Saturday, June 25, 2016
Contact us    |    Advertise    |   Help   RSS icon Twitter icon Facebook icon
    Home  ·  News  ·  Forum  ·  Stories  ·  Image Gallery  ·  Columns  ·  Encyclopedia  ·  Videos
Find: in

Did prehistoric birds fly with four wings ?


Posted on Friday, 15 March, 2013 | Comment icon 14 comments | News tip by: Still Waters


Image credit: Wikimedia Commons

 
Some of the earliest birds may have taken to the skies using a set of four wings instead of two.

Birds started to appear around 150 million years ago and were descended from therapods, a group of dinosaurs that included Tyrannosaurus Rex. It isn't clear exactly how and why the ability to fly appeared however it is generally thought that the first wings would have been used for gliding between the trees before they developed full flying capabilities.

One major difference in some of the earlier bird species was that, based on fossil evidence, these earlier fliers had large feathers on both their fore and hind limbs suggesting that they flew using two sets of wings. Over the next few million years however these additional wings would have slowly been lost, eventually leaving just the one set that we see in modern birds today.

"Roughly 150 million years ago, birds began to evolve."

  View: Full article |  Source: Smithsonian Magazine

  Discuss: View comments (14)

   


 
Recent comments on this story
Comment icon #5 Posted by Zeta Reticulum on 15 March, 2013, 16:41
Maybe I should stand on the house and flap my arms. Maybe I could develop wings and fly away. I might get committed too. Well if evolution is correct, maybe if we all flap our arms each day, in a few million years people will have developed wings and the ability to fly.
Comment icon #6 Posted by Lava_Lady on 15 March, 2013, 17:48
Maybe because Darwinism's just a bunch of speculations based on no evidence... Yeah, unlike religion which is backed up by hard evidence... This 4 wing theory does not make a lot of sense. The large feathers on the back legs were probably just that, large feathers. May have aided in gliding.
Comment icon #7 Posted by Andromedan Starseed 333 on 15 March, 2013, 20:23
interesting its more than possible and etc.like how long ago did they lose the other two set of wings?
Comment icon #8 Posted by highdesert50 on 18 March, 2013, 11:13
There is certainly less energy expelled in walking than in flying. So, using that argument, and the notion that these feathered legs would have inhibited movement, why would feathered flying legs ever emerged as an evolved trait?
Comment icon #9 Posted by Abramelin on 19 March, 2013, 8:47
interesting its more than possible and etc.like how long ago did they lose the other two set of wings? They never did lose the other set of wings: it were -and still are- also legs. .
Comment icon #10 Posted by Abramelin on 19 March, 2013, 8:51
Well if evolution is correct, maybe if we all flap our arms each day, in a few million years people will have developed wings and the ability to fly. The evolution theory is most probably correct, but your understanding of it is obviously not.
Comment icon #11 Posted by Atentutankh-pasheri on 19 March, 2013, 16:38
There is certainly less energy expelled in walking than in flying. So, using that argument, and the notion that these feathered legs would have inhibited movement, why would feathered flying legs ever emerged as an evolved trait? The feathers would have evolved before flight, for instance we now know velociraptor had feathers on parts of it's body, forearms, head and arms I think. Probably for display, but I think also for warmth. On the smaller dinosaurs these feathers were very small and seem to act as down for insulation. I presume that it is no longer disputed that dinosaurs were warm bloo... [More]
Comment icon #12 Posted by shrooma on 21 March, 2013, 5:39
Well if evolution is correct, maybe if we all flap our arms each day, in a few million years people will have developed wings and the ability to fly. . I was kinda hoping for jetpacks & hovercars instead..... :-)
Comment icon #13 Posted by Frank Merton on 21 March, 2013, 5:53
The evolution theory is most probably correct, but your understanding of it is obviously not. That would be inheritence of acquired characteristics. Chop off the puppy's tail and it does not alter the length of its decendents' tails. I would say we should prefer the phrase, "evolutionary theory," representing the body of understanding science has about evolution. The other wording is obsolete and misleading. Now if there were some reason puppies born with short tails survive and reproduce better than those with longer tails, then nature would select in favor of those with shorter tails and ult... [More]
Comment icon #14 Posted by Geldoblam on 30 March, 2013, 10:41
If they flew with four wings why lose them then?


Please Login or Register to post a comment.


  On the forums
Bipedal bear sighted again in New Jersey
6-24-2016
A bear known as Pedals has become something of a celebrity thanks to his habit of walking on two legs.
Vegetables grown on Mars should be edible
6-24-2016
Dutch scientists have replicated the soil on Mars to demonstrate that vegetables can be grown there.
Boston Dynamics reveals new 'SpotMini' robot
6-24-2016
The robotics firm has revealed its latest creation - a dog-like robot designed to help around the house.
Russia to build teleporter within 20 years
6-23-2016
The multi-trillion dollar endeavour could see teleportation become a reality within only two decades.
Other news in this category
Killer asteroid almost wiped out mammals too
Posted 6-20-2016 | 2 comments
The asteroid which wiped out the dinosaurs almost spelled disaster for the world's mammals as well....
 
New species of ichthyosaur unearthed in UK
Posted 6-14-2016 | 4 comments
The prehistoric aquatic reptile fossil, which was found in a quarry, dates back over 200 million years....
 
Neanderthal-built stone rings found in cave
Posted 5-25-2016 | 16 comments
Remarkable prehistoric structures made from stalagmites have been discovered inside a cave in France....
 
Humans lived in America earlier than thought
Posted 5-16-2016 | 25 comments
New evidence has pushed the arrival of the first humans in the Americas back more than 1,500 years....
 
Scientists find first ever fossilized heart
Posted 4-20-2016 | 7 comments
The fossil organ was discovered inside the remains of a fish specimen dating back 119 million years....
 
Dinosaurs 'in decline' before asteroid strike
Posted 4-19-2016 | 21 comments
A new study has suggested that the dinosaurs had already been dying out long before the asteroid hit....
 
Deep-sea creatures survived the apocalypse
Posted 4-17-2016 | 4 comments
Scientists have determined how deep-sea creatures survived the asteroid impact that killed the dinosaurs....
 
Did human diseases doom the Neanderthals ?
Posted 4-15-2016 | 5 comments
Recent studies have suggested that diseases carried by modern humans may have proven catastrophic....
 
Prehistoric snakeskin shows signs of color
Posted 4-2-2016 | 5 comments
Scientists have been able to determine the skin color of a snake that lived over 10 million years ago....
 
Did competition for food wipe out Megalodon ?
Posted 4-1-2016 | 6 comments
The largest shark that ever lived may have been driven to extinction by competition from other predators....
 
Were the 'hobbits' wiped out by modern man ?
Posted 3-30-2016 | 25 comments
New evidence has indicated that Homo floresiensis may have died out shortly after homo sapiens arrived....
 

 View: More news in this category
 
Top   |  Home   |   Forum   |   News   |   Image Gallery   |  Columns   |   Encyclopedia   |   Videos   |   Polls
UM-X 10.7 Unexplained-Mysteries.com 2001-2015
Privacy Policy and Disclaimer   |   Cookies   |   Advertise   |   Contact   |   Help/FAQ