Saturday, October 25, 2014   |   5,601 users online
Contact us    |    Advertise    |   Help   RSS icon Twitter icon Facebook icon
    Home  ·  News  ·  Forum  ·  Stories  ·  Image Gallery  ·  Columns  ·  Encyclopedia  ·  Videos  ·  Chat
Find: in

Do we all have a unique 'voiceprint' ?


Posted on Saturday, 16 February, 2013 | Comment icon 7 comments | News tip by: Still Waters


Image credit: J. Smith

 
Ever since the events of 9/11, scientists have been trying to find a reliable way to recognize voices.

The process of determining who someone is by their voice alone is long and difficult. The need for an effective and reliable means with which to do this stemmed from recordings of terrorists involved in the 9/11 attacks who needed to be identified. Since then, automated programs capable of detecting similarities between two voices have advanced significantly however the process of obtaining and recognizing a person's unique 'voiceprint' has yet to be accomplished.

"September 11 was the trigger for this as, after the attacks, the police and intelligence services realised that while there were so many recordings of the voices of the terrorists they didn't have the technology they needed to extract information from them," said Agnitio Corp technical director Antonio Moreno.

"Fuelled by 9/11, spurred on by the advance of our digital society and made possible by raw computing power, the development of increasingly sophisticated automated speaker recognition systems (ASRS) are now bringing the prospect of a "voiceprint" enticingly close."

  View: Full article |  Source: Independent

  Discuss: View comments (7)

   


 
<< Previous story
 Meteor explodes over Russia
 
Recent comments on this story
Comment icon #1 Posted by Reann on 15 February, 2013, 13:54
What about people who are able to impersonate voices? Would the technology be able to determine that somehow in some way?
Comment icon #2 Posted by shrooma on 16 February, 2013, 11:42
I once saw a programme years ago that did exactly that reann. it was about a machine that tested vocal resonance, and to test it, they fed it with the voice of mel blanc doing what he did best, voicing cartoon characters. they used bugs bunny, yosemite sam, elmer fudd, foghorn leghorn, amongst others, which all sound completely different to the ear, but to the resonance machine, they were all exactly the same! wonder why the FBI/CIA/MI5/McDonalds don't just use one of them, and put the money they're spending searching into housing the homeless instead....?
Comment icon #3 Posted by Sundew on 16 February, 2013, 13:33
I wonder about the animal kingdom as well. Consider a penguin colony where all the individuals look identical, then also consider that most birds have a very poor sense of smell. So if you discount vision and scent as ways of recognition, then that leaves sound. Possibly through their calls alone, a parent can find its chick in all the chaotic cacophony of several thousand birds calling at once. So does each chick have its own unique voice that is "imprinted" on its parents and how can they filter out all the background noise? This is also true in colonies of sea lions and seals, h... [More]
Comment icon #4 Posted by wimfloppp on 16 February, 2013, 16:46
Iknow my wifes voice when i hear it.
Comment icon #5 Posted by pallidin on 16 February, 2013, 19:02
Oh yeah. and sometimes not gentle.
Comment icon #6 Posted by Reann on 28 February, 2013, 12:50
That's interesting to know. I once watched something about a machine , some enormous computer , I think it's located in England somewhere , it creates files for each imdividual voice , globally I think .
Comment icon #7 Posted by Reann on 1 March, 2013, 16:51
^ yeah, by means of telephone conversations the computer which is also referred to or named " the beast " would continually listen in on phone converstations and as it discovers new voices it creates a new personal file for it. The system is designed to listen in for certain words, and is continuously active. Being that the internet is utilized by means of cable and phone lines , when clinton mentioned to watch what you say because you don't know who is listening, he may have also been referring to that particular system as well as other forms of spying.


Please Login or Register to post a comment.


Other news in this category
Would you drink milk grown in a lab ?
Posted 10-23-2014 | 46 comments
The world's first in vitro hamburger could soon be accompanied by a nice glass of lab grown milk....
 
Earth's magnetic field is preparing to flip
Posted 10-22-2014 | 20 comments
The next reversal of the Earth's magnetic field could happen within the next couple of thousand years....
 
Can your birth season affect your mood ?
Posted 10-22-2014 | 24 comments
The time of the year in which you were born may play a role in determining your temperament as an adult....
 
Doctors cure man's paralysis in world first
Posted 10-21-2014 | 13 comments
Darek Fidyka has become the first person to walk again after having his spinal nerves completely severed....
 
Inventor develops hi-tech 'Air Umbrella'
Posted 10-21-2014 | 22 comments
Inventor Chuan Wang from Nanjing has created a futuristic new version of the humble umbrella....
 
Physicists develop working tractor beam
Posted 10-20-2014 | 9 comments
The remarkable new technology is capable of pushing or pulling solid objects using nothing but lasers....
 
Has Earth entered the Anthropocene epoch ?
Posted 10-18-2014 | 41 comments
Scientists have been debating whether the Holocene epoch should now give way to the Anthropocene....
 
Lockheed claims fusion energy breakthrough
Posted 10-16-2014 | 28 comments
The technology giant has announced that it has developed a miniature 100MW nuclear fusion reactor....
 

 View: More news in this category
 
Top   |  Home   |   Forum   |   News   |   Image Gallery   |  Columns   |   Encyclopedia   |   Videos   |   Polls
UM-X 10.6 Unexplained-Mysteries.com © 2001-2014
Privacy Policy and Disclaimer   |   Cookies   |   Advertise   |   Contact   |   Help/FAQ