Tuesday, September 27, 2022
Contact    |    RSS icon Twitter icon Facebook icon  
You are viewing: Home > News > Space & Astronomy > News story
Welcome Guest ( Login or Register )  
Space & Astronomy

Should we release all we know about space ?

By T.K. Randall
December 7, 2009 · Comment icon 6 comments



Image Credit: NASA
Three astronomers have argued that it might be a bad idea to release everything discovered about the cosmos following ESA's Planck mission in 2013 due to the unavailability of additional data once we've learned all there is to know.
Cosmologists are doing the happy dance. The European Space Agency's Planck mission is busy surveying the cosmic microwave background, aka the "echo" of the big bang, and in 2013 will release a feast of data that promises to deliver profound new insights into the origin of the universe.


Source: New Scientist | Comments (6)


Recent comments on this story
Comment icon #1 Posted by Triade 13 years ago
2013 eh...marked it on my calender I wouldn't mind all the data being released..i think everyone has as much right to it. There shouldn't be an elite of space-knowledge.
Comment icon #2 Posted by Torgo 13 years ago
Why can't the astronomers just restrict the dataset on their own, in order to test hypotheses on different sections of the data?
Comment icon #3 Posted by Kensei 13 years ago
What they are wanting to hide is here: Yin-Yang Symbol In Space . Religious censorship of science data? No thanks. We the Public paid for the data, and we want it all. Now.
Comment icon #4 Posted by RamboIII 13 years ago
What they are wanting to hide is here: Yin-Yang Symbol In Space . Religious censorship of science data? No thanks. We the Public paid for the data, and we want it all. Now. Lol the only reason there is a yingyang symbol is because the half of the universe we are traveling toward is being blueshifted while the half we are moving away from is being redshifted.
Comment icon #5 Posted by Torgo 13 years ago
They are not talking about keeping the data classified or such. They are (rather needlessly, I think) talking about trickling the data out slowly over time so that scientists can generate hypotheses and theories about the early universe based on chunks of the data, and test these theories against other chunks of data. I think it is a silly idea, as scientists could just as easily segment the data themselves.
Comment icon #6 Posted by ROGER 13 years ago
They are not talking about keeping the data classified or such. They are (rather needlessly, I think) talking about trickling the data out slowly over time so that scientists can generate hypotheses and theories about the early universe based on chunks of the data, and test these theories against other chunks of data. I think it is a silly idea, as scientists could just as easily segment the data themselves. In other words they are creating their own Job security?


Please Login or Register to post a comment.


Our new book is out now!

The Unexplained Mysteries
Book of Weird News

 AVAILABLE NOW 

Take a walk on the weird side with this compilation of some of the weirdest stories ever to grace the pages of a newspaper.

Click here to learn more

We need your help!

Support us on Patreon

 BONUS CONTENT 

For less than the cost of a cup of coffee, you can gain access to a wide range of exclusive perks including our popular 'Lost Ghost Stories' series.

Click here to learn more

 Total Posts: 7,333,408    Topics: 301,798    Members: 198,358

 Not a member yet ? Click here to join - registration is free and only takes a moment!
Recent news and articles