Thursday, August 16, 2018
Contact us    |    Advertise    |   Help    |   Cookie Policy    |   Privacy Policy    RSS icon Twitter icon Facebook icon
    Home  ·  News  ·  Forum  ·  Stories  ·  Image Gallery  ·  Columns  ·  Encyclopedia  ·  Videos
Find: in
This news story is archived which means that, while it is still available to view, the information contained within may be outdated and the original source site/link may no longer be viewable.

For the most recent stories, please visit either the site's home page or main news section.

Would you buy land on another planet ?

Posted on Friday, 6 April, 2012 | Comment icon 95 comments | News tip by: Still Waters


Image credit: NASA

 
In the future we could see businesses and governments laying claim to plots of land on other worlds.

Right now the 1967 Outer Space Treaty prohibits any one nation claiming sovereignty over anywhere beyond the Earth, but as technology advances and colonization of other worlds becomes a possibility how long can this restriction remain in effect ? Space policy consultant Rand Simberg believes that in the future we will see governments making plots of land available on other planets that can be purchased and used for private development.

"Parceling out plots of land on celestial bodies might encourage people to invest in these properties, and this would benefit Earth economically, according to Simberg."

  View: Full article

 Source: Wired


  Discuss: View comments (95)

   


 
Recent comments on this story
Comment icon #86 Posted by Marks_Thoughts on 5 June, 2012, 22:23
The USA walked on the moon and planted a flag. In times past this entitled the 'discovering' nation to sovereignty of the land, at least to reasonable limits. Because there is no sentient life, actually no life at all, on the moon, I would agree that the US has the right to possession and sovereignty, with the ensuing rights to allow homesteading and other fee simple uses of the land like mining and similar. This is going to happen, perhaps not to the extent as claiming the entire moon as I describe, but it will happen. Companies or governments are going to set down on other celestial bodies i... [More]
Comment icon #87 Posted by Waspie_Dwarf on 5 June, 2012, 22:59
In case you missed the point the article refers to the ownership of celestial bodies and not the naming of them. Americas refusal to ratify both The Outer Space and Moon Treaty's are a prime example of their desire to claim territory in space. The Outer Space Treaty WAS ratified by the USA, on 10th October 1967. As for singling out the USA for the non-ratification of the Moon Treaty that seems to show a bias, given that only 13 states have ratified it and none of them are space faring nations. The nation's which have ratified the treaty are: Australia, Austria, Belgium, Chile, Kazakhstan, Leba... [More]
Comment icon #88 Posted by DONTEATUS on 5 June, 2012, 23:33
God dosnt sell the planets ! First thing one must understand is that Planets are made by Slaughtybartfast and cost tons of bucks ! Magrathea is where one must go to put in an order to get one also ! Now that ,thats well & Good Lets all go to Milliyways for a Dinner and concert !
Comment icon #89 Posted by MID on 6 June, 2012, 0:27
In case you missed the point the article refers to the ownership of celestial bodies and not the naming of them. Americas refusal to ratify both The Outer Space and Moon Treaty's are a prime example of their desire to claim territory in space. In case YOU missed the point here, I was responding to someone who mentioned the relation between owning a planet and that fad about having a star named after you. Both kind of silly, and both impossible. By the way, the US ratified the Outer Space Tereaty in 1967, and join 99 other nations as participants. The treaty is called: TreatyOn Principals Gover... [More]
Comment icon #90 Posted by MID on 6 June, 2012, 0:47
The USA walked on the moon and planted a flag. In times past this entitled the 'discovering' nation to sovereignty of the land, at least to reasonable limits. ? PROBLEM: We did not discover the Moon. We landed on it, two years after ratifying a treaty prohibiting us from such sovereignty claims. Do the words, "We came in peace for ALL MANKIND" mean anything as pertains to intent? Because there is no sentient life, actually no life at all, on the moon, I would agree that the US has the right to possession and sovereignty, with the ensuing rights to allow homesteading and other fee simple uses o... [More]
Comment icon #91 Posted by DONTEATUS on 8 June, 2012, 2:32
Billionaires Smaggillionaires ! We dont need no stinkin Quadzillionaires tell us what to do ! THe Moon Is for all to explore, mine, develop as Long as we all do it in Peace ! Same goes for every where we will plan to go ! Im all for an open and Free Space development !
Comment icon #92 Posted by Zalanox on 12 June, 2012, 19:58
It's just like those stars you can buy. You get a fancy little certificate you can frame and hang on your wall. They won't literally own the planet.
Comment icon #93 Posted by Waspie_Dwarf on 12 June, 2012, 20:53
It's just like those stars you can buy. You get a fancy little certificate you can frame and hang on your wall. They won't literally own the planet. Yes they would literally own it, that is the entire point of this discussion. From the original post: Private companies should be able to buy land on The Moon or other planets for tourism, mining or even to sell property, a space policy expert has said. Those certificates you speak of are not people buying stars, they are paying to name them (it's a total waste of money incidentally, celestial bodies are officially named by the International Astro... [More]
Comment icon #94 Posted by Zalanox on 12 June, 2012, 22:42
Yes they would literally own it, that is the entire point of this discussion. From the original post: Those certificates you speak of are not people buying stars, they are paying to name them (it's a total waste of money incidentally, celestial bodies are officially named by the International Astronomical Union, and they don't sell star names. Those fancy little certificates aren't worth the paper they are written on). You cannot own something nobody has access to. When the billionaires can get these places colonized or secured in some way then I'll acknowledge their ownership. But until then ... [More]
Comment icon #95 Posted by Waspie_Dwarf on 12 June, 2012, 23:41
You cannot own something nobody has access to. When the billionaires can get these places colonized or secured in some way then I'll acknowledge their ownership. But until then it's a giant, arrogant game. You again seem to be rather missing the point. No billionaire is claiming to own a planet. There is no one playing the arrogant game you are imagining. It is a suggestion from a so-called policy expert. Your last point about colonisation is altogether the wrong way around. If it was possible to own a planet it would make sense to buy it before it is colonised. Buying it afterwards would be l... [More]


Please Login or Register to post a comment.


  On the forums
Forum posts:
Forum topics:
Members:

6256047
265349
176560

 
Viral 'goat monster' is a genuine species
8-15-2018
A deformed-looking goat-like creature seen in a recent viral video has turned out to be an actual goat breed.
Mystery Russian satellite 'could be a weapon'
8-15-2018
A US State Department official has revealed that one Russian satellite is exhibiting 'very abnormal behavior'.
Concerns grow as Opportunity remains silent
8-15-2018
It is looking increasingly likely that the recent Martian dust storm may have silenced the rover for good.
'Drunk and irritable' wasps descend on the UK
8-14-2018
Wasps in Britain have been getting drunk on fermented fruit and left-over pub cider, experts claim.
Other news in this category
Mystery Russian satellite 'could be a weapon'
Posted 8-15-2018 | 8 comments
A US State Department official has revealed that one Russian satellite is exhibiting 'very abnormal behavior'....
 
Concerns grow as Opportunity remains silent
Posted 8-15-2018 | 13 comments
It is looking increasingly likely that the recent Martian dust storm may have silenced the rover for good....
 
Pence: US Space Force to be set up by 2020
Posted 8-13-2018 | 26 comments
Trump's plan to establish American dominance in space could be set in motion sooner rather than later....
 
Parker Solar Probe has successfully launched
Posted 8-12-2018 | 4 comments
The probe, which is on a daring mission to the Sun, will become the fastest man-made object in history....
 
Jupiter's iconic cloud bands are only skin deep
Posted 8-10-2018 | 1 comment
Scientists have determined just how far down Jupiter's colorful atmospheric bands actually go....
 
Ganymede generates powerful magnetic waves
Posted 8-8-2018 | 5 comments
Jupiter's largest moon Ganymede is producing 'chorus waves' one million times more powerful than average....
 
Meteorite found in Africa is older than the Earth
Posted 8-7-2018 | 12 comments
Scientists have been studying a meteorite that dates back to a time before the birth of our solar system....
 
Curiosity rover celebrates its 6th birthday
Posted 8-6-2018 | 7 comments
The iconic rover, which landed on Mars six years ago, has celebrated with a self-congratulating Tweet....
 
Mystery surrounds universe's rate of expansion
Posted 8-5-2018 | 34 comments
Scientists have discovered discrepancies in our understanding of how fast the universe is expanding....
 
Rogue planet detected outside our solar system
Posted 8-4-2018 | 11 comments
The huge object is 12.7 times the mass of Jupiter and has a magnetic field 200 times more powerful....
 
NASA unveils new SpaceX and Boeing crews
Posted 8-3-2018 | 1 comment
The nine astronauts will be embarking on the first manned launches from American soil since 2011....
 

 View: More news in this category
 
Top   |  Home   |   Forum   |   News   |   Image Gallery   |  Columns   |   Encyclopedia   |   Videos   |   Polls
UM-X 10.712 Unexplained-Mysteries.com © 2001-2018
Terms   |   Privacy Policy   |   Cookies   |   Advertise   |   Contact   |   Help/FAQ