Thursday, April 18, 2024
Contact    |    RSS icon Twitter icon Facebook icon  
Unexplained Mysteries
You are viewing: Home > News > Science & Technology > News story
Welcome Guest ( Login or Register )  
All ▾
Search Submit

Science & Technology

Scientists announce major new LHC discovery

By T.K. Randall
August 29, 2018 · Comment icon 25 comments

The Large Hadron Collider is still making important discoveries. Image Credit: CC BY-SA 3.0 Maximilien Brice
The world's largest atom smasher - the Large Hadron Collider - has found evidence of Higgs boson decay.
Not content with finding the long-sought Higgs boson, the scientists behind the Large Hadron Collider in Geneva have been continuing their efforts to unravel the secrets of the universe by pushing the world-famous particle accelerator to increasingly high levels of energy and intensity.

Now it seems as though their efforts have paid off once again thanks to the first confirmed observation of Higgs bosons decaying into a pair of fundamental particles known as bottom quarks.

The discovery is important because it means that the experimental data strongly agrees with theoretical predictions, as oppose to challenging the foundations of our understanding.

"This observation is a milestone in the exploration of the Higgs boson," said spokesman Karl Jakobs.

"It shows that the ATLAS and CMS experiments have achieved deep understanding of their data and a control of backgrounds that surpasses expectations."
"ATLAS has now observed all couplings of the Higgs boson to the heavy quarks and leptons of the third generation as well as all major production modes."

The findings take scientists one step closer to understanding why the Higgs boson even exists.

"The experiments continue to home in on the Higgs particle, which is often considered a portal to new physics," said Eckhard Elsen, CERN Director for Research and Computing.

"These beautiful and early achievements also underscore our plans for upgrading the LHC to substantially increase the statistics."

"The analysis methods have now been shown to reach the precision required for exploration of the full physics landscape, including hopefully new physics that so far hides so subtly."

Source: Live Science | Comments (25)




Other news and articles
Recent comments on this story
Comment icon #16 Posted by Torchwood 6 years ago
Yes they are.  But they can affect the field they are in, and perhaps the field can affect them in return....just like with the magnet thing.   As to the practical ability to manipulate the field to do something to the particles...well, lets look at another sort of duality: Spacetime!  Everything is limited by the Cosmic speed limit (C!) , you can only go so fast through space time. Some of that speed is your passage through time, some through space. The faster you move in space, the slower you move in time.  Likewise the slower you move in space , the faster you move in time. And its pret... [More]
Comment icon #17 Posted by keithisco 6 years ago
You just had to mention Spacetime!  Nope, not happening, definitely not going to get involved today... finish off my prep for tomorrow (Chinese delegation to woo). before we get onto whether there are 10 or 26 Dimensions.
Comment icon #18 Posted by sci-nerd 6 years ago
You can't blame a nerd for dreaming 
Comment icon #19 Posted by danydandan 6 years ago
Sorry your wrong, one can't just magically conjure particles into existence. Theoretically all the higgs field does is allow particles to interact with each other. ie give mass etcetera. One can't control this energy.
Comment icon #20 Posted by sci-nerd 6 years ago
Control might have been a bit optimistic. But we could learn the conditions required for each particle to emerge, and by copying those conditions, produce said particles. Right?
Comment icon #21 Posted by danydandan 6 years ago
No, sorry. The uncertainty principle would be violated if we knew the exact conditions. Even virtual particles, and all stuff measured at the LHC are as a result of interactions between other particles. IE smashing them together. We can't predict anything really about what will happen as a result of these interactions.
Comment icon #22 Posted by sci-nerd 6 years ago
Yet...! 
Comment icon #23 Posted by danydandan 6 years ago
I strongly feel that if we produce a quantum computer powerful enough, we might be able to predict these interactions, however we will always have uncertainty and inherent error in our devices used for observations. Thus I don't see the uncertainty principle being violated.
Comment icon #24 Posted by pallidin 6 years ago
Great article!
Comment icon #25 Posted by Seti42 6 years ago
"bottom quarks". Sounds like a sexual euphemism. 


Please Login or Register to post a comment.


Our new book is out now!
Book cover

The Unexplained Mysteries
Book of Weird News

 AVAILABLE NOW 

Take a walk on the weird side with this compilation of some of the weirdest stories ever to grace the pages of a newspaper.

Click here to learn more

We need your help!
Patreon logo

Support us on Patreon

 BONUS CONTENT 

For less than the cost of a cup of coffee, you can gain access to a wide range of exclusive perks including our popular 'Lost Ghost Stories' series.

Click here to learn more

Top 10 trending mysteries
Recent news and articles