Jump to content
Join the Unexplained Mysteries community today! It's free and setting up an account only takes a moment.
- Sign In or Create Account -

9/11 Bombshell:WTC7 Security Official Details


An Urban Legend

Recommended Posts

Then go ask a Controlled Demolition Company what it takes to do such task. See, if Bush and his buddies can pull such stunt with a few CIA operatrives.

I have no doubt a controlled demolition company would say alot of work would be required. Does that automatically mean it is impossible? I believe that with CIA/Mossad operatives in the right positions, the required manpower, planning and equipment would be available.

If anyone is interested, here is an excerpt of an interview with a leading Dutch demolition expert, in the business for 27 years, stating his view that WTC7 came down in a controlled demolition. To give a preview, here are his words, "This is a controlled demolition. Absolutely. It's been imploded. This was a hired job, performed by a team of experts."

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Replies 1k
  • Created
  • Last Reply

Top Posters In This Topic

  • flyingswan

    321

  • Q24

    261

  • Sunofone

    83

  • AROCES

    64

Top Posters In This Topic

Posted Images

I have no doubt a controlled demolition company would say alot of work would be required. Does that automatically mean it is impossible? I believe that with CIA/Mossad operatives in the right positions, the required manpower, planning and equipment would be available.

If anyone is interested, here is an excerpt of an interview with a leading Dutch demolition expert, in the business for 27 years, stating his view that WTC7 came down in a controlled demolition. To give a preview, here are his words, "This is a controlled demolition. Absolutely. It's been imploded. This was a hired job, performed by a team of experts."

YUP, a lot of work and the right amount of manpower, equipments, days of drilling holes on the infastructure, wirings, bombs, blueprint of the building. And no one noticed all this going on. :rolleyes:

And like I said, why not just say a bomb was planted by terrorist? I mean you want to destroy the building to go to war, right? Now, why cover up and not blame the terrorist for it. See the logic of it?

A Dutch Company? How about an American Company?

Edited by AROCES
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Well no, I only called you that because instead of refuting me you come back and make jokes in a pathetic attempt to discredit my claim, still to which you havnt done. Remember, jokes do not = refutation.

Nope, you call names when you can't exlpain the logic of your claim. Like why destroy building 7 and not simply say the terrorist planted a bomb? Why cover it up and not blame the terrorist? Isn't your claim is Bush wants to start a war?

Both of these buildings were steel framed structures, both buildings took damage from the towers debris, and one collapsed, yet the one with the minor damage did not. Oh what a striking paralle, Wtc7 and Bankers Trust both take debris damage, wt7 with the minor damage collapses, and then we have the South Tower collapsing first when it was hit second, so much for the duration of burning fires.

Same amount of damage? Same kind of damage? NO, there you go.

Again, why not simply blame the terrorist? Why bother covering it up? Beats the purpose, huh?

Wow, bold assertions; I never called the insurance companies idiots. Posting to you is a waste of time, its like trying to show a person without a mouth how to speak. Acroces, when you are ready to debate and actually can produce a intellectual rebutal, contact me, until then, Im ignoring you.

Well, you claim they bought into the Govenment Official report, like me? You think if you debate them they won't respond as I do? They won't argue with your manufactured evidence, instead tell you that if your proof is solid, it would have already had it's results. Hard to ignore that. :tu:

Edited by AROCES
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Both of these buildings were steel framed structures, both buildings took damage from the towers debris, and one collapsed, yet the one with the minor damage did not. Oh what a striking paralle, Wtc7 and Bankers Trust both take debris damage, wt7 with the minor damage collapses, and then we have the South Tower collapsing first when it was hit second, so much for the duration of burning fires.

Steel frame or not, the bankers trust building is a very different design, and it didn't catch fire when the debris struck it and burn uncontrolled for 7 hours.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

aro let me rimind you of the topic at hand-- the testimony about to be presented to the world in the new loose change documentary-- did you by any chance see the latest whistle-blower thread entry?? here are the details and the link-- how do you respond in face of this damning testimony?? what is,or will be,your latest fantasy in denial? are you going to hold your tounge until it is confirmed? why dont you give us BOTH perspectives on the evidence-- first tell how it will affect your opinion if confirmed then you can goad over how silly it will be if confirmed NOT to be credible--

Hanging Around WTC 7

by amy de miceli Page 1 of 1 page(s)

http://www.opednews.com

The Alex Jones Radio Show had Jason Bermas back on to go over the latest news about World Trade Center Tower 7. Although Bermas slipped and said his first name on national radio, (with an international Internet audience) he is still refusing to confirm the identity of his source, or release the full 20 minute interview (until the unscheduled release of the Final Cut). Some people do not believe a movie release date is the proper timetable for truth. It is clear that the man on the tape is Barry Jennings, Deputy Director, Emergency Services Department, New York City Housing Authority. Mr. Jennings has already gone on the record. On 911 he was on the news covered with debris, like many survivors seen on television that day. Barry Jennings has put his full story on the record with Loose Change, and wanted to remain anonymous until the movie is released. If Jason Bermas had not said his name, that may have been possible, but that is no longer the case.

On the morning of 911 Barry Jennings with Mr. Hess, one of Rudy Giuliani's highest ranking appointed officials, New York city's corporation counsel, (Hess is a Yale and Harvard graduate, a lawyer who has represented the United States in numerous major cases).

It was just after the first attack on the North tower, but before the second plane hit the South Tower, when Barry Jennings escorted Michael Hess to the World Trade Center Tower 7. Mr. Jennings recalls a large number of police officers in the lobby of WTC 7 when they arrived. The two men went up to the 23rd floor, but could not get in, so they went back to the lobby and the police took them up in the freight elevator for a second try. When they arrived on level 23, at the Office of Emergency Management they found it had been recently deserted, "coffee that was on the desk, smoke was still coming off the coffee, I saw half eaten sandwiches".

At that point he made some phone calls, and an un-named individual told them to "leave, and leave right away". Jennings and Hess then proceeded to the stairs, and made it to level 6, when there was an explosion, and the stairwell collapsed from under their feet, Mr. Jennings was actually hanging, and had to climb back up. They made it back up to level 8, where Barry Jennings had a view of the twin towers, both buildings were still standing. This is an important detail, as many debunkers have used Mr. Jennings statements out of context to claim the damage came to WTC 7 from the towers collapsing, not the case according, to Mr. Jennings.

The interview has been cut off where they say how they made it to the lobby, but when they did make it down, Mr. Jennings found it destroyed and littered with dead bodies.

link
Link to comment
Share on other sites

aro let me rimind you of the topic at hand-- the testimony about to be presented to the world in the new loose change documentary-- did you by any chance see the latest whistle-blower thread entry?? here are the details and the link-- how do you respond in face of this damning testimony?? what is,or will be,your latest fantasy in denial? are you going to hold your tounge until it is confirmed? why dont you give us BOTH perspectives on the evidence-- first tell how it will affect your opinion if confirmed then you can goad over how silly it will be if confirmed NOT to be credible--

link

Testimony of people who saw this, heard this and smell that. Now, whatever testimony you give got to make sense. Not just because someone swore he saw Bigfoot does not mean it does exist all of a sudden, right?

I assume all nearby buildings been evacuated, what is so surprising about someone asking them to evacuate the building?

They saw bodies in the lobby? Then how many casualties were there in building 7?

Link to comment
Share on other sites

You think the way I used to think AROCES :) Ok…

YUP, a lot of work and the right amount of manpower, equipments, days of drilling holes on the infastructure, wirings, bombs, blueprint of the building. And no one noticed all this going on. :rolleyes:

Perhaps you are looking at things too simply? Obviously a 100 strong demolition team did not stroll through the front door of the towers at the peak of the working day, with boxes of dynamite under their arms, wires trailing behind them and wander from office to office priming the buildings... "yes excuse me sir/madam working there, please step aside a moment while I place this explosive under your desk."

Who though would question a 'security guard' patrolling service areas of the WTC or a 'maintenance team' working in the elevator shafts of the WTC? What if (due to an insider) they all carried the correct security passes? What if furthermore this was during the weekend or night when the towers were more sparsely populated? What if the demolition charges were transported straight to the car park/delivery areas beneath the WTC towers and taken immediately through the elevator shafts to where they were needed? State the obvious but that is the whole point in covert ops - they are carried out quietly.. secretly.. planned so no one notices.

Would normal people going about their daily lives stop to question them? Would you challenge maintenance men with official passes working in the elevator shafts carrying out, as far as you are concerned, legitimate work AROCES? Would you challenge uniformed security guards moving say, plain boxes around the building AROCES? Assuming you did ask what they were doing and they say “we are carrying out maintenance,” now what will you do? Tell security? Security will tell you “ah yes we have a maintenance team booked into the building.” Being honest though, not you or anyone else would question them in the first place.

And like I said, why not just say a bomb was planted by terrorist? I mean you want to destroy the building to go to war, right? Now, why cover up and not blame the terrorist for it. See the logic of it?

No it would be illogical as terrorists simply do not have the ability to carry out an operation like that. With questionable backgrounds they could not gain access to the buildings. They would not have the ‘inside’ people necessary. They likely could not acquire the amount of explosive/demolition charges required within the US. They would not have the expertise. Assuming that the buildings were taken down covertly in a controlled demolition there would only be a select few groups able to carry it out – terrorists living in caves in the Middle East would not be one of those groups.

A Dutch Company? How about an American Company?

Do only Americans know about controlled demolition now? I have supplied an interview of a demolition expert stating WTC7 was taken down in a controlled demolition. I wonder if you can find an interview with a demolition expert (of any nationality :P ) who claims the collapse of the towers absolutely could not have been due to controlled demolition?

Edited by Q24
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Do only Americans know about controlled demolition now? I have supplied an interview of a demolition expert stating WTC7 was taken down in a controlled demolition. I wonder if you can find an interview with a demolition expert (of any nationality :P ) who claims the collapse of the towers absolutely could not have been due to controlled demolition?

http://xbehome.com/screwloosechange/pictur...hard_8-8-06.pdf

Edited by Redtail
Link to comment
Share on other sites

You think the way I used to think AROCES :) Ok…

Perhaps you are looking at things too simply? Obviously a 100 strong demolition team did not stroll through the front door of the towers at the peak of the working day, with boxes of dynamite under their arms, wires trailing behind them and wander from office to office priming the buildings... "yes excuse me sir/madam working at your desk there, please step aside a moment while I place this explosive under your desk."

Who though would question a 'security guard' patrolling service areas of the WTC or a 'maintenance team' working in the elevator shafts of the WTC? What if (due to an insider) they all carried the correct security passes? What if furthermore this was during the weekend or night when the towers were more sparsely populated? What if the demolition charges where transported straight to the car park/delivery areas beneath the WTC towers and taken immediately through the elevator shafts to where they were needed? State the obvious but that is the whole point in covert ops - they are carried out quietly.. secretly.. planned so no one notices.

Would normal people going about their daily lives stop to question them? Would you challenge maintenance men with official passes working in the elevator shafts carrying out, as far as you are concerned, legitimate work AROCES? Would you challenge uniformed security guards moving say, plain boxes around the building AROCES? Assuming you did ask what they were doing and they say “we are carrying out maintenance,” now what will you do? Tell security? Security will tell you “ah yes we have a maintenance team booked into the building.” Being honest though, not you or anyone else would question them in the first place.

You are assuming that the security and management of the building are incompetent and don't take security matter seriously, after the firt attack in 1993. Think about that.

The scenario you are giving is more like a movie scene.

Besides, you can always go back to records of maintenace and track it down. But of course can't do that, right?

No it would be illogical as terrorists simply do not have the ability to carry out an operation like that. With questionable backgrounds they could not gain access to the buildings. They would not have the ‘inside’ men necessary. They likely could not acquire the amount of explosive/demolition charges required within the US. They would not have the expertise. Assuming that the buildings were taken down covertly in a controlled demolition there would only be a select few groups able to carry it out – terrorists living in caves in the Middle East would not be one of those groups.
You don't have to be high tech then??? All you do is use a car bomb and blame it all on it. See, this controlled demolition stunt really is very illogical if all you want is scare people so you can go to war.

Do only Americans know about controlled demolition now? I have supplied an interview of a demolition expert stating WTC7 was taken down in a controlled demolition. I wonder if you can find an interview with a demolition expert (of any nationality :P ) who claims the collapse of the towers absolutely could not have been due to controlled demolition?

Nope, but an American company statement agreeing in the controlled demolition conspiracy would have more of an impact, don't you agree?

Edited by AROCES
Link to comment
Share on other sites

It would be better to stay on topic with someone in WTC7 witnessing explosions before ANY Tower had collapsed. Currently, Aroces and debunkers alike have no logical explanation for what could have caused explosions within WTC building 7 considering there was no debris which damaged it because either tower had not collapsed. Can anyone say "It's was like they planned to take down a building boom-boom-boom-boom-boom-boom-boom-boom"?

"Barry Jennings" :tu:

The Alex Jones show today welcomed Loose Change creators Dylan Avery and Jason Burmas to discuss an exclusive interview they have conducted with an individual with high level security clearance who was inside the Office of Emergency Management in World Trade Center 7 and has descibed and detailed explosions inside the building prior to the collapse of any of the buildings at ground zero on 9/11.

The interview, to be featured in the forthcoming Final Cut of Loose Change is currently under wraps but the creators have allowed some details to leak purely to protect themselves and the individual involved who has asked to remain anonymous until the film is released.

While details remain scant for obvious reasons, we can reveal that the individual concerned was asked to report to building seven with a city official after the first attack on the North tower but before the second plane hit the South Tower and before their eventual collapse, in order to provide the official with access to different floors of the building.

The city official he was escorting was attempting to reach Rudy Guiliani, who he had determined was inside building 7 at that time. According to Avery and Burmas this official now works for Guiliani partners.

The individual was also asked to provide access to the Office Of Emergency Management on the 23rd floor of the building, this was the so called "bunker" that was built inside WTC7 on the orders of Rudy Guiliani.

When he got there he found the office evacuated and after making some calls was told to leave immediately.

It was at this point that he witnessed a bomb going off inside the building:

"We subsequently went to the stairwell and were going down the stairs, when we reached the sixth floor, the landing that we were standing on gave way, there was an explosion and the landing gave way. I was left there hanging, I had to climb back up and now had to walk back up to the eighth floor. After getting to the eighth floor everything was dark."

The individual in a second clip detailed hearing further explosions and then described what he saw when he got down to the lobby:

"It was totally destroyed, it looked like King Kong had been through it and stepped on it and it was so destroyed i didn't know where I was. It was so destroyed that had to take me out through a hole in the wall, a makeshift hole I believe the fire department made to get me out."

He was then told by firefighters to get twenty blocks away from the area because explosions were going off all over the World Trade Center complex.

The key to this information is that the individual testifies this all happened BEFORE either tower collapsed, thus building 7 was at that point completely undamaged from any falling debris or resulting fires. It also means that explosions were witnessed in WTC7 up to eight hours before its collapse at around 5.30pm.

Avery and Burmas, who played the two short clips of the interview prior to further analysis and more clips to be played on their own GCN radio show later tonight at 7pm CST, further described how the individual had witnessed dead bodies in the lobby of 7 and was told by the police not to look at them.

This is vital information be cause it is in direct conflict with the official claim that no one was killed inside building 7. The 9/11 Commission report did not even mention building, yet here we have a key witness who told them he saw dead people inside the building after explosions had gutted the lower level.

What makes all this information even more explosive is the fact that this individual was interviewed by the 9/11 Commission as they conducted their so called investigation.

The fact that the building was not even mentioned in the report in light of this information thus becomes chilling and indicates that officials have lied in stating that they have not come into contact with evidence of explosive devices within the buildings.

Avery and Burmas successfully contacted the individual after discovering a TV interview he did on 9/11 while they were trawling through news footage from the day in research for the Final Cut.

Avery says that he can and will prove beyond any shadow of doubt that the individual was in building 7 on 9/11 and that what he is saying is accurate.

Source

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Serious Questions Debunkers(besides Aroces) Need To Answer

1. What could have caused explosions in World Trade Center Buildings 7, when it was literally undamged by any debris from the Towers that had not yet fell????

2. What could be the source of the explosion which caused the stairs under Mr Jennyings feet to collapse?

3. Considering WTC7 was undamaged before either tower collapsed, what could be the cause of the many dead bodies Mr Jennings witnessed in the lobby? What could have killed them in the building, when it was undamaged and had no fire?

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I have read this article before but did not consider it expert opinion as it is poor in so many ways. To start, the piece is written from a purely conventional demolition point of view, Assertion#1 ignores WTC7 completely, Assertion#2 states "there was a lot of resistance" though we know the towers fell at near freefall, Assertion#4 disregards all eyewitness testimony of explosions ie William Rodriguez, numerous firefighters and the witness for which this thread was started. I could go on but you get the idea.

The scenario you are giving is more like a movie scene.

No more so than the official story.

Nope, but an American company statement agreeing in the controlled demolition conspiracy would have more of an impact, don't you agree?

From my point of view, not in the slightest :no:

It would be better to stay on topic with someone in WTC7 witnessing explosions before ANY Tower had collapsed. Currently, Aroces and debunkers alike have no logical explanation for what could have caused explosions within WTC building 7 considering there was no debris which damaged it because either tower had not collapsed.

Right you are Urban :)

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Serious Questions Debunkers(besides Aroces) Need To Answer

1. What could have caused explosions in World Trade Center Buildings 7, when it was literally undamged by any debris from the Towers that had not yet fell????

Nothing, for there was no explosion.

2. What could be the source of the explosion which caused the stairs under Mr Jennyings feet to collapse?

Nothing, for there was no explosion, but merely a collapse

3. Considering WTC7 was undamaged before either tower collapsed, what could be the cause of the many dead bodies Mr Jennings witnessed in the lobby? What could have killed them in the building, when it was undamaged and had no fire?

No body, no murder.

You don't set the rules, and it's a free for all. Use the personal messages then if you want it exclusive. :tu:

Link to comment
Share on other sites

It would be better to stay on topic with someone in WTC7 witnessing explosions before ANY Tower had collapsed. Currently, Aroces and debunkers alike have no logical explanation for what could have caused explosions within WTC building 7 considering there was no debris which damaged it because either tower had not collapsed. Can anyone say "It's was like they planned to take down a building boom-boom-boom-boom-boom-boom-boom-boom"?

"Barry Jennings" :tu:

Source

Simple, so many debri falling off, and it could easily sound like explosion upon hitting the ground. And when you are inside a building, it is hard to determine where the sound is coming from.

So many have seen the Loch Ness monster and Big foot. It's the same case.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

=No more so than the official story.

Or what is accepted as facts, while you are having a hard time convincing the public to accept you facts.

From my point of view, not in the slightest :no:

The Fact is no one paid any attention to the Dutch companies comment.

Edited by AROCES
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Serious Questions Debunkers(besides Aroces) Need To Answer

Nothing, for there was no explosion.

Nothing, for there was no explosion, but merely a collapse

No body, no murder.

You don't set the rules, and it's a free for all. Use the personal messages then if you want it exclusive. :tu:

:lol: Omg. Anyone, somebody, would a real debunker please step forward, TK, somebody! Rather than make up some silly explanation put forward as an argument, Aroces simply denies it all! LOL! Wow. Good one.......It never happen. Thx AROCES, I'll just go back to sleep now......And people wonder why I'm not waste anymore time posting to you. :rolleyes:

AROCES, says Jennings account NEVER HAPPENED.

Anyway, I appreciate everyone else who actually put foward a real discussion towards this topic. Keep it up peeps........

Edited by An Urban Legend
Link to comment
Share on other sites

:lol: Omg. Anyone, somebody, would a real debunker please step forward, TK, somebody! Rather than make up some silly explanation put forward as an argument, Aroces simply denies it all! LOL! Wow. Good one.......It never happen. Thx AROCES, I'll just go back to sleep now......And people wonder why I'm not waste anymore time posting to you. :rolleyes:

AROCES, says Jennings account NEVER HAPPENED.

Anyway, I appreciate everyone else who actually put foward a real discussion towards this topic. Keep it up peeps........

And what is your proof that there were bombs as claimed by your witness? do you have bomb traces, like point of explosion? What kind of bomb? Who planted it? Where did the bomb come from?

You have no answer. so it never happened.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

And what is your proof that there were bombs as claimed by your witness? do you have bomb traces, like point of explosion? What kind of bomb? Who planted it? Where did the bomb come from?

You have no answer. so it never happened.

Why do I waste my time with you Aroces old buddy?????????Pppffff.......... Aroces, there is no other source for the multiple explosions in an undamaged building which collapsed in 7 seconds!! Not to mention the witness experienced it first hand, he heard an explosion then the stairway under his feet collapsed leaving him hanging for his life! He made it to the lobby and found dead bodies! The government maintains no lives were lost in building 7. Is that not enough to say there were explosives planeted in the building? Do the witnesses need to say "I heard and seen explosives 100%"? It doesnt matter what kind were used, the fact is they were there. We have 3 buildings exhibiting all the characteristics of a controlled demolition, then we have eye witnesses accounts.Oh and because this topic is about Jenning's account, I wont change the topic and talk about the "Molten Steel" found flowing under all 3 buildings. What a doozie.........

Currently, we dont know who planted the explosives, but we know who was in the position to plant it, the U.S. government. AROCES, I have to have the patience of a saint to deal with you, when you literally have no argument.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Why do I waste my time with you Aroces old buddy?????????Pppffff.......... Aroces, there is no other source for the multiple explosions in an undamaged building which collapsed in 7 seconds!! Not to mention the witness experienced it first hand, he heard an explosion then the stairway under his feet collapsed leaving him hanging for his life! He made it to the lobby and found dead bodies! The government maintains no lives were lost in building 7. Is that not enough to say there were explosives planeted in the building? Do the witnesses need to say "I heard and seen explosives 100%"? It doesnt matter what kind were used, the fact is they were there. We have 3 buildings exhibiting all the characteristics of a controlled demolition, then we have eye witnesses accounts.Oh and because this topic is about Jenning's account, I wont change the topic and talk about the "Molten Steel" found flowing under all 3 buildings. What a doozie.........

Currently, we dont know who planted the explosives, but we know who was in the position to plant it, the U.S. government. AROCES, I have to have the patience of a saint to deal with you, when you literally have no argument.

He heard a bomb, then we need to prove there was a bomb, correct?

He saw bodies, then we need dead bodies, correct?

And we should at least have hundreds of people backing up Jennings about a bomb explosion, unless he was the only one who heard it. :hmm:

Other than that all you have is someone who swore he saw a 50 foot snake, agree?

You don't know who planted it, but you have a suspect, the US Government. Well, that surely narrows it down, at least for now you don't think it is the Chinese or Russian government. :rolleyes:

Link to comment
Share on other sites

He heard a bomb, then we need to prove there was a bomb, correct?

He saw bodies, then we need dead bodies, correct?

And we should at least have hundreds of people backing up Jennings about a bomb explosion, unless he was the only one who heard it. :hmm:

Other than that all you have is someone who swore he saw a 50 foot snake, agree?

You don't know who planted it, but you have a suspect, the US Government. Well, that surely narrows it down, at least for now you don't think it is the Chinese or Russian government. :rolleyes:

"he" is Barry Jennings, Deputy Director, Emergency Services Department, New York City Housing Authority-- his testimony wont be dismissed as easily as that-- as far as suspects go...lets start with rudy ghoulianni,larry silverstein and the bush administration for the norad stand down and ensuing media blackout-- the entire cia should also deserves capital punishment as bin laden was a known asset although i believe even non active members should be investigated for the jfk assassination as well as that cover-up-- the fbi for the 93 wtc bombings and the clinton administration for ruby ridge,waco and the batf for the murahh demolition

Link to comment
Share on other sites

"he" is Barry Jennings, Deputy Director, Emergency Services Department, New York City Housing Authority-- his testimony wont be dismissed as easily as that-- as far as suspects go...lets start with rudy ghoulianni,larry silverstein and the bush administration for the norad stand down and ensuing media blackout-- the entire cia should also deserves capital punishment as bin laden was a known asset although i believe even non active members should be investigated for the jfk assassination as well as that cover-up-- the fbi for the 93 wtc bombings and the clinton administration for ruby ridge,waco and the batf for the murahh demolition

Good, now we have not just a bystander.

Now being a Deputy Director, he surely would want to confirm what he saw and heard, correct?

And how do you do that? Bomb traces, source, what kind of bomb, where did it come from, who supplied it, who planted it. AGAIN, you don't have an answer. So does our Deputy Director.

What Media blackout??? Rosie O donnel been blabbing her mouth about a Conspiracy, and been telling the entire Nation it is the governement who did it. What more do you want, a daily prime time coverage of your evidence? :blink:

By the way, you already want to hang Bush and his buddies and you can't even prove there was a bomb.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Good, now we have not just a bystander.

Now being a Deputy Director, he surely would want to confirm what he saw and heard, correct?

...

and you can't even prove there was a bomb.

exactly so using common sense and reason it can be deduced that there is an ensuing cover-up-- the video of bldg7 collapsing is PROOF of demolitions

Link to comment
Share on other sites

exactly so using common sense and reason it can be deduced that there is an ensuing cover-up-- the video of bldg7 collapsing is PROOF of demolitions

So, the goverment destroyed an entire building using controlled demolition, and they waited for all the media, firemen, police, cameras, witness to arrive before they decided to blow it apart, SO THEY CAN COVER IT UP and hope nobody notice of a controlled demolition.. Do you at all have a clue of what you are saying??? :blink: Common sense?

Edited by AROCES
Link to comment
Share on other sites

So, the goverment destroyed an entire building using controlled demolition, and they waited for all the media, firemen, police, cameras, witness to arrive before they decided to blow it apart, SO THEY CAN COVER IT UP and hope nobody notice of a controlled demolition.. Do you at all have a clue of what you are saying??? :blink: Common sense?

They know they can fool simple people, so why does it matter when they demolished the building. Patriotic American people don't want to believe it was an inside job period. Some American people need a good optometrist to fix there tunnel vision.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I have read this article before but did not consider it expert opinion as it is poor in so many ways. To start, the piece is written from a purely conventional demolition point of view,

So people who document, study, and take part in Controlled Demolitions are not experts in CD because you feel it is "poor"? Ok. How would one do it "uncoventionaly"?

Assertion#1 ignores WTC7 completely,
True, because he was talking about the "Twin Towers". Why would he mention WTC 7?

Assertion#2 states "there was a lot of resistance" though we know the towers fell at near freefall,

Yes, and he was talking about how much debris fell outside of the "footprints" of the towers. As far as time, how long should it have taken?

Assertion#4 disregards all eyewitness testimony of explosions ie William Rodriguez, numerous firefighters and the witness for which this thread was started.

So you believe that ALL explosions come from CD charges?

I could go on but you get the idea.

No I don't, please, continue.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    • No registered users viewing this page.