Wednesday, April 24, 2024
Contact    |    RSS icon Twitter icon Facebook icon  
Unexplained Mysteries
You are viewing: Home > News > Space & Astronomy > News story
Welcome Guest ( Login or Register )  
All ▾
Search Submit

Space & Astronomy

New spacecraft could nuke incoming asteroids

By T.K. Randall
March 11, 2018 · Comment icon 21 comments

Asteroids still pose a very real threat to our planet. Image Credit: NASA Goddard Conceptual Image Lab
NASA is working with US nuclear authorities to develop a spacecraft that can nuke dangerous space rocks.
Known as HAMMER (Hypervelocity Asteroid Mitigation Mission for Emergency Response), the new probe is being developed with the help of the National Nuclear Security Administration (NNSA).

In order to deflect an incoming asteroid, the spacecraft will have two options available.

The first and most preferable option would involve attempting to alter the asteroid's trajectory by directly smacking in to it at high speed. Even the slightest nudge off course could potentially work.

If there is not enough time for this however, the backup option would be to detonate a nuclear weapon with the goal of either deflecting or destroying the asteroid before it reaches Earth.
NASA has been using the asteroid Bennu, which is the target of the exploratory OSIRIS-REx mission, to calculate a hypothetical test of the HAMMER program. While Bennu only has a 1 in 2,700 chance of striking Earth in 2035, if it did happen to hit us the consequences would be devastating.

Due to its large size, the space agency has proposed sending a whole fleet of HAMMER probes to smack in to it over an extended period of time to slowly divert its trajectory away from our planet.

The nuclear option would also be available if there wasn't enough time left to accomplish this.

With any luck however, such a solution will never need to be implemented in a real-world scenario.

Source: Extreme Tech | Comments (21)




Other news and articles
Recent comments on this story
Comment icon #12 Posted by Grandpa Greenman 6 years ago
When we stop doing all the wars and quit investing so much money in how to kill people, we might be able to do those things and do space.  NASA is breaking the budget, poor people aren't breaking the budget, it is the corporate military money machine that is sucking us dry.  We need to keep up with space technology or we are going end up with everybody else's grandkids will be up there making money and our grandkids will be working a Walmart. (and living at home. )
Comment icon #13 Posted by Grandpa Greenman 6 years ago
Innovations in murder. Innovations in prosthetics. Was the Afghan and  Iraq war worth destroying our economy, because that was what it did? Cooperation also brings innovation without the consequences war.        
Comment icon #14 Posted by Silent Trinity 6 years ago
I think a far more effective method would be to get Harry Stamper and the boys into training now....    
Comment icon #15 Posted by Peter B 6 years ago
The thing is, when it comes to risk assessment, the matrix has two axes. One axis is the likelihood of the Bad Thing happening. The other axis is the effect if the Bad Thing does actually happen. In the case of an asteroid impact, sure, the likelihood is minuscule. But if it does happen, the effect is likely to be extremely serious. Look at a risk assessment matrix, and the risk rating is higher than you might suspect. Put it all together, and researching ways to protect us against asteroid impact is quite rational. ETA: That doesn't necessarily mean this method is the best; there are other (n... [More]
Comment icon #16 Posted by Peter B 6 years ago
A good point, except it depends on how far away the rock is when it's nuked: the further away the less debris will collide with the Earth.
Comment icon #17 Posted by Sir Smoke aLot 6 years ago
If it's strong enough to vaporize it but not strong enough to mess up environment on Earth it might be the best option for defense. Well, aside from the fact that it's the only option
Comment icon #18 Posted by Alien Origins 6 years ago
Well my guess is they would have to spot it at least 10 years out...You know how slow NASA is? By the time they get the thing up it may be to late.
Comment icon #19 Posted by Peter B 6 years ago
Slow? Sure, they're slow with things that have to operate in alien environments, and for which there isn't any significant problem if there's a delay. Project Apollo shows how fast NASA could operate when they only had an artificial deadline and buckets of money. If there was an asteroid Earth-bound, I think the purse-strings would be opened even more, and NASA would be even faster. In any case, I'm pretty sure NASA wouldn't stop at building just one such spacecraft - what's the harm in building two...or even ten? Nothing like a little redundancy when civilisation as we know it is on the line.... [More]
Comment icon #20 Posted by Alien Origins 6 years ago
Coming in from the Sun makes them harder to spot...The Cheblinsky meteor is a fine example of that.....And I agree I am sure they would build more than one. https://cneos.jpl.nasa.gov/nda/
Comment icon #21 Posted by Piney 6 years ago
The U.S. already put one up there according to some sources. But it's pointed downward. 


Please Login or Register to post a comment.


Our new book is out now!
Book cover

The Unexplained Mysteries
Book of Weird News

 AVAILABLE NOW 

Take a walk on the weird side with this compilation of some of the weirdest stories ever to grace the pages of a newspaper.

Click here to learn more

We need your help!
Patreon logo

Support us on Patreon

 BONUS CONTENT 

For less than the cost of a cup of coffee, you can gain access to a wide range of exclusive perks including our popular 'Lost Ghost Stories' series.

Click here to learn more

Recent news and articles