Wednesday, September 17, 2014   |   5,442 users online
Contact us    |    Advertise    |   Help   RSS icon Twitter icon Facebook icon
    Home  ·  News  ·  Forum  ·  Stories  ·  Image Gallery  ·  Columns  ·  Encyclopedia  ·  Videos  ·  Chat
Find: in

Do we all have a unique 'voiceprint' ?


Posted on Saturday, 16 February, 2013 | Comment icon 7 comments | News tip by: Still Waters


Image credit: J. Smith

 
Ever since the events of 9/11, scientists have been trying to find a reliable way to recognize voices.

The process of determining who someone is by their voice alone is long and difficult. The need for an effective and reliable means with which to do this stemmed from recordings of terrorists involved in the 9/11 attacks who needed to be identified. Since then, automated programs capable of detecting similarities between two voices have advanced significantly however the process of obtaining and recognizing a person's unique 'voiceprint' has yet to be accomplished.

"September 11 was the trigger for this as, after the attacks, the police and intelligence services realised that while there were so many recordings of the voices of the terrorists they didn't have the technology they needed to extract information from them," said Agnitio Corp technical director Antonio Moreno.

"Fuelled by 9/11, spurred on by the advance of our digital society and made possible by raw computing power, the development of increasingly sophisticated automated speaker recognition systems (ASRS) are now bringing the prospect of a "voiceprint" enticingly close."

  View: Full article |  Source: Independent

  Discuss: View comments (7)

   


 
<< Previous story
 Meteor explodes over Russia
 
Recent comments on this story
Comment icon #1 Posted by Reann on 15 February, 2013, 13:54
What about people who are able to impersonate voices? Would the technology be able to determine that somehow in some way?
Comment icon #2 Posted by shrooma on 16 February, 2013, 11:42
I once saw a programme years ago that did exactly that reann. it was about a machine that tested vocal resonance, and to test it, they fed it with the voice of mel blanc doing what he did best, voicing cartoon characters. they used bugs bunny, yosemite sam, elmer fudd, foghorn leghorn, amongst others, which all sound completely different to the ear, but to the resonance machine, they were all exactly the same! wonder why the FBI/CIA/MI5/McDonalds don't just use one of them, and put the money they're spending searching into housing the homeless instead....?
Comment icon #3 Posted by Sundew on 16 February, 2013, 13:33
I wonder about the animal kingdom as well. Consider a penguin colony where all the individuals look identical, then also consider that most birds have a very poor sense of smell. So if you discount vision and scent as ways of recognition, then that leaves sound. Possibly through their calls alone, a parent can find its chick in all the chaotic cacophony of several thousand birds calling at once. So does each chick have its own unique voice that is "imprinted" on its parents and how can they filter out all the background noise? This is also true in colonies of sea lions and seals, h... [More]
Comment icon #4 Posted by wimfloppp on 16 February, 2013, 16:46
Iknow my wifes voice when i hear it.
Comment icon #5 Posted by pallidin on 16 February, 2013, 19:02
Oh yeah. and sometimes not gentle.
Comment icon #6 Posted by Reann on 28 February, 2013, 12:50
That's interesting to know. I once watched something about a machine , some enormous computer , I think it's located in England somewhere , it creates files for each imdividual voice , globally I think .
Comment icon #7 Posted by Reann on 1 March, 2013, 16:51
^ yeah, by means of telephone conversations the computer which is also referred to or named " the beast " would continually listen in on phone converstations and as it discovers new voices it creates a new personal file for it. The system is designed to listen in for certain words, and is continuously active. Being that the internet is utilized by means of cable and phone lines , when clinton mentioned to watch what you say because you don't know who is listening, he may have also been referring to that particular system as well as other forms of spying.


Please Login or Register to post a comment.


Other news in this category
Human faces evolved to be recognizable
Posted 9-17-2014 | 6 comments
Scientists have conducted an extensive new study in to the uniqueness of human facial features....
 
DARPA funds '4 minute mile' jetpack
Posted 9-15-2014 | 13 comments
Scientists have come up with a jetpack that can help soldiers to run faster on the battlefield....
 
Will we soon be buying 3D printed shoes ?
Posted 9-13-2014 | 5 comments
Difficulties finding a pair of new shoes that fit perfectly could soon be a thing of the past....
 
Ozone layer showing signs of recovery
Posted 9-11-2014 | 7 comments
The protective layer in our atmosphere responsible for blocking ultra-violet rays is now on the mend....
 
Life began on Earth much earlier than thought
Posted 9-8-2014 | 10 comments
Scientists have determined that oxygen-producing life forms appeared around 3 billion years ago....
 
God particle could destroy the universe
Posted 9-7-2014 | 83 comments
Stephen Hawking has suggested that the Higgs particle has the potential to collapse space and time....
 
Dyson unveils robotic vacuum cleaner
Posted 9-5-2014 | 19 comments
The innovative Dyson 360 Eye could soon be cleaning floors in people's homes all across the world....
 
Can the brain be trained to eat healthily ?
Posted 9-3-2014 | 16 comments
A new US study has suggested that the brain can be retrained to prefer healthy food over junk food....
 

 View: More news in this category
 
Top   |  Home   |   Forum   |   News   |   Image Gallery   |  Columns   |   Encyclopedia   |   Videos   |   Polls
UM-X 10.6 Unexplained-Mysteries.com 2001-2014
Privacy Policy and Disclaimer   |   Cookies   |   Advertise   |   Contact   |   Help/FAQ