Monday, February 19, 2018
Contact us    |    Advertise    |   Help   RSS icon Twitter icon Facebook icon
    Home  ·  News  ·  Forum  ·  Stories  ·  Image Gallery  ·  Columns  ·  Encyclopedia  ·  Videos
Find: in
This news story is archived which means that, while it is still available to view, the information contained within may be outdated and the original source site/link may no longer be viewable.

For the most recent stories, please visit either the site's home page or main news section.

Humans left trees 4.2 million years ago

Posted on Friday, 11 February, 2011 | Comment icon 8 comments | News tip by: Still Waters


Image credit: Claire Huock

 
It is thought that our distant ancestors started walking on the ground up to 4.2 million years ago.

The timing of the switch suggests that it was influenced by a number of factors including changes in climate and an increase in grasslands meaning fewer trees and a greater need to cross the open ground between them.

"Early human ancestors stopped swinging in trees and started walking on the ground sometime between 4."

  View: Full article

 Source: Discovery News


  Discuss: View comments (8)

   


 
Recent comments on this story
Comment icon #1 Posted by tipotep on 11 February, 2011, 0:48
Meh i think they are guessing here considering ..... The former species is 600,000 years older than the latter and is believed to be its ancestor "believed" does not make for a solid conclusion ....TiP
Comment icon #2 Posted by :PsYKoTiC:BeHAvIoR: on 11 February, 2011, 17:22
Meh i think they are guessing here considering ..... "believed" does not make for a solid conclusion .... TiP Very true. With Darwin's theory of evolution, if we did evolve from apes or chimps, then the missing link will be found eventually. We dig out new fossils every day along with variants of existing species.
Comment icon #3 Posted by Andami on 12 February, 2011, 4:02
Very true. With Darwin's theory of evolution, if we did evolve from apes or chimps, then the missing link will be found eventually. We dig out new fossils every day along with variants of existing species. One, we didn't evolve from apes and chimps, but we probably have a common ancestor. Two, I doubt there will ever be a fossil discovered that turns out to be the "missing link" that everyone is wanting. I may sound pessimistic, but even if something was found that could satisfy the requirements of being a "missing link" many people would argue that it isn't. Why do I think this? Because of ho... [More]
Comment icon #4 Posted by Odin11 on 12 February, 2011, 6:11
Very true. With Darwin's theory of evolution, if we did evolve from apes or chimps, then the missing link will be found eventually. We dig out new fossils every day along with variants of existing species. Like Andami pretty much said, there is no such thing as a "missing link". But there are transitional fossils. In the way that people use "missing link" the following can almost all be called that. Sahelanthropus tchadensis Orrorin tugenensis Ardipithecus ramidus Australopithecus anamensis Australopithecus afarensis Kenyanthropus platyops Australopithecus africanus Australopithecus garhi Aust... [More]
Comment icon #5 Posted by danielost on 12 February, 2011, 6:16
Like Andami pretty much said, there is no such thing as a "missing link". But there are transitional fossils. In the way that people use "missing link" the following can almost all be called that. Sahelanthropus tchadensis Orrorin tugenensis Ardipithecus ramidus Australopithecus anamensis Australopithecus afarensis Kenyanthropus platyops Australopithecus africanus Australopithecus garhi Australopithecus sediba Australopithecus aethiopicus Homo habilis Homo georgicus Homo erectus Homo ergaster Homo antecessor Homo heidelbergensis Homo neanderthalensis Homo sapiens problem is until you hit homo ... [More]
Comment icon #6 Posted by Evilution13 on 12 February, 2011, 12:24
I think if man screws the world up completely, we should just climb back up into the trees and be done with it. If there's any left.
Comment icon #7 Posted by BaneSilvermoon on 14 February, 2011, 8:24
Like Andami pretty much said, there is no such thing as a "missing link". But there are transitional fossils. In the way that people use "missing link" the following can almost all be called that. Sahelanthropus tchadensis Orrorin tugenensis Ardipithecus ramidus Australopithecus anamensis Australopithecus afarensis Kenyanthropus platyops Australopithecus africanus Australopithecus garhi Australopithecus sediba Australopithecus aethiopicus Homo habilis Homo georgicus Homo erectus Homo ergaster Homo antecessor Homo heidelbergensis Homo neanderthalensis Homo sapiens Precisely, missing link is a t... [More]
Comment icon #8 Posted by :PsYKoTiC:BeHAvIoR: on 14 February, 2011, 14:03
One, we didn't evolve from apes and chimps, but we probably have a common ancestor. Two, I doubt there will ever be a fossil discovered that turns out to be the "missing link" that everyone is wanting. I may sound pessimistic, but even if something was found that could satisfy the requirements of being a "missing link" many people would argue that it isn't. Why do I think this? Because of how many times people have claimed of discovering the "missing link." Just Google "missing link between apes and humans" to see what I mean. Like Andami pretty much said, there is no such thing as a "missing ... [More]


Please Login or Register to post a comment.


  On the forums
Mystery of deadly Roman 'Gate to Hell' solved
2-19-2018
Scientists have determined what made the notorious Roman cave so deadly to those who ventured inside.
Hunt for Earth 2.0 yields 95 new exoplanets
2-18-2018
A renewed hunt for Earth-like worlds has yielded a haul of 95 previously undiscovered extrasolar planets.
Scientists create human-sheep hybrid embryos
2-18-2018
The research aims to solve donor organ shortages by making it possible to grow human organs inside sheep.
Woman sues California over Bigfoot sighting
2-18-2018
Claudia Ackley has taken it upon herself to sue the state for refusing to acknowledge the existence of Bigfoot.
Other news in this category
Early human hunting linked to drawing ability
Posted 2-11-2018 | 3 comments
The way our ancestors hunted prey may have given them a significant advantage over the Neanderthals....
 
Were dinosaurs a victim of their own success?
Posted 2-7-2018 | 0 comments
The dinosaurs' total domination of our planet may have played a major role in their eventual demise....
 
Spider with a tail found preserved in amber
Posted 2-5-2018 | 12 comments
Scientists have identified a species of long-tailed proto-spider dating back over 100 million years....
 
Dinosaur tracks found outside NASA Goddard
Posted 2-1-2018 | 11 comments
100 million-year-old dinosaur and mammal tracks have been found at NASA's Goddard Space Flight Center....
 
Oldest human fossil outside Africa discovered
Posted 1-26-2018 | 0 comments
A prehistoric jawbone unearthed in Israel's Misliya Cave is believed to date back up to 200,000 years....
 
Oolitic limestone is full of tiny fossils
Posted 1-21-2018 | 4 comments
Many of today's major buildings were constructed using a material that is filled with tiny prehistoric fossils....
 
Ancient butterflies existed before flowers
Posted 1-14-2018 | 5 comments
A fascinating discovery has called in to question everything we know about the evolution of butterflies....
 
Giant extinct bat unearthed in New Zealand
Posted 1-11-2018 | 4 comments
The giant burrowing bat not only flew, but also scurried around on the forest floor looking for food....
 
Haul of dinosaur eggs unearthed in China
Posted 1-2-2018 | 3 comments
The incredibly well-preserved fossil eggs were found by accident during excavations on Christmas Day....
 

 View: More news in this category
 
Top   |  Home   |   Forum   |   News   |   Image Gallery   |  Columns   |   Encyclopedia   |   Videos   |   Polls
UM-X 10.7 Unexplained-Mysteries.com 2001-2017
Privacy Policy and Disclaimer   |   Cookies   |   Advertise   |   Contact   |   Help/FAQ