Monday, April 29, 2024
Contact    |    RSS icon Twitter icon Facebook icon  
Unexplained Mysteries
You are viewing: Home > News > Extraterrestrial > News story
Welcome Guest ( Login or Register )  
All ▾
Search Submit

Extraterrestrial

Should we be transmitting rather than listening ?

By T.K. Randall
January 21, 2010 · Comment icon 53 comments

Image Credit: NASA
A top SETI scientist has suggested that we should be transmitting messages rather than listening for extraterrestrials.
So far despite our best efforts mankind has failed to pick up any messages from an advanced extraterrestrial civilization and now a top SETI scientist has suggested that perhaps this is because everyone is doing the same thing, listening, and that what we should be doing is sending out messages so that someone else will pick them up.
The cosmos is quiet. Eerily quiet. After decades of straining our radio ears for a whisper of civilisations beyond Earth, we have heard nothing. No reassuring message of universal peace. No helpful recipe for building faster-than-light spacecraft or for averting global catastrophes. Not even a stray interstellar advertisement.


Source: New Scientist | Comments (53)




Other news and articles
Recent comments on this story
Comment icon #44 Posted by DONTEATUS 14 years ago
Shh! ITs all in the Roswell reports!
Comment icon #45 Posted by psyche101 14 years ago
Actually it's a lot simpler than all that. nanu nanu. ET Phone Home?
Comment icon #46 Posted by the rebirth 14 years ago
i think the closest thing we have to alien contact has to be the WOW! signal. regardless, i suspect that it was probably the result of a star going supernova or something like that; being that it was so close to the hydrogen line. in regards to the transmission/reception debate, is it at all plausible that we are the oldest civilization? that is, if there are other civilizations out there at all. as vast and endless our universe is as we know it, our only hope is to send out a few message-in-a-bottles before we fade into cosmic oblivion. i for one know that there are other forms of consciousne... [More]
Comment icon #47 Posted by Lilly 14 years ago
i for one know that there are other forms of consciousness out there. i have seen them, but i could still never tell you where they are... Are you saying you've visually 'seen' an extraterrestrial biological entity, or that you've somehow 'sensed' some type of ET consciousness? There's a bit of difference between these two forms of 'seeing'.
Comment icon #48 Posted by randym23 14 years ago
scientists would probably use recognition of a series of prime numbers to establish whether a signal source is intelligent or not.
Comment icon #49 Posted by 747400 14 years ago
scientists would probably use recognition of a series of prime numbers to establish whether a signal source is intelligent or not. As suggested by Carl Sagan? I've always wondered about that. Why do we assume that everyone would count the same as us? Is it because we've got 10 fingers (mostly), or is it to do with science? Seems a bit of an assumption to me, like the assumption that they'd use radio signals like us.
Comment icon #50 Posted by Nerupe 14 years ago
As suggested by Carl Sagan? I've always wondered about that. Why do we assume that everyone would count the same as us? Is it because we've got 10 fingers (mostly), or is it to do with science? Seems a bit of an assumption to me, like the assumption that they'd use radio signals like us. It's because mathematics are universal and the meaning of numbers doesn't change, regardless of name, if '3' is called 'monkey' it will always represent 3 units of something.
Comment icon #51 Posted by Finity 14 years ago
Radio signals have been "leaking" away in to space for a long time now, enough to reach the nearest stars. But it's not like some alien could tune in to a TV station. Even if the signal survived intact they would have absolutely no clue how to decypher it as they would need human technology (nor would we if we found incoming signals). All they would pick up is the same artificial radio signals which SETI is looking for our end; just a bunch of numbers that don't fit the rest of the universe, they can be distinguished from natural ones.
Comment icon #52 Posted by TRUEYOUTRUEME 14 years ago
As suggested by Carl Sagan? I've always wondered about that. Why do we assume that everyone would count the same as us? Is it because we've got 10 fingers (mostly), or is it to do with science? Seems a bit of an assumption to me, like the assumption that they'd use radio signals like us. Prime numbers are prime numbers no matter what system or method of counting that you use.
Comment icon #53 Posted by DONTEATUS 14 years ago
I would use B.B.Q Ribs stacked up in three`s all sorted into nine piles of Three pound piles,with nineteen napkins,spaced by fourty two Ice Cold Beer`s and Loads of Fixxin`s to Please even the Biggest of Appitites! And then Top it off with some really bad Country Western Music. That outta Keep there massive intellects at bay until we can Pour the Salt water upon them t Desolve them.


Please Login or Register to post a comment.


Our new book is out now!
Book cover

The Unexplained Mysteries
Book of Weird News

 AVAILABLE NOW 

Take a walk on the weird side with this compilation of some of the weirdest stories ever to grace the pages of a newspaper.

Click here to learn more

We need your help!
Patreon logo

Support us on Patreon

 BONUS CONTENT 

For less than the cost of a cup of coffee, you can gain access to a wide range of exclusive perks including our popular 'Lost Ghost Stories' series.

Click here to learn more

Top 10 trending mysteries
Recent news and articles