Sunday, May 20, 2018
Contact us    |    Advertise    |   Help   RSS icon Twitter icon Facebook icon
    Home  ·  News  ·  Forum  ·  Stories  ·  Image Gallery  ·  Columns  ·  Encyclopedia  ·  Videos
Find: in
This news story is archived which means that, while it is still available to view, the information contained within may be outdated and the original source site/link may no longer be viewable.

For the most recent stories, please visit either the site's home page or main news section.

Would you buy land on another planet ?

Posted on Friday, 6 April, 2012 | Comment icon 95 comments | News tip by: Still Waters


Image credit: NASA

 
In the future we could see businesses and governments laying claim to plots of land on other worlds.

Right now the 1967 Outer Space Treaty prohibits any one nation claiming sovereignty over anywhere beyond the Earth, but as technology advances and colonization of other worlds becomes a possibility how long can this restriction remain in effect ? Space policy consultant Rand Simberg believes that in the future we will see governments making plots of land available on other planets that can be purchased and used for private development.

"Parceling out plots of land on celestial bodies might encourage people to invest in these properties, and this would benefit Earth economically, according to Simberg."

  View: Full article

 Source: Wired


  Discuss: View comments (95)

   


 
Recent comments on this story
Comment icon #86 Posted by Marks_Thoughts on 5 June, 2012, 22:23
The USA walked on the moon and planted a flag. In times past this entitled the 'discovering' nation to sovereignty of the land, at least to reasonable limits. Because there is no sentient life, actually no life at all, on the moon, I would agree that the US has the right to possession and sovereignty, with the ensuing rights to allow homesteading and other fee simple uses of the land like mining and similar. This is going to happen, perhaps not to the extent as claiming the entire moon as I describe, but it will happen. Companies or governments are going to set down on other celestial bodies i... [More]
Comment icon #87 Posted by Waspie_Dwarf on 5 June, 2012, 22:59
In case you missed the point the article refers to the ownership of celestial bodies and not the naming of them. Americas refusal to ratify both The Outer Space and Moon Treaty's are a prime example of their desire to claim territory in space. The Outer Space Treaty WAS ratified by the USA, on 10th October 1967. As for singling out the USA for the non-ratification of the Moon Treaty that seems to show a bias, given that only 13 states have ratified it and none of them are space faring nations. The nation's which have ratified the treaty are: Australia, Austria, Belgium, Chile, Kazakhstan, Leba... [More]
Comment icon #88 Posted by DONTEATUS on 5 June, 2012, 23:33
God dosnt sell the planets ! First thing one must understand is that Planets are made by Slaughtybartfast and cost tons of bucks ! Magrathea is where one must go to put in an order to get one also ! Now that ,thats well & Good Lets all go to Milliyways for a Dinner and concert !
Comment icon #89 Posted by MID on 6 June, 2012, 0:27
In case you missed the point the article refers to the ownership of celestial bodies and not the naming of them. Americas refusal to ratify both The Outer Space and Moon Treaty's are a prime example of their desire to claim territory in space. In case YOU missed the point here, I was responding to someone who mentioned the relation between owning a planet and that fad about having a star named after you. Both kind of silly, and both impossible. By the way, the US ratified the Outer Space Tereaty in 1967, and join 99 other nations as participants. The treaty is called: TreatyOn Principals Gover... [More]
Comment icon #90 Posted by MID on 6 June, 2012, 0:47
The USA walked on the moon and planted a flag. In times past this entitled the 'discovering' nation to sovereignty of the land, at least to reasonable limits. ? PROBLEM: We did not discover the Moon. We landed on it, two years after ratifying a treaty prohibiting us from such sovereignty claims. Do the words, "We came in peace for ALL MANKIND" mean anything as pertains to intent? Because there is no sentient life, actually no life at all, on the moon, I would agree that the US has the right to possession and sovereignty, with the ensuing rights to allow homesteading and other fee simple uses o... [More]
Comment icon #91 Posted by DONTEATUS on 8 June, 2012, 2:32
Billionaires Smaggillionaires ! We dont need no stinkin Quadzillionaires tell us what to do ! THe Moon Is for all to explore, mine, develop as Long as we all do it in Peace ! Same goes for every where we will plan to go ! Im all for an open and Free Space development !
Comment icon #92 Posted by Zalanox on 12 June, 2012, 19:58
It's just like those stars you can buy. You get a fancy little certificate you can frame and hang on your wall. They won't literally own the planet.
Comment icon #93 Posted by Waspie_Dwarf on 12 June, 2012, 20:53
It's just like those stars you can buy. You get a fancy little certificate you can frame and hang on your wall. They won't literally own the planet. Yes they would literally own it, that is the entire point of this discussion. From the original post: Private companies should be able to buy land on The Moon or other planets for tourism, mining or even to sell property, a space policy expert has said. Those certificates you speak of are not people buying stars, they are paying to name them (it's a total waste of money incidentally, celestial bodies are officially named by the International Astro... [More]
Comment icon #94 Posted by Zalanox on 12 June, 2012, 22:42
Yes they would literally own it, that is the entire point of this discussion. From the original post: Those certificates you speak of are not people buying stars, they are paying to name them (it's a total waste of money incidentally, celestial bodies are officially named by the International Astronomical Union, and they don't sell star names. Those fancy little certificates aren't worth the paper they are written on). You cannot own something nobody has access to. When the billionaires can get these places colonized or secured in some way then I'll acknowledge their ownership. But until then ... [More]
Comment icon #95 Posted by Waspie_Dwarf on 12 June, 2012, 23:41
You cannot own something nobody has access to. When the billionaires can get these places colonized or secured in some way then I'll acknowledge their ownership. But until then it's a giant, arrogant game. You again seem to be rather missing the point. No billionaire is claiming to own a planet. There is no one playing the arrogant game you are imagining. It is a suggestion from a so-called policy expert. Your last point about colonisation is altogether the wrong way around. If it was possible to own a planet it would make sense to buy it before it is colonised. Buying it afterwards would be l... [More]


Please Login or Register to post a comment.


  On the forums
Forum posts:
Forum topics:
Members:

6185558
263184
175216

 
Planet-hunting probe captures first image
5-20-2018
NASA's new spacecraft has returned a breathtaking two-second exposure which features over 200,000 stars.
Firm wants to build city of floating pyramids
5-20-2018
Italian architecture firm Lazzarini Design Studio is looking to construct entire neighborhoods that float in the ocean.
World's smallest house built using nanorobotics
5-19-2018
Scientists in France have created a house so small that not even a mite would be able to fit through the door.
128-year-old woman 'miserable her entire life'
5-19-2018
A woman thought to be the world's oldest living human has referred to her extremely long life as a 'punishment'.
Other news in this category
Planet-hunting probe captures first image
Posted 5-20-2018 | 14 comments
NASA's new spacecraft has returned a breathtaking two-second exposure which features over 200,000 stars....
 
Further evidence of Planet Nine discovered
Posted 5-18-2018 | 11 comments
A small solar system object with a strange orbit has hinted at the presence of a large, unknown world....
 
New evidence of geysers on Europa discovered
Posted 5-15-2018 | 2 comments
Decades-old data from the Galileo spacecraft has all-but confirmed the presence of geysers on Jupiter's icy moon....
 
NASA confirms drone for Mars 2020 mission
Posted 5-13-2018 | 8 comments
The space agency is moving forward with its plan to send a helicopter drone to Mars in two years' time....
 
SpaceX debuts new model of its Falcon 9 rocket
Posted 5-12-2018 | 6 comments
The new 'Block 5' Falcon 9 was used to successfully place a Bangladeshi satellite in to orbit yesterday....
 
Mysterious 'exiled' asteroid found in Kuiper Belt
Posted 5-11-2018 | 0 comments
An asteroid from the earliest days of the solar system has been found four billion kilometers from Earth....
 
Moon mission 'a step towards Mars', says NASA
Posted 5-10-2018 | 4 comments
The US space agency has emphasized that its Moon ambitions will not distract from its efforts to reach Mars....
 
Scientists reveal the Sun's ultimate fate
Posted 5-8-2018 | 22 comments
When our star eventually dies, it will go out in a blaze of glory and produce what is known as a planetary nebula....
 
NASA's InSight lander is on its way to Mars
Posted 5-5-2018 | 8 comments
The spacecraft blasted off from Vandenberg Air Force Base in California aboard an Atlas V rocket earlier today....
 
Can a medieval tapestry help find Planet Nine?
Posted 5-4-2018 | 28 comments
Scientists have been looking to the past to help them determine the whereabouts of the elusive ninth planet....
 
Helium detected on 'super-Neptune' exoplanet
Posted 5-3-2018 | 0 comments
For the first time ever, scientists have detected helium in the atmosphere of a planet in orbit around a distant star....
 

 View: More news in this category
 
Top   |  Home   |   Forum   |   News   |   Image Gallery   |  Columns   |   Encyclopedia   |   Videos   |   Polls
UM-X 10.7 Unexplained-Mysteries.com 2001-2018
Terms   |   Privacy Policy   |   Cookies   |   Advertise   |   Contact   |   Help/FAQ