Monday, March 27, 2017
Contact us    |    Advertise    |   Help   RSS icon Twitter icon Facebook icon
    Home  ·  News  ·  Forum  ·  Stories  ·  Image Gallery  ·  Columns  ·  Encyclopedia  ·  Videos
Find: in

Would you buy land on another planet ?


Posted on Friday, 6 April, 2012 | Comment icon 95 comments | News tip by: Still Waters


Image credit: NASA

 
In the future we could see businesses and governments laying claim to plots of land on other worlds.

Right now the 1967 Outer Space Treaty prohibits any one nation claiming sovereignty over anywhere beyond the Earth, but as technology advances and colonization of other worlds becomes a possibility how long can this restriction remain in effect ? Space policy consultant Rand Simberg believes that in the future we will see governments making plots of land available on other planets that can be purchased and used for private development.

"Parceling out plots of land on celestial bodies might encourage people to invest in these properties, and this would benefit Earth economically, according to Simberg."

  View: Full article |  Source: Wired

  Discuss: View comments (95)

   


 
Recent comments on this story
Comment icon #86 Posted by Marks_Thoughts on 5 June, 2012, 22:23
The USA walked on the moon and planted a flag. In times past this entitled the 'discovering' nation to sovereignty of the land, at least to reasonable limits. Because there is no sentient life, actually no life at all, on the moon, I would agree that the US has the right to possession and sovereignty, with the ensuing rights to allow homesteading and other fee simple uses of the land like mining and similar. This is going to happen, perhaps not to the extent as claiming the entire moon as I describe, but it will happen. Companies or governments are going to set down on other celestial bodies i... [More]
Comment icon #87 Posted by Waspie_Dwarf on 5 June, 2012, 22:59
In case you missed the point the article refers to the ownership of celestial bodies and not the naming of them. Americas refusal to ratify both The Outer Space and Moon Treaty's are a prime example of their desire to claim territory in space. The Outer Space Treaty WAS ratified by the USA, on 10th October 1967. As for singling out the USA for the non-ratification of the Moon Treaty that seems to show a bias, given that only 13 states have ratified it and none of them are space faring nations. The nation's which have ratified the treaty are: Australia, Austria, Belgium, Chile, Kazakhstan, Leba... [More]
Comment icon #88 Posted by DONTEATUS on 5 June, 2012, 23:33
God dosnt sell the planets ! First thing one must understand is that Planets are made by Slaughtybartfast and cost tons of bucks ! Magrathea is where one must go to put in an order to get one also ! Now that ,thats well & Good Lets all go to Milliyways for a Dinner and concert !
Comment icon #89 Posted by MID on 6 June, 2012, 0:27
In case you missed the point the article refers to the ownership of celestial bodies and not the naming of them. Americas refusal to ratify both The Outer Space and Moon Treaty's are a prime example of their desire to claim territory in space. In case YOU missed the point here, I was responding to someone who mentioned the relation between owning a planet and that fad about having a star named after you. Both kind of silly, and both impossible. By the way, the US ratified the Outer Space Tereaty in 1967, and join 99 other nations as participants. The treaty is called: TreatyOn Principals Gover... [More]
Comment icon #90 Posted by MID on 6 June, 2012, 0:47
The USA walked on the moon and planted a flag. In times past this entitled the 'discovering' nation to sovereignty of the land, at least to reasonable limits. ? PROBLEM: We did not discover the Moon. We landed on it, two years after ratifying a treaty prohibiting us from such sovereignty claims. Do the words, "We came in peace for ALL MANKIND" mean anything as pertains to intent? Because there is no sentient life, actually no life at all, on the moon, I would agree that the US has the right to possession and sovereignty, with the ensuing rights to allow homesteading and other fee simple uses o... [More]
Comment icon #91 Posted by DONTEATUS on 8 June, 2012, 2:32
Billionaires Smaggillionaires ! We dont need no stinkin Quadzillionaires tell us what to do ! THe Moon Is for all to explore, mine, develop as Long as we all do it in Peace ! Same goes for every where we will plan to go ! Im all for an open and Free Space development !
Comment icon #92 Posted by Zalanox on 12 June, 2012, 19:58
It's just like those stars you can buy. You get a fancy little certificate you can frame and hang on your wall. They won't literally own the planet.
Comment icon #93 Posted by Waspie_Dwarf on 12 June, 2012, 20:53
It's just like those stars you can buy. You get a fancy little certificate you can frame and hang on your wall. They won't literally own the planet. Yes they would literally own it, that is the entire point of this discussion. From the original post: Private companies should be able to buy land on The Moon or other planets for tourism, mining or even to sell property, a space policy expert has said. Those certificates you speak of are not people buying stars, they are paying to name them (it's a total waste of money incidentally, celestial bodies are officially named by the International Astro... [More]
Comment icon #94 Posted by Zalanox on 12 June, 2012, 22:42
Yes they would literally own it, that is the entire point of this discussion. From the original post: Those certificates you speak of are not people buying stars, they are paying to name them (it's a total waste of money incidentally, celestial bodies are officially named by the International Astronomical Union, and they don't sell star names. Those fancy little certificates aren't worth the paper they are written on). You cannot own something nobody has access to. When the billionaires can get these places colonized or secured in some way then I'll acknowledge their ownership. But until then ... [More]
Comment icon #95 Posted by Waspie_Dwarf on 12 June, 2012, 23:41
You cannot own something nobody has access to. When the billionaires can get these places colonized or secured in some way then I'll acknowledge their ownership. But until then it's a giant, arrogant game. You again seem to be rather missing the point. No billionaire is claiming to own a planet. There is no one playing the arrogant game you are imagining. It is a suggestion from a so-called policy expert. Your last point about colonisation is altogether the wrong way around. If it was possible to own a planet it would make sense to buy it before it is colonised. Buying it afterwards would be l... [More]


Please Login or Register to post a comment.


  On the forums
Forum posts:
Forum topics:
Members:

5871259
252380
166374

 
1,200ft-wide UFO reported over Gulf of Mexico
3-26-2017
A crew member of an offshore supply ship claimed the object was 'five times the size' of his vessel.
Removing 'retired' cells could reverse ageing
3-26-2017
It may one day be possible for over-65s to visit a clinic every few years to receive a rejuvenation shot.
Four-legged chicken hatches out in Brazil
3-26-2017
Despite having two additional limbs, the young chick, which wasn't expected to live, is doing quite well.
Hair salon is offering snake neck massages
3-25-2017
The Haar Mode Team salon in Dresden is offering customers a rather unique type of massage service.
Other news in this category
Trump signs new bill to send humans to Mars
Posted 3-22-2017 | 11 comments
$19.5 billion has been authorized to support a renewed commitment to NASA's manned space program....
 
Blue fireball lights up the sky over Sweden
Posted 3-21-2017 | 3 comments
People from several towns across the country reported witnessing the spectacle at 9:30pm on Monday night....
 
Stephen Hawking is planning to go in to space
Posted 3-20-2017 | 1 comment
The celebrated physicist has described journeying in to outer space as his 'ultimate ambition'....
 
Mars Base Camp mission could launch by 2028
Posted 3-19-2017 | 2 comments
NASA partner Lockheed Martin is planning an ambitious mission to put astronauts into orbit around Mars....
 
NASA could use the Sun as a magnifying glass
Posted 3-18-2017 | 12 comments
Scientists at JPL have come up with an ambitious new plan to get a better look at extrasolar planets....
 
Older galaxies had a lot less dark matter
Posted 3-18-2017 | 10 comments
Scientists have discovered that dark matter played a much smaller role in galaxies in the early universe....
 
X-37B space plane is nearing orbital record
Posted 3-17-2017 | 3 comments
The US Air Force's mysterious space plane is on track to break the mission duration record of 674 days....
 
Enceladus may be an ideal place to find life
Posted 3-15-2017 | 5 comments
New data from Cassini has suggested that Enceladus' liquid water ocean may be very close to its surface....
 
NASA ordered to send humans to Mars by 2033
Posted 3-13-2017 | 11 comments
The space agency has been given a set of ambitious new goals which include a manned mission to Mars....
 
Missing Moon probe found after eight years
Posted 3-12-2017 | 2 comments
A new radar technique has made it possible to locate a derelict spacecraft in orbit around the Moon....
 
Orbiting lunar 'spaceport' planned for 2020s
Posted 3-11-2017 | 6 comments
A space station could be placed in cis-lunar orbit to act as a stepping-stone towards a trip to Mars....
 

 View: More news in this category
 
Top   |  Home   |   Forum   |   News   |   Image Gallery   |  Columns   |   Encyclopedia   |   Videos   |   Polls
UM-X 10.7 Unexplained-Mysteries.com © 2001-2017
Privacy Policy and Disclaimer   |   Cookies   |   Advertise   |   Contact   |   Help/FAQ