Monday, January 13, 2025
Contact    |    RSS icon Twitter icon Facebook icon  
Unexplained Mysteries
You are viewing: Home > News > Conspiracy > News story
Welcome Guest ( Login or Register )  
All â–¾
Search Submit

Conspiracy

The Onion purchases Alex Jones' Infowars at bankruptcy auction

By T.K. Randall
November 15, 2024 · Comment icon 56 comments
Alex Jones
Alex Jones. Image Credit: CC BY-SA 4.0 Jaredlholt
The satirical news outlet has confirmed that it is now the new owner of the conspiracy theorist's media platform.
The bizarre turn of events came about as a result of Jones being ordered by a judge to sell off his personal assets to help pay the $1.4 billion he owes the families of those killed in the Sandy Hook school shooting which saw the deaths of 20 children and 6 teachers back in 2012.

Infamous for peddling harmful and disproven conspiracy theories, Jones had ended up in hot water when he started claiming that the whole thing had been a hoax and that those involved were 'actors'.

He ended up owing the eye-watering amount after being taken to court for defamation.

The loss of Infowars - his flagship platform - is the latest bitter blow for the conspiracy theorist.

According to reports, the families of the victims had made an agreement to receive less compensation in order to increase the value of The Onion's bid and make it more likely that it would win the auction.
"After surviving unimaginable loss with courage and integrity, they rejected Jones's hollow offers for allegedly more money if they would only let him stay on the air because doing so would have put other families in harm's way," said their attorney Chris Mattei.

The Onion is now planning to turn the site into something very different.

"The Onion, with the help of the Sandy Hook families, has purchased InfoWars," said CEO Ben Collins. "We are planning on making it a very funny, very stupid website."

"We have retained the services of some Onion and Clickhole Hall of Famers to pull this off."

"I can't wait to show you what we have cooked up."

Source: The Guardian | Comments (56)




Other news and articles
Recent comments on this story
Comment icon #47 Posted by jmccr8 1 month ago
This is the Kellogg plan that Trump is said to be putting forth but don't see it happening.  https://t.me/pilotblog/17308 Not sure how other NATO members feel about lifting sanctions
Comment icon #48 Posted by Tatetopa 1 month ago
Old man here.  I don't watch cable news either. If you look at a number of past conversations, you will find the response to quoting Trump is either we don't understand him properly, or it was taken out of context, or MSM somehow distorted his remark.
Comment icon #49 Posted by C L Palmer 1 month ago
"...is said to be..." says it all.  And, if Russia clears out of Ukraine, why not lift sanctions? What good is a stick without a carrot? That's how diplomacy works. You have to give them a reason to end the war, especially when they're a nuclear power. The idea of beating them into desperation and submission isn't very smart when their last, desperate option is a nuclear missile. (Everyone conveniently forgets that part.)  Reagan defeated the Soviets using economics. Their economy simply couldn't handle the Cold War arms race. It was a war of economic attrition. Modern Russia has more tools ... [More]
Comment icon #50 Posted by jmccr8 1 month ago
HI Palmer You can take the link any way you want to and gave it because I saw your post and had seen this information. Putin has no intention of pulling out of anywhere and increased his military budget to $145 billion. If you think lifting sanctions is a good idea I would think most of the European NATO members would disagree.  We will see what happens but doubt Trump will succeed
Comment icon #51 Posted by C L Palmer 1 month ago
I think he´s had to do this because he´s afraid of being boxed in. He´s a holdover from the Soviet days--still with that old Warsaw Pact mindset. Honestly, I don´t see why we didn´t offer Russia a place in NATO (or at least given them more guidance) once they left communism behind. It would have been a show of goodwill and a step in the right direction. We really screwed that transition up. The whole point of NATO was to blockade Europe from communist aggression and expansionism. Let´s face it--that part of its functionality is over. Is Putin a dictator with aims of expansionism? Yes. Is... [More]
Comment icon #52 Posted by jmccr8 1 month ago
HI C L Russia has never stopped being communist which is not likely to change. Putin has his own agenda and is willing to risk the lives and safety of his people just as he is to other bordering countries.  The Ukrainian people do not want communist rule governing them, Zelensky is doing what his people voted him in to do which was to keep them independent of Russian influence and that infuriated Putin.  Putin will break Russia and I don't really have a problem with that as it will take civil revolt to do so. Keep them sanctioned and the pressure on which doesn't seem to be what Trump's plan... [More]
Comment icon #53 Posted by C L Palmer 1 month ago
So you think that the economy of Russia is still communism? Or that it's government is simply still totalitarian. I think maybe you're confusing your terms. I would argue that their economy has moved to more of a crony capitalism, ruled by an elite few, a mobocracy of sorts. (Granted, that's what most socialist and communist states end up resembling after a while--see Venezuela.) But the economy went officially non-communist as far back as Glasnost and got off that train with Yeltsin. We just failed to show them how to do it in an organized fashion, so the old communist bosses became the new R... [More]
Comment icon #54 Posted by jmccr8 1 month ago
HI C L China is closer to a capitalist/communist economy than Russia could ever hope to be. The rich in Russia are all Putin oligarchs that are expendable and involved in drug, weapons and human trafficking all giving tithes to Putin. If he wants to live in a bunker in fear fine weld the doors shut and cut off communication.  He has openly said that Ukraine would be ethically cleansed from their own country and erase everything about them who just so happen to be the majority of the population. We have lots of Russians living in my country and the US should Putin decide to take over our count... [More]
Comment icon #55 Posted by C L Palmer 24 days ago
Nobody wants Putin to take Ukraine. However, neither does anyone want an endless war. Well, at least most people don't. Nor do they think that nuclear winter is an acceptable trade-off for, well, what would be gained if that were the price? Simply not having to have made a deal? That's self-destructive stubbornness. Any deal would be an evil, but, alas, sometimes the lesser evil is the path to the greater good. Eventually Putin will be dead. How many thousands more Ukrainian young men will have to be cut down in the prime of their life? What will be left of the nation at the end of it all? If ... [More]
Comment icon #56 Posted by jmccr8 23 days ago
HI C. L.  Trump wants to remove sanctions which will only spur Russian military development rather that stabilize the lives of Russian citizens. True no one wants war but the security guarantees for the Ukraine and other ex Soviet countries that Putin wants needs to be absolute. 


Please Login or Register to post a comment.


Our new book is out now!
Book cover

The Unexplained Mysteries
Book of Weird News

 AVAILABLE NOW 

Take a walk on the weird side with this compilation of some of the weirdest stories ever to grace the pages of a newspaper.

Click here to learn more

We need your help!
Patreon logo

Support us on Patreon

 BONUS CONTENT 

For less than the cost of a cup of coffee, you can gain access to a wide range of exclusive perks including our popular 'Lost Ghost Stories' series.

Click here to learn more

Top 10 trending mysteries
Recent news and articles