Friday, December 9, 2016
Contact us    |    Advertise    |   Help   RSS icon Twitter icon Facebook icon
    Home  ·  News  ·  Forum  ·  Stories  ·  Image Gallery  ·  Columns  ·  Encyclopedia  ·  Videos
Find: in

Solar system 'habitable zone' redefined


Posted on Thursday, 31 January, 2013 | Comment icon 26 comments | News tip by: Render


Image credit: ESO

 
Scientists have updated their calculations for determining if a planet is likely to support life.

The habitable or 'Goldilocks' zone around a star is the region in which the temperature is considered 'just right' for liquid water to exist. Planet hunters have been using this concept to identify which planets around other stars may be able to support life with planets too close to their star being considered too hot and planets further away being considered too cold.

Now however the calculations used to determine this zone have been changed thanks to a team of researchers who have undertaken the task of updating the formula. The new measurements would mean that the Earth lies at the very edge of our own Sun's habitable zone and that extrasolar planets once thought to be too hot or too cold might actually be 'just right' after all.

"Also known as the Goldilocks zone, because temperatures are "just right" for life there, the habitable zone is the main tool that exoplanet hunters have to rank their finds."

  View: Full article |  Source: New Scientist

  Discuss: View comments (26)

   


 
Recent comments on this story
Comment icon #17 Posted by Waspie_Dwarf on 3 February, 2013, 11:03
And in fact it's possible for life as we know it to also evolve outside the "goldilocks zone." I would say that the term "in fact" is a little strong. It is hypothetically possible as it is believed that such conditions could exist BUT we have not yet the absolute proof that such conditions ACTUALLY exist or that life has/can actually form there. In my opinion, this is why we need to further study the icy moons of Jupiter and Saturn and fill in the gaps in our knowledge.
Comment icon #18 Posted by Harte on 4 February, 2013, 13:15
I would say that the term "in fact" is a little strong. It is hypothetically possible as it is believed that such conditions could exist BUT we have not yet the absolute proof that such conditions ACTUALLY exist or that life has/can actually form there. In my opinion, this is why we need to further study the icy moons of Jupiter and Saturn and fill in the gaps in our knowledge. Okay, I can buy that. Fact is too strong of a word... for now. harte
Comment icon #19 Posted by Uncle Sam on 3 March, 2013, 12:27
If Earth as a planet did lose its goldilock status, I don't know if I should be worried or just shrug it off.
Comment icon #20 Posted by danielost on 3 March, 2013, 15:32
I have been told that with our current technology it would take to long for a probe or whatever to get to one of these planets. If I remember correctly hundreds of years. Thousands of years. That is just to get to the closest at 4.5 light years. Further we can't detect planets around a star that close.
Comment icon #21 Posted by Frank Merton on 3 March, 2013, 15:59
The technology is coming where we will be able to get spectra of planets orbiting close stars. Over time we will extend this ability outward. This is far more likely than probes to be the route we will use, since we look at light that has already spent all the time needed to get to us.
Comment icon #22 Posted by Waspie_Dwarf on 3 March, 2013, 16:07
Thousands of years. That is just to get to the closest at 4.5 light years. As Hazzard has already correctly pointed out it would take tens of thousands of years to reach the nearest star which is 4.2 light years away. Further we can't detect planets around a star that close. What? Not only can we detect planets around a star that close, we HAVE detected planets around a star that close, see this topic: Earth Mass Planet Orbits Alpha Centauri B
Comment icon #23 Posted by bison on 3 March, 2013, 16:25
The habitable zone is a rather crude estimate of a more nuanced situation. Even a little additional carbon dioxide in the atmosphere of a planet farther out than this zone could make for an eminently habitable world. A planet with a thin, rather dry atmosphere, which loses heat with greater than usual efficiency might be habitable, even if nearer a star than its habitable zone.
Comment icon #24 Posted by danielost on 3 March, 2013, 17:47
As Hazzard has already correctly pointed out it would take tens of thousands of years to reach the nearest star which is 4.2 light years away. What? Not only can we detect planets around a star that close, we HAVE detected planets around a star that close, see this topic: Earth Mass Planet Orbits Alpha Centauri B I stand corrected. Last I heard the star hd to be 100 light years out.
Comment icon #25 Posted by Harte on 27 March, 2013, 3:20
If Earth as a planet did lose its goldilock status, I don't know if I should be worried or just shrug it off. You should just try the other bowl of prridge, the other chair, or the other bed. Not necessesarily in that order, depending on who is with you at the time, of course. Harte
Comment icon #26 Posted by Zeta Reticulum on 28 March, 2013, 0:01
As Hazzard has already correctly pointed out it would take tens of thousands of years to reach the nearest star which is 4.2 light years away. And it used to take months of sea travel to get across the earths oceans by sail. Now we have a previously unheard of technology (jet propulsion).Another technology will come along, either by invention or by capture.


Please Login or Register to post a comment.


  On the forums
Forum posts:
Forum topics:
Members:

5827271
263593
164368

 
Actual dinosaur tail found preserved in amber
12-8-2016
The unprecedented 99 million-year-old specimen contains preserved bones, soft tissues and feathers.
Mars One delays first manned mission to Mars
12-8-2016
The Netherlands-based firm has pushed back its ambitious plans by several years due to funding issues.
Bleak figures show giraffes face extinction
12-8-2016
The world's tallest animal has suffered a worrying decline in numbers over the last three decades.
Loch Ness Monster sightings are on the rise
12-7-2016
There have been more sightings of the elusive creature this year than during any other this millennium.
Other news in this category
Mars One delays first manned mission to Mars
Posted 12-8-2016 | 5 comments
The Netherlands-based firm has pushed back its ambitious plans by several years due to funding issues....
 
Earth to see 25-hour days as rotation slows
Posted 12-7-2016 | 8 comments
Scientists have been attempting to work out how long it will take for us to gain an extra hour per day....
 
Trip to the Moon could be available by 2026
Posted 12-5-2016 | 15 comments
Moon Express is hoping to be able to send people on trips to the Moon within as little as ten years....
 
Virgin Galactic test flight proves a success
Posted 12-5-2016 | 4 comments
Richard Branson's fledgling space tourism firm is back on track following a fatal crash two years ago....
 
Buzz Aldrin is evacuated from Antarctica
Posted 12-4-2016 | 14 comments
The Apollo 11 astronaut fell ill just after becoming the oldest person ever to visit the South Pole....
 
New mission aims to revisit Apollo 17 site
Posted 11-30-2016 | 30 comments
The privately-funded endeavour aims to revisit the lunar rover left behind by the Apollo 17 astronauts....
 
New Mars satellite returns first photographs
Posted 11-30-2016 | 6 comments
The Trace Gas Orbiter (TGO) has returned a set of high-quality test photographs from the Red Planet....
 
Astronaut tasked with repairing ISS toilets
Posted 11-28-2016 | 2 comments
One of Thomas Pesquet's first tasks aboard the space station wasn't quite what he was hoping for....
 
'Data glitch' caused demise of Mars lander
Posted 11-26-2016 | 7 comments
Scientists have finally determined exactly what caused the Schiaparelli probe to crash-land on Mars....
 
Did rover find evidence of past life on Mars?
Posted 11-24-2016 | 5 comments
Geologists have managed to link silica deposits on Mars with biological processes occurring on the Earth....
 
Scientists discover huge ice deposit on Mars
Posted 11-23-2016 | 5 comments
NASA's Mars Reconnaissance Orbiter has identified an ice deposit with more water than Lake Superior....
 

 View: More news in this category
 
Top   |  Home   |   Forum   |   News   |   Image Gallery   |  Columns   |   Encyclopedia   |   Videos   |   Polls
UM-X 10.7 Unexplained-Mysteries.com © 2001-2015
Privacy Policy and Disclaimer   |   Cookies   |   Advertise   |   Contact   |   Help/FAQ