Sunday, June 15, 2025
Contact    |    RSS icon Twitter icon Facebook icon  
Unexplained Mysteries Support Us
You are viewing: Home > News > Modern Mysteries > News story
Welcome Guest ( Login or Register )  
All ▾
Search Submit

Modern Mysteries

Titanic sunk by steering blunder

By T.K. Randall
September 23, 2010 · Comment icon 9 comments

Image Credit: Public Domain
According to a new book the Titanic sunk due to a basic steering blunder rather than from not seeing the iceberg.
The revelation comes almost 100 years after the event and had been kept secret by the family of the most senior officer to survive the disaster. It was also revealed that if the ship had stayed put instead of carrying on after hitting the iceberg that it would have stayed afloat long enough for everyone to be rescued.
According to a new book, the ship had plenty of time to miss the iceberg but the helmsman panicked and turned the wrong way. By the time the catastrophic error was corrected it was too late and the side of the ship was fatally holed by the iceberg.


Source: Telegraph | Comments (9)




Other news and articles
Our latest videos Visit us on YouTube
Recent comments on this story
Comment icon #1 Posted by Eldorado 15 years ago
The latest, in a long line, of documentaries I've seen on the subject put the main blame on the quality of the rivets used on the hull. Although the programme was sensible enough to concede that a combination of chance and human error led to the tragedy.
Comment icon #2 Posted by ThePitOfReason 15 years ago
Yea it sounds to me like someone just wanting to sell a book. All of her real creditable witnesses are dead and now she thinks is a good time to make a profit off a family secret. Well keep it and give all the money you make from your book to charity then I might buy into the idea.
Comment icon #3 Posted by Raptor Witness 15 years ago
There's some credibility here. For one thing, an error like this is very reasonable, given the deion of the reason. It's not something you would expect to be made up by an inexperienced navigator, and it's not a theory I've heard before ... not to say someone hasn't mentioned it, someplace. Second, and perhaps most important is the ten minutes makes perfect sense, regardless of blame, because they assumed that they could still navigate, even if they had some damage. I would expect more marvelous tales if this were just someone wanting to sell a book. It's not much to make a book out of, really... [More]
Comment icon #4 Posted by Corp 15 years ago
"Oh turn away from the iceberg. My bad."
Comment icon #5 Posted by BiffSplitkins 15 years ago
Well, at least it wasn't some stupid consipracy theory saying that the United States government blew a hole in the side of the ship and the rivets were coated with thermite or something.
Comment icon #6 Posted by Psychosis The Juggalo 15 years ago
"Oh turn away from the iceberg. My bad." Well, at least it wasn't some stupid consipracy theory saying that the United States government blew a hole in the side of the ship and the rivets were coated with thermite or something. OK THOSE where hilarious. Now, I mentioned this article in chat and someone said "Maybe it is a stir to make money" well Maybe it is a stir to make money, but at the expense of a war hero? That's bullsh*t. And where are all her witnesses? No one in the family is alive who witnessed it. In fact, I don't think there are any survivors of the Titanic left alive period, thou... [More]
Comment icon #7 Posted by psychoticmike 15 years ago
there are so many theorys like the men in the crows nest didn't have binoculars, or the rivits i don't think we will ever know for sure what really all went wrong that caused it to sink
Comment icon #8 Posted by danielost 15 years ago
Well, at least it wasn't some stupid consipracy theory saying that the United States government blew a hole in the side of the ship and the rivets were coated with thermite or something. your talking hindenburg, and that was supposedly accidently coated with thermite. they didnt know what thermite was then. so they put the ingredents for it when they painted it. but mythbusters disproved it.
Comment icon #9 Posted by electro13 15 years ago
Just bad luck thats all.


Please Login or Register to post a comment.


Our new book is out now!
Book cover

The Unexplained Mysteries
Book of Weird News

 AVAILABLE NOW 

Take a walk on the weird side with this compilation of some of the weirdest stories ever to grace the pages of a newspaper.

Click here to learn more

We need your help!
Patreon logo

Support us on Patreon

 BONUS CONTENT 

For less than the cost of a cup of coffee, you can gain access to a wide range of exclusive perks including our popular 'Lost Ghost Stories' series.

Click here to learn more

Top 10 trending mysteries
Recent news and articles