Thursday, May 26, 2016
Contact us    |    Advertise    |   Help   RSS icon Twitter icon Facebook icon
    Home  ·  News  ·  Forum  ·  Stories  ·  Image Gallery  ·  Columns  ·  Encyclopedia  ·  Videos
Find: in

Would you buy land on another planet ?


Posted on Friday, 6 April, 2012 | Comment icon 96 comments | News tip by: Still Waters


Image credit: NASA

 
In the future we could see businesses and governments laying claim to plots of land on other worlds.

Right now the 1967 Outer Space Treaty prohibits any one nation claiming sovereignty over anywhere beyond the Earth, but as technology advances and colonization of other worlds becomes a possibility how long can this restriction remain in effect ? Space policy consultant Rand Simberg believes that in the future we will see governments making plots of land available on other planets that can be purchased and used for private development.

"Parceling out plots of land on celestial bodies might encourage people to invest in these properties, and this would benefit Earth economically, according to Simberg."

  View: Full article |  Source: Wired

  Discuss: View comments (96)

   


 
Recent comments on this story
Comment icon #87 Posted by Waspie_Dwarf on 5 June, 2012, 22:59
The Outer Space Treaty WAS ratified by the USA, on 10[sup]th[/sup] October 1967. As for singling out the USA for the non-ratification of the Moon Treaty that seems to show a bias, given that only 13 states have ratified it and none of them are space faring nations. The nation's which have ratified the treaty are: Australia, Austria, Belgium, Chile, Kazakhstan, Lebanon, Mexico, Morocco, Netherlands, Pakistan, Peru, Philippines, and Uruguay.
Comment icon #88 Posted by DONTEATUS on 5 June, 2012, 23:33
God dosnt sell the planets ! First thing one must understand is that Planets are made by Slaughtybartfast and cost tons of bucks ! Magrathea is where one must go to put in an order to get one also ! Now that ,thats well & Good Lets all go to Milliyways for a Dinner and concert !
Comment icon #89 Posted by MID on 6 June, 2012, 0:27
In case YOU missed the point here, I was responding to someone who mentioned the relation between owning a planet and that fad about having a star named after you. Both kind of silly, and both impossible. [u] . The treaty is called:[/u] TreatyOn Principals Governing the Activities of States in the Exploration of Outer Space, Including the Moon and Other Celestial Bodies, and is all-inclusive. The so-called "Moon Treaty" is a dead issue, and has been since its inception in 1979, since it was already covered by the 1967 treaty (which again, was ratified by the U.S.), and was thus re... [More]
Comment icon #90 Posted by MID on 6 June, 2012, 0:47
National Possession and sovereighnty aren't permitted in space. Homesteading and other simple uses of land are personal property matters. Different things, different laws, and none established at this time (and who's going to homestead on the Moon or an asteroid (Infrastructure, life support, hosing, medical care, food...)? And the presence of life, sentient or otherwise, simply means that no one has any right to interfere with it if it's there. If it's not, we still have no right to claim possession of anything on a heavenly body. Well, we've discovered water... [More]
Comment icon #91 Posted by DONTEATUS on 8 June, 2012, 2:32
Billionaires Smaggillionaires ! We dont need no stinkin Quadzillionaires tell us what to do ! THe Moon Is for all to explore, mine, develop as Long as we all do it in Peace ! Same goes for every where we will plan to go ! Im all for an open and Free Space development !
Comment icon #92 Posted by Zalanox on 12 June, 2012, 19:58
It's just like those stars you can buy. You get a fancy little certificate you can frame and hang on your wall. They won't literally own the planet.
Comment icon #93 Posted by Waspie_Dwarf on 12 June, 2012, 20:53
Yes they would literally own it, that is the entire point of this discussion. From the original post: Those certificates you speak of are not people buying stars, they are paying to name them (it's a total waste of money incidentally, celestial bodies are officially named by the International Astronomical Union, and they don't sell star names. Those fancy little certificates aren't worth the paper they are written on).
Comment icon #94 Posted by Zalanox on 12 June, 2012, 22:42
You cannot own something nobody has access to. When the billionaires can get these places colonized or secured in some way then I'll acknowledge their ownership. But until then it's a giant, arrogant game.
Comment icon #95 Posted by Waspie_Dwarf on 12 June, 2012, 23:41
You again seem to be rather missing the point. No billionaire is claiming to own a planet. There is no one playing the arrogant game you are imagining. It is a suggestion from a so-called policy expert. Your last point about colonisation is altogether the wrong way around. If it was possible to own a planet it would make sense to buy it before it is colonised. Buying it afterwards would be like shutting the stable door after the horse has bolted.


Please Login or Register to post a comment.


  On the forums
New optical clock is most accurate ever built
5-26-2016
Scientists have come up with a clock so accurate that it could even redefine the length of a second.
Neanderthal-built stone rings found in cave
5-25-2016
Remarkable prehistoric structures made from stalagmites have been discovered inside a cave in France.
'Human dog' appears in daytime TV interview
5-25-2016
Sound technician Tom Peters likes nothing more than to dress up in a latex costume and act like a dog.
Woman stalked by swarm of bees for 24 hours
5-25-2016
Carol Howarth was shocked to discover that a swarm of 20,000 bees had followed her car all the way home.
Other news in this category
Scientists find evidence of tsunamis on Mars
Posted 5-20-2016 | 8 comments
New evidence has suggested that Mars may have once experienced frequent and destructive tidal waves....
 
Mars methane spike 'not a seasonal event'
Posted 5-18-2016 | 8 comments
A mysterious spike of methane picked up by the Curiosity rover two years ago has yet to reoccur....
 
NASA invests in eight new sci-fi technologies
Posted 5-16-2016 | 11 comments
The US space agency will be attempting to turn several more futuristic technology concepts into reality....
 
Dwarf planet is third largest in solar system
Posted 5-12-2016 | 15 comments
Despite being comparable in size to Pluto and Eris, this enigmatic world has yet to even be given a name....
 
NASA announces discovery of 1,284 exoplanets
Posted 5-10-2016 | 14 comments
The incredible new haul has more than doubled the total number of known extrasolar worlds to over 3,200....
 
NASA to make Kepler announcement tomorrow
Posted 5-9-2016 | 33 comments
The space agency will be revealing the latest findings of its Kepler Space Telescope tomorrow afternoon....
 
Three new Earth-sized planets discovered
Posted 5-3-2016 | 12 comments
Astronomers have identified three new terrestrial worlds around a relatively close 'ultracool' star....
 
NASA reveals telescope's giant golden mirror
Posted 4-30-2016 | 17 comments
The impressive gold-coated mirror of the James Webb Space Telescope has been revealed in all its glory....
 
'Space umbrella' could stop global warming
Posted 4-28-2016 | 25 comments
Scientists have been exploring ambitious new ways to effectively cool, rather than to warm up the planet....
 
SpaceX reveals plans for 2018 mission to Mars
Posted 4-27-2016 | 14 comments
Elon Musk's private space firm is aiming to land a spacecraft on the Red Planet within just two years....
 
Sharper images of Beagle 2 on Mars revealed
Posted 4-26-2016 | 17 comments
Researchers have succeeded in enhancing the images taken of the ill-fated probe's final resting place....
 

 View: More news in this category
 
Top   |  Home   |   Forum   |   News   |   Image Gallery   |  Columns   |   Encyclopedia   |   Videos   |   Polls
UM-X 10.7 Unexplained-Mysteries.com 2001-2015
Privacy Policy and Disclaimer   |   Cookies   |   Advertise   |   Contact   |   Help/FAQ