Friday, February 23, 2018
Contact us    |    Advertise    |   Help   RSS icon Twitter icon Facebook icon
    Home  ·  News  ·  Forum  ·  Stories  ·  Image Gallery  ·  Columns  ·  Encyclopedia  ·  Videos
Find: in
This news story is archived which means that, while it is still available to view, the information contained within may be outdated and the original source site/link may no longer be viewable.

For the most recent stories, please visit either the site's home page or main news section.

Higgs: 'stop calling it the god particle'

Posted on Tuesday, 9 April, 2013 | Comment icon 28 comments | News tip by: Render


Image credit: CC 2.0 Andrew A. Ranicki

 
The scientist behind the Higgs boson has called for people to stop calling it the God particle.

Professor Peter Higgs is credited with predicting the existence of the particle in 1964 and following its discovery became a worldwide celebrity. One thing he still has a problem with however is the use of the term "God particle" to reference the Higgs boson. "First of all, I'm an atheist," he said during a recent BBC interview. "The second thing is I know that name was a kind of joke and not a very good one."

The term "God particle" was first suggested by Nobel Prize-winning physicist Leon Lederman in a book in which he wrote - "This boson is so central to the state of physics today, so crucial to our final understanding of the structure of matter, yet so elusive, that I have given it a nickname: the God particle." The Higgs Boson was thereafter referred to as the God particle both by scientists and in the media, much to Professor Higgs' dismay.

"The 83-year-old scientist, who lives in Edinburgh, insisted the reference was not funny and was actually misleading."

  View: Full article

 Source: Telegraph


  Discuss: View comments (28)

   


 
Recent comments on this story
Comment icon #19 Posted by Frank Merton on 23 April, 2013, 9:59
Peter Higgs is a great scientist and a charming man. That he gets this honor is fine with me. That there are others involved is always the case.
Comment icon #20 Posted by Render on 23 April, 2013, 12:04
Peter Higgs is a great scientist and a charming man. That he gets this honor is fine with me. That there are others involved is always the case. But Higgs wasn't the only discoverer. That's the whole point. He discovered it in parallel with Brout and Englert .. then 3 others get involved and contributed further. But a lazy journalist only used one name in an article, Higgs...So now everyone ingorantly calls it the Higgs like he's the only one who came with it and built on this theory. It's disrespectful to keep singling him out and ignoring all the others. How would you feel?
Comment icon #21 Posted by Frank Merton on 23 April, 2013, 12:41
Was Einstein the only discoverer of relativity, Darwin the only discoverer of evolution, Feynman the only discoverer of Feynman diagrams? No one works in a vacuum, and this is getting to be less and less the case. You ask how I would feel? What sort of question is that? I would be happy for him. Envy is what I am hearing, and it isn't appropriate in science.
Comment icon #22 Posted by Render on 23 April, 2013, 13:11
Was Einstein the only discoverer of relativity, Darwin the only discoverer of evolution, Feynman the only discoverer of Feynman diagrams? No one works in a vacuum, and this is getting to be less and less the case. You ask how I would feel? What sort of question is that? I would be happy for him. Envy is what I am hearing, and it isn't appropriate in science. Maybe im not explaining this right ... Okay, suppose you discovered a planet where life is present... and around the same time someone in different place discoveres the exact same planet . Then some jerk journalist doesn't even mention you... [More]
Comment icon #23 Posted by Frank Merton on 23 April, 2013, 13:39
I assume there will be awards aplenty handed out for this, not just to Higgs. It's just that a simple name is needed, this one has stuck, it is vastly better than "god particle," and the man is worthy. Lots and lots of things are named after just one individual, and there may be some unfairness involved, but words and names stick. After all, we don't call "America" something like "Columbia," and from what I know about Christopher as a person, it is just as well.
Comment icon #24 Posted by sepulchrave on 24 April, 2013, 15:59
In the original papers, Englert and Brout describe how the gauge vector bosons in a system with broken symmetry do not necessarily have to be massless, while Peter Higgs identifies a specific symmetry-breaking mechanism that will lead to two massive scalar gauge bosons (in addition to some vector gauge bosons). The ``Higgs particle'' is a massive scalar boson; I do not think it is unfair to attribute this particle to Higgs alone. Englert and Brout came very close, but did not explicitly identify the particle in their paper; Higgs did. If a Nobel prize for the entire theory is awarded only to H... [More]
Comment icon #25 Posted by Colonel Rhuairidh on 27 April, 2013, 6:47
But Higgs wasn't the only discoverer. That's the whole point. He discovered it in parallel with Brout and Englert .. then 3 others get involved and contributed further. But a lazy journalist only used one name in an article, Higgs...So now everyone ingorantly calls it the Higgs like he's the only one who came with it and built on this theory. It's disrespectful to keep singling him out and ignoring all the others. How would you feel? yes, but Higgs Boson is one thing, Higgs Brout Englert Boson is surely quite another. It sounds like a firm of lawyers, or an advertising agency.
Comment icon #26 Posted by Colonel Rhuairidh on 27 April, 2013, 6:54
Maybe im not explaining this right ... Okay, suppose you discovered a planet where life is present... and around the same time someone in different place discoveres the exact same planet . Then some jerk journalist doesn't even mention you, and hails the other person as the most brilliant mind of this century. And then, even though you did the exact same thing, you get no recognition from because no one knows you or receives you as credible, because you weren't "the discoverer". They're not even asking to have their names mentioned, that's not envy .. that's validated entitled recognition. The... [More]
Comment icon #27 Posted by libstaK on 27 April, 2013, 10:11
Well now that it has been proven to exist "God Particle" does seem a bit inappropriate doesn't it
Comment icon #28 Posted by ExpandMyMind on 27 April, 2013, 14:55
In the original papers, Englert and Brout describe how the gauge vector bosons in a system with broken symmetry do not necessarily have to be massless, while Peter Higgs identifies a specific symmetry-breaking mechanism that will lead to two massive scalar gauge bosons (in addition to some vector gauge bosons). The ``Higgs particle'' is a massive scalar boson; I do not think it is unfair to attribute this particle to Higgs alone. Englert and Brout came very close, but did not explicitly identify the particle in their paper; Higgs did. If a Nobel prize for the entire theory is awarded only to H... [More]


Please Login or Register to post a comment.


  On the forums
Forum posts:
Forum topics:
Members:

6118042
261239
173461

 
CT scans reveal baby thylacines for first time
2-22-2018
Scientists have used modern scanning techniques to discover what thylacine infants really looked like.
Transplant patient ends up with two hearts
2-22-2018
A man in India unexpectedly underwent a rare operation that has left him with two working, beating hearts.
NASA reveals Phoenix lander's dusty grave
2-22-2018
A new image of the long-dead Phoenix lander on Mars has shown that it has become coated in a layer of dust.
How did the Egyptians align the Great Pyramid?
2-21-2018
Archaeologist and engineer Glen Dash has worked out how such a precise alignment was achieved.
Other news in this category
CT scans reveal baby thylacines for first time
Posted 2-22-2018 | 1 comment
Scientists have used modern scanning techniques to discover what thylacine infants really looked like....
 
'World's loneliest tree' records new epoch
Posted 2-21-2018 | 4 comments
A solitary tree on an island in New Zealand may hold the key to determining the beginning of the Anthropocene....
 
Scientists create human-sheep hybrid embryos
Posted 2-18-2018 | 2 comments
The research aims to solve donor organ shortages by making it possible to grow human organs inside sheep....
 
Graphene filter can make seawater drinkable
Posted 2-16-2018 | 16 comments
Scientists have developed a new type of water filter that can make even polluted seawater drinkable....
 
NASA to develop a new 'quiet' supersonic jet
Posted 2-13-2018 | 2 comments
The US government is funding a new experimental aircraft known as the Low-Boom Flight Demonstrator....
 
Boston Dynamics robot can now open doors
Posted 2-13-2018 | 16 comments
The firm's dog-like SpotMini robot is now able to use its robotic arm to turn handles and hold doors open....
 
Scientists create self-healing electronic skin
Posted 2-10-2018 | 1 comment
The new material is capable of repairing itself when damaged and can even be recycled to make new skin....
 
Millions of viruses are raining down every day
Posted 2-7-2018 | 11 comments
A new study has revealed that large numbers of viruses may be falling from the sky on a daily basis....
 
Vahana 'flying car' passes first flight test
Posted 2-5-2018 | 7 comments
The autonomous flying passenger drone has taken to the skies for the first time at a test site in Oregon....
 
Sophia the robot is now a fashion model
Posted 1-28-2018 | 18 comments
The eerily human-like robot has ditched her bald-headed android guise in favor of something more glamorous....
 
Chinese scientists create cloned monkeys
Posted 1-28-2018 | 1 comment
Two identical long-tailed macaques, Zhong Zhong and Hua Hua, have been created by scientists in China....
 

 View: More news in this category
 
Top   |  Home   |   Forum   |   News   |   Image Gallery   |  Columns   |   Encyclopedia   |   Videos   |   Polls
UM-X 10.7 Unexplained-Mysteries.com 2001-2017
Privacy Policy and Disclaimer   |   Cookies   |   Advertise   |   Contact   |   Help/FAQ