cannot do this to steel.

linked-image

Fires dont cause buildings to collapse neatly straight down in 7 seconds without damaging nearby buildings, a controlled demolition does though......

As for you puppet journalists who spew fiction as fact

And bury lies Bush told to invade Iraq

and Afghanistan you're a part of the scam

That allows the carnage of child woman and man

The 9/11 commissions rendition of truth is fiction

Tower 7 ain't mentioned why the omission

Of it's controlled demolition, Silverstein said "pull it"

There's more spin on your book than that magic bullet

>From Pennsylvania to the lawn of the Pentagon,

The con's on, you sent pawns with fangs drawn like pythons

And spawned another Saigon for cash

Oil profits soar as rockets crash

It was a high rise genocide, planned from the inside

NORAD let it fly

Bush-Qaeda, ISI

CIA, FBI

Got the world terrorized,

your lies don't justify globalize homicide......

I tell you what, find out who the Insurance company the building is insured with and tell them you know excatly who destroyed Building 7 , they might give you a reward for it.
Oh, now that's funny, Im glad you have a sense of humor but too bad you cant argue. You see AROCES, this is all you ever do, you make a jive remark to make fun of the claim being contested while believing you have just refuted it. Jokes dont disprove, nor do they prove, so lets leave them out of this discussion, let deal with facts.

I've watched the Loose Change videos several times and the videos speak for themselves; it was clearly an inside job. I'm interested in any follow-up information and thank you for posting this, Urban Legend.
Thx,no problem; go read my article in the column section for more information. Pnac,Atta,9/11:The Conspiracy Facts Edited by An Urban Legend
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Fire from the twin tower destroyed building 7, but of course you don't believe that. I tell you what, find out who the Insurance company the building is insured with and tell them you know excatly who destroyed Building 7 , they might give you a reward for it.

that exact answer is just what i needed, thanks AROCES. I actually thought you would come up with a better explanation, anyway. If building 7 collapsed like that by fire from the twin towers like you say, than i am the stupidest person in the world, because i don't think i could ever understand that.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Sounds like this guys just trying to get his "15 minutes of fame".

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Its been confirmed! 9/11 was an inside job, this is the nail in the coffin, the burning bullet of the smoking gun!

Barry Jennings--Deputy Director, Emergency Services Department, New York City Housing Authority.

The Alex Jones Radio Show had Jason Bermas back on to go over the latest news about World Trade Center Tower 7. Although Bermas slipped and said his first name on national radio, (with an international Internet audience) he is still refusing to confirm the identity of his source, or release the full 20 minute interview (until the unscheduled release of the Final Cut). Some people do not believe a movie release date is the proper timetable for truth. It is clear that the man on the tape is Barry Jennings, Deputy Director, Emergency Services Department, New York City Housing Authority. Mr. Jennings has already gone on the record. On 911 he was on the news covered with debris, like many survivors seen on television that day. Barry Jennings has put his full story on the record with Loose Change, and wanted to remain anonymous until the movie is released. If Jason Bermas had not said his name, that may have been possible, but that is no longer the case.

On the morning of 911 Barry Jennings with Mr. Hess, one of Rudy Giuliani's highest ranking appointed officials, New York city's corporation counsel, (Hess is a Yale and Harvard graduate, a lawyer who has represented the United States in numerous major cases).

It was just after the first attack on the North tower, but before the second plane hit the South Tower, when Barry Jennings escorted Michael Hess to the World Trade Center Tower 7. Mr. Jennings recalls a large number of police officers in the lobby of WTC 7 when they arrived. The two men went up to the 23rd floor, but could not get in, so they went back to the lobby and the police took them up in the freight elevator for a second try. When they arrived on level 23, at the Office of Emergency Management they found it had been recently deserted, "coffee that was on the desk, smoke was still coming off the coffee, I saw half eaten sandwiches".

At that point he made some phone calls, and an un-named individual told them to "leave, and leave right away". Jennings and Hess then proceeded to the stairs, and made it to level 6, when there was an explosion, and the stairwell collapsed from under their feet, Mr. Jennings was actually hanging, and had to climb back up. They made it back up to level 8, where Barry Jennings had a view of the twin towers, both buildings were still standing. This is an important detail, as many debunkers have used Mr. Jennings statements out of context to claim the damage came to WTC 7 from the towers collapsing, not the case according, to Mr. Jennings.

The interview has been cut off where they say how they made it to the lobby, but when they did make it down, Mr. Jennings found it destroyed and littered with dead bodies. He said it looked like, "King Kong had came through it and stepped on it, so destroyed, I didn't know where I was. So destroyed that they had to take me out through a hole in the wall, that I believe the fire department made to get me out." Shortly after he made it out, he was seen on several news channels telling his story.

Mr. Jennings is still confused as to why Building 7 had to come down at all, and does not accept the official reason that the noises he heard were from a fuel oil tank, "I know what I heard, I heard explosions". Michael Hess has not made any public statements about that morning with Barry Jennings, perhaps we can call on wearechange.org to document Michael Hess's account of the events on 911.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

How about that video showing the BBC reporting wtc7 collapsed 20 mins before it actually did? And William Rodriguez and others heard the explosion below them seconds before they feel the big one above them so he didn't have time to report the explosions seeing how he was rescuing people being burn alive.

Why BBC, not one American Media reported it and ask our officials about it???

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Let's say fire destroyed WTC 7

My question then is, why did the building collapse in on itself like it did rather than coming down in stages?

I'm not convinced there was or wasn't a conspiracy, but how was it possible for WTC 1, 2 & 7 to all collapse at free fall speed?

That has been explained, by several engineers, both independent and the government. Support beams collapsed and it cause a pancake effect.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

that exact answer is just what i needed, thanks AROCES. I actually thought you would come up with a better explanation, anyway. If building 7 collapsed like that by fire from the twin towers like you say, than i am the stupidest person in the world, because i don't think i could ever understand that.

The point is, if ever there was the slightest evidence of foul play, Insurance companies would be one of the most interested, agree? How come none is buying into any of this theory?

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Its been confirmed! 9/11 was an inside job, this is the nail in the coffin, the burning bullet of the smoking gun!

Barry Jennings--Deputy Director, Emergency Services Department, New York City Housing Authority.

Then how come none of the major media is following up on your nail in the coffin crap?

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Fire from the twin tower destroyed building 7, but of course you don't believe that. I tell you what, find out who the Insurance company the building is insured with and tell them you know excatly who destroyed Building 7 , they might give you a reward for it.

Silverstein had it at the time and it was not insured against acts of war or terrorism.

Considering all of the money that his group lost, they will likely pay millions to make back even more through insurance settlements to anyone who can actually prove that it was not a result of terrorism on that day.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    • No registered users viewing this page.