Siara Posted July 13, 2007 #1 Share Posted July 13, 2007 Does anyone know how far back archaeologists can date things with dendrochronology (history of climate recorded by tree rings)? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Raptor Posted July 13, 2007 #2 Share Posted July 13, 2007 You can go back however old the tree is. The oldest living tree is a bristlecone pine (?), which is almost 5000 years old. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
BlueZone Posted July 13, 2007 #3 Share Posted July 13, 2007 I think you can go further back than the tree.... for example if you have a 200 year old tree truck it might be that the first 50 rings would coincide with the last 50 rings of a tree that lived from 400 years ago to 150 years ago. In other words, it seems like they should be able to overlap trees. What they need is a 5,000 year old tree and another tree which lived from 10.000 to 4,900 years ago. I don't know how old the oldest wood artifacts are. They find incredibly old wooden objects in Chinese tombs. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
questionmark Posted July 13, 2007 #4 Share Posted July 13, 2007 I think you can go further back than the tree.... for example if you have a 200 year old tree truck it might be that the first 50 rings would coincide with the last 50 rings of a tree that lived from 400 years ago to 150 years ago. In other words, it seems like they should be able to overlap trees. Quite possible ... the only problem is that the chronology would be lost unless you had a complete section of the tree. The procedure in that case would be to Carbon date it, which would give us the date of the tree's demise and go from there. What is questionable is if the data preserved in that tree would still be accurate, wood is hygroscopic and can have absorbed all kinds of foreign matter during that time. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
camlax Posted July 16, 2007 #5 Share Posted July 16, 2007 Quite possible ... the only problem is that the chronology would be lost unless you had a complete section of the tree. The procedure in that case would be to Carbon date it, which would give us the date of the tree's demise and go from there. What is questionable is if the data preserved in that tree would still be accurate, wood is hygroscopic and can have absorbed all kinds of foreign matter during that time. They overlap, but I believe the oldest overlaps done with any accuracy are 10,000 years. There are many other dating techniques that can go much farther back, like; K-Ar dating, thorium-230 dating, Fission track dating etc Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Create an account or sign in to comment
You need to be a member in order to leave a comment
Create an account
Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!
Register a new accountSign in
Already have an account? Sign in here.
Sign In Now