ONCE AGAIN,PIXELATION IS THE KEY. THE CAMERA WAS IN MOTION WHEN THIS WAS TAKEN. JUST SAYING

Yes the camera was moving but the ' subject ' does not appear to suffer because I think that if it were a person of flesh and bones as portrayed in the mirror would appear to move as the rest of the photos so this to me shows that he is a ghost and anyway I don't understand what you mean with pixelation is the key, move is a move but does not seem to me to be so pixelated

Could be a ghost or anything else....

What do you mean with anything else Damian? that is undoubtedly the silhouette of a priest and the photo is absolutely genuine

it could have been the guy taking the picture

certainly I could be I the image in the mirror but there are 3 good reasons that belie this possibility: 1) while I was shooting the picture I was on the side of the mirror (but always in front stance) with the camera at eye height while the template is turned in profile with his hand lowered 2) while I was shooting I was obviously careful not to be reflected in the mirror 3) I was dressed in a simple t-shirt and shorts instead of the template has undoubtedly wearing a dress by friar (behind the head you notice a swelling that could be a CAP if you look good)

your own reflection

believe what you want who cares