HomeNewsForumA‑ZStoriesImagesColumns

Space & Astronomy

Solar system 'habitable zone' redefined

By T.K. Randall
January 31, 2013 · Comment icon

26 comments

Image Credit: ESO

Scientists have updated their calculations for determining if a planet is likely to support life.

The habitable or 'Goldilocks' zone around a star is the region in which the temperature is considered 'just right' for liquid water to exist. Planet hunters have been using this concept to identify which planets around other stars may be able to support life with planets too close to their star being considered too hot and planets further away being considered too cold.

Now however the calculations used to determine this zone have been changed thanks to a team of researchers who have undertaken the task of updating the formula. The new measurements would mean that the Earth lies at the very edge of our own Sun's habitable zone and that extrasolar planets once thought to be too hot or too cold might actually be 'just right' after all.

Also known as the Goldilocks zone, because temperatures are "just right" for life there, the habitable zone is the main tool that exoplanet hunters have to rank their finds. But researchers are still using a definition coined in 1993.

Source: New Scientist | Comments (26)

Tags:

Recent comments on this story

#17 Posted by Waspie_Dwarf 11 years ago

And in fact it's possible for life as we know it to also evolve outside the "goldilocks zone." I would say that the term "in fact" is a little strong. It is hypothetically possible as it is believed that such conditions could exist BUT we have not yet the absolute proof that such conditions ACTUALLY exist or that life has/can actually form there. In my opinion, this is why we need to further study the icy moons of Jupiter and Saturn and fill in the gaps in our knowledge.

#18 Posted by Harte 11 years ago

I would say that the term "in fact" is a little strong. It is hypothetically possible as it is believed that such conditions could exist BUT we have not yet the absolute proof that such conditions ACTUALLY exist or that life has/can actually form there. In my opinion, this is why we need to further study the icy moons of Jupiter and Saturn and fill in the gaps in our knowledge. Okay, I can buy that. Fact is too strong of a word... for now. harte

#19 Posted by Uncle Sam 11 years ago

If Earth as a planet did lose its goldilock status, I don't know if I should be worried or just shrug it off.

#20 Posted by danielost 11 years ago

I have been told that with our current technology it would take to long for a probe or whatever to get to one of these planets. If I remember correctly hundreds of years. Thousands of years. That is just to get to the closest at 4.5 light years. Further we can't detect planets around a star that close.

#21 Posted by Frank Merton 11 years ago

The technology is coming where we will be able to get spectra of planets orbiting close stars. Over time we will extend this ability outward. This is far more likely than probes to be the route we will use, since we look at light that has already spent all the time needed to get to us.

#22 Posted by Waspie_Dwarf 11 years ago

Thousands of years. That is just to get to the closest at 4.5 light years. As Hazzard has already correctly pointed out it would take tens of thousands of years to reach the nearest star which is 4.2 light years away. Further we can't detect planets around a star that close. What? Not only can we detect planets around a star that close, we HAVE detected planets around a star that close, see this topic: Earth Mass Planet Orbits Alpha Centauri B

#23 Posted by bison 11 years ago

The habitable zone is a rather crude estimate of a more nuanced situation. Even a little additional carbon dioxide in the atmosphere of a planet farther out than this zone could make for an eminently habitable world. A planet with a thin, rather dry atmosphere, which loses heat with greater than usual efficiency might be habitable, even if nearer a star than its habitable zone.

#24 Posted by danielost 11 years ago

As Hazzard has already correctly pointed out it would take tens of thousands of years to reach the nearest star which is 4.2 light years away. What? Not only can we detect planets around a star that close, we HAVE detected planets around a star that close, see this topic: Earth Mass Planet Orbits Alpha Centauri B I stand corrected. Last I heard the star hd to be 100 light years out.

#25 Posted by Harte 11 years ago

If Earth as a planet did lose its goldilock status, I don't know if I should be worried or just shrug it off. You should just try the other bowl of prridge, the other chair, or the other bed. Not necessesarily in that order, depending on who is with you at the time, of course. Harte

#26 Posted by Zeta Reticulum 11 years ago

As Hazzard has already correctly pointed out it would take tens of thousands of years to reach the nearest star which is 4.2 light years away. And it used to take months of sea travel to get across the earths oceans by sail. Now we have a previously unheard of technology (jet propulsion).Another technology will come along, either by invention or by capture.

Click here to view all 26 comments on this story

Please Login or Register to post a comment.

Our new book is out now!

The Unexplained Mysteries
Book of Weird News

AVAILABLE NOW

Take a walk on the weird side with this compilation of some of the weirdest stories ever to grace the pages of a newspaper.

Click here to learn more

We need your help!

Support us on Patreon

BONUS CONTENT

For less than the cost of a cup of coffee, you can gain access to a wide range of exclusive perks including our popular 'Lost Ghost Stories' series.

Click here to learn more

On the forum

Natural World

Cicadapocalypse returns to the US with f...

Underwater mountain range off Easter Isl...

How do you age an octopus?

Dozens team up for complex rescue of tra...

Extraterrestrial Life and The UFO Phenomenon

Avi Loeb: ET may have reached us using '...

10-page UFO dossier released by Australi...

Ex-Navy officer: 'Underwater UFOs jeopar...

Strange glowing blue object descends int...

Stories, Sightings & Experiences

Hair orb??

Glowing eyes in a foggy mirror

Black blob in my room/bed

Extraterrestrial Experience

UK and Europe

GB News accused of fuelling Net Zero con...

'Arrest me!': JK Rowling challenges Scot...

Police order closure of conference atten...

Former British PM Liz Truss says it ‘h...

Total Posts: 7,602,824 Topics: 316,181 Members: 201,795

Not a member yet ? Click here to join - registration is free and only takes a moment!

	1.	Bigfoot
	2.	Electronic Voice Phenomenon
-	3.	Phoenix Lights
	4.	Pareidolia
	5.	Ghost
	6.	Extraterrestrial
	7.	Amelia Earhart
	8.	Area 51
	9.	Loch Ness Monster
	10.	Storm Area 51

Solar system 'habitable zone' redefined

The Unexplained Mysteries
Book of Weird News

Support us on Patreon

NASA makes major announcement about Mars sample-return mission

Weird new species found on seamounts off Easter Island

Ex-Navy officer: 'Underwater UFOs jeopardize US maritime security'

25 years after release, The Blair Witch Project is getting a reboot

Strange glowing blue object descends into river in Philadelphia

Physicist Peter Higgs, who theorized the Higgs boson, dies aged 94