Sunday, October 21, 2018
Contact us    |    Advertise    |   Help    |   Cookie Policy    |   Privacy Policy    RSS icon Twitter icon Facebook icon
    Home  ·  News  ·  Forum  ·  Stories  ·  Image Gallery  ·  Columns  ·  Encyclopedia  ·  Videos
Find: in
This news story is archived which means that, while it is still available to view, the information contained within may be outdated and the original source site/link may no longer be viewable.

For the most recent stories, please visit either the site's home page or main news section.

Would you buy land on another planet ?

Posted on Friday, 6 April, 2012 | Comment icon 95 comments | News tip by: Still Waters


Image credit: NASA

 
In the future we could see businesses and governments laying claim to plots of land on other worlds.

Right now the 1967 Outer Space Treaty prohibits any one nation claiming sovereignty over anywhere beyond the Earth, but as technology advances and colonization of other worlds becomes a possibility how long can this restriction remain in effect ? Space policy consultant Rand Simberg believes that in the future we will see governments making plots of land available on other planets that can be purchased and used for private development.

"Parceling out plots of land on celestial bodies might encourage people to invest in these properties, and this would benefit Earth economically, according to Simberg."

  View: Full article

 Source: Wired


  Discuss: View comments (95)

   


 
Recent comments on this story
Comment icon #86 Posted by Marks_Thoughts on 5 June, 2012, 22:23
The USA walked on the moon and planted a flag. In times past this entitled the 'discovering' nation to sovereignty of the land, at least to reasonable limits. Because there is no sentient life, actually no life at all, on the moon, I would agree that the US has the right to possession and sovereignty, with the ensuing rights to allow homesteading and other fee simple uses of the land like mining and similar. This is going to happen, perhaps not to the extent as claiming the entire moon as I describe, but it will happen. Companies or governments are going to set down on other celestial bodies i... [More]
Comment icon #87 Posted by Waspie_Dwarf on 5 June, 2012, 22:59
In case you missed the point the article refers to the ownership of celestial bodies and not the naming of them. Americas refusal to ratify both The Outer Space and Moon Treaty's are a prime example of their desire to claim territory in space. The Outer Space Treaty WAS ratified by the USA, on 10th October 1967. As for singling out the USA for the non-ratification of the Moon Treaty that seems to show a bias, given that only 13 states have ratified it and none of them are space faring nations. The nation's which have ratified the treaty are: Australia, Austria, Belgium, Chile, Kazakhstan, Leba... [More]
Comment icon #88 Posted by DONTEATUS on 5 June, 2012, 23:33
God dosnt sell the planets ! First thing one must understand is that Planets are made by Slaughtybartfast and cost tons of bucks ! Magrathea is where one must go to put in an order to get one also ! Now that ,thats well & Good Lets all go to Milliyways for a Dinner and concert !
Comment icon #89 Posted by MID on 6 June, 2012, 0:27
In case you missed the point the article refers to the ownership of celestial bodies and not the naming of them. Americas refusal to ratify both The Outer Space and Moon Treaty's are a prime example of their desire to claim territory in space. In case YOU missed the point here, I was responding to someone who mentioned the relation between owning a planet and that fad about having a star named after you. Both kind of silly, and both impossible. By the way, the US ratified the Outer Space Tereaty in 1967, and join 99 other nations as participants. The treaty is called: TreatyOn Principals Gover... [More]
Comment icon #90 Posted by MID on 6 June, 2012, 0:47
The USA walked on the moon and planted a flag. In times past this entitled the 'discovering' nation to sovereignty of the land, at least to reasonable limits. ? PROBLEM: We did not discover the Moon. We landed on it, two years after ratifying a treaty prohibiting us from such sovereignty claims. Do the words, "We came in peace for ALL MANKIND" mean anything as pertains to intent? Because there is no sentient life, actually no life at all, on the moon, I would agree that the US has the right to possession and sovereignty, with the ensuing rights to allow homesteading and other fee simple uses o... [More]
Comment icon #91 Posted by DONTEATUS on 8 June, 2012, 2:32
Billionaires Smaggillionaires ! We dont need no stinkin Quadzillionaires tell us what to do ! THe Moon Is for all to explore, mine, develop as Long as we all do it in Peace ! Same goes for every where we will plan to go ! Im all for an open and Free Space development !
Comment icon #92 Posted by Zalanox on 12 June, 2012, 19:58
It's just like those stars you can buy. You get a fancy little certificate you can frame and hang on your wall. They won't literally own the planet.
Comment icon #93 Posted by Waspie_Dwarf on 12 June, 2012, 20:53
It's just like those stars you can buy. You get a fancy little certificate you can frame and hang on your wall. They won't literally own the planet. Yes they would literally own it, that is the entire point of this discussion. From the original post: Private companies should be able to buy land on The Moon or other planets for tourism, mining or even to sell property, a space policy expert has said. Those certificates you speak of are not people buying stars, they are paying to name them (it's a total waste of money incidentally, celestial bodies are officially named by the International Astro... [More]
Comment icon #94 Posted by Zalanox on 12 June, 2012, 22:42
Yes they would literally own it, that is the entire point of this discussion. From the original post: Those certificates you speak of are not people buying stars, they are paying to name them (it's a total waste of money incidentally, celestial bodies are officially named by the International Astronomical Union, and they don't sell star names. Those fancy little certificates aren't worth the paper they are written on). You cannot own something nobody has access to. When the billionaires can get these places colonized or secured in some way then I'll acknowledge their ownership. But until then ... [More]
Comment icon #95 Posted by Waspie_Dwarf on 12 June, 2012, 23:41
You cannot own something nobody has access to. When the billionaires can get these places colonized or secured in some way then I'll acknowledge their ownership. But until then it's a giant, arrogant game. You again seem to be rather missing the point. No billionaire is claiming to own a planet. There is no one playing the arrogant game you are imagining. It is a suggestion from a so-called policy expert. Your last point about colonisation is altogether the wrong way around. If it was possible to own a planet it would make sense to buy it before it is colonised. Buying it afterwards would be l... [More]


Please Login or Register to post a comment.


  On the forums
Forum posts:
Forum topics:
Members:

6306100
267124
177575

 
Ancient talisman inscription remains a mystery
10-20-2018
Experts in London have been attempting to decipher the writing on an ancient stone found in the 19th century.
Dr Who and Star Trek get new constellations
10-20-2018
NASA has revealed an unofficial list of new gamma ray constellations based on popular culture icons.
BepiColombo probe is on its way to Mercury
10-20-2018
The ambitious new mission will see two satellites placed in to orbit around the closest planet to the Sun.
Man hits record-breaking high-pitched note
10-19-2018
Wang Xiaolong, who is from China, achieved a world record in the 'highest vocal note by a male' category.
Other news in this category
Dr Who and Star Trek get new constellations
Posted 10-20-2018 | 1 comment
NASA has revealed an unofficial list of new gamma ray constellations based on popular culture icons....
 
BepiColombo probe is on its way to Mercury
Posted 10-20-2018 | 2 comments
The ambitious new mission will see two satellites placed in to orbit around the closest planet to the Sun....
 
Bizarre solar system is baffling astronomers
Posted 10-16-2018 | 5 comments
Four gargantuan planets have been observed orbiting a relatively young star approximately 500 light years away....
 
Are there moonmoons orbiting other moons ?
Posted 10-14-2018 | 10 comments
A new study has looked in to the possibility that some large moons may actually have their own 'submoons'....
 
Astronomers detect 19 more fast radio bursts
Posted 10-13-2018 | 3 comments
The previously undiscovered deep space flashes could help scientists solve this ongoing astronomical enigma....
 
Astronauts will fly again after Soyuz failure
Posted 10-12-2018 | 52 comments
NASA has stated that it is still committed to using Russian Soyuz rockets to launch astronauts to the ISS....
 
Soyuz astronauts make emergency landing
Posted 10-11-2018 | 52 comments
Two astronauts narrowly escaped disaster today when their Soyuz rocket developed a problem with its booster....
 
Virgin Galactic to fly to space 'within weeks'
Posted 10-9-2018 | 7 comments
Richard Branson's fledgling space tourism firm could be heading in to space for the first time very soon....
 
Hubble in trouble as another gyroscope fails
Posted 10-8-2018 | 7 comments
The iconic space telescope has now lost so many of its gyroscopes that it may never fully recover....
 
Voyager 2 is nearing the edge of the solar system
Posted 10-8-2018 | 5 comments
The long-lived interplanetary spacecraft is set to become the second probe ever to reach interstellar space....
 
Europe's MASCOT rover dies after just one day
Posted 10-7-2018 | 9 comments
The latest robotic lander to touch down on the asteroid Ryugu had only enough power to last around 17 hours....
 

 View: More news in this category
 
Top   |  Home   |   Forum   |   News   |   Image Gallery   |  Columns   |   Encyclopedia   |   Videos   |   Polls
UM-X 10.712 Unexplained-Mysteries.com © 2001-2018
Terms   |   Privacy Policy   |   Cookies   |   Advertise   |   Contact   |   Help/FAQ