Jump to content
Join the Unexplained Mysteries community today! It's free and setting up an account only takes a moment.
- Sign In or Create Account -

UFO research: Findings vs. facts


UM-Bot

Recommended Posts

ufo2.jpg
Image credit: iStockPhoto
For decades now, eyes and sky have met to witness the buzzing of our world by Unidentified Flying Objects, termed UFOs or simply flying saucers. Extraterrestrials have come a long way to purportedly share the friendly skies with us.UFOs and alien visitors are part of our culture—a far-out phenomenon when judged against those "low life" wonders Bigfoot and the Loch Ness monster.

And after all those years, as the saying goes, UFOs remain a riddle inside a mystery wrapped in an enigma.

news icon View: Full Article | Source: Space.com
Link to comment
Share on other sites

 
  • Replies 4
  • Created
  • Last Reply

Top Posters In This Topic

  • snuffypuffer

    2

  • UM-Bot

    1

  • Lilly

    1

  • Cebrakon

    1

Top Posters In This Topic

user posted image "The capture of optical spectra from mobile, unpredictable luminosities is one of those innovations.

More work to be done here but [there are] some good results already."NARCAP was established in 2000 and is dedicated to the advancement of aviation safety issues as they apply to, what they term Unidentified Aerial Phenomena (UAP).Roe said that a decade from now, researchers should have even better instrumentation at their disposal and better data on UAP of several varieties. His forecast is that scientific rigor will prevail, demonstrating that there are "stable, mobile, unusual, poorly documented phenomena with quite unusual properties manifesting within our atmosphere," he told SPACE.com.

user posted image View: Full Article | Source: Space.com

That was a pretty long, vague way to say that these folks have better equipment and can get better video images of these doodads. I'm glad to see this, though. Out of all the unexplained phenomena going around, UFOs have the least amount of credibility. I'd like to see that change.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

.... Out of all the unexplained phenomena going around, UFOs have the least amount of credibility. I'd like to see that change.

So would I. I've seen one of the darn things. I haven't come to any conclusions, mind you (I have no idea if it was black ops, ET, a natural phenomenon, or a prank etc.). Some further investigation certainly will please me.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

So would I. I've seen one of the darn things. I haven't come to any conclusions, mind you (I have no idea if it was black ops, ET, a natural phenomenon, or a prank etc.). Some further investigation certainly will please me.

:ph34r: The odd thing is, we have boatloads of scientific proof of UFOs, but no one seems to know about it. This may be because the studies date from 1947 to 1969 and have long been out of print. I refer to a book called The Humanoids, published first by the Flying Saucer Review, an English journal still in healthy existence. There is a page about it on the web. Next one of the greatest Ufologists of the 20th C., the late Gordon Creighton, added more chapters, each dealing in detail with just one case. In that form, it was published as a hardback in the US by Henry Regnery. This is one of the great books in my library. I bought it for $50 on the Web.

:w00t: OK, so the book is obscure. Surely those who read it must be struck by the vast amount of information one can glean from it, though it is nothing more than case studies. If you want to read it, it is on my web site below, readable or downloadable, free.

:geek: Why is it so important? For one thing, it provides scientific proof that we are visited by hundreds of species of star-traveling humanoids. Scientific proof means we can rule out the alternatives. It also shows that probably all the star-traveling species are humanoids like us, in a fantastic array of different sizes and colors. I suspect their interal organs are quite different.

:rofl: At the moment, there seems to be a battle between science and the forbidden sciences, such as Ufology. This may be the way sociologists see it. And there seems to be a misunderstanding between New Age people and science. These phoney wars are all based on ignorance. Really, we should be allies against the fundamentalists. I explain these phoney wars in The Book.

:geek:The Humanoids are all encounters by ordinary citizens in lightly inhabited spots with alien humanoids and their space-craft. The type of encounter varies, from sexual seduction to wrestling matches. Some communicate solely by vocalizations, as we do. Some communicate solely by telepathy, with one another and with us. But what if we don't speak their language? Then they resort to hand signals or brute force. It is quite clear their space-craft are not secret military weapons, expecially when the aliens fall outside the variation of humans? They are not hallucinations because of the physical contact that sometimes happens. Similarly, one can rule out Venus, Hoaxes by ultra-lights

and whatever else you can think of.

~~~Cebrakon

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Can you explain the "scientific evidence" on alien existence here, sort of paraphrase it down to the gist? Or will I have to read your book?

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    • No registered users viewing this page.