Thursday, April 25, 2024
Contact    |    RSS icon Twitter icon Facebook icon  
Unexplained Mysteries
You are viewing: Home > News > Space & Astronomy > News story
Welcome Guest ( Login or Register )  
All ▾
Search Submit

Space & Astronomy

One small step for man, or for 'a' man ?

By T.K. Randall
August 28, 2012 · Comment icon 16 comments

Image Credit: NASA
Over the years there has been much debate over what words Armstrong used in his famous phrase.
"That's one small step for man, one giant leap for mankind." It's one of the most recognizable phrases in history, Neil Armstrong uttered these famous words as he stepped on to the lunar surface as the first human ever to walk on another world. But has history got it right ? After returning to the Earth, Armstrong pointed out that his actual words were "one small for a man", but that the "a" was too quiet to hear properly on the recording.

NASA has always supported Armstrong's position on the matter, claiming that there was indeed an additional "a" in the statement. In 2006 a computer analysis conducted by Peter Shann Ford also seemed to confirm that there was a missing word in there but that it was too quiet for a human to pick up. Smithsonian's space curator, Roger Launius, also reviewed this evidence and found the conclusions convincing.

"I thought about it after landing," Armstrong had said in 2011 interview. "It, you know, was a pretty simple statement, talking about stepping off something. Why, it wasn't a very complex thing. It was what it was."[!gad]"That's one small step for man, one giant leap for mankind." It's one of the most recognizable phrases in history, Neil Armstrong uttered these famous words as he stepped on to the lunar surface as the first human ever to walk on another world. But has history got it right ? After returning to the Earth, Armstrong pointed out that his actual words were "one small for a man", but that the "a" was too quiet to hear properly on the recording.

NASA has always supported Armstrong's position on the matter, claiming that there was indeed an additional "a" in the statement. In 2006 a computer analysis conducted by Peter Shann Ford also seemed to confirm that there was a missing word in there but that it was too quiet for a human to pick up. Smithsonian's space curator, Roger Launius, also reviewed this evidence and found the conclusions convincing.

"I thought about it after landing," Armstrong had said in 2011 interview. "It, you know, was a pretty simple statement, talking about stepping off something. Why, it wasn't a very complex thing. It was what it was."
The astronaut acknowledged during a 30th anniversary gathering in 1999 that he did not hear himself say it either when he listened to the transmission from the July 20, 1969, moon landing.


Source: New Zealand Herald | Comments (16)




Other news and articles
Recent comments on this story
Comment icon #7 Posted by Karlis 12 years ago
Interesting how one singular word can make such a difference.. If we say it was (the usually accepted) *man* and *mankind*, it's basically saying the same thing. i.e., *man* & *mankind* can both be taken to be referring to humans as a species. When thought of as *a man* and *mankind*, it makes much more sense... *a man* suddenly becomes an individual person.. "One small step for a man, one giant leap for mankind" makes much more sense when considering the enormity of the event. For me it will always be *a man* Or am I overthinking this too much? As you write, "One small step for a man, one... [More]
Comment icon #8 Posted by King Fluffs 12 years ago
It's a quote I believe most, if not all people in the civilized world have heard.
Comment icon #9 Posted by Karlis 12 years ago
It's a quote I believe most, if not all people in the civilized world have heard. Hi King Fluffs -- the quote the world knows is: "That's one small step for man, one giant leap for mankind."What Armstrong actually said included the indefinite article, "a", thus what Armstrong actually said was: "That's one small step for a man, one giant leap for mankind." Nit-picking? Maybe. Below is an axcerpt from the article in the OP Was the walk on the moon one small step for man, or a man? Neil Armstrong's first words from the moon were heard all over Earth, and Earth heard this: "That's one small step ... [More]
Comment icon #10 Posted by Taun 12 years ago
The broadcast was a bit staticy (if that's a word) and it seems to have either lost signal strength for a fractional instant right at that moment, or the microphone just didn't pick up the 'a' at the same level as the rest of the statement... 'a man' does make more sense - though I always thought that what 'man' could have meant was 'man' as in the species, and 'mankind' as in civilization... (at least thats what I thought at the time)...
Comment icon #11 Posted by 27vet 12 years ago
I remember listening to it on the radio, as there was no TV in S.A. in those days. I always wondered what he meant and it only became apparent years later when the debate started.
Comment icon #12 Posted by Ryegrog 12 years ago
To me it's not important what he said. The great feat of landing on the moon and returning to tell about it is the big picture. God Bless Neil Armstrong.
Comment icon #13 Posted by Likely Guy 12 years ago
"That's one small step..." Was the greatest understatement in history from the world's most modest hero. They don't make them like that anymore. *edit: add Buzz Aldrin and Mike Collins* Unless today, there exists a super energetic youngster, with all the smarts and energy that will take humankind to Mars in a few generations. That will be another "...giant leap, for all mankind".
Comment icon #14 Posted by Walter White 12 years ago
If he says he said it that's good enough for me. Agreed. If Neil Armstrong claims he said "One small step for a man", then as far as I'm concerned he said it.
Comment icon #15 Posted by cerberusxp 12 years ago
I watched it as it happened and in the 70's "man" still meant all humans in that type of reference. " One small step for man, one giant leap for mankind" those words still echo in my mind exactly the way he said them, being I was not quite a teen yet. It was very impressionable. Then again it may be we didn't hear the A was because he was exerting energy to take the step and wasn't audible enough.
Comment icon #16 Posted by Opinionist 12 years ago
The one who actually said it had confirmed it already, so why argue.


Please Login or Register to post a comment.


Our new book is out now!
Book cover

The Unexplained Mysteries
Book of Weird News

 AVAILABLE NOW 

Take a walk on the weird side with this compilation of some of the weirdest stories ever to grace the pages of a newspaper.

Click here to learn more

We need your help!
Patreon logo

Support us on Patreon

 BONUS CONTENT 

For less than the cost of a cup of coffee, you can gain access to a wide range of exclusive perks including our popular 'Lost Ghost Stories' series.

Click here to learn more

Recent news and articles