Sunday, April 14, 2024
Contact    |    RSS icon Twitter icon Facebook icon  
Unexplained Mysteries
You are viewing: Home > News > Space & Astronomy > News story
Welcome Guest ( Login or Register )  
All ▾
Search Submit

Space & Astronomy

Venus really is volcanically active, new study shows

March 16, 2023 · Comment icon 19 comments

Image Credit: NASA / JPL-Caltech / Peter Rubin
Scientists had been looking for evidence of active volcanism on the surface of Venus for years.
Venus is almost the same size, mass and density as Earth. So it should be generating heat in its interior (by the decay of radioactive elements) at much the same rate as the Earth does. On Earth, one of the main ways in which this heat leaks out is via volcanic eruptions. During an average year, at least 50 volcanoes erupt.

But despite decades of looking, we've not seen clear signs of volcanic eruptions on Venus - until now. A new study by geophysicist Robert Herrick of the University of Alaska, Fairbanks, which he reported this week at the Lunar & Planetary Science Conference in Houston and published in the journal Science, has at last caught one of the planet's volcanoes in the act.

It's not straightforward to study Venus's surface because it has a dense atmosphere including an unbroken cloud layer at a height of 45-65km that is opaque to most wavelengths of radiation, including visible light. The only way to get a detailed view of the ground from above the clouds is by radar directed downward from an orbiting spacecraft.

A technique known as aperture synthesis is used to build up an image of the surface. This combines the varying strength of the radar echos bounced back from the ground - including the time delay between transmission and receipt, plus slight shifts in frequency corresponding to whether the spacecraft is getting closer to or further from the origin of a particular echo. The resulting image looks rather like a black and white photograph, except that the brighter areas usually correspond to rougher surfaces and the darker areas to smoother surfaces.

Nasa's Magellan probe orbited Venus from August 1990 to October 1994 and used this sort of radar technique to map the planet's surface with a spatial resolution of about a hundred metres at best. It showed that over 80% of the surface is covered by lava flows, but just how recently the youngest of them were erupted, and whether any eruptions continue today, remained a mystery for the next three decades.

There have been various hints of activity provided by spacecraft peering into, and sometimes through, the clouds - suggesting that the rocks there are so young that their minerals have not yet been altered by reaction with the acidic atmosphere and so are freshly erupted lava. Thermal anomalies that could correspond to active lava flows have also been detected, as have temporary local hiccups in the atmospheric sulphur dioxide concentration - another potential sign of volcanic eruptions. But none of these was fully convincing.

Volcanic vent spotted

The new study now seems to have settled the matter, by revealing changes on the surface that really have to be a result of volcanic activity. The authors spent hundreds of hours comparing Magellan radar images of parts of Venus that had been imaged more than once to look for new or changed features on the surface.

They concentrated on the most promising volcanic regions, and eventually spotted an example where details on an image recorded in October 1991 are different to those on an image from February of the same year. The changes they saw are best explained by a volcanic eruption within that time window.
Using radar images to verify surface changes is tricky because the appearance of even an unchanging surface can differ according to surface slopes and direction of view. However, the researchers performed simulations to verify that the observed changes could not result from these things.

The paired images show an initially near circular volcanic crater about 1.5km across that between February and October doubled in size by extending eastwards. It also became shallower, and the authors suggest that the crater is a volcanic vent that partially collapsed and was largely filled by fresh lava during October.

There are probably also new lava flows extending several kilometres down slope, northwards of the crater, which either flooded over the crater rim or leaked out of an associated fissure. The active crater sits high on Maat Mons, one of Venus's largest volcanoes whose summit is 5km above the surrounding plains.

Future missions

Most planetary scientists already expected Venus to be volcanically active. The focus of attention will now surely turn to how often, and at how many sites, are eruptions occurring on Venus. The biggest surprise in all this is that it took so long for someone to find the evidence for surface changes that had been lurking in the Magellan data for 30 years.

The likelihood of finding and studying ongoing volcanism is one of the main drivers for Nasa's Veritas mission and Esa's EnVision mission (both approved in 2021). Each will carry a better imaging radar than Magellan. EnVision is intended to reach its orbit about Venus in 2034. Originally Veritas should have been there several years beforehand, but there have been delays to the schedule.

With Nasa's DaVinci mission likely to arrive year or two ahead of them, providing optical images from below the clouds during its descent, we are in for an exciting time about ten years from now.

David Rothery, Professor of Planetary Geosciences, The Open University

This article is republished from The Conversation under a Creative Commons license.

Read the original article. The Conversation

Source: The Conversation | Comments (19)




Other news and articles
Recent comments on this story
Comment icon #10 Posted by Waspie_Dwarf 1 year ago
Firstly this is factually incorrect. As I have already pointed out Venera 13 lasted more than four times longer than this... 127 minutes. Secondly, again as l have already pointed out, NASA disagrees with you as they working on surface vehicles which can survive several months. When it comes to opinions I'm afraid that of the most successful space agency in the world immeasurably outweighs yours. Here is a link to an article about a proposal for a Venus lander that would last for 120 days. There is no magical reason why a spacecraft can't survive for a long time on the surface of Venus, the li... [More]
Comment icon #11 Posted by Waspie_Dwarf 1 year ago
  Who mentioned putting humans on the surface? This is what I said:  
Comment icon #12 Posted by Montello 1 year ago
no crew on venus big heat pressure we dont have rovers there russians rover work 30 min
Comment icon #13 Posted by Waspie_Dwarf 1 year ago
Repeatedly posting the same, false, information doesn't magically make it true, but I don't think that you are actually interested in facts or the truth or even an intelligent discussion. I strongly suspect that you are simply trolling now. If you have something to add to the conversation then please do so, but if you are just going to keep repeating the same falsehood, without adding anything to the conversation, then now would be a good time to stop. For those actually interested in the truth: As I have repeatedly pointed out Venera 13 lasted 4 times longer on the Venusian surface than Monte... [More]
Comment icon #14 Posted by Montello 1 year ago
again like said rovers or landers cant work.too long on surface venus fact  too heat they can work 45 nin and burn
Comment icon #15 Posted by Waspie_Dwarf 1 year ago
What part of "Venera 13 lasted over 2 hours" are you not understanding?
Comment icon #16 Posted by Montello 1 year ago
lasted 1 hour or 2bhour  no sence to send rovers to venus  to work.short  hell planet 
Comment icon #17 Posted by Waspie_Dwarf 1 year ago
That's progress, at least you've finally stopped  falsely claiming that they only last 30 minutes.  So let's see if we can stop you repeating the rest of your nonsense. I will, once again, repeat the points that you are ignoring.  They are not rovers, they are landers. Previous landers used 40 year old technology. Technology has advanced in 4 decades. Both Russia and the USA have plans for landers that can survive for days or even weeks on the surface. An additional point, a lot of science can be achieved in a few hours, so it makes perfect sense to send landers to Venus. 
Comment icon #18 Posted by Montello 12 months ago
my opinion is that they cant work too long in venus 465 c end quote
Comment icon #19 Posted by Waspie_Dwarf 12 months ago
NASA's opinion is that they can. Their opinion matters, yours doesn't. 


Please Login or Register to post a comment.


Our new book is out now!
Book cover

The Unexplained Mysteries
Book of Weird News

 AVAILABLE NOW 

Take a walk on the weird side with this compilation of some of the weirdest stories ever to grace the pages of a newspaper.

Click here to learn more

We need your help!
Patreon logo

Support us on Patreon

 BONUS CONTENT 

For less than the cost of a cup of coffee, you can gain access to a wide range of exclusive perks including our popular 'Lost Ghost Stories' series.

Click here to learn more

Top 10 trending mysteries
Recent news and articles