Thursday, April 27, 2017
Contact us    |    Advertise    |   Help   RSS icon Twitter icon Facebook icon
    Home  ·  News  ·  Forum  ·  Stories  ·  Image Gallery  ·  Columns  ·  Encyclopedia  ·  Videos
Find: in

Did prehistoric birds fly with four wings ?


Posted on Friday, 15 March, 2013 | Comment icon 14 comments | News tip by: Still Waters


Image credit: Wikimedia Commons

 
Some of the earliest birds may have taken to the skies using a set of four wings instead of two.

Birds started to appear around 150 million years ago and were descended from therapods, a group of dinosaurs that included Tyrannosaurus Rex. It isn't clear exactly how and why the ability to fly appeared however it is generally thought that the first wings would have been used for gliding between the trees before they developed full flying capabilities.

One major difference in some of the earlier bird species was that, based on fossil evidence, these earlier fliers had large feathers on both their fore and hind limbs suggesting that they flew using two sets of wings. Over the next few million years however these additional wings would have slowly been lost, eventually leaving just the one set that we see in modern birds today.

"Roughly 150 million years ago, birds began to evolve."

  View: Full article |  Source: Smithsonian Magazine

  Discuss: View comments (14)

   


 
Recent comments on this story
Comment icon #5 Posted by Zeta Reticulum on 15 March, 2013, 16:41
Maybe I should stand on the house and flap my arms. Maybe I could develop wings and fly away. I might get committed too. Well if evolution is correct, maybe if we all flap our arms each day, in a few million years people will have developed wings and the ability to fly.
Comment icon #6 Posted by Lava_Lady on 15 March, 2013, 17:48
Maybe because Darwinism's just a bunch of speculations based on no evidence... Yeah, unlike religion which is backed up by hard evidence... This 4 wing theory does not make a lot of sense. The large feathers on the back legs were probably just that, large feathers. May have aided in gliding.
Comment icon #7 Posted by Andromedan Starseed 333 on 15 March, 2013, 20:23
interesting its more than possible and etc.like how long ago did they lose the other two set of wings?
Comment icon #8 Posted by highdesert50 on 18 March, 2013, 11:13
There is certainly less energy expelled in walking than in flying. So, using that argument, and the notion that these feathered legs would have inhibited movement, why would feathered flying legs ever emerged as an evolved trait?
Comment icon #9 Posted by Abramelin on 19 March, 2013, 8:47
interesting its more than possible and etc.like how long ago did they lose the other two set of wings? They never did lose the other set of wings: it were -and still are- also legs. .
Comment icon #10 Posted by Abramelin on 19 March, 2013, 8:51
Well if evolution is correct, maybe if we all flap our arms each day, in a few million years people will have developed wings and the ability to fly. The evolution theory is most probably correct, but your understanding of it is obviously not.
Comment icon #11 Posted by Atentutankh-pasheri on 19 March, 2013, 16:38
There is certainly less energy expelled in walking than in flying. So, using that argument, and the notion that these feathered legs would have inhibited movement, why would feathered flying legs ever emerged as an evolved trait? The feathers would have evolved before flight, for instance we now know velociraptor had feathers on parts of it's body, forearms, head and arms I think. Probably for display, but I think also for warmth. On the smaller dinosaurs these feathers were very small and seem to act as down for insulation. I presume that it is no longer disputed that dinosaurs were warm bloo... [More]
Comment icon #12 Posted by shrooma on 21 March, 2013, 5:39
Well if evolution is correct, maybe if we all flap our arms each day, in a few million years people will have developed wings and the ability to fly. . I was kinda hoping for jetpacks & hovercars instead..... :-)
Comment icon #13 Posted by Frank Merton on 21 March, 2013, 5:53
The evolution theory is most probably correct, but your understanding of it is obviously not. That would be inheritence of acquired characteristics. Chop off the puppy's tail and it does not alter the length of its decendents' tails. I would say we should prefer the phrase, "evolutionary theory," representing the body of understanding science has about evolution. The other wording is obsolete and misleading. Now if there were some reason puppies born with short tails survive and reproduce better than those with longer tails, then nature would select in favor of those with shorter tails and ult... [More]
Comment icon #14 Posted by Geldoblam on 30 March, 2013, 10:41
If they flew with four wings why lose them then?


Please Login or Register to post a comment.


  On the forums
Mystery of Antarctica's 'Blood Falls' solved
4-26-2017
Researchers have made a new discovery in relation to one of Antarctica's most unusual natural features.
Cassini begins dive between Saturn's rings
4-26-2017
The dangerous nature of the maneuver has resulted in NASA temporarily losing contact with the spacecraft.
Plastic-eating caterpillar could aid disposal
4-26-2017
A species of caterpillar known to eat wax inside beehives has been found to eat plastic bags as well.
Trump urges NASA to speed up Mars mission
4-25-2017
The US President has stated that he would like to see astronauts visiting Mars before the year 2021.
Other news in this category
Mystery human species had an advanced brain
Posted 4-24-2017 | 1 comment
Homo naledi's brain may not have been as big as that of a modern human, but it was still sophisticated....
 
Fossilized dinosaur eggs unearthed in China
Posted 4-23-2017 | 7 comments
Discovered near Foshan in the southeast of the country, the eggs date back over 70 million years....
 
'Hobbits' much older than previously thought
Posted 4-21-2017 | 2 comments
Scientists have revealed that Homo floresiensis is actually one of the earliest known forms of human....
 
Tallest men trace back to mammoth hunters
Posted 4-13-2017 | 19 comments
A new study has linked a prehistoric population of mammoth hunters with some of today's tallest people....
 
Tyrannosaurs used 'sixth sense' to hunt prey
Posted 3-30-2017 | 38 comments
The giant two-legged carnivores of the Cretaceous had more than just big teeth and jaws in their arsenal....
 
Australia's own 'Jurassic Park' discovered
Posted 3-27-2017 | 10 comments
Scientists have identified a site containing thousands of footprints from 21 different dinosaur species....
 
Scotland could be birthplace of the dinosaurs
Posted 3-23-2017 | 16 comments
A major shakeup of the dinosaur family tree has suggested that they may have originated in the UK....
 
World's oldest plant fossil discovered
Posted 3-14-2017 | 0 comments
The groundbreaking find pushes back the evolution of complex life forms by another 400 million years....
 
Ancient human cranium unearthed in Portugal
Posted 3-14-2017 | 12 comments
The 400,000-year-old fossil cranium has been hailed as the oldest discovery of its kind in the country....
 
DNA offers clues to woolly mammoth's demise
Posted 3-4-2017 | 13 comments
An analysis of mammoth DNA has revealed that the species had become wracked with genetic disease....
 
Mystery surrounds ancient skulls in China
Posted 3-4-2017 | 14 comments
Two partial human skulls unearthed in central China could belong to an unknown archaic human species....
 

 View: More news in this category
 
Top   |  Home   |   Forum   |   News   |   Image Gallery   |  Columns   |   Encyclopedia   |   Videos   |   Polls
UM-X 10.7 Unexplained-Mysteries.com 2001-2017
Privacy Policy and Disclaimer   |   Cookies   |   Advertise   |   Contact   |   Help/FAQ